Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 13, 2017

Universal Basic Income and Helicopter Money

  • Jože Mencinger EMAIL logo
From the journal Basic Income Studies


A unique opportunity for testing whether universal basic income (UBI) on the European level is a realistic option could be provided by its monetary financing as an alternative to “traditional” fiscal financing. Fiscal financing of UBI would namely request a much larger European “federal” budget financed by a specific European tax or by participation of the “federation” on some of the existing tax bases, and by agreed upon allotment of the accumulated “federal” fiscal revenues. Though ensuing redistribution of GDP would be relatively modest, the European UBI without an alternative to the tax revenues requirements remains illusionary. Helicopter money (HM) replacing quantitative easing (QE) might provide such an alternative. Modalities of its implementation differ and the idea raises questions of its compliance with the legal regime of the ECB and opens many other topics such as the effectiveness of “QE for the people” and its long-run consequences.


Arcarons, J., Raventos, P. D., & Torrens, M. L. (2014). Feasibility of financing a basic income. Basic Income Studies, 9(1–2), 79–93.10.1515/bis-2014-0005Search in Google Scholar

Astellon Capital Partners. (2016). Helicopter money – let it rain?, Q2 2016, Notes No.22.Search in Google Scholar

Buiter, W. H. (2014). The simple analytics of helicopter money: Why it works-always. Economics, 8, 1–51.10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2014-28Search in Google Scholar

Damijan, J. P. (2016). A case for helicopter money: Monetary financing of fiscal stimulus in a liquidity trap, Banking in negative interest rates environment: special issue, Bančni vestnik, Special issue, vol. 65, 24–33.Search in Google Scholar

Di Maggio, M., Kermani, A., & Palmer, C. (2016). How quantitative easing works: evidenceon the refinancing channel. NBER Working Paper 22638, September 2016.10.3386/w22638Search in Google Scholar

European Parliament (2016). Helicopter money: A cure for what ails the euro area? Briefing, April 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Gali, J. (2014). The Effects of a Money-Financed Fiscal Stimulus, CEPR Discussion Paper 10165, September.10.3386/w26249Search in Google Scholar

Gilroy, B., Heimann, A., Schopf, M., (2013). Basic income and labour supply: The German case. Basic Income Studies, 8(1), 43–70.10.1515/bis-2012-0009Search in Google Scholar

Healy, S., Murphy, M., Ward, S., & Reynolds, B. (2012). Basic income – why and how in difficult economic times: Financing a UBI in Ireland. BIEN Congress Munich 14th September 2012.Search in Google Scholar

ING International Survey. (2016). Helicopter money: Loved, not spent. Special report, October 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Konrad, K. A., & Zschapitz, H. (2011). The Future of the Eurozone. CESifo Forum, 46–49.Search in Google Scholar

Korošec, V. (2010). Predlog UTD v Sloveniji – zakaj in kako, (Proposal for UBI in Slovenia – why and how?).Search in Google Scholar

Meltzer, A. H. (2016). Mortgaging our low interest future, September 1, 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Mencinger, J. (2015). The Revenue Side of universal basic income in the European Union and Euro Area, Danube, 2015/3, 157–174.10.1515/danb-2015-0010Search in Google Scholar

Mencinger, J. (2011). Evro, fiskalni pakt, fiskalna unija (Euro, fiscal pact, fiscal union), Gospodarska Gibanja, (Economic Trends), 441, November 2011, 17–30.Search in Google Scholar

Mencinger, J. (2016). Helicopter money, Banking in negative interest rates environment, Bančni vestnik, Special issue, vol. 65, No. 11, 34–40.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, M.A. (2016). Why are interest rates so low? A framework for modeling current global financial developments. The Fraser Institute.Search in Google Scholar

Muellbauer, J. (2014). Combatting Eurozone deflation: QE for the people. CEPR’s Policy Portal, 23 December 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Munger, M. C. (2012). Basic income is not an obligation, but it might be a legitimate choice. Basic Income Studies, 6(2), 1–13.10.1515/1932-0183.1222Search in Google Scholar

Standing, G. (2012). Why a basic income is necessary for a right to work?. Basic Income Studies, 7(2), 19–40.10.1515/bis-2013-0007Search in Google Scholar

Summers, L. (2016). The age of secular stagnation: What it is and what to do about it, Foreign Affairs, February 15, 2016.10.3386/w22172Search in Google Scholar

Widerquist, K. (2005). A failure to communicate: What (If Anything) can we learn from the negative income tax experiments?. The Journal of Socioeconomics, 34(1), 49–81.10.1016/j.socec.2004.09.050Search in Google Scholar

Zwolinski, M. (2012). Classical liberalism and the basic income. Basic Income Studies, 6(2), 1–14.10.1515/1932-0183.1221Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2017-9-13

© 2017 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 1.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button