Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg May 12, 2016

Diskussion/Discussion. A Reply to Six Critics

Richard Rorty
From the journal Analyse & Kritik

Abstract

Professors Maclntyre and Rosenberg are more inclined than I to believe that ‘philosophy’ names a natural kind -- a distinctive sort of inquiry with a continuous history since the Greeks. Their criticisms of my book reflect this disagreement. Mr. Montefiore brings to light various ambiguities in my use of such terms as “edifying philosophy” and “Continental philosophy”. His criticisms make good points against the concluding portions of Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Professors Bennett and Turnbull rightly say that I have over-simplified the current situation in Anglo-Saxon analytic philosophy, but I would hope that these; simplificatons do not affect the gist of my argument. Dr. Köhler very helpfully traces connections between my metaphilosophical views and my discussion of certain first-order issues.

Online erschienen: 2016-5-12
Erschienen im Druck: 1984-5-1

© 1984 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

Scroll Up Arrow