Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter January 19, 2022

The Body, Experience, and the History of Dream-Science in Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica

Calloway B. Scott
From the journal Apeiron

Abstract

The five books of Artemidorus of Ephesus’ Oneirocritica (c. second century CE) constitute the largest collection of divinatory dream-interpretations to survive from Graeco-Roman antiquity. This article examines Artemidorus’ contribution to longstanding medico-philosophical debates over the ontological and epistemic character of such dreams. As with wider Mediterranean traditions concerning premonitory dreams, Greeks and Romans popularly understood them as phenomena with origins exterior to the dreamer (e.g. a visitation of a god). Presocratic and Hippocratic thinkers, however, initiated an effort to bring at least some dream events within the body as interior processes of a physical soul, a bodily turn which ultimately engendered a split in thinking about the possibility and scope of prophetic and diagnostic dreams (e.g. Hippocrates Regimen 4, Aristotle On Prophecy in Dreams, Rufus of Ephesus, and Galen). Here, I examine the way that Artemidorus meant the Oneirocritica to address seriously questions about the origins of dreams and the powers of empirical science in two, related ways. We will see that his defense of oneirocriticism as a techne unfolds along two main axes. First, Artemidorus constructs a necessary veneer of scientific credibility by mobilizing the tropes and organizational strategies characteristic of contemporary technical literature. Secondly, he anchors that authority upon a materialist account of prophetic dreams as “semiotic movements of the soul.” As Price, S. 1986. “The Future of Dreams: From Freud to Artemidorus.” Past & Present 113: 3–36 and Harris-McCoy, D. 2012. Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press observed, this explicit commitment to an empirical method of dream-interpretation resembles that of the Hellenistic medical ‘sect’ known as ‘Empiricists,’ who eschewed interest in theoretical etiology in favor of observation, comparison, and compilation of symptoms and outcomes. Pushing beyond similarity, I argue that Artemidorus not only deployed this method to defend empirically grounded accounts of dream-divination (cf. Cicero De div. 1), but endeavored to show that such a scientific method can be used to stabilize and corral productively the potentially infinite number of interpretations any dream-sign might bear without recourse to an underlying, causal theory.


Corresponding author: Calloway B. Scott, Classics, University of Cincinnati, Blegen Library, 45221 Cincinnati, OH, USA, E-mail:
My heartfelt gratitude to the organizers of the conference Scientific Traditions in the Ancient Mediterranean and Near East, Amber Jacob and Sofie Schiødt, for the invitation to present a nascent version of this paper. Likewise, my appreciation goes to Anna Bonnell-Freidin, Celia Campbell, Caitlin Hines, Mirjam Kotwick, and Colin Webster, all of whom patiently read and offered myriad suggestions at various stages of writing. Finally, my sincere thanks to Apeiron’s anonymous referees who offered extremely productive observations and trenchant criticisms which have greatly improved the overall argument. All omissions and errors remain my own.

References

Allen, J. 2010. “Pyrrhonism and Medicine.” In The Cambridge Companion to Ancient Scepticism, edited by R. Bett, 232–248. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CCOL9780521874762.013Search in Google Scholar

Berrey, M. 2014. “Early Empiricism, Therapeutic Motivation, and the Asymmetrical Dispute Between Hellenistic Medical Sects.” Apeiron 47 (2): 141–71, https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron-2013-0002.Search in Google Scholar

Berrey, M. 2015. “Reading Communities and Hippocratism in Hellenistic Medicine.” Science in Context 28 (3): 465–87, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0269889715000204.Search in Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. 2004. “Artemidorus and the Second Sophistic.” In Paideia: The World of the Second Sophistic, edited by B. Borg, 53–84. Berlin: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110204711.53Search in Google Scholar

Brockman, C. 2013. “Galen und Asklepios.” Zeitschrift für antikes Christentum 17 (1): 51–67, https://doi.org/10.1515/zac-2013-0003.Search in Google Scholar

Chandezon, C. 2012. “Artémidore: Le cadre historique, géographique et sociale d’une vie.” In Études sur Artémidore et l’interprétation des rêves, edited by J. Bouchet, and C. Chandezon, 11–26. Paris: University Press of Paris Nanterre.10.4000/books.pupo.3252Search in Google Scholar

Craik, E. 2006. “Horizontal Transmission in the Hippocratic Tradition.” Mnemosyne 59 (3): 334–347.10.1163/156852506778132365Search in Google Scholar

Deichgräber, K. 1965. Die griechische Empirikerschule: Sammlung der Fragmente und Darstellung der Lehre. Berlin: Weidmann Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dillon, M. 2017. Omens and Oracles: Divination in Ancient Greece. London: Routledge.10.4324/9781315577791Search in Google Scholar

Downie, J. 2013. At the Limits of the Art: A Literary Study of Aelius Aristides’ Hieroi Logoi. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199924875.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. 1990. “The Theology of the Hippocratic Treatise on the Sacred Disease.” Apeiron 23 (2): 87–119, https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.1990.23.2.87.Search in Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. 1991. “‘Airs, Waters, Places’ and ‘On the Sacred Disease’: Two Different Religiosities?” Hermes 119 (2): 168–76.Search in Google Scholar

van der Eijk, P. 2004. “Divination, Prognosis and Prophylaxis: The Hippocratic Work ‘On Dreams’ (De victu 4) and its Near Eastern Background.” In Magic and Rationality in Ancient Near Eastern and Graeco-Roman Medicine, edited by H. F. J. Horstmanshoff, and M. Stol, 187–218. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047414315_011Search in Google Scholar

Edelstein, E. J., and L. Edelstein. 1998. Asclepius: Collection and Interpretation of the Testimonies, 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Edelstein, L. 1967. Ancient Medicine: Selected Papers of Ludwig Edelstein. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1987. Essays in Ancient Philosophy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1988. “The Empiricist Attitude Toward Reason and Theory.” Apeiron 21 (2): 79–97, https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.1988.21.2.79.Search in Google Scholar

Frede, M. 1990. “An Empiricist View of Knowledge: Memorism.” In Companions to Ancient Thought: Epistemology, edited by S. Everson, 225–50. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 1998. “Magic, Religion and Science: Divine and Human in the Hippocratic Corpus.” Apeiron 31 (1): 1–34, https://doi.org/10.1515/apeiron.1998.31.1.1.Search in Google Scholar

Hankinson, R. J. 2001. Cause and Explanation in Ancient Greek Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199246564.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Harris-McCoy, D. 2012. Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica: Text, Translation, and Commentary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Harris-McCoy, D. 2013. “Artemidorus’ Oneirocritica as Fragmentary Encyclopedia.” J. König, and G. Woolf, 154–77. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139814683.009Search in Google Scholar

Harris, W. 2009. Dreams and Experience in Classical Antiquity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.4159/9780674053977Search in Google Scholar

Holmes, B. 2010. The Symptom and the Subject: The Emergence of the Body in Ancient Greece. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400834884Search in Google Scholar

Hulskamp, M. 2013. “The Value of Dream Diagnosis in the Medical Praxis of the Hippocratics and Galen.” In Dreams, Healing, and Medicine in Greece: From Antiquity to the Present, edited by S. Oberhelman, 33–68. London: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

Hulskamp, M. 2016. “On Regimen and the Question of Medical Dreams in the Hippocratic Corpus.” In Ancient Concepts of the Hippocratic, edited by L. Dean-Jones, and R. Rosen, 258–70. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004307407_014Search in Google Scholar

Ierodiakonou, K. 1995. “Alexander of Aphrodisias on Medicine as a Stochastic Art.” In Medicine in its Socio-Cultural Context, Vol. 2, edited by H. F. J. Horstmanshoff, P. van der Eijk, and P. H. Schrivers, 473–85. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004418387_014Search in Google Scholar

König, J., and G. Woolf, eds. 2013. Encyclopedism from Antiquity to the Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

König, J., and G. Woolf. 2017. Authority and Expertise in Ancient Scientific Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781107446724Search in Google Scholar

Kotwick, M. 2021. “Practices of Interpretation in the Derveni Papyrus and the Hippocratic Text On Dreams (Vict. IV).” In Studies on the Derveni Papyrus, Vol. 2, edited by G. W. Most. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

van Lieshout, R. G. A. 1980. Greeks on Dreams. Utrecht: Hes Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Lloyd, G. E. R. 1991. Problems and Methods in Greek Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Melfi, M. 2007. I Santuari di Asclepio in Grecia. Rome: ‘D’erma’ di Bretscheider.Search in Google Scholar

van Nuffelen, P. 2014. “Galen, Divination, and the Status of Medicine.” CQ 64 (1): 337–52, https://doi.org/10.1017/s0009838813000761.Search in Google Scholar

