Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter Mouton June 14, 2019

Attitudinal bias, individual differences, and second language speakers’ interactional performance

Pavel Trofimovich, Kim McDonough, Phung Dao and Dato Abashidze


This study examined whether an interlocutor’s attitudinal bias affects second language (L2) speakers’ recall of narratives and their responses to corrective feedback (recasts) and whether the role of attitudinal bias depends on individual differences in speakers’ background and personality characteristics. After receiving a positive or negative attitudinal bias orientation, 70 L2 English speakers completed tasks with an interlocutor who provided recasts in response to language errors. Speakers also completed questionnaires targeting individual differences in their motivation and acculturation to the home and target cultures. There were no general effects for positive or negative attitudinal bias on speakers’ recall of personal narratives or responses to feedback. However, under negative bias, motivation scores were associated with speakers’ accurate reformulation of errors. Under positive bias, there was an association between accurate narrative recall and greater psychological adaptation and motivation. Results imply that attitudinal bias plays a subtle role in L2 speakers’ interactional performance.


Beukeboom, C. J. & G. R. Semin. 2006. How mood turns on language. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 42. 553–566.Search in Google Scholar

Carpenter, H., K. S. Jeon, D. MacGregor & A. Mackey. 2006. Learners’ interpretation of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 28. 209–236.Search in Google Scholar

Choi, H. & N. Iwashita. 2016. Interactional behaviours of low-proficiency learners in small group work. In M. Sato & S. Ballinger (eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda, 113–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, C., G. Kaltenboeck & U. Smit. 1997. Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes 16. 115–128.Search in Google Scholar

DeKeyser, R. 1993. The effect of error correction on L2 grammar knowledge and oral proficiency. The Modern Language Journal 77. 501–514.Search in Google Scholar

Demes, K. A. & N. Geeraert. 2014. Measures matter: Scales for adaptation, cultural distance and acculturation orientation revisited. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45. 82–100.Search in Google Scholar

Dewaele, J.-M. 2016. Multi-competence and personality. In Li Wei & V. Cook (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence, 403–419. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dörnyei, Z. 2010. Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar

Doucerain, M. M., R. S. Varnaamkhaasti, N. Segalowitz & A. G. Ryder. 2015. Second language social networks and communication-related acculturative stress: The role of interconnectedness. Frontiers in Psychology 6. 1111.Search in Google Scholar

Dragojevic, M. & H. Giles. 2016. I don’t like you because you’re hard to understand: The role of processing fluency in the language attitudes process. Human Communication Research 42. 396–420.Search in Google Scholar

Egi, T. 2007. Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length, and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 29. 511–537.Search in Google Scholar

Elliot, S. 1979. Perceived homophily as a predictor of classroom learning. In D. Nimmo (ed.), Human communication yearbook 3, 585–602. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.Search in Google Scholar

Fuertes, J. N., W. H. Gottdiener, H. Martin, T. C. Gilbert & H. Giles. 2012. A meta-analysis of the effects of speakers’ accents on interpersonal evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology 42. 120–133.Search in Google Scholar

Giles, H. & B. Watson (eds.). 2013. The social meanings of accents and dialects: An international perspective. New York: Peter Lang.Search in Google Scholar

Gluszek, A. & J. F. Dovidio. 2010a. Speaking with a nonnative accent: Perceptions of bias, communication difficulties, and belonging in the United States. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 29. 224–234.Search in Google Scholar

Gluszek, A. & J. F. Dovidio. 2010b. The way they speak: A social psychological perspective on the stigma of non-native accents in communication. Personality and Social Psychology Review 14. 214–237.Search in Google Scholar

Havranek, G. & H. Cesnik. 2001. Factors affecting the success of corrective feedback. In S. H. Foster-Cohen & A. Nizegorodcew (eds.), EUROSLA yearbook, 99–122. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, G. & S. Lindemann. 2009. Stereotypes of Cantonese English, apparent native/non-native status, and their effect on non-native English speakers’ perception. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development 30. 253–269.Search in Google Scholar

Hu, G. & J. Su. 2015. The effect of native/non-native information on non-native listeners’ comprehension. Language Awareness 24. 273–281.Search in Google Scholar

Hulstijn, J., R. Young, L. Ortega, M. Bigelow, R. DeKeyser, N. Ellis … S. Talmy. 2014. Bridging the gap: Cognitive and social approaches to research in second language learning and teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 36. 361–421.Search in Google Scholar

Kang, O. & D. L. Rubin. 2009. Reverse linguistic stereotyping: Measuring the effect of listener expectations on speech evaluation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28. 441–456.Search in Google Scholar

Kempe, V., M. Rookes & L. Swarbrigg. 2013. Speaker emotion can affect ambiguity production. Language and Cognitive Processes 28. 1579–1590.Search in Google Scholar

Loewen, S. & J. Philp. 2006. Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness, and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal 90. 536–556.Search in Google Scholar

Lum, J. A. G., M. Powell, L. Timms & P. Snow. 2015. A meta-analysis of cross sectional studies investigating language in maltreated children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 58. 961–976.Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, P. D., T. Gregersen & S. Mercer (eds.). 2016. Positive psychology in SLA. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

MacIntyre, P. D. & L. Vincze. 2017. Positive and negative emotions underlie motivation for L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching 7. 61–88.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, A., S. Gass & K. McDonough. 2000. How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22. 471–497.Search in Google Scholar

Mackey, A. & J. Philp. 1998. Conversational interaction and second language development: Recasts, responses, and red herrings? The Modern Language Journal 82. 338–356.Search in Google Scholar

McCroskey, J. C., V. P. Richmond & J. A. Daly. 1975. The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research 1. 323–332.Search in Google Scholar

Miller, Z. F., J. K. Fox, J. S. Moser & A. Godfroid. 2018. Playing with fire: Effects of negative mood induction and working memory on vocabulary acquisition. Cognition and Emotion 32. 1105–1113.Search in Google Scholar

Niedzielski, N. 1999. The effect of social information on the perception of sociolinguistic variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 18. 62–85.Search in Google Scholar

Paladino, M.-P., L. Poddesu, M. Rauzi, J. Vaes, M. Cadinu & D. Forer. 2009. Second language competence in the Italian-speaking population of Alto Adige/Südtirol: Evidence for linguistic stereotype threat. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 28. 222–243.Search in Google Scholar

Pessoa, L. 2009. How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13. 160–166.Search in Google Scholar

Philp, J. 2003. Constraints on “noticing the gap.” Studies in Second Language Acquisition 25. 99–126.Search in Google Scholar

Philp, J. & S. Duchesne. 2008. When the gate opens: The interaction between social and linguistic goals in child second language development. In J. Philp, R. Oliver & A. Mackey (eds.), Second language acquisition and the younger learners: Child’s play? 83–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

Philp, J. & A. Mackey. 2010. Interaction research: What can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa)? In R. Batstone (ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning, 210–228. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, L. & D. Brown. 2015. Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research 31. 267–278.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, L. & F. Oswald. 2014. How big is “big”? Interpreting effects sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64. 878–912.Search in Google Scholar

Révész, A. 2012. Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts on different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning 62. 93–132.Search in Google Scholar

Rowe, G., J. B. Hirsh & A. K. Anderson. 2007. Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104. 383–388.Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, D. L. 1992. Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education 33. 511–531.Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, D. L. 2002. Help! My professor (or doctor or boss) doesn’t talk English!. In J. Martin, T. Nakayama & L. Flores (eds.), Readings in intercultural communication: Experiences and contexts, 127–137. Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Rubin, D. L. 2012. The power of prejudice in accent perception: Reverse linguistic stereotyping and its impact on listener judgments and decisions. In J. Levis & K. Levelle (eds.), Social factors in pronunciation acquisition: Proceedings of the 3rd pronunciation in second language learning and teaching conference, 11–18. Ames: Iowa State University.Search in Google Scholar

Sánchez-Hernández, A. 2018. A mixed-methods study of the impact of sociocultural adaptation on the development of pragmatic production. System 75. 93–105.Search in Google Scholar

Saville-Troike, M. 2017. Introducing second language acquisition, 2nd edn. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. 2006. Exploring the relationship between characteristics of recasts and learner uptake. Language Teaching Research 10. 361–392.Search in Google Scholar

Sheen, Y. 2008. Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning 58. 835–874.Search in Google Scholar

Stein, N. L. & C. G. Glenn. 1979. An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children. In R. Freedle (ed.), New directions in discursive processing, 53–120. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Search in Google Scholar

Swain, M. 2013. The inseparability of cognition and emotion in second language learning. Language Teaching 46. 195–207.Search in Google Scholar

Taylor Reid, K., P. Trofimovich & M. O’Brien. 2018. Social attitudes and speech ratings: Effects of positive and negative bias on multiage listeners’ judgments of second language speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition. Published online 13 November 2018. in Google Scholar

Toohey, K. 2000. Learning English at school: Identity, social relations, and classroom practice. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.Search in Google Scholar

Trofimovich, P., A. Ammar & E. Gatbonton. 2007. How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies, 171–195. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Vedder, P. & E. Virta. 2005. Language, ethnic identity, and the adaptation of Turkish immigrant youth in the Netherlands and Sweden. International Journal of Intercultural Relations 29. 317–337.Search in Google Scholar

Vissers, C. T. W. M., D. Virgillito, D. A. Fitzgerald, A. E. M. Speckens, I. Tendolkar, I. Van Oostrom & D. J. Chwilla. 2010. The influence of mood on the processing of syntactic anomalies: Evidence from P600. Neuropsychologia 48. 3521–3531.Search in Google Scholar

Watts, D. J. 1999. Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Yilmaz, Y. & G. Granena. 2016. The role of cognitive aptitudes for explicit language learning in the relative effects of explicit and implicit feedback. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 19. 147–161.Search in Google Scholar

Yoshida, R. 2010. How do teachers and learners perceive corrective feedback in the Japanese language classroom? The Modern Language Journal 94. 293–314.Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI:

Published Online: 2019-06-14

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston