Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 12, 2018

Framing the Basic Income: An Experimental Study of How Arguments and Metaphors Influence Individuals’ Opinion Formation

  • Thomas Legein EMAIL logo , Audrey Vandeleene , François Randour , Pauline Heyvaert , Julien Perrez and Min Reuchamps
From the journal Basic Income Studies

Abstract

Using an experimental design, this paper tackles the question of the framing impact of metaphors by focusing on the opportunity to implement a basic income (BI) system in a given polity. We take advantage of the preliminary stage of the BI debate in Belgium to study the influence of discursive strategies on the opinion formation process of individuals, since carefully choosing the arguments employed to address this question can help increase its psychological feasibility. Our experiment aims at determining to what extent the confrontation of individuals to metaphors illustrating the BI system impacts the way they apprehend its implementation. We show that very light variations in an informative text can induce major differences in the opinion formation process of the participants. BI proponents should thus pay attention to which metaphors are put forward in the public debate, as this could modify its outcome.

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude to the two anonymous reviewers and the Editor of Basic Income Studies for their insightful comments throughout the evaluation process. For all the meaningful exchanges, we also thank the participants to the conferences where previous versions of this article were presented, notably the MetaPol conference held in Liège in 2016, the annual conference BELGIUM: THE STATE OF THE FEDERATION and the 18th BIEN CONGRESS 2018 in Tampere. Because their answers are the breeding ground for our analysis, we are greatly indebted to the several hundred respondents to our experiment. Finally, we are also grateful to Frédérique Depas for her research assistance as well as to Yannick Vanderborght and Philippe Van Parijs for their useful comments on earlier drafts and their insights on the choice of the metaphors. Jérémy Dodeigne has been the master of the statistical analyses of our many experiments and this article is definitely his, too. Needless to say, however, that all remaining errors are ours. The research reported in this article was supported by the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique — FNRS under grant no. PDR-T.1036.15.

References

Ackerman, B., Alstott, A., & Van Parijs, P. (2006). Redesigning distribution. Basic income and stakeholder grants as cornerstones for an egalitarian capitalism.Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Baker, J. (1992). An egalitarian case for basic income. In P. Van Parijs (Ed.), Arguing for basic income: Ethical foundations for a radical reform. London: Verso, 101–127.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, B. (1996a). Surfer’s saviours? Citizen’s Income Bulletin, 22, 2–4.Search in Google Scholar

Barry, B. (1996b). Real freedom and basic income. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 4(3), 242–276.10.1111/j.1467-9760.1996.tb00052.xSearch in Google Scholar

Baudewyns, P., Dandoy, R., & Reuchamps, M. (2015). The success of the regionalist parties in the 2014 elections in Belgium. Regional & Federal Studies, 25(1), 91–102.10.1080/13597566.2014.998202Search in Google Scholar

Belorgey, J.-M. (2000). Minima sociaux, revenus d’activité, précarité. Paris: La Documentation française.Search in Google Scholar

Birnbaum, S. (2012). Basic income reconsidered. Social justice, liberalism, and the demands of equality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137015426Search in Google Scholar

Blais, P. (1999). Loisir, travail et réciprocité. Une justification « rawlsienne » de l’allocation universelle est-elle possible? Loisir Et Société, 22(2), 337–353.10.1080/07053436.1999.10715592Search in Google Scholar

Bougher, L. D. (2012). The case for metaphor in political reasoning and cognition. Political Psychology, 33(1), 145–163.10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00865.xSearch in Google Scholar

Camerer, C. F., & Loewenstein, G. (2004). Behavioral economics: Past, present, future. In C. F. Camerer, G. Loewenstein, & M. Rabin (Eds.), Advances in behavioral economics (pp. 3–51). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.10.1515/9781400829118-004Search in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2011). Politicians and rhetoric. The persuasive power of metaphor. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230319899Search in Google Scholar

Charteris-Black, J. (2013). Analysing political speeches: Rhetoric, discourse and metaphor. London: Palgrave MacMillan.Search in Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007a). Framing theory. Annual Reviews Political Sciences, 10, 103–126.10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054Search in Google Scholar

Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007b). A theory of framing and opinion formation in competitive elite environments. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 99–118.10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331.xSearch in Google Scholar

Cunliffe, J., & Erreygers, G. (2001). The enigmatic legacy of charles fourier: Joseph charlier and basic income. History of Political Economy, 33(3), 459–484.10.1215/00182702-33-3-459Search in Google Scholar

De Wispelaere, J. (2015a). The struggle for strategy: On the politics of the basic income proposal. Political Studies, 36(2), 131–141.10.1111/1467-9256.12102Search in Google Scholar

De Wispelaere, J. (2015b). An income of one’s own? The political analysis of universal basic income. Tampere: Tampere University Press.Search in Google Scholar

De Wispelaere, J., & Noguera, J. A. (2012). On the political feasibility of universal basic income. In K. Caputo (Eds.), Basic income guarantee and politics. International experiences and perspectives on the viability of income guarantee (pp. 17–38). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9781137045300_2Search in Google Scholar

De Wispelaere, J., & Stirton, L. (2004). The many faces of universal basic income. The Political Quarterly, 75(3), 266–274.10.1111/j.1467-923X.2004.00611.xSearch in Google Scholar

De Wispelaere, J., & Stirton, L. (2013). The politics of unconditional basic income: Bringing Bureaucracy back in. Political Studies, 61, 915–932.10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.01004.xSearch in Google Scholar

Debras, C., & L’Hôte, E. (2015). Framing, metaphor and dialogue - a multimodal approach to party conference speeches. Metaphor and the Social World, 5(2), 177–204.10.1075/msw.5.2.01debSearch in Google Scholar

Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58.10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.xSearch in Google Scholar

Goatly, A. (2007). Washing the brain: metaphor and hidden ideology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/dapsac.23Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, M. (2010). Metaphor and cognition. In D. Schmicking & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Handbook of phenomenology and cognitive science (pp. 401–414). London: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-2646-0_22Search in Google Scholar

Koistinen, P., & Perkiö, J. (2014). Good and bad times of social innovations: The case of universal basic income in Finland. Basic Income Studies, 9, 25–57.10.1515/bis-2014-0009Search in Google Scholar

Koller, V. (2009). Missions and Empires: Religious and political metaphors in corporate discourse. In A. Musolff & J. Zinken (Eds.), Metaphor and Discourse (pp. 116–134). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230594647_8Search in Google Scholar

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction [2nd ed.]. New York: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

L’Hôte, E. (2012). « Breaking up Britain »? Métaphores et discours sur la dévolution au Royaume-Uni. In J. Perrez & M. Reuchamps (Eds.), Les relations communautaires en Belgique. Approches politiques et linguistiques (pp. 161–189). Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-L’Harmattan (Science politique).Search in Google Scholar

Lakoff, G. (2004). Don’t think of an Elephant: Know your values and frame the debate. White River Jct., Vt.: Chelsea Green Publishing Company.Search in Google Scholar

Liebig, S., & Mau, S. (2002). A legitimate guaranteed minimum income? 9th BIEN Congress. Geneva.Search in Google Scholar

Maniquet, F., & Neumann, D. (2016). L’allocation universelle : Quelques éléments pour y voir plus clair. Regards Économiques, 1–14.Search in Google Scholar

Meade, J. E. (1989). Agathotopia : The economics of partnership. Aberdeen: Aberdeen University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Musolff, A. (2004). Metaphor and political discourse: Analogical reasoning in debates about Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230504516Search in Google Scholar

Noguera, J. A., & De Wispelaere, J. (2006). A plea for the use of laboratory experiments in basic income research. Basic Income Studies, 1, 2.10.2202/1932-0183.1044Search in Google Scholar

Paine, T. (1796). Agrarian justice. In P. Foner (Ed.), The Life and Major Writings of Thomas Paine. New-York: Citadel Press, 605-623.Search in Google Scholar

Perkiö, J. (2012). The struggle over interpretation: Basic income in the finnish public discussion in 2006–2012. 14th BIEN Congress. Munich.Search in Google Scholar

Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (eds.). (2012). Les relations communautaires en Belgique : Approches politiques et linguistiques. Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-L’Harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2014). Deliberate metaphors in political discourse: The case of citizen discourse. metaphorik.de, 25, 7–41. Retrieved from http://www.metaphorik.de/fr/journal/25/deliberate-metaphors-political-discourse-case-citizen-discourse.htmlSearch in Google Scholar

Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015a). The “Belgian Tetris”: Assessing the political impact of metaphors on citizens’ representations of Belgian federalism. Metaphors and the Social World, 5(2), 223–244.10.1075/msw.5.2.03perSearch in Google Scholar

Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015b). A serious LAT relationship or a crazy machine? Metaphors in citizens’ perception of Belgian federalism. Mots. Les Langages du Politique, 109.Search in Google Scholar

