Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 23, 2019

A Psychometric Investigation of the Personality Traits Underlying Individual Tax Morale

Nicolas Jacquemet, Stéphane Luchini, Antoine Malézieux and Jason F. Shogren

Abstract

Why do people pay taxes? Rational choice theory has fallen short in answering this question. Another explanation, called “tax morale”, has been promoted. Tax morale captures the behavioral idea that non-monetary preferences (like norm-submission, moral emotions and moral judgments) might be better determinants of tax compliance than monetary trade-offs. Herein we report on two lab experiments designed to assess whether norm-submission, moral emotions (e.g. affective empathy, cognitive empathy, propensity to feel guilt and shame) or moral judgments (e.g. ethics principles, integrity, and moralization of everyday life) can help explain compliance behavior. Although we find statistically significant correlations of tax compliance behavior with empathy and shame, the economic significance of these correlations are low–—more than 80% of the variability in compliance remains unexplained. These results suggest that tax authorities should focus on the institutional context, rather than individual preference characteristics, to handle tax evasion.

JEL Classification: C9; D03; H26; H31

Acknowledgements

We thank James Alm, Cécile Bazart, Todd Cherry, Taya Cohen, Elisa Darriet, Marine Hainguerlot, Erich Kirchler, Nils Myszkowski, Drazen Prelec, Claire Vandendriessche, Marie-Claire Villeval, and Franck Zenasni for their comments and the helpful discussions from which we benefited in the development of this work. We also thank Kene Boun My for his assistance in running the experiments. The authors thank the Conseil Régional de Lorraine for its financial support. We also thank the University of Alaska-Anchorange for their support when writing up this project.

Appendix

A Description of the questionnaires used in Experiment 1

QuestionnairesSub-scalesMeasuresDescriptionNb of items
Concern for Appropriateness Scale (CAS)Cross-Situational Variability of Behavior (CSV)Behavioral variabilityCSV taps the behavioral variability that is a consequence of continually tailoring one’s actions so as to avoid disapproval7
Attention to Social Comparison Information (ATSCI)Tendency to compare behaviorMany of the items of the ATSCI subscale have a defensive connotation and of behavior comparison13
Questionnaire for Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE)Perspective Taking (PT)Intuitive perspective takingIntuitively putting oneself in another person’s shoes in order to see things from his/her perspective10
Online Simulation (OS)Costly perspective takingAn effortful attempt to put oneself in another person’s position by imagining what that person is feeling. Online simulation is likely to be used for future intentions9
Emotion Contagion (EC)Emotional contagionThe automatic mirroring of the feelings of others4
Peripheral Responsivity (PERIR)Mood transmission in a detached social contextThe affective response when witnessing the mood of others in a detached social context4
Proximal Responsivity (PROXR)Mood transmission in a closed social contextThe affective response when witnessing the mood of others in a close social context4
Guilt And Shame Proneness (GASP)Guilt - Negative Behavior-Evaluations (NBE)GuiltGuilt - NBE items describe feeling bad about how one acted4
Guilt - Repair responses (GR)Correction of transgressionsGuilt - repair items describe action tendencies (i.e. behavior or behavioral intentions) focused on correcting or compensating for the transgression4
Shame - Negative Self-Evaluations (NSE)ShameShame - NSE items describe feeling bad about oneself4
Shame - Withdrawal Responses (SW)Willingness to hide oneselfShame - withdraw items describe action tendencies focused on hiding or withdrawing from public4

B Description of the questionnaires used in Experiment 2

QuestionnaireSub-scalesMeasuresDescriptionNb of items
Ethics Position Questionnaire (EPQ)RelativismThe extent to which the individual rejects universal moral rules in favor of relativismSome individuals use moral absolutes in making moral judgments. Others do not rely on such universal moral rules10
IdealismThe extent to which the individual idealizes moral rulesSome individuals believe that “right” actions will always produce beneficial consequences. Others think that beneficial consequences will be mixed with non-beneficial ones10
Integrity scale (IS)IntegrityLevel of integrityHigher integrity involves personal commitment to moral identity that increases positive activities and reduces illicit temptations18
Moralization of Everyday Life Scale (MELS)Factor 1Use of deceptionLying or cheating to get something that one should not have had in the first place5
Factor 2Social norm violations that harm community membersViolations of social norm that harm community members5
Factor 3LazinessBehaviors adopted because of laziness5
Factor 4Failures to do goodFailures to take an opportunity to act in a good way for the community5
Factor 5Violations of the bodyUse or modifications of the body in ways that threaten body purity5
Factor 6Disgusting behaviorsBehaviors that are related to animal-like aspect of human nature5

C Additional statistics on Experiment 1

Figure 3: Declared and earned income in the first experiment.

Figure 3:

Declared and earned income in the first experiment.

Table 9:

Correlation matrix of the variables from the first experiment.

CASCSVATSCICOG. E.PTOSAFF. E.ECPROXRPERIRGUILTNBEGRSHAMENSESW
CAS1.0000
CSV0.76611.0000
ATSCI0.85810.32751.0000
COG.E.–0.05500.0150–0.09281.0000
PT–0.07080.0464–0.14120.79981.0000
OS–0.0108–0.02730.00600.74110.18981.0000
AFF.E0.17900.08100.19840.20680.03120.30341.0000
EC0.24170.17510.21550.0115–0.10570.13710.77021.0000
PROXR0.1006–0.01030.15610.26880.02500.41180.85510.58031.0000
PERIR0.06310.01540.08050.20150.15870.15200.66880.16620.38521.0000
GUILT–0.1440–0.1502–0.09170.2423–0.00720.40450.31770.17490.47310.08441.0000
NBE–0.1199–0.1013–0.09530.31340.07560.42810.35270.23250.49380.08500.90791.0000
GR–0.1223–0.1666–0.04670.0222–0.14020.19310.12460.00570.23740.04750.72480.36931.0000
SHAME0.46490.38970.37220.1273–0.03700.24960.37820.30780.35640.20280.31030.37160.07721.0000
NSE0.35690.28920.29360.20740.03290.30260.39580.34120.38780.17730.46550.47890.24480.87541.0000
SW0.42920.37240.3334–0.0231–0.11270.08820.21400.14970.18260.1594–0.00470.0950–0.16660.78510.38781.0000

D Additional statistics on Experiment 2

Figure 4: Earned and declared (for WWF) income in the second experiment.

Figure 4:

Earned and declared (for WWF) income in the second experiment.

Table 10:

Correlation matrix of the variables from the second experiment.

IdealismRelativismIntegrityF1F2F3F4F5F6
Idealism1.0000
Relativism0.14351.0000
Integrity0.59950.17761.0000
F1-Deception0.2980–0.20610.37471.0000
F2-Norm violation0.1388–0.0981–0.02820.48771.0000
F3-Laziness0.08010.14600.10560.2002–0.06211.0000
F4-Failure0.2083–0.22840.24830.65720.56860.08851.0000
F5-Body violations0.1517–0.06200.25010.54840.27960.62870.54421.0000
F6-Disgust0.0004–0.06250.03380.25970.50430.41430.25620.43611.0000

Table 11:

Multivariate regressions of compliance (for ASPAS) decisions on psychometric scores.

VariableCoef.(St. e.)
 _Idealism0.003(0.005)
 _Relativism–0.002(0.004)
_Integrity–0.010(0.008)
 _F1-Deception0.008(0.011)
 _F2-Norm violation0.002(0.012)
 _F3-Laziness–0.005(0.015)
 _F4-Failure–0.001(0.011)
 _F5-Body violations0.005(0.012)
 _F6-Disgust–0.007(0.009)
Intercept0.827(0.506)
N50
R20.09
F(9,40)0.437

References

Ajzen, I. 1985. “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior.” In Action Control, edited by Julius Kuhl and Jürgen Beckmann, 11–39. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Search in Google Scholar

Al-Khatib, J., M. Y. Rawwas, Z. Swaidan, and R. J. Rexeisen. 2005. “The Ethical Challenges of Global Business-to-Business Negotiations: An Empirical Investigation of Developing Countries’ Marketing Managers.” Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 13 (4): 46–60.10.1080/10696679.2005.11658558Search in Google Scholar

Allingham, M. G., and A. Sandmo. 1972. “Income Tax Evasion: A Theoretical Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 1: 323–38.10.1016/0047-2727(72)90010-2Search in Google Scholar

Alm, J., K. M. Bloomquist, and M. McKee. 2015. “On the External Validity of Laboratory Tax Compliance Experiments.” Economic Inquiry 53 (2): 1170–86.10.1111/ecin.12196Search in Google Scholar

Alm, J., T. Cherry, M. Jones, and M. McKee. 2010. “Taxpayer Information Assistance Services and Tax Compliance Behavior.” Journal of Economic Psychology 31 (4): 577–86.10.1016/j.joep.2010.03.018Search in Google Scholar

Alm, J., B. R. Jackson, and M. McKee. 1993. “Fiscal Exchange, Collective decision Institutions, and Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 22 (3): 285–303.10.1016/0167-2681(93)90003-8Search in Google Scholar

Alm, J., and A. Malézieux. 2019. “The Impact of Experimental and Individual Variables in Tax Evasion Games.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Alm, J., G. H. McClelland, and W. D. Schulze. 1992. “Why Do People Pay Taxes?” Journal of Public Economics 48 (1): 21–38.10.1016/0047-2727(92)90040-MSearch in Google Scholar

Alm, J., G. H. McClelland, and W. D. Schulze. 1999. “Changing the Social Norm of Tax Compliance by Voting.” Kyklos 52 (2): 141–71.10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb01440.xSearch in Google Scholar

Alm, J., and B. Torgler. 2006. “Culture Differences and Tax Morale in the United States and in Europe.” Journal of Economic Psychology 27 (2): 224–46.10.1016/j.joep.2005.09.002Search in Google Scholar

Almlund, M., A. L. Duckworth, J. Heckman, and T. Kautz. 2011. “Personality Psychology and Economics.” In Handbook of the Economics of Education, edited by Eric A. Hanushek, Stephen Machin, Ludger Woessmann, vol. 4, chap. Chapter 1, 1–181. Elsevier.Search in Google Scholar

Andreoni, J., B. Erard, and J. Feinstein. 1998. “Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (2): 818–60.Search in Google Scholar

Bachner-Melman, R., N. Bacon-Shnoor, A. H. Zohar, Y. Elizur, and R. P. Ebstein. 2009. “The Psychometric Properties of the Revised Self-Monitoring Scale (RSMS) and the Concern for Appropriateness Scale (CAS) in Hebrew.” European Journal of Psychological Assessment 25 (1): 8–15.10.1027/1015-5759.25.1.8Search in Google Scholar

Baldry, J. C. 1986. “Tax Evasion Is Not a Gamble: A Report on Two Experiments.” Economics Letters 22 (4): 333–35.10.1016/0165-1765(86)90092-3Search in Google Scholar

Barnett, T., K. Bass, and G. Brown. 1996. “Religiosity, Ethical Ideology, and Intentions to Report a Peer’s Wrongdoing.” Journal of Business Ethics 15 (11): 1161–74.10.1007/BF00412815Search in Google Scholar

Batson, C. D., J. L. Dyck, J. R. Brandt, J. G. Batson, A. L. Powell, M. R. McMaster, and C. Griffitt. 1988. “Five Studies Testing Two New Egoistic Alternatives to the Empathy-Altruism Hypothesis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 55 (1): 52–77.10.1037/0022-3514.55.1.52Search in Google Scholar

Bobek, D. D., A. M. Hageman, and C. F. Kelliher. 2013. “Analyzing the Role of Social Norms in Tax Compliance Behavior.” Journal of Business Ethics 115 (3): 451–68.10.1007/s10551-012-1390-7Search in Google Scholar

Bobek, D. D., R. W. Roberts, and J. T. Sweeney. 2007. “The Social Norms of Tax Compliance: Evidence from Australia, Singapore, and the United States.” Journal of Business Ethics 74 (1): 49–64.10.1007/s10551-006-9219-xSearch in Google Scholar

Borghans, L., A. L. Duckworth, J. J. Heckman, and B. Ter Weel. 2008. “The Economics and Psychology of Personality Traits.” Journal of Human Resources 43 (4): 972–1059.Search in Google Scholar

Boylan, S. J. 2010. “Prior Audits and Taxpayer Compliance: Experimental Evidence on the Effect of Earned Versus Endowed Income.” Journal of the American Taxation Association 32 (2): 73–88.10.2308/jata.2010.32.2.73Search in Google Scholar

Boylan, S. J., and G. B. Sprinkle. 2001. “Experimental Evidence on the Relation between Tax Rates and Compliance: The Effect of Earned vs. Endowed Income.” Journal of the American Taxation Association 23 (1): 75–90.10.2308/jata.2001.23.1.75Search in Google Scholar

Bracht, J., and T. Regner. 2013. “Moral Emotions and Partnership.” Journal of Economic Psychology 39: 313–26.10.1016/j.joep.2013.09.007Search in Google Scholar

Bühren, C., and T. C. Kundt. 2013. “Worker or Shirker? Who Evades More Taxes? A Real Effort Experiment.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Cadsby, C. B., E. Maynes, and V. U. Trivedi. 2006. “Tax Compliance and Obedience to Authority at Home and in the Lab: A New Experimental Approach.” Experimental Economics 9 (4): 343–59.10.1007/s10683-006-7053-8Search in Google Scholar

Calvet, C. R., and J. Alm. 2014. “Empathy, Sympathy, and Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Psychology 40: 62–82.10.1016/j.joep.2012.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Child, J. T., and E. A. Agyeman-Budu. 2010. “Blogging Privacy Management Rule Development: The Impact of Self-Monitoring Skills, Concern for Appropriateness, and Blogging Frequency.” Computers in Human Behavior 26 (5): 957–63.10.1016/j.chb.2010.02.009Search in Google Scholar

Choo, C. L., M. A. Fonseca, and G. D. Myles. 2015. “Do Students Behave Like Real Taxpayers in the Lab? Evidence from a Real Effort Tax Compliance Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 124: 102–14.Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, T. R. 2010. “Moral Emotions and Unethical Bargaining: The Differential Effects of Empathy and Perspective Taking in Deterring Deceitful Negotiation.” Journal of Business Ethics 94 (4): 569–79.10.1007/s10551-009-0338-zSearch in Google Scholar

Cohen, T. R., A. T. Panter, and N. Turan. 2012. “Guilt Proneness and Moral Character.” Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (5): 355–59.10.1177/0963721412454874Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, T. R., A. T. Panter, N. Turan, L. Morse, and Y. Kim. 2013. “Agreement and Similarity in Self-Other Perceptions of Moral Character.” Journal of Research in Personality 47 (6): 816–30.10.1016/j.jrp.2013.08.009Search in Google Scholar

Cohen, T. R., S. T. Wolf, A. T. Panter, and C. A. Insko. 2011. “Introducing the GASP Scale: A New Measure of Guilt and Shame Proneness”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (5): 947–66.10.1037/a0022641Search in Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., M. Joffily, C. Montmarquette, and M. C. Villeval. 2010. “Cheating, Emotions, and Rationality: An Experiment on Tax Evasion.” Experimental Economics 13 (2): 226–47.10.1007/s10683-010-9237-5Search in Google Scholar

Coricelli, G., E. Rusconi, and M. C. Villeval. 2014. “Tax Evasion and Emotions: An Empirical Test of Re-integrative Shaming Theory.” Journal of Economic Psychology 40: 49–61.10.1016/j.joep.2012.12.002Search in Google Scholar

Craft, J. L. 2013. “A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 2004–2011.” Journal of Business Ethics 117 (2): 221–59.10.1007/s10551-012-1518-9Search in Google Scholar

Crissman, P. 1942. “Temporal Change and Sexual Difference in Moral Judgments.” The Journal of Social Psychology 16 (1): 29–38.10.1080/00224545.1942.9714102Search in Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. 1951. “Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests.” Psychometrika 16 (3): 297–334.10.1007/BF02310555Search in Google Scholar

Dal Bó, P., A. Foster, and L. Putterman. 2010. “Institutions and Behavior: Experimental Evidence on the Effects of Democracy.” American Economic Review 100 (5): 2205–29.10.1257/aer.100.5.2205Search in Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. 1994. Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. New York: Putnam.Search in Google Scholar

Davis, M. A., M. G. Andersen, and M. B. Curtis. 2001. “Measuring Ethical Ideology in Business Ethics: A Critical Analysis of the Ethics Position Questionnaire.” Journal of Business Ethics 32(1): 35–53.10.1023/A:1010701417165Search in Google Scholar

Dorantes, C. A., B. Hewitt, and T. Goles. 2006. “Ethical Decision-Making in an IT Context: The Roles of Personal Moral Philosophies and Moral Intensity.” In Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference, Kauia, HI, USA, vol. 8, 206–16.Search in Google Scholar

Doris, J. M. 2010. “Introduction.” In The Moral Psychology Handbook, edited by J. M. Doris, and the Moral Psychology Research Group. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Dulleck, U., J. Fooken, C. Newton, A. Ristl, M. Schaffner, and B. Torgler. 2016. “Tax Compliance and Psychic Costs: Behavioral Experimental Evidence Using a Physiological Marker.” Journal of Public Economics 134: 9–18.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2015.12.007Search in Google Scholar

Dunn, P., J. Farrar, and C. Hausserman. 2016. “The Influence of Guilt Cognitions on Taxpayers’ Voluntary Disclosures.” Journal of Business Ethics, 1–13.Search in Google Scholar

Durham, Y., T. S. Manly, and C. Ritsema. 2014. “The Effects of Income Source, Context, and Income Level on Tax Compliance Decisions in a Dynamic Experiment.” Journal of Economic Psychology 40: 220–33.10.1016/j.joep.2012.09.012Search in Google Scholar

Erard, B., and J. S. Feinstein. 1994. “Honesty and Evasion in the Tax Compliance Game.” The RAND Journal of Economics 25 (1): 1–19.10.2307/2555850Search in Google Scholar

Etter, S., J. J. Cramer, and S. Finn. 2006. “Origins of Academic Dishonesty: Ethical Orientations and Personality Factors Associated with Attitudes about Cheating with Information Technology.” Journal of Research on Technology in Education 39(2): 133–55.10.1080/15391523.2006.10782477Search in Google Scholar

Forsyth, D. R. 1980. “A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 (1): 175–84.10.1037/0022-3514.39.1.175Search in Google Scholar

Frank, R. H. 1988. Passion Within Reason. New York: WW Norton & Company.Search in Google Scholar

Ghosh, D., and T. L. Crain. 1995. “Ethical Standards, Attitudes Toward Risk, and Intentional Noncompliance: An Experimental Investigation.” Journal of Business Ethics 14 (5): 353–65.10.1007/BF00872098Search in Google Scholar

Gordon, J. P. P. 1989. “Individual Morality and Reputation Costs as Deterrents to Tax Evasion.” European Economic Review 33 (4): 797–805.10.1016/0014-2921(89)90026-3Search in Google Scholar

Greiner, B. 2015. “Subject Pool Recruitment Procedures: Organizing Experiments with ORSEE.” Journal of the Economic Science Association 1 (1): 1–12.Search in Google Scholar

Haidt, J. 2001. “The Emotional Dog and Its Rational Tail: A Social Intuitionist Approach to Moral Judgment.” Psychological Review 108 (4): 814–34.10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814Search in Google Scholar

Haidt, J. 2008. “Morality.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 3 (1): 65–72.10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00063.xSearch in Google Scholar

Henderson, B. C., and S. E. Kaplan. 2005. “An Examination of the Role of Ethics in Tax Compliance Decisions.” Journal of the American Taxation Association 27 (1): 39–72.10.2308/jata.2005.27.1.39Search in Google Scholar

Hill, P. L., A. L. Burrow, J. W. Brandenberger, D. K. Lapsley, and J. C. Quaranto. 2010. “Collegiate Purpose Orientations and Well-being in Early and Middle Adulthood.” Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 31 (2): 173–79.10.1016/j.appdev.2009.12.001Search in Google Scholar

Howell, A. J., J. B. Turowski, and K. Buro. 2012. “Guilt, Empathy, and Apology.” Personality and Individual Differences 53 (7): 917–22.10.1016/j.paid.2012.06.021Search in Google Scholar

Jacquemet, N., S. Luchini, A. Malézieux, and J. Shogren. 2016. “L’évasion fiscale est-elle un trait de personnalité? Une évaluation empirique des déterminants psychologiques de la ‘ morale fiscale ’ [Is tax evasion a personality trait? An empirical evaluation of psychological determinants of ‘ tax morale ’].” Revue économique, Forthcoming.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, M. A. 1984. “Concern for Appropriateness Scale and Behavioral Conformity.” Journal of Personality Assessment 53 (3): 567–74.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R., and B. Schlenker. 2007. “Assessing the Commitment to Ethical Principles: Psychometric Properties of the Integrity Scale.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Jourdheuil, R., and E. Petit. 2015. “Émotions morales et comportement prosocial: Une revue de la littérature [Moral emotions and pro-social behavior: A literature review].” Revue d’économie politique 125 (4): 499–525.10.3917/redp.254.0499Search in Google Scholar

Kamei, K. 2014. “Democracy and Resilient Pro-Social Behavioral Change: An Experimental Study.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

King, S., and S. M. Sheffrin. 2002. “Tax Evasion and Equity Theory: An Investigative Approach.” International Tax and Public Finance 9 (4): 505–21.10.1023/A:1016528406214Search in Google Scholar

Kirchler, E., S. Muehlbacher, E. Hoelzl, and P. Webley. 2009. Effort and Aspirations in Tax Evasion: Experimental Evidence.” Applied Psychology 58 (3): 488–507.10.1111/j.1464-0597.2009.00403.xSearch in Google Scholar

