Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg May 14, 2016

On Some Difficulties Concerning John Searle’s Notion of an ‘Institutional Fact’

Comment to John R. Searle “Social Ontology and the Philosophy of Society” (Analyse & Kritik 20, 149-158)

  • Carsten Heidemann
From the journal Analyse & Kritik


John Searle’s conception of institutional facts figures centrally in his latest works. It is defective for several reasons: (1) Searle’s argument for philosophical realism is inconsistent. (2) Searle’s conceptions of consciousness and collective intentionality are problematic. (3) The notion of normativity is indispensable in Searle’s system, but cannot be accounted for and makes wide parts of his theory superfluous. (4) It is not clear what entities might be regarded as institutional facts. These problems have a common source: The philosophical basis of Searle’s theory, his combination of realism and physicalist monism, clashes with his thesis that both the 'first-person-ontology' and normativity are irreducible.

Online erschienen: 2016-5-14
Erschienen im Druck: 1999-11-1

© 1999 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

Downloaded on 28.2.2024 from
Scroll to top button