Abstract
Models have evolved into a major tool to analyse, understand and shape the world we live in. Ubiquitous as they are in the sciences, engineering and in public discourse, models are rarely reflected on or even used in literary studies, as testified by their conspicuous absence in most dictionaries of literary and cultural theory. This essay, first of all, provides a rough survey where models have been applied in literature, literary studies or theory. It traces the use of models from a strong start with the rise of formalism and structuralism in the twentieth century to some occasional resurfacing in the context of narratological research and literary pedagogy which, however, appears to be restricted to German academia. After a brief evaluation of these instances, new departures in the use of models in literary studies are charted before a general assessment of the prospects and profits of bringing models into the field of literature brings a conclusion with the hope of opening up new lines of research.1
Works Cited
Adler, Carl G. and Byron L. Coulter. 1978. “Galileo and the Tower of Pisa Experiment”. American Journal of Physics 46.3: 199–201.10.1119/1.11165Search in Google Scholar
Alexander, Gavin. 2013. “Introduction”. In: William Scott. The Model of Poesy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. xix–lxxxiv.Search in Google Scholar
Baasner, Rainer and Maria Zens. 2005. Methoden und Modelle der Literaturwissenschaft. Eine Einführung. 3rd ed. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.Search in Google Scholar
Bachmann-Medick, Doris. 2018. Cultural Turns: Neuorientierungen in den Kulturwissenschaften. rowohlts enzyklopädie. 3rd ed. Reinbeck: Rowohlt.Search in Google Scholar
Bal, Mieke. 2002/2012. Travelling Concepts in the Humanities: A Rough Guide. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1972 a. “Literature and Discontinuity”. In: Critical Essays. Trans. Richard Howard. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. 170–183.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1972 b. “The Structuralist Activity”. In: Critical Essays. Trans. Richard Howard. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press. 213–220.Search in Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. 1977. “Introduction to the Structural Analysis of Narrative”. In: Image, Music, Text: Essays Selected and Translated by Stephen Heath. London: Fontana Press. 79–124.Search in Google Scholar
Bonheim, Helmut. 1990. Literary Systematics. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.Search in Google Scholar
Bonheim, Helmut. 1991. “The History of Anglo-Canadian Literature: A Model”. In: Peter Easingwood, Konrad Gross and Wolfgang Klooss (eds.). Probing Canadian Culture. Augsburg: AV-Verlag. 22–37.Search in Google Scholar
Bonheim, Helmut. 1999. “Genres and the Theory of Models”. European Journal of English Studies 3.1: 11–32.10.1080/13825579908574427Search in Google Scholar
Bonnekamp, Udo. 1967. “Wert und Problematik sprachlicher Modelle”. Poetica 1: 39–44.10.30965/25890530-00102002Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Marshall (ed.). 2001. Periodization. Issue of Modern Language Quarterly 62.4.10.1215/00267929-62-4-309Search in Google Scholar
Bülich, Elisabeth and Wolfgang Raible. 1977. Linguistische Textmodelle: Grundlagen und Möglichkeiten. München: Wilhelm Fink.Search in Google Scholar
Carter, Ronald and Paul Simpson. 1989/1995. “Introduction”. In: Ronald Carter and Paul Simpson (eds.). Language, Discourse and Literature. London: Routledge. 1–18.10.4324/9780203396711Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Chen Chung and H. Jerome Keisler. 1990. Model Theory. 3rd ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ciula, Arianna, Øyvind Eide, Cristina Marras and Patrick Sahle (eds.). 2018. Models and Modelling between Digital and Humanities – A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Supplement 31 of Historical Social Research.Search in Google Scholar
Curtis, Ron. 1994. “Narrative Form and Normative Force: Baconian Story-Telling in Popular Science”. Social Studies of Science 24: 419–461.10.1177/030631279402400301Search in Google Scholar
Danto, Arthur C. 1984. “Literature and/as/of Philosophy”. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 58.1: 5–20.10.2307/3131555Search in Google Scholar
Demastes, William W. 1998. Theatre of Chaos: Beyond Absurdism, Into Orderly Disorder. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Dewar-Watson, Sarah. 2015. “Shakespeare’s Dramatic Odysseys: Homer as a Tragicomic Model in Pericles and the Tempest”. Classical and Modern Literature 25.1: 23–40.Search in Google Scholar
Edmundson, Harold P. 1967. “Mathematical Models in Linguistics and Language Processing”. In: Harold Borko (ed.). Automated Language Processing. New York: Wiley. 33–96.Search in Google Scholar
Erdbeer, Robert Matthias. 2015. “Poetik der Modelle”. Textpraxis: Digital Journal for Philology 11.2. <https://www.textpraxis.net/robert-matthias-erdbeer-poetik-der-modelle> [accessed 19 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Erdbeer, Robert Matthias. 2019. “Form und Modell”. In: Robert Matthias Erdbeer, Florian Kläger and Klaus Stierstorfer (eds.). Grundthemen der Literaturwissenschaft: Form. Grundthemen der Literaturwissenschaft. Berlin: De Gruyter. 223–280.Search in Google Scholar