Nutton, V. 2013. Ancient Medicine, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203081297Search in Google Scholar

Oberhelman, S. 1983. “Galen, on Diagnosis from Dreams.” Journal of the History of Medicine and Allied Sciences 38: 36–47, https://doi.org/10.1093/jhmas/38.1.36.Search in Google Scholar

Oberhelman, S. 1993. “Dreams in Graeco-Roman Medicine.” ANRW II (37.1): 121–57, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110887877-006.Search in Google Scholar

Oppenheim, L. 1956. “The Interpretation of Dreams in the Ancient Near East. With a Translation of an Assyrian Dream Book.” Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 46 (3): 179–373, https://doi.org/10.2307/1005761.Search in Google Scholar

Petaslis-Diomidis, A. 2012. Truly Beyond Wonders: Aelius Aristides and the Cult of Asklepios. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Petridou, G. 2017. “Contesting Religious and Medical Expertise in Aelius Aristides and Galen.” In Beyond Priesthood: Religious Entrepreneurs and Innovators in the Roman Empire, edited by R. Gordon, G. Petridou, and J. Rüpke, 185–214. Berlin: Brill.Search in Google Scholar

Petridou, G. 2018. “The Curious Case of Aelius Aristides: the Author as Sufferer and Illness as Individualizing Motif.” In Autoren in religiösen literarischen Texten der späthellenistischen und der frühkaiserzeitlichen Welt. Zwölf Fallstudien, edited by E. M. Becker, and J. Rüpke, 199–220. Tübingen: Morh Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

Prada, L. 2015. “Oneirocritica Aegiptiaca: Artemidorus of Daldis, Egypt, and the Contemporary Oneirocrtic Literature in Egyptian.” In Artemidor von Daldis und die antike Traumdeutung, edited by G. Weber, 263–309. Berlin: De Gruyter, https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110407402-011.Search in Google Scholar

Prada, L. 2016. “P. Oxy. XXXI. 2607 Re-Edited: A Greek Oneirocriticon in Roman Egypt.” In The Proceedings of the 27th International Congress of Papyrology, edited by T. Derda, A. Lajtar, and J. Urbanik, 623–46. Warsaw: Journal of Juristic Papyrology.Search in Google Scholar

Price, S. 1986. “The Future of Dreams: From Freud to Artemidorus.” Past & Present 113: 3–36, https://doi.org/10.1093/past/113.1.3.Search in Google Scholar

Renberg, G. 2017. Where Dreams May Come: Incubation Sanctuaries in Greece and Rome, Vol. I-II. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789004330238Search in Google Scholar

Riethmüller, J. 2005. Asklepios: Heiligtümer und Kulte, 2 vols. Studien zu Antiken Heiligtümern. Heidelberg: Verlag Archäologie und Geschichte.Search in Google Scholar

Schiefsky, M. 2005. Hippocrates on Ancient Medicine. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9789047405016Search in Google Scholar

Scott, C. 2018. “Gender in the Temple: Female Ailments in the Epidaurian Miracle Cures.” Classical Antiquity 37 (2): 321–50, https://doi.org/10.1525/ca.2018.37.2.321.Search in Google Scholar

von Staden, H. 1975. “Experiment and Experience in Hellenistic Science.” BICS 22: 178–99, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-5370.1975.tb00340.x.Search in Google Scholar

von Staden, H. 1989. Herophilus: The Art of Medicine in Early Alexandria. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Struck, P. 2005. “The Self in Artemidorus’ Interpretation of Dreams.” In Religion and the Self in Antiquity, edited by D. Brakle, M. L. Sattlow, and S. Weitzman, 109–22. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Struck, P. 2016. Divination and Human Nature: A Cognitive History of Intuition in Classical Antiquity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.23943/princeton/9780691169392.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Thonemann, P. 2020. An Ancient Dream Manual: Artemidorus’ The Interpretation of Dreams. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198843825.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

Tieleman, T. 2016. “Religion and Therapy in Galen.” In Religion and Illness, edited by A. Weissenrieder, and G. Etzelmüller, 15–31. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Search in Google Scholar

Walzer, R. 1944. Galen on Medical Experience: First Edition of the Arabic Version with Translation and Notes in English. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Walzer, R., and M. Frede. 1985. Galen: Three Treatises on the Nature of Science. Indianapolis: University of Indiana Press.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2022-01-19

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston