Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 12, 2013

Pass-through of Per Unit and ad Valorem Consumption Taxes: Evidence from Alcoholic Beverages in France

  • Clément Carbonnier EMAIL logo

Abstract

Economic theory states that in a market with imperfect competition, per unit consumption taxes should induce a greater increase in prices than ad valorem consumption taxes. This implies that consumers bear a greater share of the tax burden with per unit consumption taxes than that with ad valorem consumption taxes. This article seeks to test this theoretical result empirically using the French market for alcoholic beverages, which is subject to both per unit (excise taxes) and ad valorem (value-added tax, VAT) consumption taxes. Econometric analysis is applied to two consumption tax reforms affecting two distinct French markets for alcoholic beverages, those for beer and for aperitif. In 1995, the full rate of VAT increased from 18.6 to 20.6%; excise taxes on alcoholic beverages increased in 1997. Graphical evidence and econometric results confirm the statements of economic theory. For both classes of alcoholic beverages – beer and aperitif – the change in prices due to per unit excise taxes was significantly larger than that due to ad valorem VAT.

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the research program ITACE on indirect taxation, conducted with Pascal Belan and Martine Carré-Tallon and funded by the French Agence Nationale pour la Recherche (ANR). In addition, I am grateful to the Editor and referees, the participants of THEMA seminar and those of LAGV and PET conferences for their comments that allowed me to improve this article. I want to thank Michel Pierssens, Amanda Skoda and Keith Tribe for their helpful rereading. Every remaining error is mine.

References

Anderson, S. P., A.de Palma, and B.Kreider. 2001a. “The Efficiency of Indirect Taxes under Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Public Economics81:23151.10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00085-2Search in Google Scholar

Anderson, S. P., A.de Palma, and B.Kreider. 2001b. “Tax Incidence in Differentiated Product Oligopoly.” Journal of Public Economics81:17392.10.1016/S0047-2727(00)00079-7Search in Google Scholar

Besley, T.1989. “Commodity Taxation and Imperfect Competition: A Note on the Effects of Entry.” Journal of Public Economics40:35967.10.1016/0047-2727(89)90048-0Search in Google Scholar

Besley, T. J., and H. S.Rosen. 1999. “Vertical Externalities in Tax Setting: Evidence from Gasoline and Cigarettes,” NBER Working Papers.10.3386/w6517Search in Google Scholar

Besson, D.2004. “Boissons alcoolisées: 40 ans de baisse de consommation.” INSEE première n° 966.Search in Google Scholar

Blackorby, C., and S.Murty. 2007. “Unit versus Ad Valorem Taxes: Monopoly in General Equilibrium.” Journal of Public Economics91:81722.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Bonnet, C., and V.Réquillart. 2011. “Tax Incidence with Strategic Firms on the Soft Drink Market,” TSE Working Papers 11-233, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).Search in Google Scholar

Carbonnier, C. 2007. “Who Pays Sales Taxes? Evidence from French VAT Reforms, 1987–1999.” Journal of Public Economics91:121929.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2006.12.004Search in Google Scholar

Carbonnier, C. 2008. “Différence des ajustements de prix à des hausses ou baisses des taux de la TVA: un examen empirique à partir des réformes françaises de 1995 et 2000.” Economie Et Statistique413:320.10.3406/estat.2008.7033Search in Google Scholar

Carbonnier, C. 2013. “The Incidence of Non-Linear Consumption Taxes,” THEMA Working Papers 2013-19.Search in Google Scholar

Cournot, A. 1838. Recherches Sur Les Principes Mathematiques De La Theorie Des Richesses. Oeuvres Complètes Tome VIII. Paris, 1980: C.N.R.S. and Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.Search in Google Scholar

Delipalla, S., and M.Keen. 1992. “The Comparison between Ad Valorem and Specific Taxation Under Imperfect Competition.” Journal of Public Economics49:35167.10.1016/0047-2727(92)90073-OSearch in Google Scholar

Delipalla, S., and O.O’Donnell. 2001. “Estimating Tax Incidence, Market Power and Market Conduct: The European Cigarette Industry.” International Journal of Industrial Organization19:885908.10.1016/S0167-7187(99)00057-0Search in Google Scholar

Denicolo, V., and M.Matteuzzi. 2000. “Specific and Ad Valorem Taxation in Asymmetric Cournot Oligopolies.” International Tax and Public Finance7:33542.10.1023/A:1008709914537Search in Google Scholar

Dröge, S., and P. J.Schröder. 2009. “The Welfare Comparison of Corrective Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes Under Monopolistic Competition.” International Tax and Public Finance16:16475.10.1007/s10797-007-9061-9Search in Google Scholar

Dungan, P., J.Mintz, F.Poschmann, and T.Wilson. 2008. “Growth Oriented Sales Tax Reform for Ontario: Replacing the Retail Sales Tax with a 7.5 Percent Value-Added Tax,” C.D. Howe Institute Commentary.Search in Google Scholar

Gopinath, G., and O.Itskhoki. 2010. “Frequency of Price Adjustment and Pass-Through.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics125:675727.10.1162/qjec.2010.125.2.675Search in Google Scholar

Grazzini, L.. 2006. “A Note on Ad Valorem and per Unit Taxation in an Oligopoly Model.” Journal of Economics89:5974.10.1007/s00712-006-0201-ySearch in Google Scholar

Hamilton, S. F.. 1999. “Tax Incidence under Oligopoly: A Comparison of Policy Approaches.” Journal of Public Economics71:23345.10.1016/S0047-2727(98)00066-8Search in Google Scholar

Katz, M. L., and H. S.Rosen. 1985. “Tax Analysis in an Oligopoly Model,” NBER Working Papers 1088, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Keen, M., and B.Lockwood. 2010. “The Value Added Tax: Its Causes and Consequences.” Journal of Development Economics92:13851.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2009.01.012Search in Google Scholar

Kenkel, D. S.. 2005. “Are Alcohol Tax Hikes Fully Passed Through to Prices? Evidence from Alaska.” American Economic Review95:2737.10.1257/000282805774670284Search in Google Scholar

Myles, G. 1996. “Imperfect Competition and the Optimal Combination of Ad Valorem and Specific Taxation.” International Tax and Public Finance3:2944.10.1007/BF00400145Search in Google Scholar

Nakamura, E. 2008. “Pass-Through in Retail and Wholesale.” American Economic Review98:4307.10.1257/aer.98.2.430Search in Google Scholar

Nakamura, E., and D.Zerom. 2010. “Accounting for Incomplete Pass-Through.” Review of Economic Studies77:1192230.10.1111/j.1467-937X.2009.589.xSearch in Google Scholar

Seade, J. K. 1980. “On the Effects of Entry.” Econometrica48:47989.10.2307/1911111Search in Google Scholar

Skeath, S., and G. A.Trandel. 1994. “A Pareto Comparison of Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes in Noncompetitive Environments.” Journal of Public Economics53:5371.10.1016/0047-2727(94)90013-2Search in Google Scholar

Smart, M., and R. M.Bird. 2009. “The Economic Incidence of Replacing a Retail Sales Tax with a Value-Added Tax: Evidence From Canadian Experience.” Canadian Public Policy35:8597.10.3138/cpp.35.1.85Search in Google Scholar

Stern, N. 1987. “The Effects of Taxation, Price Control and Government Contracts in Oligopoly and Monopolistic Competition.” Journal of Public Economics32:13358.10.1016/0047-2727(87)90009-0Search in Google Scholar

Suits, D., and R.Musgrave. 1953. “Ad Valorem and Unit Taxes Compared.” Quarterly Journal of Economics67:598604.10.2307/1883604Search in Google Scholar

Whalley, J., and V.Kononova. 2010. “Recent Russian Debate on Moving from VAT to Sales Taxes and Its Global Implications.” Journal of Globalization and Development1:4.10.2202/1948-1837.1142Search in Google Scholar

Wicksell, K. 1896. Finanztheoretische Untersuchungen Nebst Darstellung and Kritik Des Steuerwesens Schwedens. Jena: Gustav Fisher.Search in Google Scholar

Young, D. J., and A.Bielinska-Kwapisz. 2006. “Alcohol Prices, Consumption, and Traffic Fatalities.” Southern Economic Journal72:690703.Search in Google Scholar

  1. 1

    2005 is the year for the observations used by Bonnet and Réquillart (2011); soft-drink excise has been introduced in 2012 in France.

  2. 2

    In France, the excise payments are not deductible from the VAT base: after payment of and t, the producer keeps .

  3. 3

    These parameters correspond to those of Delipalla and O’Donnell (2001), with a difference in the specification of the ad valorem tax. As Delipalla and Keen (1992), they considered where the ad valorem tax rate v is applied to the selling price p. To reproduce European VAT (the ad valorem tax in the data), I consider the ad valorem tax applied to the selling price without VAT . Their v equals to . Besley and Rosen (1999) did not formalize the changing incidence of taxation, since their goal was to test full-shifting against over-shifting and under-shifting. Therefore, they only considered the pre-tax price and estimated whether it increases or decreases with respect to tax changes.

  4. 4

    Indice des prix à la consommation: consumption price index.

  5. 5

    All prices are converted to euro, because the time series of the mean prices built by INSEE are fully converted to euros.

  6. 6

    Different lags are used, from 0 (equivalent to the White method for estimating standard errors) to 4. Results are very close the ones to the others using different lags; I present the results with lag equal to 1, the most appropriate to correct autocorrelation of the residuals at first order.

Published Online: 2013-09-12

©2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston

Downloaded on 7.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bejeap-2013-0047/html
Scroll Up Arrow