Fisseni, Bernhard and Benedikt Löwe. 2012. “Which dimensions of narrative are relevant for human judgments of story equivalence?”. In: Mark A. Finlayson (ed.). The Third Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative. Cambridge, MA. 114–118.Search in Google Scholar
Flaschka, Horst. 1976. Modell, Modelltheorie und Formen der Modellbildung in der Literaturwissenschaft. Böhlau forum litterarum 6. Köln: Böhlau-Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Fludernik, Monika. 2006. Towards a “Natural” Narratology. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Fortmann-Roe, Scott and Gene Bellinger. 2017. “Models and Truth: Predictive versus Narrative Modeling”. Systems Thinking and Modelling Series. Real KM Magazine. <https://realkm.com/2017/08/28/models-and-truth-predictive-versus-narrative-modeling-systems-thinking-modelling-series/> [accessed 19 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Fowler, Alastair. 1982/2002. Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Frigg, Roman and Stephan Hartmann. 2020. “Models in Science”. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models-science/> [accessed 18 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Gelfert, Axel. 2017. “The Ontology of Models”. In: Lorenzo Magnani and Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.). The Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Dordrecht: Springer. 5–23.10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_1Search in Google Scholar
Gouvea, Julia and Cynthia Passmore. 2017. “‘Models of’ versus ‘Models for’. Towards an Agent-Based Conception of Modeling in the Science Classroom”. Science and Education 26: 49–63.10.1007/s11191-017-9884-4Search in Google Scholar
Harmann, Peter. 1965. “Modellbildungen in der Sprachwissenschaft”. Studium Generale 18: 364–379.Search in Google Scholar
Hodges, Wilfrid. 2013. “Model Theory”. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2018/entries/model-theory/> [accessed 18 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
“Home”. Narrative Science. Narrative Science Inc., n. d. <https://narrativescience.com> [accessed 19 October 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang. 1993. The Fictive and the Imaginary: Charting Literary Anthropology. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Jacobson, Claire. 1963. “Translator’s Preface”. In: Claude Lévi-Strauss. Structural Anthropology. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Jahn, Manfred and Ansgar Nünning. 1994. “A Survey of Narratological Models”. LWU 27.4: 283–303.Search in Google Scholar
Kerschbaumer, Sandra. 2018. Immer wieder Romantik: Modelltheoretische Beschreibungen ihrer Wirkungsgeschichte. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Kerschbaumer, Sandra and Stefan Matuschek. 2015. “Romantik als Modell”. In: Daniel Fulda, Sandra Kerschbaumer and Stefan Matuschek (eds.). Aufklärung und Romantik: Epochenschnittstellen. Laboratorium Aufklärung 28. Paderborn: Wilhelm Fink. 141–155.Search in Google Scholar
Kerschbaumer, Sandra and Stefan Matuschek (eds.). 2018. Romantik erkennen – Modelle finden. Paderborn: Schöningh.Search in Google Scholar
Klaeger, Florian. 2018. Reading Into the Stars: Cosmopoetics in the Contemporary Novel. Heidelberg: Winter.Search in Google Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1963. Structural Anthropology. Trans. Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York: Basic Books.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Yuri M. 1972. Vorlesungen zu einer strukturalen Poetik. Einführung: Theorie des Verses [Lektsii po struktural'noi poetike. Vvedenie, teoriia stikha, 1964]. Ed. Karl Eimermacher. Trans. Waltraud Jachnow. München: Fink.Search in Google Scholar
Magnani, Lorenzo and Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.). 2017. Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4Search in Google Scholar
Mahr, Bernd. 2004. “Das Wissen im Modell”. In: KIT Report Nr. 150. Berlin: Institut für Telekommunikationssysteme. 1–21.Search in Google Scholar
Mahr, Bernd. 2012. “On the Epistemology of Models”. In: Günter Abel and James Conant (eds.). Rethinking Epistemology. Vol. 1. Berlin: De Gruyter. 301–352.10.1515/9783110253573.301Search in Google Scholar
Matthews, Peter H. 1997. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
McCloskey, Deirdre N. 1992. If You’re So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Experience. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco. 2005. Graphs, Maps, Trees: Abstract Models for Literary History. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar
Morrison, Margaret. 1998. “Modelling Nature: Between Physics and the Physical World”. Philosophia Naturalis 35: 65–85.Search in Google Scholar
Morrison, Margaret and Mary S. Morgan. 1999. “Models as Mediating Instruments”. In: Mary S. Morgan and Margaret Morrison (eds.). Models as Mediators: Perspectives on Natural and Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 10–37.10.1017/CBO9780511660108.003Search in Google Scholar
Nünning, Ansgar (ed.). 1995. Literaturwissenschaftliche Theorien, Modelle und Methoden. WVT: Trier.Search in Google Scholar
Nünning, Ansgar (ed.). 2013. Metzler Lexikon Literatur- und Kulturtheorie: Ansätze – Personen – Grundbegriffe. 5th ed. Stuttgart: J. B. Metzler.10.1007/978-3-476-05349-7Search in Google Scholar
O’Connor, Timothy and Hong Yu Wong. 2015. “Emergent Properties”. In: Edward N. Zalta (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2015/entries/properties-emergent/> [accessed 18 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
OED = The Oxford English Dictionary. 2000–. 3rd ed. online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. <https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/120688#eid36546599> [last accessed 31 August 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Perkins, David. 1992. Is Literary History Possible? Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Petersen, Jürgen H. 2000. Mimesis – Imitatio – Nachahmung: eine Geschichte der europäischen Poetik. UTB für Wissenschaft 8191. Stuttgart: Wilhelm Fink.Search in Google Scholar
Portides, Demetris. 2017. “Models and Theories”. In: Lorenzo Magnani and Tommaso Bertolotti (eds.). The Springer Handbook of Model-Based Science. Dordrecht: Springer. 25–48.10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_2Search in Google Scholar
Prince, Gerald. 2003. Dictionary of Narratology. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Search in Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. 1928/1958. Morphology of the Folktale. Ed. Svatava Pirkova-Jakobson. Trans. Laurence Scott. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1983/1984. Time and Narrative. Trans. Kathleen McLaughlin and David Pellauer. 3 vols. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226713519.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ross, David A. 2009. A Critical Companion to William Butler Yeats: A Literary Reference to His Life and Work. New York: Facts on File.Search in Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure. 2012/2013. “Possible Worlds”. Rev. ed. In: Peter Hühn et al. (eds.). The Living Handbook of Narratology. Hamburg: Hamburg University. <https://www.lhn.uni-hamburg.de/node/54.html#> [accessed 26 August 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Scott, William. 2013. The Model of Poesy. Ed. Gavin Alexander. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Stachowiak, Herbert. 1965. “Gedanken zu einer allgemeinen Theorie der Modelle”. Studium Generale 18.7: 432–479Search in Google Scholar
Stanzel, Franz K. 1979/2008. Theorie des Erzählens. UTB Taschenbücher 904. 8th ed. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.Search in Google Scholar
Stern, Tiffany. 2007. Rehearsal from Shakespeare to Sheridan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199229727.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Stockwell, Peter. 2002. Cognitive Poetics: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Stoppard, Tom. 1993. Arcadia. London and Boston: faber and faber.Search in Google Scholar
Tenev, Darin. 2017. “Models of Poetics. A Response to Robert Matthias Erdbeer’s ‘Poetik der Modelle’”. Textpraxis: Digital Journal for Philology 14.3. <https://www.textpraxis.net/darin-sofia-models-of-poetics> [accessed 19 June 2020].Search in Google Scholar
Topitsch, E. 1965. “Mythische Modelle in der Erkenntnislehre”. Studium Generale 18.3: 400–418.Search in Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. 1918/2013. Die Philosophie des Als Ob. Paderborn: Salzwasser Verlag.Search in Google Scholar
Vees-Gulani, Susanne. 1999. “Hidden Order in the ‘Stoppard Set’: Chaos Theory in the Content and Structure of Tom Stoppard’s Arcadia”. Modern Drama 42: 411–426.10.3138/md.42.3.411Search in Google Scholar
Viviani, Vicenzo. 2019. Racconto istorica della vita del Signore Galileo Galilei / Historical Account of the Life of Galileo Galilei (1654). In: Stefano Gattei (ed. and trans.). On the Life of Galilei: Viviani’s Historical Account and Other Early Biographies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 1–94.Search in Google Scholar
Wenzel, Peter. 1997. “Ein Plädoyer für Modelle als Orientierungshilfen im Literaturunterricht”. LWU 30.1: 51–70.Search in Google Scholar
Wenzel, Peter (ed.). 2004. Einführung in die Erzähltextanalyse: Kategorien Modelle, Probleme. WVT-Handbücher zum literaturwissenschaftlichen Studium 6. Trier: WVT.Search in Google Scholar
Wolf, Werner. 2008. “Chance in Fiction as a Privileged Index of Implied Worldviews: A Contribution to the Study of the World-Modelling Functions of Narrative Fiction”. In: John Pier and José Angel Garcia Landa (eds.). Theorizing Narrativity. Berlin: De Gruyter. 165–210.Search in Google Scholar
Yeats, William Butler. 1989. The Collected Works of William Butler Yeats. Volume 1: The Collected Poems. Ed. Richard J. Finneran. New York: Macmillan.Search in Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Thomas Ede. 2019. “Model-theoretic Semantics”. In: Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger and Paul Portner (eds.). Models – Theories. Berlin: De Gruyter. 181–231.Search in Google Scholar
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston