Abstract
Myanmar has been perceived to be in a sociopolitical and economic transition since the semi-civilian government under President Thein Sein took office in 2011. Amongst other things, for a representative democracy to function, citizens have to have the freedom to express their opinions and deliberate them with fellow citizens. This requires the secure granting of fundamental civil liberties, as prescribed in the freedom of expression, association, and assembly. Hence, once in the process of democratization, a formerly authoritarian state has to make significant improvements in the granting and protection of these rights too. To empirically test whether Myanmar has made such improvements since 2011 is the goal of a greater research project I am working on. This research note introduces the project and summarizes first findings. By combining knowledge on legal reforms and protest data from the Myanmar Protest Event Dataset, it is suggested that, in Myanmar, the de jure exercisability and de facto exercise of fundamental civil liberties have significantly improved from 2011 to 2015. Informal methods of suppressing the right to protest, such as arbitrary violence, have increasingly descended while methods that are formally in accordance with the rule of law but still lack compliance with international human rights standards have ascended.
Referenzen
Buschmann, Andy (2016): Myanmar Protest Event Dataset. Version: 1. GESIS Data Archive. Dataset. http://doi.org/10.7802/1168Search in Google Scholar
Buschmann, Andy (2017a): Myanmar in 2017: Democratic Progress or Authoritarian Rollback? IAPS Dialogue. https://iapsdialogue.org/2017/10/03/myanmar-in-2017-democratic-progress-or-authoritarian-rollback/(11/12/2017)Search in Google Scholar
Buschmann, Andy (2017b): Myanmar Protest Event Dataset. Version: 1.1. GESIS Data Archive. Dataset. http://doi.org/10.7802/1442Search in Google Scholar
Chan, Debby Sze Wan (2017): “Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam controversy: social opposition akin to David’s stone against Goliath”. The Pacific Review 30.5: 674–691.10.1080/09512748.2017.1293714Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Paul Y. (2015): Protest Dialectics: State Repression and South Korea’s Democracy Movement, 1970–1979. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.10.1515/9780804794305Search in Google Scholar
Chang, Paul Y., Vitale, Alex S. (2013): “Repressive Coverage in an Authoritarian Context: Threat, Weakness and Legitimacy in South Korea’s Democracy Movement”. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 18.1: 19–39.10.17813/maiq.18.1.p84k823062334831Search in Google Scholar
Cheesman, Nick (2015): Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar’s Courts Make Law and Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781316014936Search in Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. (1971): Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Ekiert, Grzegorz, Kubik, Jan (2001): Rebellious Civil Society: Popular Protest and Democratic Consolidation in Poland, 1989–1993. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Search in Google Scholar
Egreteau, Renaud (2012): “Burma/Myanmar”. Political Insight 3.2: 30–33.10.1111/j.2041-9066.2012.00110.xSearch in Google Scholar
Egreteau, Renaud (2016): Caretaking Democratization: The Military and Political Change in Myanmar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190620967.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Tom, Simpser, Alberto (2014): Constitutions in Authoritarian Regimes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.2139/ssrn.2427794Search in Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen (1989): The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hutter, Swen (2014): “Protest Event Analysis and Its Offspring”. In: Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. Hrsg. von Donatella Della Porta. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 335–367.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0014Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Sunhyuk (2009): “Civic Engagement and Democracy in South Korea”. South Korean Observer 40.1: 1–26.Search in Google Scholar
Merkel, Wolfgang (2004): “Embedded and Defective Democracies”. Democratization 11.5: 33–58.10.5771/9783845200484-29Search in Google Scholar
Oberschall, Anthony (2000): “Social Movements and the Transition to Democracy”. Democratization 7.3: 25–45.10.1080/13510340008403670Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
