In this article, we describe the applicability of a signal processing method, specifically the modified S-transform (MST) method, on RNA sequences to identify periodicities between 2 and 11. MicroRNAs (miRNA) are associated with gene regulation and gene silencing and thus have wide applications in biological sciences. Also, the functionality of miRNA is highly associated with its secondary structures (stem, bulge and loop). Signal processing methods have been previously applied on genomic data to reveal the periodicities that determine a wide variety of biological functions, ranging from exon detection to microsatellite identification in DNA sequences. However, there has been less focus on RNA-based signal processing. Here, we show that the signal processing method can be successfully applied to miRNA sequences. We observed that these periodicities are highly correlated with the secondary structure of miRNA and such methods could possibly be used as indicators of secondary and tertiary structure formation.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
2. Damasevicius R. Complexity estimation of genetic sequences using information-theoretic and frequency analysis methods. Informatica 2010;21:13–30. Search in Google Scholar
3. Liu B, Fang L, Liu F, Wang X, Chen J, Chou KC. Identification of real microRNA precursors with a pseudo structure status composition approach. PLoS One 2015;10:e0121501.10.1371/journal.pone.012150125821974 Search in Google Scholar
4. Liu B, Childs-Disney JL, Znosko BM, Wang D, Fallahi M, Gallo SM, et al. Analysis of secondary structural elements in human microRNA hairpin precursors. BMC Bioinform 2016;17:112.10.1186/s12859-016-0960-6 Search in Google Scholar
5. Ardenkani AM, Naeini MM. The role of microRNAs in human diseases’. Avicenna J Med Biotechnol 2010;2:161–79. Search in Google Scholar
6. Yoon BJ, Vaidyanathan RP. Computational identification and analysis of noncoding RNAs – unearthing the buried treasures in the genome. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2007;24:64–74.10.1109/MSP.2007.273058 Search in Google Scholar
8. RNA structure (molecular biology). Available at: http://what-when-how.com/molecular-biology/rna-structure-molecular-biology/. Accessed: 18 Jun 2017. Search in Google Scholar
9. Moss WN. Computational prediction of RNA secondary structure. In: Lorsch J, editor. Methods in Enzymology: RNA. San Diego, USA: Elsevier, 2013:3–65. Search in Google Scholar
11. Borkar PS, Mahajan AR. Different RNA secondary structure prediction methods. In: Electronic Systems, Signal Processing and Computing Technologies (ICESC), 2014 International Conference, 9 Jan 2014. Nagpur, India: IEEE, 2014:228–30. Search in Google Scholar
12. Sharma SD, Saxena R, Sharma SN. Short tandem repeats detection in DNA sequences using modified S-transform. Int J Adv Eng Technol 2015;8:233–45. Search in Google Scholar
13. Kozomara A, Griffiths-Jones S. miRBase: annotating high confidence microRNAs using deep sequencing data. Nucl Acids Res 2013;42:D68–73. Search in Google Scholar
17. Mrazek J. Comparative analysis of sequence periodicity among prokaryotic genomes points to differences in nucleoid structure and a relationship to gene expression. J Bacteriol 2010;192:3763–72.10.1128/JB.00149-10 Search in Google Scholar
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bams-2017-0023).
©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston