Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 4, 2016

Transient beam oscillation with a highly dynamic scanner for laser beam fusion cutting

Cindy Goppold, Thomas Pinder and Patrick Herwig

Abstract

Sheet metals with thicknesses >8 mm have a distinct cutting performance. The free choice of the optical configuration composed of fiber diameter, collimation, and focal length offers many opportunities to influence the static beam geometry. Previous analysis points out the limitations of this method in the thick section area. Within the present study, an experimental investigation of fiber laser fusion cutting of 12 mm stainless steel was performed by means of dynamical beam oscillation. Two standard optical setups are combined with a highly dynamic galvano-driven scanner that achieves frequencies up to 4 kHz. Dependencies of the scanner parameter, the optical circumstances, and the conventional cutting parameters are discussed. The aim is to characterize the capabilities and challenges of the dynamic beam shaping in comparison to the state-of-the-art static beam shaping. Thus, the trials are evaluated by quality criteria of the cut edge as surface roughness and burr height, the feed rate, and the cut kerf geometry. The investigation emphasizes promising procedural possibilities for improvements of the cutting performance in the case of fiber laser fusion cutting of thick stainless steel by means of the application of a highly dynamic scanner.


Corresponding author: Cindy Goppold, Fraunhofer IWS, Winterbergstraße 28, 01277 Dresden, Germany, e-mail:

References

[1] Optech Consulting, Press Release, 21st January 2015. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Optech Consulting, Laser Magazin, 2, 48 (2014). Search in Google Scholar

[3] G. Overton, A. Nogee, D. A. Belforte and C. Holton, Laser Focus World 49/1, 36–70, (2013). Search in Google Scholar

[4] Conzzeta, Geschäftsbericht 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Amada Group, Annual Report 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Trumpf Gruppe, Geschäftsbericht 2014/15. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Prima Industrie, Facts and Figures 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[8] O. F. Olsen, Proc. of the 25th ICALEO, 188–196 (2006). Search in Google Scholar

[9] C. Wandera, PhD thesis (2010). Search in Google Scholar

[10] T. Himmer, T. Pinder, L. Morgenthal and E. Beyer, Proc. of the 26th ICALEO, 87–91 (2007). Search in Google Scholar

[11] W. O’Neill, The Laser User, Issue 51, 34–36, (2008). Search in Google Scholar

[12] R. Poprawe, W. Schulz and R. Schmitt, Physics Procedia, 5, 1–18 (2010). Search in Google Scholar

[13] P. A. Hilton, Proc. of the 5th LAMP (2009). Search in Google Scholar

[14] A. Mahrle and E. Beyer, Proc. of the 5th LIM 215–221 (2009). Search in Google Scholar

[15] A. Mahrle and E. Beyer, Proc. of the 28th ICALEO 610–619 (2009). Search in Google Scholar

[16] D. Petring, F. Schneider, N. Wolf and V. N. Goneghany, The Laser User, Issue 56, 20–23 (2009). Search in Google Scholar

[17] L. D. Scintilla, L. Tricarico, A. Mahrle, A. Wetzig, T. Himmer, et al. The Laser User, Issue 62, 24–26 (2011). Search in Google Scholar

[18] F. O. Olsen, Proc. of the 30th ICALEO, 6–15 (2011). Search in Google Scholar

[19] D. Petring, F. Schneider and N. Wolf, Proc. of the 31th ICALEO, 43–48 (2012). Search in Google Scholar

[20] D. Petring, T. Molitor, F. Schneider and N. Wolf, Physics Procedia 39, 186–196 (2012). Search in Google Scholar

[21] K. Hirano and R. Fabbro, J. Laser Appl. 24, 12006–12014 (2012). Search in Google Scholar

[22] K. Hirano and R. Fabbro, Proc. of the 32th ICALEO, 119–124 (2013). Search in Google Scholar

[23] L. D. Scintilla, L. Tricarico, A. Wetzig and E. Beyer, Int. J. Mach. Tool. Manu. 69, 30–37, (2013). Search in Google Scholar

[24] S. Stelzer, A. Mahrle, A. Wetzig and E. Beyer, Physics Procedia 41, 399–404 (2013). Search in Google Scholar

[25] A. Laskin, Technology report 2006, πShaper. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Holo/Or Ltd, Web: http://www.holoor.co.il/Diffractive_optics_Applications/Application_Notes_BeamShapers.htm (2013). Search in Google Scholar

[27] C. G. Gómez, Master thesis, Brno University of Technology, (2012). Search in Google Scholar

[28] O. F. Olsen, K. S. Hansen and J. S. Nielsen, J. Laser Appl. 21. 133–138, (2001). Search in Google Scholar

[29] C. Mauclair, D. Pietroy, Y. D. Maïo, E. Baubeau, J. P. Colombier, et al., Opt. Lasers Eng. 67, 212–217 (2015). Search in Google Scholar

[30] J. Powell, W. K. Tan, P. Maclennan, D. Rudd, C. Wykes, et al., J. Laser Appl. 12, 224–231 (2000). Search in Google Scholar

[31] A. Mahrle and E. Beyer, J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 42, 175507–175516 (2009). Search in Google Scholar

[32] C. Goppold, K. Zenger, P. Herwig, A. Wetzig, A. Mahrle, et al., Physics Procedia 56, 892–900 (2014). Search in Google Scholar

[33] S. Schiller, U. Heisig and S. Panzer, ‘Elektronenstrahltechnologie’ (Verlag Technik GmbH, Berlin, 1995). Search in Google Scholar

[34] D. von Dobeneck, T. Löwer and V. Adam, ‘Elektronenstrahlschweißen – Das Verfahren und seine industrielle Anwendung für höchste Produktivität’ (Verlag Moderne Industrie, Landsberg/Lech, 2001). Search in Google Scholar

[35] K. Matthes and E. Richter, ‘Schweißtechnik’ (Fachbuchverlag, Leipzig, 2003). Search in Google Scholar

[36] J. Overrath, Dissertationsschrift, TU Braunschweig, 1998. Search in Google Scholar

[37] R. Schedewy, D. Dittrich, J. Standfuss and B. Brenner, Proc. of the 27th ICALEO, 332–339 (2008). Search in Google Scholar

[38] M. Krätzsch, J. Standfuss, A. Klotzbach, J. Kaspar, B. Brenner, et al., Physics Procedia 12, 142–149 (2011). Search in Google Scholar

[39] M. Schweier, J. F. Heins, M. W. Haubold and M. F. Zäh, Physics Procedia 41, 20–30 (2013). Search in Google Scholar

[40] C. Thiel, R. Weber, J. Johannsen and T. Graf, Physics Procedia 41, 209–215 (2013). Search in Google Scholar

[41] A. Müller, S. F. Goecke, P. Sievi, F. Albert and M. Rethmeier, Physics Procedia 56, 458–466 (2014). Search in Google Scholar

[42] K. Hao, G. Li, M. Gao and X. Zeng, J. Mater. Process. Technol. 225, 77–83 (2015). Search in Google Scholar

[43] T. Arai and S. Riches, Proc. of the 16th ICALEO, 19–26 (1997). Search in Google Scholar

[44] Y. Morimoto, D. He, W. Hijikata, T. Shinshi, T. Nakai, et al., Precision Eng. 40, 112–123 (2015). Search in Google Scholar

[45] J. Harris and M. Brandt, Proc. of the 20th ICALEO, section B, paper 1502, p. 1–8 (2001). Search in Google Scholar

[46] A. Mahrle, F. Bartels and E. Beyer, Proc. of the 27th ICALEO, 703–712 (2008). Search in Google Scholar

[47] C. Goppold, T. Pinder, P. Herwig, A. Mahrle, A. Wetzig, et al., LIM 2015. Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-12-2
Accepted: 2016-1-13
Published Online: 2016-2-4
Published in Print: 2016-2-1

©2016 THOSS Media & De Gruyter