Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter June 2, 2022

Once again on Noah’s lost son in the Qur’ān: the Enochic connection

  • Suleyman Dost EMAIL logo

Abstract

In the Qur’ān, a son of Noah dies in the flood because, the Qur’ān states, he is not actually of Noah’s family. The passage in question (Q 11:46) was puzzling to classical Muslim exegetes and modern scholars alike, and the search for parallel narratives in previous biblical and parabiblical texts has been largely unsuccessful. Another Qur’ānic passage that portrays Noah’s wife in negative terms (Q 66:10) led some early Muslim scholars to consider the possibility that she cheated on his husband but this interpretation was later dismissed on the principle of prophetic infallibility. In this paper, the story of Noah’s perished son is examined in the light of Second Temple Jewish texts, in particular the First Book of Enoch and the Genesis Apocryphon, where the sexual corruption of the fallen angels leads to cases of doubtful paternity. In these sources Noah’s own birth is recounted as a wondrous event that makes Noah’s father Lamech suspect that his wife had the child from an angel. Lamech’s grandfather Enoch eventually confirms Noah’s righteous conception and birth but the narrative motifs around antediluvian sexual decadence, conjugal disloyalty and miraculous birth stories survive into other Second Temple Jewish and early Christian texts. I argue that the Qur’ān, too, was aware of these narrative motifs and the story of Noah’s son constitutes a unique Qur’ānic spin on certain of these Enochic themes.


Corresponding author: Suleyman Dost, University of TorontoDepartment for the Study of Religion, 80-391 Beechgrove Dr, Toronto, Ontario M1E 2R1, Canada, E-mail:

My thanks to Gabriel S. Reynolds, who read and commented on an earlier draft of this article. I am also grateful for the feedback I received from the two anonymous reviewers of Asiatische Studien.


References

Bonner, Campbell (1937): The Last Chapters of Enoch in Greek. London: Christophers.Search in Google Scholar

Bow, Beverly A (2000): “Melchizedek’s Birth Narrative in 2 Enoch 68-73: Christian Correlations”. In: For a Later Generation: The Transformation of Tradition in Israel, Early Judaism, and Early Christianity. Edited by Randal A. Argall/Beverly Bow/Rod Werline. Harrisburg: Trinity, 33–41.Search in Google Scholar

Böttrich, Christfried (2001): “The Melchizedek Story of ‘2 (Slavonic) Enoch’: A Reaction to A. Orlov”. Journal for the Study of Judaism in the Persian, Hellenistic, and Roman Period 32.4: 445–70.10.1163/157006301X00278Search in Google Scholar

al-Bukhārī (2002): Ṣaḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Damascus/Beirut: Dār Ibn Kathīr.Search in Google Scholar

Charlesworth, James H. (1983): The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday.Search in Google Scholar

Crone, Patricia (2013): “The Book of Watchers in the Qur’ān”. In: Exchange and Transmission Across Cultural Boundaries. Edited by Haggai Ben -Shammai/Shaul Shaked/Sarah Stroumsa. Jerusalem: The Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 16–51.Search in Google Scholar

Fitzmyer, Joseph A (2004): The Genesis Apocryphon of Qumran Cave 1 (1Q20): A Commentary. Roma: Editrice Pontificio Istituto Biblico.Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Cornelia B. (2006): “Intersections: The Reception History of the Protoevangelium of James in Sources from the Christian East and in the Qur’ān”. Apocrypha 17: 113–150.10.1484/J.APOCRA.2.302050Search in Google Scholar

Horn, Cornelia B. (2007): “Mary between Bible and Qur’an: Soundings into the transmission and reception history of the Protoevangelium of James on the basis of selected literary sources in Coptic and Copto-Arabic and of art-historical evidence pertaining to Egypt”. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 18.4: 509–538.10.1080/09596410701577332Search in Google Scholar

Ibn al-Jawzī (1986): Kitāb al-Duʿafāʾ wa-l-Matrūkīn. Edited by Abū al-Fidāʾ ʿAbd Allāh al-Qāḍī. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyya, Beirut.Search in Google Scholar

Ibn Kathīr (1999): Tafsīr Al-Qurʾān al-ʿAẓīm. Edited by Sāmī b. Muḥammad al-Salāma. Riyadh: Dār Ṭayba.Search in Google Scholar

Lane, Edward William (1863): An Arabic-English Lexicon. London: Williams and Norgate.Search in Google Scholar

Loader, William R. G (2007): Enoch, Levi, and Jubilees on Sexuality: Attitudes towards Sexuality in the Early Enoch Literature, the Aramaic Levi Document, and the Book of Jubilees. Grand Rapids, Mich.: William B. Eerdmans Pub.Search in Google Scholar

Knibb, Michael A (1978): The Ethiopic Book of Enoch: A New Edition in the Light of the Aramaic Dead Sea Fragments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Milik, J. T (1976): The Books of Enoch: Aramaic Fragments of Qumrân Cave 4 with the collaboration of Matthew Black. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Nickelsburg, George W. E (2001): 1 Enoch: A Commentary on the Book of 1 Enoch. Minneapolis, Minn.: Fortress.Search in Google Scholar

Nickelsburg, George W. E (1999): “Patriarchs Who Worry about Their Wives: A Haggadic Tendency in the Genesis Apocryphon”. In: Pseudepigraphic Perspectives: The Apocrypha and the Pseudepigrapha in Light of the Dead Sea Scrolls. Edited by Esther G. Chazon/Michael Stone/Avital Pinnick. Leiden: Brill, 137–158.10.1163/9789004350298_010Search in Google Scholar

Orlov, Andrei A (2000): “‘Noah’s Younger Brother’: The Anti-Noachic Polemics in 2 Enoch”. Henoch 22.2: 207–21.Search in Google Scholar

al-Qurṭubī, Shams al-Dīn (2006): Al-Jāmiʿ Li-Aḥkām al-Qurʾān. Edited by ʿAbd Allāh al-Turkī. Beirut: Muʾassasat al-Risāla.Search in Google Scholar

al-Rāzī, Fakhr al-Dīn (1981): Mafātīḥ Al-Ghayb. Beirut: Dār al-Fikr.Search in Google Scholar

Reed, Annette Y. (2015): “Fallen Angels and the Afterlives of Enochic Traditions in Early Islam”. Paper for 2015 Enoch Seminar Nangeroni Meeting, Milan.Search in Google Scholar

Reeves, John C. (2003): “Some Explorations of the Intertwining of Bible and Qur’ān”. In: Bible and Qur’ān: Essays in Scriptural Intertextuality. Edited by John C. Reeves. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 43–60.Search in Google Scholar

Reeves, John C. (2015): “Some Parascriptural Dimensions of the ‘Tale of Harut Wa-Marut’”. The Journal of the American Oriental Society 135.4: 817–42.10.7817/jameroriesoci.135.4.817Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Gabriel Said (2016): “A Flawed Prophet? Noah in the Qurʾān and Qurʾānic Commentary”. In: Islamic Studies Today. Edited by Majid Daneshgar and Walid Saleh. Leiden: Brill, 260–73.10.1163/9789004337121_014Search in Google Scholar

Reynolds, Gabriel Said (2017): “Noah’s Lost Son in the Qurʾān”. Arabica 64: 129–48.10.1163/15700585-12341452Search in Google Scholar

Segovia, Carlos A. (2011): “Noah as Eschatological Mediator Transposed: From 2 Enoch 71-72 to the Christological Echoes of 1 Enoch 106:3 in the Qur’ān”. Henoch 33.1: 130–45.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Shawkānī (2007): Fatḥ al-Qadīr. Edited by Yūsuf al-Ghūth. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa.Search in Google Scholar

Speyer, Heinrich (1961): Die Biblischen Erzählungen Im Qoran. Hildesheim: G. Olms.Search in Google Scholar

al-Ṭabarī, Muḥammad b. Jarīr (2001): Jāmiʿ Al-Bayān ʿan Taʾwīl Āy al-Qurʾān. Edited by ʿAbd Allāh al-Turkī. Cairo: Dār Hajar.Search in Google Scholar

al-Ṭabarsī (2006): Majmaʿ Al-Bayān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Beirut: Dār al-Murtaḍā.Search in Google Scholar

Tesei, Tommaso (2016): “The Fall of Iblīs and Its Enochic Background”. In: Religious Stories in Transformation: Conflict, Revision and Reception. Edited by Alberdina Houtman et al.. Leiden: Brill, 66–81.10.1163/9789004334816_007Search in Google Scholar

Al-Thaʿālibī, ʿAbd al-Raḥmān (1997): Al-Jawāhir al-Ḥisān fī Tafsīr al-Qurʾān. Edited by ʿAlī Muḥammad Muʿawwiḍ and ʿĀdil Aḥmad ʿAbd al-Mawjūd. Beirut: Dār Iḥyāʾ al-Turāth al-ʿal-th.Search in Google Scholar

al-Zamakhsharī (2009): Tafsīr Al-Kashshāf. Edited by Khalīl Shayḥā. Beirut: Dār al-Maʿrifa.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-12-14
Accepted: 2022-05-06
Published Online: 2022-06-02
Published in Print: 2022-05-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/asia-2021-0047/html
Scroll to top button