Perrez, J., & Reuchamps, M. (2015c). Special issue on the political impact of metaphors. Metaphors and the Social World, 5(2), 165–176.10.1075/msw.5.2.00intSearch in Google Scholar

Prats, M. (1996). L’allocation universelle à l’épreuve de théorie de la justice. Documents Pour L’enseignement Économique Et Social, 106, 71–110.Search in Google Scholar

Rawls, J. (2009). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Reuchamps, M., Dodeigne, J., & Perrez, J. (2018). Changing your political mind: The impact of a metaphor on citizen’s representations and preferences for federalism. Regional & Federal Studies, 28(2), 151–175.10.1080/13597566.2018.1433663Search in Google Scholar

Reuchamps, M., & Perrez, J. (2012). Métaphores conceptuelles dans les discours citoyens en Belgique. In J. Perrez & M. Reuchamps (eds.), Les relations communautaires en Belgique : Approches politiques et linguistiques (pp. 133–158). Louvain-la-Neuve: Academia-L’harmattan.Search in Google Scholar

Standing, G. (2002). Beyond the new paternalism. Basic security as equality. London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When do natural language metaphors influence reasoning? A follow-up study to thibodeau and boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9, 12.10.1371/journal.pone.0113536Search in Google Scholar

Steiner, H. (1992). Three just taxes. In P. Van Parijs (Ed.), Arguing for basic income: Ethical foundations for a radical reform (pp. 81–92). London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., & Durgin, F. H. (2011). Metaphor aptness and conventionality: A processing fluency account. Metaphor and Symbol, 26(3), 206-226.10.1080/10926488.2011.583196Search in Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2011). Metaphors we think with: The role of metaphor in reasoning. PLoS ONE, 6(2), e16782.10.1371/journal.pone.0016782Search in Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2013). Natural language metaphors covertly influence reasoning. PLoS ONE, 8(1), e52961.10.1371/journal.pone.0052961Search in Google Scholar

Thibodeau, P. H., & Boroditsky, L. (2015). Measuring effects of metaphor in a dynamic opinion landscape. PLoS ONE, 10(7), e0133939.10.1371/journal.pone.0133939Search in Google Scholar

Tobin, J. (1965). On improving the economic status of the negro. Daedalus, 94(4), 878–898.Search in Google Scholar

van der Veen, R. (1998). Real freedom versus reciprocity: Competing views on the justice of unconditional basic income. Political Studies, 46(1), 140–163.10.1111/1467-9248.00134Search in Google Scholar

Van der Veen, R. J., & Van Parijs, P. (1986). A capitalist road to communism. Theory and Society, 15(5), 635–655.10.1007/BF00239129Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, P. (1991). Why surfers should be fed: The liberal case for an unconditional basic income. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 20(2), 101–131.10.4324/9781315257563-16Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, P. (1998). Real freedom for All: What (if anything) can justify capitalism?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, P. (2006). Basic Income: A simple and powerful idea for the 21st century In B. Ackerman, A. Alstott, P. Van Parijs, & E. O. Wright (Ed.), Redesigning distribution: Basic income and stakeholder grants as alternative cornerstones for a more egalitarian capitalism Vol. V, (pp. 4–39). London: Verso.Search in Google Scholar

Van Parijs, P., & Vanderborght, Y. (2017). Basic income: A radical proposal for a free society and a sane economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674978072Search in Google Scholar

Vanderborght, Y. (2002). Belgique : VIVANT ou l’allocation universelle pour seul programme électoral. Multitudes, 1(1), 135–145.10.3917/mult.008.0135Search in Google Scholar

Vanderborght, Y. (2004). The political feasibility of an unconditional minimum income: A comparative analysis of political debates on a basic income, a negative income tax, and a participation income in five OECD countries (1970–2003). Louvain-La-Neuve.Search in Google Scholar

Vanderborght, Y., & Van Parijs, P. (2005). L’allocation universelle. Paris: La Découverte.10.3917/dec.vande.2005.01Search in Google Scholar

Wendler, F. (2016). Debating Europe in National Parliaments: Public justification and political polarization. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/978-1-137-51727-2Search in Google Scholar

Widerquist, K., Vanderborght, Y., Noguera, J. A., & De Wispelaere, J. (2013). The idea of an unconditional incorme for everyone. In K. Widerquist, Y. Vanderborght, J. A. Noguera, & J. De Wispelaere (Eds.), Basic income: An anthology of contemporary research (pp. xi-xxi). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2018-12-12

© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 28.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bis-2018-0010/html
Scroll to top button