Kleven, H. J., M. B. Knudsen, C. T. Kreiner, S. Pedersen, and E. Saez. 2011. “Unwilling or Unable to Cheat? Evidence from a Tax audit Experiment in Denmark.” Econometrica 79 (3): 651–92.10.3982/ECTA9113Search in Google Scholar

Lago-Peñas, I., and S. Lago-Peñas. 2010. “The Determinants of Tax Morale in Comparative Perspective: Evidence from European Countries.” European Journal of Political Economy 26 (4): 441–53.10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2010.06.003Search in Google Scholar

Lamberton, C. P., J.-E. De Neve, and M. I. Norton. 2014. “Eliciting Taxpayer Preferences Increases Tax Compliance.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Le Sage, S., and E. Van der Heijden. 2015. “The Effect of Voting on Contributions in a Public Goods Game.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Lefevor, G. T., B. J. Fowers, S. Ahn, S. F. Lang, and L. M. Cohen. 2017. “To What Degree Do Situational Influences Explain Spontaneous Helping Behaviour? A Meta-Analysis.” European Review of Social Psychology, 1–30.Search in Google Scholar

Lennox, R. D., and R. N. Wolfe. 1984. “Construct Validity of the Concern for Appropriateness Scale.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 (6): 1349–64.Search in Google Scholar

Lewis, N. P., and B. Zhong. 2011. “The Personality of Plagiarism.” Journalism & Mass Communication Educator 66 (4): 325–39.10.1177/107769581106600403Search in Google Scholar

Little, T. D., and M. Rhemtulla. 2013. “Planned Missing Data Designs for Developmental Researchers.” Child Development Perspectives 7 (4): 199–204.10.1111/cdep.12043Search in Google Scholar

Lockwood, P. L., A. Seara-Cardoso, and E. Viding. 2014. “Emotion Regulation Moderates the Association between Empathy and Prosocial Behavior.” PloS one 9 (5).Search in Google Scholar

Lovett, B. J., A. H. Jordan, and S. S. Wiltermuth. 2012. “Individual Differences in the Moralization of Everyday Life.” Ethics & Behavior 22 (4): 248–57.10.1080/10508422.2012.659132Search in Google Scholar

Low, B., J. A. Al-Khatib, S. M. Vollmers, and Y. Liu. 2007. “Business-to-Business Negotiating in China: The Role of Morality.” Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing 22 (2): 84–96.10.1108/08858620710730203Search in Google Scholar

Luttmer, E. F. P., and M. Singhal. 2014. “Tax Morale.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28 (4): 149–68.10.1257/jep.28.4.149Search in Google Scholar

Maciejovsky, B., H. Schwarzenberger, and E. Kirchler. 2012. “Rationality versus emotions: The case of tax ethics and compliance.” Journal of Business Ethics 109 (3): 339–50.10.1007/s10551-011-1132-2Search in Google Scholar

Markussen, T., L. Putterman, and J.-R. Tyran. 2013. “Self-Organization for Collective Action: An Experimental Study of Voting on Sanction Regimes.” The Review of Economic Studies 81: 301–24.Search in Google Scholar

McGee, R. W. 2011. The Ethics of Tax Evasion: Perspectives in Theory and Practice. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Search in Google Scholar

Meng, C. L., J. Othman, J. L. D’Silva, and Z. Omar. 2014. “Ethical Decision Making in Academic Dishonesty with Application of Modified Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review.” International Education Studies 7 (3): 126–39.Search in Google Scholar

Messer, K. D., J. F. Suter, and J. Yan. 2013. “Context Effects in a Negatively Framed Social Dilemma Experiment.” Environmental and Resource Economics 55 (3): 387–405.10.1007/s10640-012-9631-xSearch in Google Scholar

Messer, K. D., H. Zarghamee, H. M. Kaiser, and W. D. Schulze. 2007. “New Hope for the Voluntary Contributions Mechanism: The Effects of Context.” Journal of Public Economics 91 (9): 1783–99.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2007.08.001Search in Google Scholar

Michaels, T. M., W. P. Horan, E. J. Ginger, Z. Martinovich, A. E. Pinkham, and M. J. Smith. 2014. “Cognitive Empathy Contributes to Poor Social Functioning in Schizophrenia: Evidence from a New Self-report Measure of Cognitive and Affective Empathy.” Psychiatry Research 220 (3): 803–10.10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.054Search in Google Scholar

