Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 20, 2016

Negative effect of roosting starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) on clutch survival in the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus)

  • Thomas O. Mérő EMAIL logo , Antun Žuljević and Szabolcs Lengyel
From the journal Biologia

Abstract

This study provides preliminary findings related to whether and how the roosting of starlings (Sturnus vulgaris) in reedbeds influences the survival of clutches of the great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus). During the nesting seasons of 2014 and 2015, we surveyed the complete area of a mining pond in Serbia (south-eastern Europe) for great reed warbler nests, and the presence of roosting starlings was also recorded. Using the Mayfield method, we estimated the daily survival rate of great reed warbler eggs and nestlings, and compared these rates between starling roosting and non-roosting areas. Although both egg and nestling survival rates were lower in the Starling roosting than in the non-roosting areas, the differences were not significant, which was also reflected in overall nesting success. However, when only data from the time period when starling roosting occurred, the overall great reed warbler egg survival was significantly lower in roosting areas than in non-roosting areas. Our results suggest that Starling roosting did not influence the clutch survival of the great reed warbler significantly, but that there can be a negative short-term or local effect. Our study implies that a larger number of starlings and a longer roosting period could affect clutch survival more negatively.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Nature Protection and Study Society – NATURA from Sombor, Serbia. T.O.M. and S.L. were funded by a grant from the National Scientific Research Base Programs of Hungary (OTKA K106133).

References

Cantos F.J., Jiménez M., Fernández-Renau A., Gómez J.A., de Juan F., de Miguel E. & Sanglier G. 1999. Application of sensors and thermal cameras for the census of winter roosts of birds. Ardeola 46 (2): 187–193.Search in Google Scholar

Clergeau P. & Quenot F. 2007. Roost selection flexibility of European starlings aids invasions of urban landscape. Landscape Urban Plan. 80 (1-2): 56–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2006.06.00210.1016/j.landurbplan. 2006.06.002Search in Google Scholar

Dyrcz A. 1981. Breeding ecology of Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus and reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus at fishponds in SW Poland and lakes in NW Switzerland. Acta Ornithol. 18 (5): 307–334.Search in Google Scholar

Fischer S. 1994. Einfluß der Witterung auf den Bruterfolg des Drosselrohrsängers Acrocephalus arundinaceus am Berliner Müggelsee. Vogelwelt 115 (6): 287–292.Search in Google Scholar

Graveland J. 1998. Reed die-back, water level management and the decline of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in The Netherlands. Ardea 86: 187–201.Search in Google Scholar

Hensler G.L. & Nichols J.D. 1981. The Mayfield method for estimating nesting success: a model, estimators and simulation results. Wilson Bull. 93 (1): 42–53.Search in Google Scholar

Janousek W.M., Marra P.P. & Kilpatrick M.A. 2014. Avian roosting behavior influences vector-host interactions for West Nile virus host. Parasit. Vectors 7: 399. DOI: 10.1186/1756-3305-7-39910.1186/1756-3305-7-399Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

Johnson D.H. 1979. Estimating nest success: the Mayfield method and an alternative. Auk 96 (4): 651–661.Search in Google Scholar

Klimaszyk P., Joniak T. & Rzymski P. 2014. Roosting colony of cormorants (Phalacrocorax carbo sinensis L.) as a source of nutrients for the lake. Limnol. Rev. 14 (3): 111–119. DOI: 10.1515/limre-2015-000110.1515/limre-2015-0001Search in Google Scholar

Lambertucci S.A. 2013. Variability in size of groups in communal roosts: influence of age-class, abundance of individuals and roosting site. Emu 113 (2): 122–127. DOI: 10.1071/MU1204810.1071/MU12048Search in Google Scholar

Mayfield H. 1975. Suggestions for calculating nest success. Wilson Bull. 87 (4): 456–466.Search in Google Scholar

Meanley B. 1965. The roosting behaviour of the Red-winged Blackbird in the southern United States. Wilson Bull. 77 (3): 217–228.Search in Google Scholar

Mérő T.O., Lontay L. & Lengyel S. 2015. Habitat management varying in space and time: the effect of grazing and fire management on marshland birds. J. Ornithol. 156 (3): 579–590. DOI: 10.1007/s10336-015-1202-910.1007/s10336-015-1202-9Search in Google Scholar

Mérő T.O. & Žuljević A. 2013/2014. Birds on Bager Pond in Sombor and their statuses. Ciconia 22/23: 9–13.Search in Google Scholar

Mérő T.O. & Žuljević A. 2014. Effect of reed quality on the breeding success of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus (Passeriformes, Sylviidae). Acta Zool. Bulg. 66 (4): 511–516.Search in Google Scholar

Mérő T.O., Žuljević A., Varga K., Bocz R. & Lengyel S. 2014. Effect of reed burning and precipitation on the breeding success of Great Reed Warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus, on a mining pond. Turk. J. Zool. 38 (5): 622–630. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1311-5410.3906/zoo-1311-54Search in Google Scholar

Mérő T.O., Žuljević A., Varga K. & Lengyel S. 2015. Habitat use and nesting success of the Great Reed Warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) in different reed habitats in Serbia. Wilson J. Ornithol. 127 (3): 477–485. DOI: 10.1676/13-200.110.1676/13-200.1Search in Google Scholar

Molnár G. 1998. Seregély Sturnus vulgaris, pp. 359–360. In: Haraszthy L. (ed.), Magyarország madarai [Birds of Hungary] 2nd ed., Mezőgazda Kiadó, Budapest, 442 pp. ISBN: 9639121053Search in Google Scholar

Moskát C., Hauber M.E., Avilés J.M., Bán M., Hargitai R. & Honza M. 2009. Increased host tolerance of multiple cuckoo eggs leads to higher fledgling success of the brood parasite. Anim. Behav. 77 (5): 1281–1290. DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.03010.1016/j.anbehav.2009.01.030Search in Google Scholar

Petro R., Literak I. & Honza M. 1998. Breeding biology and migration of the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in the Czech Silesia. Biologia 53 (5): 685–694.Search in Google Scholar

Trnka A. & Grim T. 2014. Dynamic risk assessment: does a nearby breeding nest predator affect nest defence of its potential victim? J. Ethol. 32 (2): 103–110. DOI: 10.1007/s10164-014-0400-x10.1007/s10164-014-0400-xSearch in Google Scholar

Uzun A., Ayyildiz Z., Yilmaz F., Uzun B. & Sağiroğlu M. 2014. Breeding ecology and behavior of the Great Reed Warbler, Acrocephalus arundinaceus, in Poyrazlar Lake, Turkey. Turk. J. Zool. 38 (1): 55–60. DOI: 10.3906/zoo-1303-3510.3906/zoo-1303-35Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-9-21
Accepted: 2016-2-13
Published Online: 2016-4-20
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

© 2016 Institute of Zoology, Slovak Academy of Sciences

Downloaded on 8.12.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/biolog-2016-0036/html
Scroll to top button