Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 15, 2017

Macroeconomic Shocks and Corporate R&D

  • John D. Burger , Norman Sedgley EMAIL logo and Kerry M. Tan


This paper investigates the impact of output and credit market shocks on R&D spending in advanced economies and builds on the commonly accepted view that credit constraints lead to procyclical R&D spending. A theoretical model is developed where output and credit shocks are treated separately, though these shocks may be highly correlated. The estimation procedure utilizes a panel vector autoregression (VAR) in order to empirically identify the role of credit market shocks separately from the output shocks more commonly studied in the existing literature. The primary empirical findings can be summarized as follows: (1) R&D responds pro-cyclically to output shocks at the macroeconomic level, and (2) R&D co-moves positively with credit. More concretely, the results indicate that negative output shocks induce a simultaneous and subsequent contraction in credit and R&D consistent with a model where credit constraints drive cyclical adjustments to R&D. The impact of output and credit shocks on R&D are economically significant and a simulation exercise suggests the shocks associated with the global financial crisis have reduced US R&D by 10% relative to the pre-crisis path.


Andrews, D., and B. Lu. 2001. “Consistent Model and Moment Selection Procedures for GMM Estimation with Application to Dynamic Panel Data Models.” Journal of Econometrics 101 (1): 123–164.10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00077-4Search in Google Scholar

Aghion, P., G.M. Angeletos, A. Banerjee, and K. Manova. 2010. “Volatility and Growth: Credit Constraints and the Composition of Investment.” Journal of Monetary Economics 57 (3): 246–265.10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.02.005Search in Google Scholar

Aghion, P., P. Askenazy, N. Berman, G. Cette, and L. Eymard. 2012. “Credit Constraints and the Cyclicality of R&D Investment: Evidence from France.” Journal of the European Economic Association 10 (5): 1001–1024.10.2139/ssrn.1680324Search in Google Scholar

Aghion, P., A. Banerjee, and T. Piketty. 1999. “Dualism and Macroeconomic Volatility.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 114: 1359–1397.10.1162/003355399556296Search in Google Scholar

Aghion, P., and G. Saint-Paul. 1998. “Virtues of Bad Times: Interaction Between Productivity Growth and Economic Fluctuations.” Macroeconomic Dynamics 2: 322–344.10.1017/S1365100598008025Search in Google Scholar

Arellano, M., and O. Bover. 1995. “Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Components Models.” Journal of Econometrics 68 (1): 29–51.10.1016/0304-4076(94)01642-DSearch in Google Scholar

Barlevy, G 2007. “On the Cyclicality of Research and Development.” The American Economic Review 97 (4): 1131–1164.10.1257/aer.97.4.1131Search in Google Scholar

Beck, T., A. Demirguc-Kunt, L. Laeven, and R. Levine. 2008. “Finance, Firm Size and Growth.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 40 (7): 1379–1405.10.3386/w10983Search in Google Scholar

Borio, C 2014. “The Financial Cycle and Macroeconomics: What Have We Learnt?” Journal of Banking & Finance 45: 182–198.10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.031Search in Google Scholar

Campello, M., J. Graham, and C. Harvey. 2010. “The Real Effects of Financial Constraints: Evidence from a Financial Crisis.” Journal of Financial Economics 97: 470–487.10.3386/w15552Search in Google Scholar

Dembiermont, C., M. Drehmann, and S. Muksakunratana. 2013. “How Much Does the Private Sector Really Borrow? A New Database for Total Credit to the Private Non-Financial Sector.” BIS Quarterly Review 65–81. Available from: in Google Scholar

Ha, J., and P. Howitt. 2006. “Accounting for Trends in Productivity and R&D: A Schumpeterian Critique of Semi-Endogenous Growth Theory.” Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 39: 733–774.10.1111/j.1538-4616.2007.00045.xSearch in Google Scholar

Khan, A., and J. Thomas. 2013. “Credit Shocks and Aggregate Fluctuations in an Economy with Production Heterogeneity.” Journal of Political Economy 121 (6): 1055–1107.10.3386/w17311Search in Google Scholar

Levine, R., and S. Zervos. 1998. “Stock Markets, Banks, and Economic Growth.” American Economic Review 88: 537–558.10.1596/1813-9450-1690Search in Google Scholar

Levine, R., N. Loayza, and T. Beck. 2000. “Financial Intermediation and Growth: Causality and Causes.” Journal of Monetary Economics 46: 31–77.10.1596/1813-9450-2059Search in Google Scholar

Love, I., and L. Zicchino. 2006. “Financial Development and Dynamic Investment Behavior: Evidence from Panel VAR.” The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance 46 (2): 190–210.10.1016/j.qref.2005.11.007Search in Google Scholar

Ouyang, M 2011. “Ön the Cyclicality of R&D.” Review of Economics and Statistics 93 (2): 542–553.10.1162/REST_a_00076Search in Google Scholar

Reifschneider, D., W. Wascher, and D. Wilcox. 2013. “Aggregate Supply in the United States: Recent Developments and Implications for the Conduct of Monetary Policy.”.Working Paper.10.2139/ssrn.2376334Search in Google Scholar

Saint-Paul, G 1993. “Productivity Growth and the Structure of the Business Cycle.” European Economic Review 37 (4): 861–883.10.1016/0014-2921(93)90095-RSearch in Google Scholar

Schumpeter, J 1939. Business Cycles. New York: McGraw-Hill.Search in Google Scholar

Summers, L 2014. “US Economic Prospects: Secular Stagnation, Hysteresis, and the Zero Lower Bound.” Business Economics 49 (2): 65–73.10.1057/be.2014.13Search in Google Scholar

Walde, K., and U. Woitek. 2004. “R&D Spending in G7 Countries and the Implications for Endogenous Fluctuations and Growth.” Economics Letters 82: 91–97.10.1016/j.econlet.2003.07.014Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-7-15

©2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 29.11.2023 from
Scroll to top button