Miller, M. L., R. S. Omens, and R. Delvadia. 1991. “Dimensions of Social Competence: Personality and Coping style Correlates.” Personality and Individual Differences 12 (9): 955–64.10.1016/0191-8869(91)90185-ESearch in Google Scholar

Mittone, L. 2006. “Dynamic Behaviour in Tax Evasion: An Experimental Approach.” Journal of Socio-Economics 35 (5): 813–35.10.1016/j.socec.2005.11.065Search in Google Scholar

Moore, C., J. R. Detert, L. Klebe Treviño, V. L. Baker, and D. M. Mayer. 2012. “Why Employees Do Bad Things: Moral Disengagement and Unethical Organizational Behavior.” Personnel Psychology 65 (1): 1–48.10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01237.xSearch in Google Scholar

Muehlbacher, S., and E. Kirchler. 2009. “Origin of Endowments in Public Good Games: The Impact of Effort on Contributions.” Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics 2 (1): 59–67.10.1037/a0015458Search in Google Scholar

Murray, A. 1984. “Cheating Uncle Sam.” Wall Street Journal, 1, 12.Search in Google Scholar

Myszkowski, N., E. Brunet-Gouet, P. Roux, L. Robieux, A. Malézieux, E. Boujut, and F. Zenasni. 2016. “Is the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy Measuring Two or Five Dimensions? Evidence in a French Sample.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Myszkowski, N., M. Storme, F. Zenasni, and T. Lubart. 2014. “Appraising the Duality of Self-Monitoring: Psychometric Qualities of the Revised Self-Monitoring Scale and the Concern for Appropriateness Scale in French.” Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science 46 (3): 387–96.10.1037/a0033107Search in Google Scholar

Noll, J., K. Schnell, and S. Zdravkovic. 2016. “Tax and Ethics: A Panoramic View.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

OECD. 2013. “What Drives Tax Morale?” OECD Tax and Development Programme.Search in Google Scholar

Prinz, J. J., and S. Nichols. 2010. “Moral Emotions.” In The Moral Psychology Handbook, edited by J. M. Doris, and the Moral Psychology Research Group. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Ragsdale, J. D., and F. E. Brandau-Brown. 2005. “Individual Differences in the Use of Relational Maintenance Strategies in Marriage.” The Journal of Family Communication 5(1): 61–75.10.1207/s15327698jfc0501_4Search in Google Scholar

Reckers, P. M., D. L. Sanders, and S. J. Roark. 1994. “The Influence of Ethical Attitudes on Taxpayer Compliance.” National Tax Journal 47 (4): 825–36.Search in Google Scholar

Reniers, R. L., R. Corcoran, R. Drake, N. M. Shryane, and B. A. Völlm. 2011. “The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy.” Journal of Personality Assessment 93 (1): 84–95.10.1080/00223891.2010.528484Search in Google Scholar

Reniers, R. L., R. Corcoran, B. A. Völlm, A. Mashru, R. Howard, and P. F. Liddle. 2012. “Moral Decision-Making, ToM, Empathy and the Default Mode Network.” Biological Psychology 90 (3): 202–10.10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.03.009Search in Google Scholar

Sabini, J., M. Siepmann, J. Stein, and M. Meyerowitz. 2000. “Who Is Embarrassed by What?” Cognition and Emotion 14 (2): 213–40.10.1080/026999300378941Search in Google Scholar

Schaumberg, R. L., and F. J. Flynn. 2012. “Uneasy Lies the Head that Wears the Crown: The Link between Guilt Proneness and Leadership.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 103 (2): 327.10.1037/a0028127Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R. 2008. “Integrity and Character: Implications of Principled and Expedient Ethical Ideologies.” Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 27 (10): 1078–125.10.1521/jscp.2008.27.10.1078Search in Google Scholar

Schlenker, B. R., J. R. Chambers, and B. M. Le. 2012. “Conservatives Are Happier Than Liberals, But Why? Political Ideology, Personality, and Life Satisfaction.” Journal of Research in Personality 46 (2): 127–46.10.1016/j.jrp.2011.12.009Search in Google Scholar

Scholz, J. T., and M. Lubell. 1998. “Trust and Taxpaying: Testing the Heuristic Approach to Collective Action.” American Journal of Political Science 42 (2): 398–417.10.2307/2991764Search in Google Scholar

Seara-Cardoso, A., H. Dolberg, C. Neumann, J. P. Roiser, and E. Viding. 2013. “Empathy, Morality and Psychopathic Traits in Women.” Personality and Individual Differences 55 (3): 328–33.10.1016/j.paid.2013.03.011Search in Google Scholar

Shepperd, J. A., W. A. Miller, C. T. Smith, and J. Algina. 2014. “Does Religion Offer Worldviews that Dissuade Adolescent Substance Use?” Psychology of Religion and Spirituality 6 (4): 292–301.10.1037/a0037052Search in Google Scholar

Sierra, J. J., and M. R. Hyman. 2008. “Ethical Antecedents of Cheating Intentions: Evidence of Mediation.” Journal of Academic Ethics 6 (1): 51–66.10.1007/s10805-008-9056-xSearch in Google Scholar

Singhapakdi, A., S. J. Vitell, and G. R. Franke. 1999. “Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Effects of Perceived Moral Intensity and Personal Moral Philosophies.” Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 27 (1): 19–36.10.1177/0092070399271002Search in Google Scholar

Smith, B., and F. Shen. 2013. “We All Think It’s Cheating, But We All Won’t Report It: Insights into the Ethics of Marketing Students.” Journal for Advancement of Marketing Education 21 (1): 27–37.Search in Google Scholar

Stoeber, J., and H. Yang. 2016. “Moral Perfectionism and Moral Values, Virtues, and Judgments: Further Investigations.” Personality and Individual Differences 88: 6–11.10.1016/j.paid.2015.08.031Search in Google Scholar

Sullivan, D., M. J. Landau, I. F. Young, and S. A. Stewart. 2014. “The Dramaturgical Perspective in Relation to Self and Culture.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 107 (5): 767–90.10.1037/a0037904Search in Google Scholar

Swenson, C. 1996. “Experimental Market Evidence on Implicit Taxes.” Working Paper.Search in Google Scholar

Tangney, J., R. Dearing, P. Wagner, and R. Gramzow. 2000. “The Test of Self-Conscious Afffec-3 (TOSCA-3).” Unpublished instrument.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas, K. D. 2015. “The Psychic Cost of Tax Evasion.” Boston College Law Review 56: 617–70.Search in Google Scholar

Thurman, Q. C., C. S. John, and L. Riggs. 1984. “Neutralization and Tax Evasion: How Effective Would a Moral Appeal be in Improving Compliance to Tax Laws?” Law & Policy 6 (3): 309–27.10.1111/j.1467-9930.1984.tb00329.xSearch in Google Scholar

Torgler, B. 2002. “Speaking to Theorists and Searching for Facts: Tax Morale and Tax Compliance in Experiments.” Journal of Economic Surveys 16 (5): 657–83.10.1111/1467-6419.00185Search in Google Scholar

Torgler, B., and F. Schneider. 2007. “What Shapes Attitudes Toward Paying Taxes? Evidence from Multicultural European Countries.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (2): 443–70.10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00466.xSearch in Google Scholar

Torgler, B., and F. Schneider. 2009. “The Impact of Tax Morale and Institutional Quality on the Shadow Economy.” Journal of Economic Psychology 30 (2): 228–45.10.1016/j.joep.2008.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Wahl, I., S. Muehlbacher, and E. Kirchler. 2010. “The Impact of Voting on Tax Payments.” Kyklos 63 (1): 144–58.10.1111/j.1467-6435.2010.00464.xSearch in Google Scholar

Wartick, M. L., S. A. Madeo, and C. C. Vines. 1999. “Reward Dominance in Tax-Reporting Experiments: The Role of Context.” Journal of the American Taxation Association 21 (1): 20–31.10.2308/jata.1999.21.1.20Search in Google Scholar

Wenzel, M. 2005. “Motivation or Rationalisation? Causal Relations between Ethics, Norms and Tax Compliance.” Journal of Economic Psychology 26 (4): 491–508.10.1016/j.joep.2004.03.003Search in Google Scholar

Wolfe, R. N., R. D. Lennox, and B. L. Cutler. 1986. “Getting Along and Getting Ahead: Empirical Support for a Theory of Protective and Acquisitive Self-Presentation.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50 (2): 356–61.10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.356Search in Google Scholar

Wowra, S. A. 2007. “Moral Identities, Social Anxiety, and Academic Dishonesty among American College Students.” Ethics & Behavior 17 (3): 303–21.10.1080/10508420701519312Search in Google Scholar

Yoder, K. J., and J. Decety. 2014. “Spatiotemporal Neural Dynamics of Moral Judgment: A High-Density ERP Study.” Neuropsychologia 60: 39–45.10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.022Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (DOI:https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2018-0149).

Published Online: 2019-04-23

© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston