Abstract
This paper sheds light on how labor market regulations affect the relationship between different types of innovation and employment in Latin America. We estimate the effect of process and product innovation on employment growth using Enterprise Surveys for 14 Latin American countries. We calculate the model for the whole sample and then classify countries according to the rigidness of their labor market regulations. We find that: (i) product innovations have a positive impact on employment growth; (ii) process innovations do not affect employment growth; and (iii) more rigid labor market regulations (minimum wages and severance payments) reduce the effects of innovation.
Appendix
A Additional Robustness Checks
Robustness check – additional instruments.
(1) | (2) | (3) | (4) | (5) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
All | High MWE | Low MWE | High SP | Low SP | |
(B) Instrumental variables (Instruments: innovation support & R&D) | |||||
g2 | 0.8312*** | 0.7579 | 0.8694*** | 0.6633 | 0.9101** |
(0.320) | (0.652) | (0.250) | (0.521) | (0.396) | |
D | 0.0006 | 0.0085 | −0.0131 | −0.0110 | 0.0083 |
(0.039) | (0.079) | (0.031) | (0.077) | (0.045) | |
Constant | 0.0422 | 0.0793 | −0.0204 | 0.0433 | 0.1358 |
(0.055) | (0.109) | (0.065) | (0.103) | (0.090) | |
F-stat | 37.72 | 11.51 | 32.08 | 11.57 | 27.30 |
H0: β = 1 (p-value) | 0.598 | 0.710 | 0.602 | 0.518 | 0.820 |
Sargan test | 0.0384 | 0.0384 | 1.478 | 0.0347 | 0.00543 |
p-value | 0.845 | 0.845 | 0.224 | 0.852 | 0.941 |
Observations | 3,164 | 1,695 | 1,469 | 814 | 2,350 |
Sector & country FE | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Controls | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Notes: SE clustered by country-sector in parentheses; * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, and *** p < 0.01. Controls: age, age2, ln(employment beginning) & foreign.
Robustness check: minimum wage effectiveness based on median wages.
(1) | (2) | |
---|---|---|
MWE high | MWE low | |
(A) OLS | ||
g2 | 0.4122* | 0.6061*** |
(0.243) | (0.212) | |
d | −0.0301 | −0.0323 |
(0.027) | (0.038) | |
Constant | 0.1173** | −0.0084 |
(0.048) | (0.066) | |
(B) Instrumental variables (Instrument: innovation support) | ||
g2 | 0.5478 | 1.0328* |
(0.681) | (0.537) | |
d | −0.0170 | 0.0023 |
(0.075) | (0.057) | |
Constant | 0.0983 | −0.0495 |
(0.108) | (0.092) | |
F-stat | 19.24 | 17.85 |
H0: β = 1 (p-value) | 0.507 | 0.951 |
Observations | 1,965 | 1,044 |
Controls | Yes | Yes |
Sector & country FE | Yes | Yes |
Notes: SE clustered by country-sector in parentheses; * p < 0.1, ** p < 0.05, and *** p < 0.01.
Controls: age, age2, ln(employment beginning) & foreign.
References
Aaronson, D., and B. J. Phelan. 2017. “Wage Shocks and the Technological Substitution of Low-Wage Jobs.” The Economic Journal 129 (617): 1–34.10.17848/wp17-266Search in Google Scholar
Ahsan, A., and C. Pages. 2009. “Are All Labor Regulations Equal? Evidence from Indian Manufacturing.” Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (1): 62–75.10.1016/j.jce.2008.09.001Search in Google Scholar
Alaniz, E., T. H. Gindling, and K. Terrell. 2011. “The Impact of Minimum Wages on Wages, Work and Poverty in Nicaragua.” Labour Economics 18: S45–S59.10.1016/j.labeco.2011.06.010Search in Google Scholar
Amin, M. 2009. “Labour Regulation and Employment in India’s Retail Stores.” Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (1): 47–61.10.1016/j.jce.2008.07.001Search in Google Scholar
Andrews, D., C. Criscuolo, and C. Menon. 2014. “Do Resources Flow to Patenting Firms? Cross-Country Evidence from Firm Level Data.” OECD Economic Department Working Papers, No. 1127, Paris: OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Arango-Arango, C., and A. Pachón. 2007. “The Minimum Wage in Colombia 1984-2001: Favoring the Middle Class with a Bite on the Poor.” Ensayos Sobre Política Económica 25 (55): 148–93.10.32468/Espe.5505Search in Google Scholar
Basker, E., L. Foster, and S. Klimek. 2017. “Customer-Employee Substitution: Evidence from Gasoline Stations.” Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 26 (4): 876–96.10.1111/jems.12215Search in Google Scholar
Bassanini, A., and E. Ernst. 2002. “Labour Market Institutions, Product Market Regulation, and Innovation: Cross-Country Evidence.” OECD Economics Department Working Paper, No.316, Paris: OECD Publishing.Search in Google Scholar
Benavente, J. M., and R. Lauterbach. 2008. “Technological Innovation and Employment: Complements or Substitutes?” The European Journal of Development Research 20 (2): 318–29.10.1080/09578810802060744Search in Google Scholar
Besley, TJ, and R. Burges. 2004. “Can Labour Regulations Hinder Economic Performance? Evidence from India.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (1): 91–134.10.1162/003355304772839533Search in Google Scholar
Blanchard, O., and J. Wolfers. 2000. “The Role of Shocks and Institutions in the Rise of European Unemployment: The Aggregate Evidence.” The Economic Journal 110 (462): 1–33.10.1111/1468-0297.00518Search in Google Scholar
Boeri, T. 2011. Institutional Reforms and Dualism in European Labor Markets. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4 (Part B): 1173–236.Search in Google Scholar
Bogliacino, F., M. Piva, and M. Vivarelli. 2012. “R&D and Employment: An Application of the Lsdvc Estimator Using European Microdata.” Economics Letters 116 (1): 56–59.10.1016/j.econlet.2012.01.010Search in Google Scholar
Calvino, F., and M. E. Virgillito. 2018. “The Innovation-Employment Nexus: A Critical Survey of Theory and Empirics.” Journal of Economic Surveys 32 (1): 83–117.10.1111/joes.12190Search in Google Scholar
Cirera, X., and S. Muzi. 2016. “Measuring Firm-Level Innovation Using Short Questionnaires: Evidence from an Experiment.” Policy Research Working Paper no. WPS 7696 World Bank Group, Washington, D.C., June 2016.Search in Google Scholar
Coad, A., and R. Rao. 2011. “The Firm-Level Employment Effects of Innovations in High-Tech Us Manufacturing Industries.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 21 (2): 255–83.10.1007/s00191-010-0209-xSearch in Google Scholar
Coad, A., A. Segarra, and M. Teruel. 2016. “Innovation and Firm Growth: Does Firm Age Play a Role?” Research Policy 45 (2): 387–400.10.1016/j.respol.2015.10.015Search in Google Scholar
Crespi, G., E. Tacsir, and M. Pereira. 2019. “Effects of Innovation on Employment in Latin America.” Industrial and Corporate Change 28 (1): 139–59.10.1093/icc/dty062Search in Google Scholar
Dachs, B., and B. Peters. 2014. “Innovation, Employment Growth, and Foreign Ownership of Firms: A European Perspective.” Research Policy 43 (1): 214–32.10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.001Search in Google Scholar
De Elejalde, R., D. Giuliodori, and R. Stucchi. 2015. “Employment and Innovation: Firm-Level Evidence from Argentina.” Emerging Markets Finance and Trade 51 (1): 27–47.10.1080/1540496X.2015.998088Search in Google Scholar
De Spiegelaere, S., G. Van Gyes, H. De Witte, W. Niesen, and G. Van Hootegem. 2014. “On the Relation of Job Insecurity, Job Autonomy, Innovative Work Behaviour and the Mediating Effect of Work Engagement.” Creativity and Innovation Management 23 (3): 318–30.10.1111/caim.12079Search in Google Scholar
Del Carpio, X., H. Nguyen, L. Pabon, and L. C. Wang. 2015. “Do Minimum Wages Affect Employment? Evidence from the Manufacturing Sector in Indonesia.” IZA Journal of Labor & Development 4 (1): 17.10.1186/s40175-015-0040-8Search in Google Scholar
Gindling, T. H., and K. Terrell. 2007. “The Effects of Multiple Minimum Wages Throughout the Labor Market: The Case of Costa Rica.” Labour Economics 14 (3): 485–511.10.1016/j.labeco.2006.01.004Search in Google Scholar
Giuliodori, D., and R. Stucchi. 2012. “Innovation and Job Creation in a Dual Labor Market: Evidence from Spain.” Economics of Innovation and New Technology 21 (8): 801–13.10.1080/10438599.2012.670696Search in Google Scholar
Greenan, N., and D. Guellec. 2000. “Technological Innovation and Employment Reallocation.” Labour 14 (4): 547–90.10.1111/1467-9914.00146Search in Google Scholar
Hall, B. H., F. Lotti, and J. Mairesse. 2009. “Innovation and Productivity in SMES: Empirical Evidence for Italy.” Small Business Economics 33 (1): 13–33.10.1007/s11187-009-9184-8Search in Google Scholar
Harrison, R., J. Jaumandreu, J. Mairesse, and B. Peters. 2014. “Does Innovation Stimulate Employment? A Firm-Level Analysis Using Comparable Micro-Data from Four European Countries.” International Journal of Industrial Organization 35: 29–43.10.1016/j.ijindorg.2014.06.001Search in Google Scholar
Heckman, J. J., and C Pages. 2000. “The Cost of Job Security Regulation: Evidence from Latin American Labour Markets.” Economia 1 (1): 109–44.10.3386/w7773Search in Google Scholar
Hopenhayn, H, and R. Rogerson. 1993. “Job Turnover and Policy Evaluations: A General Equilibrium Analysis.” Journal of Political Economy 101 (October): 915–38.10.1086/261909Search in Google Scholar
Kaplan, D. S. 2009. “Job Creation and Labor Reform in Latin America.” Journal of Comparative Economics 37 (1): 91–105.10.1016/j.jce.2008.10.002Search in Google Scholar
Kugler, A. 2004. “The Effect of Job Security Regulations on Labour Market Flexibility: Evidence from the Colombian Labour Market Reform. Chapter 3.” In Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean, edited by J. Heckman, and C. Pages, 183–228. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226322858.003.0004Search in Google Scholar
Lee, D. S. 1999. “Wage Inequality in the United States during the 1980s: Rising Dispersion or Falling Minimum Wage?” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 114 (3): 977–1023.10.1162/003355399556197Search in Google Scholar
Lemos, S., R. Rigobon, and K. Lang. 2004. “Minimum Wage Policy and Employment Effects: Evidence from Brazil.” Economia 5 (1): 219–66.10.1353/eco.2005.0007Search in Google Scholar
Lordan, G., and D. Neumark. 2018. “People versus Machines: The Impact of Minimum Wages on Automatable Jobs.” Labour Economics 52: 40–53.10.1016/j.labeco.2018.03.006Search in Google Scholar
Maloney, W., and J. Mendez. 2004. “Measuring the Impact of Minimum Wages. Evidence from Latin America.” In Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean, edited by James J. Heckman, and Carmen Pages. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226322858.003.0002Search in Google Scholar
Meer, J., and J. West. 2016. “Effects of the Minimum Wage on Employment Dynamics.” Journal of Human Resources 51 (2): 500–22.10.3368/jhr.51.2.0414-6298R1Search in Google Scholar
Montenegro, C. E., and C. Pagés. 2004. “Who Benefits from Labor Market Regulations?” In Law and Employment: Lessons from Latin America and the Caribbean, edited by James J. Heckman, and Carmen Pages. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226322858.003.0008Search in Google Scholar
Neumark, D., W. Cunningham, and L. Siga. 2006. “The Effects of the Minimum Wage in Brazil on the Distribution of Family Incomes: 1996–2001.” Journal of Development Economics 80 (1): 136–59.10.1016/j.jdeveco.2005.02.001Search in Google Scholar
Neumark, D., J. I. Salas, and W. Wascher. 2014. “More on Recent Evidence on the Effects of Minimum Wages in the United States.” IZA Journal of Labor Policy 3 (1): 24.10.1186/2193-9004-3-24Search in Google Scholar
Olea, J. L. M., and C. Pflueger. 2013. “A Robust Test for Weak Instruments.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 31 (3): 358–69.10.1080/00401706.2013.806694Search in Google Scholar
Scarpetta, S. 2014. “Employment Protection.” IZA World of Labor 12. https://doi.org/10.15185/izawol.12.Search in Google Scholar
Scarpetta, S., and T. Tressel. 2004. “Boosting Productivity via Innovation and Adoption of New Technologies: Any Role for Labor Market Institutions?” Social Protection and Labor Policy and Technical Notes 29144, The World Bank.10.2139/ssrn.535682Search in Google Scholar
Smolny, W. 1998. “Innovations, Prices and Employment: A Theoretical Model and an Empirical Application for West German Manufacturing Firms.” The Journal of Industrial Economics 46 (3): 359–81.10.1111/1467-6451.00076Search in Google Scholar
Stam, E., and K. Wennberg. 2009. “The Roles of R&D in New Firm Growth.” Small Business Economics 33 (1): 77–89.10.1007/s11187-009-9183-9Search in Google Scholar
Stock, J. H., J. H. Wright, and M. Yogo. 2002. “A Survey of Weak Instruments and Weak Identification in Generalized Method of Moments.” Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 20 (4): 518–29.10.1198/073500102288618658Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, H., R. Dekker, and A. Kleinknecht. 2011. “Flexible Labor and Innovation Performance: Evidence from Longitudinal Firm-Level Data.” Industrial and Corporate Change 20 (3): 941–68.10.1093/icc/dtr013Search in Google Scholar
Note
We thank Marisol Rodriguez Chatruc, Lucas Figal Garone, and the participants at the 23th LACEA Meeting for useful comments. The usual disclaimers apply. The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent those of the InterAmerican Development Bank or IDB Invest, their Board of Executive Directors or the countries they represent.
© 2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston