Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter August 11, 2016

Production of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate from mixed culture

Thomas Shalin, Raveendran Sindhu, Ashok Pandey, Vincenza Faraco and Parameswaran Binod
From the journal Biologia


Poly-3-hydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a biodegradable polymer produced by many bacteria. Some of the properties are similar to thermoplastics like polypropylene, hence finding application PHB can directly replace non-biodegradable polymers. But the main barrier has been the cost difference. The utilization of mixed microbial cultures facilitates the use of complex substrates and thus can reduce the cost of PHB production. In the present study, mixed culture systems, where metabolite produced by one organism may be assimilated by the other organism, were employed. Bacillus firmus NII 0830, the first organism, was used for the production of PHB since it accumulates a large amount of PHB, while the second organism, Lactobacillus delbrueckii NII 0925, was used to provide acetic acid. Enzyme kinetic studies were performed on the PHB biosynthetic enzymes, such as β-ketothiolase, acetoacetyl CoA reductase and PHB synthase. PHB production by mixed culture was higher when compared to pure cultures. The mathematical model was then fitted to the experimental data, which can describe the dynamics of a mixed culture. The β-ketothiolase and acetoacetyl CoA reductase showed a Vmax value of 0.0093 μM/min and 0.0253 μM/min, respectively. The Km values were 140.8 μM and 183.5 μM, respectively. The enzyme kinetic studies gave an idea about the action of the enzymes.



Authors are grateful to the Department of Biotechnology, Government of India, New Delhi, for financial support of the project. One of the authors, Raveendran Sindhu, acknowledges the Department of Biotechnology for financial support under DBT Bio-CARe scheme. Raveendran Sindhu and Parameswaran Binod acknowledge European Commission Seventh Framework Programme, Marie Curie Actions-International Research Staff Exchange Scheme - Contact Number 318931.


Deepthi K.S., Binod P., Sindhu R. & Pandey A. 2011. Media engineering for production of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate by Bacillus firmus NII 0830. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 70: 968–975.Search in Google Scholar

Desjardins P., Hansen J.B. & Allen M. 2009. Microvolume protein concentration determination using the NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer. J. Vis. Exp. 33: e1610.10.3791/1610Search in Google Scholar

Ellman G. L. 1959. Tissue sulfhydryl groups. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 82: 70–77.10.1016/0003-9861(59)90090-6Search in Google Scholar

Fletcher A. 1993. PHA as natural, biodegradable polyesters, pp. 77–93. In: Plastics from Bacteria and for Bacteria. Springer-Verlag, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Jincy M., Sindhu R. & Binod P. 2013. Bioprocess development for utilizing biodiesel industry generated crude glycerol for production of poly-3-hydroxybutyrate. J Sci. Ind. Res. 72: 596–602.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson K., Jiang Y., Klereebezem R., Muyzer G. & van Loosdrecht M.C.M. 2009. Enrichment of a mixed bacterial culture with a high polyhydroxyalkaonate storage capacity. Biomacromolecules 10: 670–676.10.1021/bm8013796Search in Google Scholar

Kleerebezem R. & Loosdrecht M.C.M. 2007. Mixed culture biotechnology for bioenergy production. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 18: 207–212.10.1016/j.copbio.2007.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Law J.H. & Slepeckey R.A. 1961. Assay of poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid. J. Bacteriol. 82: 33–36.10.1128/jb.82.1.33-36.1961Search in Google Scholar

Lynen F. & Wieland H. 1955. β-Ketoreductase. Methods Enzymol. 1: 566–573.10.1016/0076-6879(55)01099-9Search in Google Scholar

Meenakshisundaram S., Suresh G., Fernando R.K., Jenny K., Sachidanandham R. & Jayaraman K. 1997. Metabolic response of Bacillus sphaericus 1593M for dual-substrate limitation in continuous and total-cell-retention cultures. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 47: 554–559.10.1007/s002530050972Search in Google Scholar

Nishimura T., Saito T. & Tomita K. 1978. Purification and properties of β-ketothiolase from Zoogloea ramigera. Arch. Microbiol. 116: 21–27.10.1007/BF00408729Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Salehizadeh H. & Loosdrecht M.C.M. 2004. Production of polyhy-droxyalkaonates by mixed culture: recent trends and biotechnological importance. Biotechnol. Adv. 22: 261–279.10.1016/j.biotechadv.2003.09.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Serafim L.S., Lemos P.C., Oliveira R. & Reis M.A.M. 2004. Optimization of polyhydroxybutyrate production by mixed cultures submitted to aerobic dynamic feeding conditions. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 85: 145–160.10.1002/bit.20085Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Shalin T., Sindhu R., Binod P., Soccol C.R. & Pandey A. 2014. Mixed cultures fermentation for the production of poly-β-hydroxybutyrate. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 57: 644–652.10.1590/S1516-89132013005000016Search in Google Scholar

Sluiter A., Hames B., Ruiz R., Scarlata C., Sluiter J. & Templeton D. 2008. Determination of sugars, byproducts, and degradation products in liquid fraction process samples. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42623, National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Search in Google Scholar

Tohyama M. & Shimizu K. 1999. Control of a mixed culture of Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Ralstonia eutropha for the production of PHB from glucose via lactate. Biochem. Eng. J. 4: 45–53.10.1016/S1369-703X(99)00031-5Search in Google Scholar


dithionitrobenzoic acid


mixed culture biotechnology



Received: 2016-1-11
Accepted: 2016-7-7
Published Online: 2016-8-11
Published in Print: 2016-7-1

©2016 Institute of Molecular Biology, Slovak Academy of Sciences