Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter Oldenbourg May 14, 2016

Meaningful Work and Market Socialism Revisited

  • Richard J. Arneson
From the journal Analyse & Kritik

Abstract

If the economy consisted of labor-managed firms, so the workplace is democratic, and in addition the benefits and burdens of economic cooperation were shared equitably and the economy operated efficiently, might there still be a morally compelling case for further intervention into economic arrangements so as to increase the degree to which people gain meaningful or satisfying work? ‘No!’, answers a 1987 essay by the author. This comment argues against that judgment, on the ground that morally required perfectionism or paternalism or simple fairness to the worse off might demand such intervention. It is plausible to hold the good life includes meaningful work, and that what we fundamentally owe one another is a fair distribution of good quality of life. However, this comment also takes issue with Russell Keats’s argument against Arneson in his essay in this issue of this journal.

Online erschienen: 2016-5-14
Erschienen im Druck: 2009-5-1

© 2009 by Lucius & Lucius, Stuttgart

Downloaded on 27.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/auk-2009-0109/html
Scroll to top button