Skip to content
Accessible Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published online by De Gruyter November 9, 2021

Birthplace Favoritism and Quality of Education

Tien Manh Vu ORCID logo and Hiroyuki Yamada ORCID logo

Abstract

We investigated the long-term effects of birthplace favoritism by top-ranking politicians on the quality of education in Vietnam. We used over 1 million test scores from the 2009 and 2014 Vietnamese national university entrance examinations. We examined both the different timing of political terms and the total years of birthplace favoritism. Using the school fixed effects, we found that birthplace favoritism did not have any significant impacts, regardless of the timing and duration of such favoritism. We did not find evidence for such impacts in the distribution of test scores either. The results also suggest that national entrance examinations were unaffected by birthplace favoritism up to 2014.

JEL Classification: I21; I28; H75

Corresponding author: Tien Manh Vu, Miyazaki International College, 1405 Kano-hei, Kiyotake-cho, Miyazaki-shi, Miyazaki, 889-1605, Japan, E-mail:

Funding source: Japan Society for the Promotion of Science

Award Identifier / Grant number: 18K01580, 19H00619, 20H01506, and 21K01455

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS (Japan Society for the Promotion of Science) KAKENHI Grant Numbers 18K01580, 19H00619, 20H01506, and 21K01455.

References

Bitler, P. M., B. J. Gelbach, and W. H. Hoynes. 2006. “What Means Impacts Miss: Distributional Effects of Welfare Reform Experiments.” The American Economic Review 96 (4): 988–1012. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.96.4.988.Search in Google Scholar

Chen, T., J. K. Kung, and C. Ma. 2020. “Long Live Keju! The Persistent Effects of China’s Civil Examination System.” The Economic Journal 130 (631): 2030–64. https://doi.org/10.1093/ej/ueaa043.Search in Google Scholar

Do, Q., K.-T. Nguyen, and A. N. Tran. 2017. “One Mandarin Benefits the Whole Clan: Hometown Favoritism in an Authoritarian Regime.” American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 9 (4): 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20130472.Search in Google Scholar

Hodler, R., and P. A. Raschky. 2014. “Regional Favoritism.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 129: 995–1033. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qju004.Search in Google Scholar

Kramon, E., and D. N. Posner. 2016. “Ethnic Favoritism in Education in Kenya.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 11: 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00015005.Search in Google Scholar

Machado, J. A. F., and J. M. C. Santos Silva. 2018. “XTQREG: Stata Module to Compute Quantile Regression with Fixed Effects.” Statistical Software Components S458523. Boston College Department of Economics (revised October 13, 2021).Search in Google Scholar

Machado, J. A. F., and J. M. C. Santos Silva. 2019. “Quantiles via Moments.” Journal of Econometrics 213 (1): 145–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2019.04.009.Search in Google Scholar

Vu, T. M., and H. Yamada. 2021a. “Firms and Regional Favouritism.” Economics of Transition and Institutional Change 29 (4): 711–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12308.Search in Google Scholar

Vu, T. M., and H. Yamada. 2021b. Impacts of the 1075–1919 Vietnamese Imperial Examinations on Contemporary Quantity and Quality of Education. unpublished paper.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-09-15
Accepted: 2021-10-29
Published Online: 2021-11-09

© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston