Abstract
We investigate the effectiveness of task meaning, time pressure, and knowing the upper bound of performance (maximum performance goal) in a reciprocal information digitization task and their interactions. Participants search information about schools where the quantity dimension of information refers to the number of schools and the quality dimension to finding the correct name of the headmaster. We obtain measures of quality (correctly entered information) and quantity (number of digitized entities). Time pressure has a positive effect on quantity and a negative on quality. Moreover, we cannot replicate the positive effects of high task meaning found in previous research. This indicates that its effectiveness might depend on the work context. While time pressure significantly decreases quality, its interaction with task meaning and maximum performance goals increases quantity marginally without loss in quality.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank seminar participants at the University of Düsseldorf. The usual disclaimer applies.
References
Ariely, D., E. Kamenica, and D. Prelec. 2008. “Man’s Search for Meaning: The Case of Legos.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 67 (3): 671–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2008.01.004.Search in Google Scholar
Ashraf, N., O. Bandiera, and B. Kelsey Jack. 2014a. “No Margin, No Mission? A Field Experiment on Incentives for Public Service Delivery.” Journal of Public Economics 120: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2014.06.014.Search in Google Scholar
Ashraf, N., O. Bandiera, and S. S. Lee. 2014b. “Awards Unbundled: Evidence from a Natural Field Experiment.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 100: 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2014.01.001.Search in Google Scholar
Bäker, A., and M. Mechtel. 2018. “The Role of Task Meaning on Output in Groups: Experimental Evidence.” Managerial and Decision Economics 39 (2): 131–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2875.Search in Google Scholar
Bradler, C., R. Dur, S. Neckermann, and N. Arjan. 2016. “Employee Recognition and Performance: A Field Experiment.” Management Science 62 (11): 3085–99. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2291.Search in Google Scholar
Bradler, C., and S. Neckermann. 2019. “The Magic of the Personal Touch: Field Experimental Evidence on Money and Appreciation as Gifts.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 121 (3): 1189–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjoe.12310.Search in Google Scholar
Bryan, G., K. Dean, and N. Scott. 2010. “Commitment Devices.” Annual Review of Economics 2 (1): 671–98. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124324.Search in Google Scholar
Cassar, L. 2019. “Job Mission as a Substitute for Monetary Incentives: Benefits and Limits.” Management Science 65 (2): 896–912. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2903.Search in Google Scholar
Cassar, L., and S. Meier. 2018. “Nonmonetary Incentives and the Implications of Work as a Source of Meaning.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (3): 215–38. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.3.215.Search in Google Scholar
Cassar, L., and S. Meier. 2020. “Intentions for Doing Good Matter for Doing Well: The Negative Effects of Prosocial Incentives.” The Economic Journal: ueaa136. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa136.Search in Google Scholar
Chadi, A., S. Jeworrek, and V. Mertins. 2017. “When the Meaning of Work Has Disappeared: Experimental Evidence on Employees’ Performance and Emotions.” Management Science 63 (6): 1696–707. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2426.Search in Google Scholar
Chandler, D., and A. Kapelner. 2013. “Breaking Monotony with Meaning: Motivation in Crowdsourcing Markets.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 90: 123–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.03.003.Search in Google Scholar
Cohen, T., W. Scott, A. Panter, and C. Insko. 2011. “Introducing the GASP Scale: A New Measure of Guilt and Shame Proneness.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 100 (5): 947–66. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022641.Search in Google Scholar
Falk, A., and M. Kosfeld. 2006. “The Hidden Costs of Control.” The American Economic Review 96 (5): 1611–30. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.5.1611.Search in Google Scholar
Gneezy, U., S. Meier, and P. Rey-Biel. 2011. “When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behavior.” The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25 (4): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.4.191.Search in Google Scholar
Grant, A. M. 2008. “The Significance of Task Significance: Job Performance Effects, Relational Mechanisms, and Boundary Conditions.” Journal of Applied Psychology 93 (1): 108–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.108.Search in Google Scholar
Huillery, E., and J. Seban. 2021. “Financial Incentives, Efforts, and Performances in the Health Sector: Experimental Evidence from the Democratic Republic of Congo.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 69 (3): 1115–64. https://doi.org/10.1086/703235.Search in Google Scholar
Kosfeld, M., and S. Neckermann. 2011. “Getting More Work for Nothing? Symbolic Awards and Worker Performance.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics 3 (3): 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1257/mic.3.3.86.Search in Google Scholar
Kosfeld, M., S. Neckermann, and X. Yang. 2017. “The Effects of Financial and Recognition Incentives across Work Contexts: The Role of Meaning.” Economic Inquiry 55 (1): 237–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12350.Search in Google Scholar
Kvaløy, O., P. Nieken, and A. Schöttner. 2015. “Hidden Benefits of Reward: A Field Experiment on Motivation and Monetary Incentives.” European Economic Review 76: 188–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.03.003.Search in Google Scholar
Mertins, V., and C. Walter. 2021. “In Absence of Money: A Field Experiment on Volunteer Work Motivation.” Experimental Economics 24 (3): 952–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09686-4.Search in Google Scholar
Neckermann, S., R. Cueni, and B. S. Frey. 2014. “Awards at Work.” Labour Economics 31: 205–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2014.04.002.Search in Google Scholar
Neckermann, S., and B. S. Frey. 2013. “And the Winner is...? The Motivating Power of Employee Awards.” The Journal of Socio-Economics 46: 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2013.06.006.Search in Google Scholar
Neckermann, S., and X. Yang. 2017. “Understanding the (Unexpected) Consequences of Unexpected Recognition.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 135: 131–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.01.013.Search in Google Scholar
Riener, G., and S. Wiederhold. 2016. “Team Building and Hidden Costs of Control.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 123: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.12.008.Search in Google Scholar
Riener, G., S. Schneider, and V. Wagner. 2020. “Addressing Validity and Generalizability Concerns in Field Experiments.” In Discussion Paper 2020/16. Max Planck Institute for Research on Collective Goods.10.2139/ssrn.3637868Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2021-0254).
© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
