Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 26, 2017

The Impact of Innovation on Financial and Insurance Services Exports

Kristie Briggs


Striving for growth in service exports is an important way many service-oriented countries offset trade deficits commonly generated by a disproportional dependence on manufactured imports. Exports of business services are a significant subset of overall services trade. This paper examines whether innovation enhances exports of financial and insurance services by firms operating in these service industries. Results indicate that innovation has a sizable, positive impact on financial and insurance services exports. This holds true when examining a country’s aggregate level of insurance and financial services exports, as well as bilateral exports to a specific trade partner. However, robustness tests suggest that the positive effect of innovation on bilateral financial and insurance services exports holds true only at the extensive margin of trade (i. e. the decision to export), but not at the intensive margin (i. e. how much to export).

JEL Classification: F14; G20; O31


Ariu, A. (2012). Services versus Goods Trade: Are They the Same? National Bank of Belgium Working Paper No. 237. Brussels, Belgium.Search in Google Scholar

Baroncelli, E., C. Fink, and B.S. Javorcik. 2005. “The Global Distribution of Trademarks: Some Stylized Facts.” The World Economy 28 (6):765–778.10.1111/j.1467-9701.2005.00706.xSearch in Google Scholar

Block, J.H., C.O. Fisch, A. Hahn, and P.G. Sander. 2015. “Why Do SMEs Life Trademarks? Insights from Firms in Innovative Industries.” Research Policy 44:1915–1930.10.1016/j.respol.2015.06.007Search in Google Scholar

Borchert, I., B. Gootiiz, and A. Mattoo (2012). Policy Barriers to International Trade in Services: Evidence from a New Database. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 6109.Search in Google Scholar

Breinlich, H., and C. Criuscolo. 2011. “International Trade in Services: A Portrait of Importers and Exporters.” Journal of International Economics 84 (2):188–206.10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.03.006Search in Google Scholar

Durst, S., A.-L. Mention, and P. Poutanen. 2015. “Service Innovation and Its Impact: What Do We Know About?” Investigaciones Europeas De Dirección Economía De La Empresa 21:65–72.10.1016/j.iedee.2014.07.003Search in Google Scholar

Ebling, Günther and Janz, Norbert (October 28, 1999). Export and Innovation Activities in the German Service Sector: Empirical Evidence at the Firm Level. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 99–53. Available at in Google Scholar

Egger, P., M. Larch, and K. Staub. (2012).Trade Preferences and Bilateral Trade in Goods and Services: A Structural Approach London, UK: Centre for Economic Policy Research, CEPR Discussion Paper, Number 9051.Search in Google Scholar

Gani, A., and M.D. Clemes. 2016. “Does the Strength of Legal Systems Matter for Trade in Insurance and Financial Services?” Research in International Business and Finance 36:511–519.10.1016/j.ribaf.2015.10.008Search in Google Scholar

Gómez-Herrera, E. 2013. “Comparing Alternative Methods to Estimate Gravel Models of Bilateral Trade.” Empirical Economics 44:1087–1111.10.1007/s00181-012-0576-2Search in Google Scholar

Gotsch, M., and C. Hipp. 2012. “Measurement of Innovation Activities in the Knowledge-Intensive Services Industry: A Trademark Approach.” The Service Industries Journal 32 (13):2167–2184.10.1080/02642069.2011.574275Search in Google Scholar

Gourlay, A., J. Seaton, and J. Suppakitjarak. 2005. “The Determinants of Export Behavior in UK Service Firms.” The Service Industries Journal 25 (7):879–889.10.1080/02642060500134154Search in Google Scholar

Helpman, E., M. Melitz, and Y. Rubinstein. 2008. “Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2): 441–487.Search in Google Scholar

Hertog, P.D. 2000. “Knowledge-Intensive Business Services as Co-Producers of Innovation.” International Journal of Innovation Management 4 (4):491–528.10.1142/S136391960000024XSearch in Google Scholar

Hipp, C., and H. Grupp. 2005. “Innovation in the Service Sector: The Demand for Service-Specific Innovation Measurement Concepts and Typologies.” Research Policy 34:517–535.10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.002Search in Google Scholar

Hoekman, B., and A. Mattoo. 2013. “Liberalizing Trade in Services: Lessons from Regional and WTO Negotiations.” International Negotiation 18 (1):131–151.10.1163/15718069-12341251Search in Google Scholar

Jensen, J.B. 2008. “Trade in High-Tech Services.” Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade 8:181–197.10.1007/s10842-008-0035-0Search in Google Scholar

Kimura, F., and H.-H. Lee. 2006. “The gravity equation in international trade in services.” Review of World Economics 142 (1): 92–121.10.1007/s10290-006-0058-8Search in Google Scholar

La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Schleifer, R. Vishny, 1999. “The Quality of Government.” The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15 (1): 222–279.10.1093/jleo/15.1.222Search in Google Scholar

Love, J.H., and M.S. Mansury. 2009. “Exporting and Productivity in Business Services: Evidence from the United States.” International Business Review 18:630–642.10.1016/j.ibusrev.2009.08.002Search in Google Scholar

Maskus, K.E. 2008. “The Globalization of IPRs and Innovation Services.” Journal of Industry, Competition, and Trade 8:247–267.10.1007/s10842-008-0040-3Search in Google Scholar

Masso, J., and P. Vahler. 2012. “The Link between Innovation and Productivity in Estonia’s Services Sector.” The Service Industries Journal 32 (16):2527–2541.10.1080/02642069.2011.600444Search in Google Scholar

Mendonҫa, S., T.S. Pereira, and M.M. Godinho. 2004. “Trademarks as an Indicator of Innovation and Industrial Change.” Research Policy 33:1385–1404.10.1016/j.respol.2004.09.005Search in Google Scholar

Millot, V. (2009). Trademarks as an Indicator of Product and Marketing Innovations. OECD Science, Technology, and Industry Working Papers, 2009/06.Search in Google Scholar

Minondo, A. 2014. “The relationship between export status and productivity in services: A firm-level analysis for Spain.” Bulletin of Economic Research 66 (S1): S138–S146.Search in Google Scholar

Miozzo, M., P. Desyllas, H.-F. Lee, and I. Miles. 2016. “Innovation Collaboration and Appropriability by Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Firms.” Research Policy 47 (5): 1337–1351.Search in Google Scholar

OECD,. (Eurostat) (2005).Oslo Manual: Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data, 3rd edition. Paris, France.Search in Google Scholar

Sander, P.G., and J. Block. 2011. “The Market Value of R&D, Patents, and Trademarks.” Research Policy 40:969–985.10.1016/j.respol.2011.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Schmoch, U. 2003. “Service Marks as Novel Innovation Indicator.” Research Evaluation 12 (2):149–156.10.3152/147154403781776708Search in Google Scholar

U.S. International Trade Commission (2014). Recent Trends in U.S. Services Trade: 2014 Annual Report. Publication Number 4463, Investigation Number 332-345.Search in Google Scholar

U.S. International Trade Commission (2015). Recent Trends in U.S. Services Trade: 2015 Annual Report. Publication Number 4526, Investigation Number 332-345.Search in Google Scholar

Vergori, A.S. 2014. “Measuring Innovation in Services: The Role of Surveys Evaluate CIS Surveys.” The Service Industries Journal 34 (2):145–161.10.1080/02642069.2013.763343Search in Google Scholar

WIPO (2016). Nice Classification, Official Publication. Web. Accessed October 14 2016. in Google Scholar

World Trade Organization (2010). Measuring Trade in Services – a Training Module. Manual on statistics on international trade in services. Web. Access 14 October 2016. in Google Scholar

Zahler, A., L. Iacovone, and A. Mattoo. 2014. “Trade and Innovation in Services: Evidence from a Developing Economy.” The World Economy 37 (7):953–979.10.1111/twec.12117Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-9-26

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston