Abstract
This study uses controlled experiments to analyze the effectiveness of peer-comparison nudges to promote pro-social behavior. Participants make decisions as consumers in a simple posted-offer market (i.e. buyers are price takers) in which reducing consumption produces positive externalities through the purchase of carbon offsets. We analyze the effectiveness of the nudge under two common pricing schemes (ratepaying and non-ratepaying customers), and examine heterogeneous impacts depending on consumers’ concern about climate change and cultural worldviews. Our findings show that on average peer-comparison nudges are equally effective policy tools in both pricing environments. However, the nudges are only effective for those participants concerned about climate change, and for those with individualist or hierarchical worldviews.
Funding source: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Funding source: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
Award Identifier / Grant number: Unassigned
Acknowledgements
We thank the Energy and Environment Program at the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation for generously funding this research, and we thank an anonymous reviewer for providing helpful comments and suggestions.
References
Allcott, H. 2011. “Social Norms and Energy Conservation.” Journal of Public Economics 95 (9–10): 1082–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003.Search in Google Scholar
Andor, M. A., A. Gerster, J. Peters, and C. M. Schmidt. 2020. “Social Norms and Energy Conservation beyond the US.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 103: 1–16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102351.Search in Google Scholar
Buckley, P. 2020. “Prices, Information and Nudges for Residential Electricity Conservation: A Meta-Analysis.” Ecological Economics 172: 1–14, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106635.Search in Google Scholar
Carlsson, F., C. Gravert, O. Johansson-Stenman, and V. Kurz. 2021. “The Use of Green Nudges as an Environmental Policy Instrument.” Review of Environmental Economics and Policy 15 (2): 216–37, https://doi.org/10.1086/715524.Search in Google Scholar
Cherry, T. L., S. Kallbekken, S. Kroll, and D. McEvoy. 2013. “Cooperation in and Out of Markets: An Experimental Comparison of Public Good Games and Markets with Externalities.” Economics Letters 120 (1): 93–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.03.034.Search in Google Scholar
Crago, C. L., J. M. Spraggon, and E. Hunter. 2020. “Motivating Non-ratepaying Households with Feedback and Social Nudges: A Cautionary Tale.” Energy Policy 145: 1–10, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111764.Search in Google Scholar
Falk, A., and J. Heckman. 2009. “Lab Experiments Are a Major Source of Knowledge in the Social Sciences.” Science 326 (5952): 535–8. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1168244.Search in Google Scholar
Kahan, D. M., H. Jenkins-Smith, and D. Braman. 2011. “Cultural Cognition of Scientific Consensus.” Journal of Risk Research 14 (20): 147–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.511246.Search in Google Scholar
Lazaric, N., and M. Toumi. 2022. “Reducing Consumption of Electricity: A Field Experiment in Monaco with Boosts and Goal Setting.” Ecological Economics 191: 1–17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107231.Search in Google Scholar
Myers, E., and M. Souza. 2020. “Social Comparison Nudges without Monetary Incentives: Evidence from Home Energy Reports.” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 101: 1–19, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102315.Search in Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W., J. M. Nolan, R. B. Cialdini, N. J. Goldstein, and V. Griskevicus. 2007. “The Constructive, Destructive, and Reconstructive Power of Social Norms.” Psychological Science 18 (5): 429–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.x.Search in Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New York: Penguin Books.Search in Google Scholar
Zhang, B., B. Ritchie, J. Mair, and S. Driml. 2019. “Can Message Framings Influence Air Passenger’s Perceived Credibility of Aviation Voluntary Carbon Offsetting Messages?” Journal of Sustainable Tourism 27 (9): 1416–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2019.1629448.Search in Google Scholar
Supplementary Material
This article contains supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/bejeap-2023-0100).
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
