Abstract
This article undertakes a conceptual enquiry into the history of the Ottoman/Turkish concept of civilization. It shows how the concept of civilization became one of the key elements of political and intellectual thought in the late Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic. Beginning with the adaption of the idea of civilization in the nineteenth century, the desire to be recognized as civilized has moulded the thinking of Ottoman and Turkish elites regardless of their political orientation. From the early Ottoman modernizers to the present-day AKP government the pursuit of medeniyet (Turkish for ‘civilization’) has united radical reformers and religious conservatives. The article analyses how these succeeding imperial and republican elites understood the concept of civilization, how they transformed it into a specific Ottoman and Turkish civilizing mission, and how they approached those groups of the population who were regarded as ‘backward’ and ‘uncivilized’. Thereby medeniyet has maintained its dominance until today, making ‘civilization’ the most influential ideological concept of modern Turkish history besides the idea of the nation.
Bibliography
Adanır, Fikret (2001): „Das Osmanische Reich als orientalische Despotie in der Wahrnehmung des Westens“. In: Türkei und Europa. Hrsg. von Elçin Kürşat-Ahlers, Dursun Tan und Hans Peter Waldhoff. Frankfurt am Main: IKO – Verlag für Interkulturelle Kommunikation, 83–121.Search in Google Scholar
Ankara Üniversitesi Türk İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü (Hrsg.) (2006): Atatürk’ün Söylev ve Demeçleri. Cilt II (1906–1938). Ankara: Türk İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar
Arat-Koç, Sedef (2007): “(Some) Turkish Transnationalism(s) in an Age of Capitalist Globalization and Empire: ‘White Turk’ Discourse, the New Geopolitics, and Implications for Feminist Transnationalism”. Transnational Theory, National Politics, and Gender in the Contemporary Middle East/North Africa. Special Issue of Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies 3.1: 35–57.10.2979/MEW.2007.3.1.35Search in Google Scholar
Barth, Boris (2005): „Die Grenzen der Zivilisierungsmission. Rassenvorstellungen in den europäischen Siedlungskolonien Virginia, den Burenrepubliken und Deutsch-Südwestafrika“. In: Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert. Hrsg. von Boris Barth und Jürgen Osterhammel. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, 201–228.Search in Google Scholar
Baykara, Tuncer (2007): Osmanlıda Medeniyet Kavramı. Istanbul: İQ Kültür Sanat Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar
Bilici, Mücahit (2009): “Black Turks, White Turks: On the Three Requirements of Turkish Citizenship”. Insight Turkey 11.3: 23–35.Search in Google Scholar
Davutoğlu, Ahmet (2001): Stratejik Derinlik: Türkiye’nin Uluslararası Konumu. Istanbul: Küre Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar
Davutoğlu, Ahmet (2008): “Turkey’s Foreign Policy Vision: An Assessment of 2007”. Insight Turkey 10.1: 77–96.Search in Google Scholar
Demiralp, Seda (2012): “White Turks, Black Turks? Faultlines beyond Islamism versus Secularism”. Third World Quarterly 33.3: 511–524.10.1080/01436597.2012.657487Search in Google Scholar
Deringil, Selim (1998): The Well-Protected Domains: Ideology and the Legitimation of Power in the Ottoman Empire 1876–1909. London: I. B. Tauris.Search in Google Scholar
Deringil, Selim (2003): “‘They Live in a State of Nomadism and Savagery’: The Late Ottoman Empire and the Post-Colonial Debate”. Comparative Studies in Society and History 45.2: 311–342.10.1017/S001041750300015XSearch in Google Scholar
Ergin, Murat (2008): “‘Is the Turk a White Man?’ Towards a Theoretical Framework for Race in the Making of Turkishness”. Middle Eastern Studies 44.6: 827–850.10.1080/00263200802425973Search in Google Scholar
Ferguson, Michael (2014): “White Turks, Black Turks: The Politics of Polarization”. In: The making of a protest movement in Turkey: #occupygezi. Edited by Umut Özkırımlı. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 77–88.10.1057/9781137413789_6Search in Google Scholar
Fisch, Jörg (2004): „Zivilisation, Kultur“. In: Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe. Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland. Bd. VII. Hrsg. von Werner Conze, Otto Brunner und Reinhart Koselleck. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 679–774.Search in Google Scholar
Gladstone, William E. (1876): Bulgarian Horrors and the Question of the East. New York: Lovell.Search in Google Scholar
Gökalp (1976): Türkçülüğün Esasları. Istanbul: Kültür Bakanliği Millî Eğitim Basımevi.Search in Google Scholar
Graf, Friedrich Wilhelm (2008): „Zivilisation“. In: Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart. Band 8 T-Z. Hrsg. von Hans Dieter Betz. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1888–1891.Search in Google Scholar
Guizot, François (2004 [1838]): Histoire générale de la civilisation en Europe depuis la chute de l’empire romain jusqu’à la Révolution française. Erstausgabe Bruxelles: Lacrosse 1838. Digitalisierte Ausgabe Saguenay: Bibliothèque Paul-Émile-Boulet de l’Université du Québec à Chicoutimi.http://www.uqac.ca/Classiques_des_sciences_sociales (19/09/2009).Search in Google Scholar
Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü (1995): The Young Turks in Opposition. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hanioğlu, M. Şükrü (2011): Atatürk: An Intellectual Biography. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400838172Search in Google Scholar
Hartmann, Michael (2004): The Sociology of Elites. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Herzog, Christoph/Motika, Raoul (2000): “Orientalism Alla Turca: Late 19th/Early 20th Century Ottoman Voyages into the Muslim ‘Outback’”. Die Welt des Islams 40.2: 139–195.10.1163/1570060001527754Search in Google Scholar
Karpat, Kemal H. (2001): The Politicization of Islam: Reconstructing Identity, State, Faith, and Community in the Late Ottoman State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kemal, Mustafa (1929): A Speech delivered by Ghazi Mustapha Kemal, President of the Turkish Republic, October 1927. Leipzig: K.F. Koehler.Search in Google Scholar
Kitromilides, Paschalis M. (1979): “The Dialectic of Intolerance: Ideological Dimensions of Ethnic Conflict”. In: Small States in the Modern World: The Conditions of Survival. Edited by Peter Worsley and Paschalis Kitromilides. Revised Edition. Nicosia : New Cyprus Association, 143–184.Search in Google Scholar
Kollmeier, Kathrin/Hoffmann, Stefan-Ludwig (2010): „Einleitung zur Debatte: Zeitgeschichte der Begriffe? Perspektiven einer Historischen Semantik des 20. Jahrhunderts“. Zeithistorische Forschungen/Studies in Contemporary History, 7.1: 75–78.Search in Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart u.a. (2006): Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Search in Google Scholar
Kuehn, Thomas (2011): Empire, Islam, and Politics of Difference. Ottoman rule in Yemen, 1849–1919. Leiden: Brill, 2011.10.1163/ej.9789004211315.i-292Search in Google Scholar
Lafi, Nora (2015): “L’Empire ottoman en Afrique: perspectives d’histoire critique”. Cahiers d’histoire. Revue d’histoire critique 128: 59–70.10.4000/chrhc.4505Search in Google Scholar
Lokmanhekim, Dr. Hafız Cemal (2001): Anı – Yaşantı. Translated by Harid Fedai. Istanbul: Dr. Hafız Cemal Lokmanhekim ve Eşi Sabiha Lokmanhekim Sağlık Vakfı Yayınları.Search in Google Scholar
Makdisi, Ussama (2000): The Culture of Sectarianism: Community, History, and Violence in Nineteenth-Century Ottoman Lebanon. Berkeley: California University Press.10.1525/california/9780520218451.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Makdisi, Ussama (2002): “Ottoman Orientalism”. The American Historical Review 107: 768–796.10.1086/532495Search in Google Scholar
Mardin, Şerif (1969): Continuity and Change in the Ideas of the Young Turks, Ankara: School of Business Administration and Economics, Robert College.Search in Google Scholar
Mardin, Şerif (2000): The Genesis of Young Ottoman Thought. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Öktem, Kerem (2011): Angry Nation: Turkey Since 1989. London: Zed Books.10.5040/9781350218475Search in Google Scholar
Osterhammel, Jürgen (2005): “‘The Great Work of Uplifting Mankind’. Zivilisierungsmission und Moderne“. In: Zivilisierungsmissionen. Imperiale Weltverbesserung seit dem 18. Jahrhundert. Hrsg. von Boris Barth und Jürgen Osterhammel. Konstanz: UVK Verlagsgesellschaft, 363–425.Search in Google Scholar
Palabıyık, Mustafa Serdar (2012): “Ottoman travelers’ perceptions of Africa in the Late Ottoman Empire (1860–1922): A discussion of civilization, colonialism and race”. New Perspectives on Turkey 46: 187–212.10.1017/S0896634600001552Search in Google Scholar
Ramm, Christoph (2009) “The ‘sick man’ beyond Europe: the orientalization of Turkey and Turkish immigrants in European Union accession discourses in Germany”. In: Racism – Postcolonialism – Europe. Edited by Graham Huggan and Ian Law. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, 102–115.10.5949/liverpool/9781846312199.003.0007Search in Google Scholar
Ramm, Christoph (2011) „Die Türkei und ihre Politik der ‚strategischen Tiefe‘: Abkehr vom Westen, neuer Osmanismus oder nationale Großmachtphantasie?“. In: Die Zukunft arabisch-türkischer Beziehungen: Nationales Interesse, nicht Religion als Basis der Kooperation. Hrsg. von Sigrid Faath. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag, 51–63.10.5771/9783845232638-51Search in Google Scholar
Reinkowski, Maurus (2005): Die Dinge der Ordnung. Eine vergleichende Untersuchung über die osmanische Reformpolitik im 19. Jahrhundert. München: Oldenbourg.Search in Google Scholar
Reinkowski, Maurus (2006): „Das Osmanische Reich – ein antikoloniales Imperium?“. Zeithistorische Forschungen/Studies in Contemporary History 3.1: 34–54.Search in Google Scholar
Schäbler, Birgit (2003): „Globale Moderne und die Geburt der Zivilisationsmission an der kulturellen Binnengrenze: Die mission civilisatrice Ottomane“. In: Periplus. Jahrbuch für außereuropäische Geschichte. Hrsg. von Christoph Marx. Münster: Lit-Verlag, 9–29.Search in Google Scholar
Schaebler, Birgit (2004): “Civilizing Others: Global Modernity and the Local Boundaries (French, German, Ottoman, Arab) of Savagery”. In: Globalization and the Muslim World: Culture, Religion, and Modernity. Edited by Birgit Schaebler and Leif Stenberg. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 3–29.Search in Google Scholar
Sekman, Mümin (2000): Türk Usulü Başarı (Turkish-Style Success), Istanbul: Arıtan Yayınevi.Search in Google Scholar
Steinmetz, Willibald (2011) “New Perspectives on the Study of Language and Power in the Short Twentieth Century”. In: Political Languages in the Age of Extremes. Edited by Willibald Steinmetz. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–51.Search in Google Scholar
Stephan, Johannes (2012): „Wie man die anderen verstehen soll und wie man über sie schreiben kann“ Der Paris-Bericht Rifāʿa Rāfiʿ aṭ – Ṭahṭāwīs (1801–1873) als vielseitige Vermittlung von ,Kultur‘“. In: zeitenblicke 11 (1). http://www.zeitenblicke.de/2012/1/Stephan/index_html (01/07/2016).Search in Google Scholar
Sumer, Beyza (2003): White vs. Black Turks: The Civilising Process in Turkey in the 1990s. Master Thesis. Graduate School of Social Sciences, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.Search in Google Scholar
Üngör, Uğur Ümit (2011): The Making of Modern Turkey. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199603602.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Wasner, Barbara (2004): Eliten in Europa. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.10.1007/978-3-322-80939-1Search in Google Scholar
White, Jenny (2013): Muslim Nationalism and the New Turks. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400851256Search in Google Scholar
Zürcher, Erik Jan (2000): “Young Turks, Ottoman Muslims and Turkish Nationalists: Identity Politics 1908-1938”. In: Ottoman Past and Today’s Turkey. Edited by Kemal H. Karpat. Leiden: Brill, 150–179.10.1163/9789004492271Search in Google Scholar
©2016 by De Gruyter