Abstract
This is a short paper assessing the impacts of a targeted policy aimed to improve the quality of education for girls in India, i.e., the Kasturba Gandhi Balika Vidyalaya (KGBV) program. Under this program residential schools were built for girls in grades 6–8 (often known as middle school) and were unique because it is one of the few programs that exclusively focuses on improving school infrastructure for girls. The program was restricted to individuals belonging to backward castes in India which provides exogenous identifying variation. I use this eligibility criteria along with cohort variation in exposure to the program introduced in 2004 to estimate the impact of KGBV on enrollment and academic performance. I find that potentially affected cohorts are more likely to have attended school and perform better on reading tests. I run placebo regressions with data from a pre-policy year and do not find any effects along these dimensions providing confidence in the identification strategy.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank Tanika Chakraborty and the seminar participants at Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur for valuable feedback and suggestions. I also thank Indrajit Sinha Ray and Barun Kumar Thakur for useful discussion on the topic. Finally, I thank an anonymous referee and the editor Mariapia Mendola for the very constructive and enriching comments.
References
Debnath, Sisir. School Subsidy for Girls and Gender Gap in Enrollment 2012;Working Paper, https://792c8580-a-b03adb69-s-sites.googlegroups.com/a/virginia.edu/sisir-debnath/p/NPEGEL_SD.pdf?attachauth=ANoY7cob-TtVsIqKXrHCgv7Bi-pLQx5_AfcCyCy6nkG7G3f4KMgqBn7jak3QyjTQxXqDt19G6WBbFNRlxP0z3mcUwu0J8hL5DmvbDG-9WCIB-aEVho-89T339h1V-kQ9wGZxL8-gM9lTlGLQRzPR_L_9WGF3C4Ny_mgs5-7smBKE3HqTfkJmDwUV8hcb1S_WWzGd742xFgxP_cfsAIHF_gK8TT8O7aii5w%3D%3D&attredirects=0.Search in Google Scholar
Desai, Sonalde, and Reeve Vanneman. India Human Development Survey (IHDS). National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi. , 2005;ICPSR22626-v11. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2016-02-16 .Search in Google Scholar
Desai, Sonalde, and Reeve Vanneman. India Human Development Survey-II (IHDS-II). 2011-12;ICPSR36151-v4. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2016-04-26.Search in Google Scholar
Duflo, Esther. 2001. “Schooling and Labor Market Consequences of School Construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an Unusual Policy Experiment.” American Economic Review 91 (4): 795–813.10.3386/w7860Search in Google Scholar
Fairlie, Robert. 2016. “Do Boys and Girls Use Computers Differently, and Does It Contribute to Why Boys Do Worse in School than Girls?” The B. E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy 16 (1): 59–96.10.1515/bejeap-2015-0094Search in Google Scholar
Kazianga, Harounan, Dan Levy, Leigh L. Linden, and Matt Sloan. 2013. “The Effects of ‘Girl-Friendly’ Schools: Evidence from the BRIGHT School Construction Program in Burkina Faso.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 5 (3): 41–62.10.3386/w18115Search in Google Scholar
Meller, Marian, and Stephan Litschig. Adapting the Supply of Education to the Needs of Girls: Evidence from a Policy Experiment in Rural India. 2015;Barcelona GSE Working Paper Series; Working Paper 805.10.3368/jhr.51.3.0612-5000RSearch in Google Scholar
© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
