Abstract
In this volume Harvey argues that guaranteeing people the right to work would be a better policy approach than guaranteeing people an unconditional basic income. This is because a guaranteed job would provide many of the benefits that a basic income would but at far lower cost. I argue that Harvey’s analysis of the relative cost differences between guaranteeing one a job or an income is misleading if not flat out wrong in some places. I also argue that there is one benefit that BI could promote that his jobs strategy, at least as presented in the paper in this volume, could not – the right of an able-bodied person to lead the kind of life they desire even if they desire not to sell their labor.
References
Atkinson, A.(1996). The case for participation income. Political Quarterly, 67, 67–70.10.1111/j.1467-923X.1996.tb01568.xSearch in Google Scholar
Clark, C. M. A.(2003). Promoting economic equity in a 21st century economy: The basic income solution. In Paul Dale Bush & Marc Tool (Eds.), Institutional analysis of economic policy. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 133–156.10.1007/978-1-4615-0261-6_5Search in Google Scholar
Currie, E.(1985). Confronting crime: An American challenge. New York: Pantheon Books.Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, P.(2005). The right to work and basic income guarantees: Competing or complementary goals. Rutgers Journal of Law and Urban Policy, 8–48.Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, P. (2006). The relative cost of a universal basic income and a negative income tax.Basic Income Studies, 1–24.10.2202/1932-0183.1032Search in Google Scholar
Harvey, P.(2011a). Back to work: A public jobs proposal for economic recovery. Demos. Retrieved November 16, 2012 from http://www.demos.org/publication/back-work-public-jobs-proposal-economic-recoverySearch in Google Scholar
Harvey, P.(2011b). Securing the right to work at the state or local level with a direct job-creation program. Big Ideas for Jobs Initiative, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment, University of California at Berkeley, CA. Retrieved November 16, 2012 from http://www.bigideasforjobs.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Harvey-Full-Report-2-PDF.pdf.Search in Google Scholar
Morgan, M. G., & Henrion, M. (1990). Uncertainty: A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511840609Search in Google Scholar
Nicholson, W.(1989). Microeconomic theory: Basic principles and extensions. Illinois: The Dryden Press.Search in Google Scholar
Noguchi, E., & Lewis, M. A. (2007). In defense of lazy: An argument for less work, more community. Discussion Paper #91. Retrieved October 5, 2012 from http://www.usbig.net/papers.php.Search in Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.Search in Google Scholar
Taylor, J. R. (1997). An introduction to error analysis: The study of uncertainties in physical measurements.California: University Science Books.Search in Google Scholar
Van Parijs, P. (1995). Real freedom for all: What (if anything) can justify capitalism?New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar
© 2013 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin / Boston