Swatantra Kumar, Vimal K Maurya, Himanshu R Dandu, Madan LB Bhatt and Shailendra K Saxena

Global Perspective of Novel Therapeutic Strategies for the Management of NeuroAIDS

Novel drug delivery methods for NeuroAIDS

Open Access
De Gruyter | Published online: May 8, 2018


Among Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected individuals, around two-thirds of patients present with neuroAIDS, where HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders (HAND), and HIV-associated dementia (HAD) are the most prevailing neurological complications. The neuropathology of neuroAIDS can be characterized by the presence of HIV infected macrophages and microglia in the brain, with the formation of multinucleated giant cells. Global predominant subtypes of HIV-1 clade B and C infections influence the differential effect of immune and neuronal dysfunctions, leading to clade-specific clinical variation in neuroAIDS patient cohorts. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) enhances the survival rate among AIDS patients, but due to the inability to cross the Blood-Brain-Barrier (BBB), incidence of neuroAIDS during disease progression may be envisaged. The complex structure of blood-brain-barrier, and poor pharmacokinetic profile coupled with weak bio-distribution of antiretroviral drugs, are the principle barriers for the treatment of neuroAIDS. In the combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) era, the frequency of HAD has decreased; however the incidence of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI) and minor neurocognitive disorder (MND) remains consistent. Therefore, several effective novel nanotechnology based therapeutic approaches have been developed to improve the availability of antiretroviral drugs in the brain for the management of neuroAIDS.


Several novel therapeutic strategies have improved the care of people living with HIV/AIDS in the past three decades. HIV-1 infection of the central nervous system (CNS) leads to neuroAIDS in about 30–50% patients [1, 2], which may be characterized by a decline in brain function and movement skills, as well as shifts in behaviour and mood [3]. This disorder is called HIV-associated Neurocognitive Disorder (HAND), which is primarily diagnosed on the basis of brain functional status assessment and neurophysiological testing. HAND can be further categorized as asymptomatic HAND/asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment (ANI), minor neurocognitive disorder (MND), and HIV associated dementia (HAD). In the combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) era, the frequency of HAD has decreased, however the incidence of ANI and MND remains consistent [4]. The prevalence of ANI and MND is ~50-80% (of the total HAND patients), whereas the prevalence of HAD is 2-4 %. [5]. ANI can be characterized by HIV associated cognitive impairment, and the involvement of at least two cognitive areas, such as memory, processing speed, attention, sensory perceptual and motor skills, which do not interfere with the daily activity of the patients. Similarly, MND can be characterized by HIV associated cognitive impairment, with a decline in brain function, movement skills, and shifts in behaviour. Whereas in HAD, no pre-existing cause of dementia should be present, in addition to MND [6].

Prevalence and Epidemiology of NeuroAIDS

On the basis of differences in the genome, HIV-1 subtypes are phylogenetically classified in distinct groups – M, N, O, and P and subtype/clade – A-K; and several recombinant forms (~89). Subtypes A-D are highly prevalent, whereas other subtypes have low prevalence and limited geographic distributions. Two circulating recombinant forms (CRF01_AE and CRF02_AG) are found principally in Southeast Asia and West Africa [7]. The majority of clinical HIV research has been carried out for HIV-1 subtype B, predominantly in America, Western Europe and Australia, however, it only reflects 12% of global HIV infection. In contrast, less research has been conducted for the HIV-1 subtype C, which represents 50% of global HIV infection. HIV-1 subtype C is predominant in Africa and India. The ART has been developed primarily to target HIV-1 subtype B [8]. However, ART has been shown to be ineffective against HIV-1 subtype C in Sweden [9]. Prevalence of HAD in the untreated HIV-1 subtypes A and D infected individuals is ~31% [10].

Clade-specific differences at the level of neurological manifestation can be explained by the difference in the amino acid sequence of viral regulatory protein Trans-activator of transcription (Tat) among the various subtypes of HIV-1 [11]. HIV-1 clade C infection in South African revealed that the cognitive impairment induced by clade C is similar to other HIV clades, and infection is independent of substitution of HIV Tat (C31S) [12]. HIV-1C in India and sub-Saharan Africa are underdiagnosed due to several reasons including; social stigma, shorter life expectancy, short survival of HIV infected individuals along with prevalence of opportunistic infections, all together decreasing the reported incidences of HAD. Global predominant subtypes of HIV-1 clade B and C infections influence the differential effect of immune and neuronal dysfunctions leading to clade-specific clinical variation in neuroAIDS patient cohorts [1].

Neuropathology of NeuroAIDS

A low or nadir CD4 count is the predictive factor for HAND and neuropsychological impairment (NPI) [13]. During HIV infection of the brain, gray and white matter gets impaired and can be observed in the brain autopsy of HIV infected samples. Moreover, the perivascular lymphocytic cuffing and low grade lymphocytic meningitis are identified, especially in the white matter comprising of primarily CD20+ B lymphocytes and CD8+ T lymphocytes [14]. Patients with HAD present an overall reduced volume of gray and white matter predominantly in the area of parietal, frontal and temporal lobes. Viral proteins, such as Tat, Vpr and Gp120, cause neuronal apoptosis by TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1, intracellular calcium ion load and increased ROS production [15]. Neuropathological alterations range from HIV encephalitis (HIVE), ADC (AIDS dementia complex), neurodegeneration, necrotizing lesions, neurosyphilis, meningitis, neuropathies, vacuolar myelopathy, leukoencephalopathy and CNS lymphomas [3]. The neuropathological features of HIVE have been demonstrated as the presence of multinucleated giant cells (MGCs) and white matter pallor, due to perivascular demyelination, as well as hippocampal neuronal apoptosis in companion with microglia activation and astrocytosis. Increased proliferation of progenitor cells in the subgranular zone and hippocampal dentate granule cell layer have been observed in HIVE brain autopsy sample [14]. In HIVE patients, Tat mRNA and protein has been detected in the brain tissue extract [16]. Tat has been shown to cross the BBB via a nonsaturable mechanism with a unidirectional influx rate of about 0.490 microl/gram/min, where 0.126% of an intravenous dose of Tat enters each gram of the brain. The most Tat-permeable regions of the brain are the hypothalamus, occipital cortex, and hippocampus [17]. Tat has been detected in 42% of CSF samples by ELISA from HIV-infected individuals [18].

Mechanism of Neuropathogenesis and NeuroAIDS

Transmigration of HIV across the BBB (Figure-1) can be explained by several mechanisms [19] Disruption of endothelial tight junction proteins, specifically occludin and zonula occludens-1, leads to monocyte/macrophage infiltration into the brain [20]. HIV Tat protein induces the over-expression of chemokines by astrocytes and microglia, which are responsible for the leukocyte entry to CNS [21]. Similarly, Gp120 is critically involved in the neuropathogenesis of HIV by inducing injury and apoptosis [22]. An astonishing role of Tat protein as a growth factor has been proposed, which results in the trans-cellular migration of HIV infected cells into the CNS [23]. Surprisingly, neuroAIDS is independent of HIV titer and is correlated with the degree of monocyte infiltration, following activation of microglia in the brain [24]. CD4 expressing cells with either CXCR4 or CXCR5 are targeted by HIV-1. HIV-1 isolates targeting CXCR5 predominantly infects macrophages, hence classified as M-tropic; whereas isolates targeting CXCR4 predominantly infects T cells, classified as T-tropic [25]. Macrophage-tropic (mac-tropic) HIV-1 R5 strains are known to infect macrophages with low CD4 expression, whereas non-macrophage-tropic (non-mac-tropic) HIV-1 R5 variants requires high level of CD4 expression and primarily target CD4+ T Cells [26]. Highly macrophage-tropic HIV-1 R5 variants are predominant in brain tissue and can be detected in CSF, whereas the detection in immune tissue or the blood is infrequent, even in the late disease condition [27]. The presence of highly macrophage-tropic HIV-1 R5 envelopes (mac-tropic HIV-1 R5 envs) in brain tissue is responsible for adaption for replication in microglia and macrophages, which in turn forms the principal HIV reservoir. Moreover, the mechanism behind the virus dissemination from HIV-1 infected macrophages, and establishment of virus reservoir, can be explained as cell to cell contacts between infected T cells and macrophages, leading to cell fusion for rapid and massive transfer of R5 tropic viruses to macrophages. These fused cells attain the ability to further fuse with neighbouring non infected macrophages, eventually leading to the generation of MGCs [28].

Figure 1 Mechanism of HIV Neuropathogenesis. (A) Cell independent transmigration of HIV across the BBB, (B) HIV-1 Tat protein functions as a growth factor resulting in the trans-cellular migration of HIV infected cells into the brain, (C) Disruption of endothelial tight junction proteins, specifically occludin and zonula occludens-1, results in transmigration of monocytes/macrophages into the brain, (D) The presence of highly mac-tropic HIV-1 R5 envs in the brain tissue is responsible for the adaption for replication in microglia and macrophages, which in turn forms the principal HIV reservoir. (E) Viral Tat protein induces the over-expression of chemokines by astrocytes and microglia, which are responsible for the leukocyte entry to CNS, (F) Interaction between infected T cells and macrophages leading to cell fusion and the generation of highly virus productive multinucleated giant cells (MGCs).

Figure 1

Mechanism of HIV Neuropathogenesis. (A) Cell independent transmigration of HIV across the BBB, (B) HIV-1 Tat protein functions as a growth factor resulting in the trans-cellular migration of HIV infected cells into the brain, (C) Disruption of endothelial tight junction proteins, specifically occludin and zonula occludens-1, results in transmigration of monocytes/macrophages into the brain, (D) The presence of highly mac-tropic HIV-1 R5 envs in the brain tissue is responsible for the adaption for replication in microglia and macrophages, which in turn forms the principal HIV reservoir. (E) Viral Tat protein induces the over-expression of chemokines by astrocytes and microglia, which are responsible for the leukocyte entry to CNS, (F) Interaction between infected T cells and macrophages leading to cell fusion and the generation of highly virus productive multinucleated giant cells (MGCs).

Challenges for the treatment

More than 35 million people infected with HIV are living worldwide. In 2013, access to ART treatment reached 12.9 million people (37% of 35 million), which further enhanced to 15 million people by 2015. The UNAIDS proposed 90-90-90 target by 2020, where 90 % of the HIV infected individual will know their status, 90 % of HIV diagnosed people will have access to ART and 90 % of those on ART will be virally suppressed [29]. ART has been significantly executed among the HIV infected individuals [30], even though the eradication of HIV from the CNS remains a challenging task. Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) enhances the survival rate among the AIDS patients, but due to inability to cross the BBB, incidence of neuroAIDS during the disease progression may be envisaged [31]. Upon administration, ART mostly bound with plasma proteins, further limiting their available fractions for the CNS [32]. The complex structure of the BBB and poor pharmacokinetic profile, coupled with weak bio-distribution of antiretroviral drugs, are the principal barriers for the effective drug delivery to the CNS [33]. Brain microvessel endothelial cells (BMVECs), contributing to the formation of brain capillaries, exert a major obstacle for molecule passage. BMVECs acquire a higher amount of mitochondria and low pinocytotic activity, leading to diminished transport of anti-retroviral (ARV) drugs across the BBB. In addition, overexpression of P glycoprotein (P-gp) on the BBB limits the entry of many drugs, such as protease inhibitors (indinavir and ritonavir), epileptic drugs, and anti-inflammatory agents [34]. The mechanism of neuroAIDS has been well explored, despite the treatment challenges that remain as a major obstacle for the development of effective therapeutics [35]. Consequently, several novel therapeutic approaches have been developed to improve the antiretroviral drugs delivery to the brain for the management of neuroAIDS and various other CNS disorders with desired properties [36].

Novel drug delivery approaches for targeting brain

The ineffectiveness of neurotherapeutics for CNS infections and disorders can be explained by the unsuccessful delivery of the drugs across the BBB. Though there is the presence of a comparative high blood flow in the brain, the drug delivery to the brain remains a challenging task [37]. Therefore, advancement of approaches exploiting novel therapeutics which specifically target the brain, with enhanced drug penetration and effectiveness, is imperative. Several nanotechnology-based approaches have been utilized for effective drug delivery to the CNS (Figure-2), where the most significant approaches are polymeric nanocarriers, liposome-based nanomedicines, magnetic nanoparticles-based nanomedicines, and nanogels [38]. In addition to nanotechnology, alteration of the BBB, adsorptive mediated transcytosis by BMVECs and cell-mediated delivery, have been shown to be effective methods for ARV delivery across the BBB [39]. Similarly, other approaches include chemical modification of proteins for CNS delivery, prodrug-based approach, and biotechnology-based therapeutics for improved permeability and therapeutics delivery to the brain [40].

Figure 2 Novel drug delivery approaches for targeting the brain in NeuroAIDS. Novel drug delivery approaches for targeting the brain in NeuroAIDS are Magnetic nanoparticles-based Nanomedicines (3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine-5’-triphosphate), Polymeric Nanocarriers (lamivudine, stavudine and zidovudine), Nanogels (zidovudine and didanosine), Liposome-based Nanomedicines (zidovudine, zalcitabine and didanosine), Tat conjugated NPs mediated drug delivery (ritonavir), Cell mediated delivery of NPs (ritonavir and efavirenz), P85 mediated drug delivery (lamivudine, zidovudine and nelfinavir) and Prodrug-based approach (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and fosamprenavir).

Figure 2

Novel drug delivery approaches for targeting the brain in NeuroAIDS. Novel drug delivery approaches for targeting the brain in NeuroAIDS are Magnetic nanoparticles-based Nanomedicines (3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine-5’-triphosphate), Polymeric Nanocarriers (lamivudine, stavudine and zidovudine), Nanogels (zidovudine and didanosine), Liposome-based Nanomedicines (zidovudine, zalcitabine and didanosine), Tat conjugated NPs mediated drug delivery (ritonavir), Cell mediated delivery of NPs (ritonavir and efavirenz), P85 mediated drug delivery (lamivudine, zidovudine and nelfinavir) and Prodrug-based approach (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and fosamprenavir).

Nanotechnology-based approach

Advancement of current ARV drugs using nanotechnology can be achieved with higher effectiveness and reduced side effects, ultimately achieving therapeutic concentration at the target sites. Properties, such as multi-functionality, small particle size, increased surface area, high dissolution rate, have increased the permeability of nanocarriers across the BBB. Nanotechnology-based drug delivery systems (NDDS) offer various strategies, which can be exploited for the development of various nanoformulations based therapy [41]. These nanoformulations include solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN), polymeric nanoparticles, nanogels, nanoemulsions, nanosuspensions, nanospheres, nanomicelles and liposomes, lipid drug conjugates (LDC) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC). Nanosizing of ARV drugs in the form of nanoparticles, nanocrystals or nanosuspensions, also increases the bioavailability and dissolution rate across the BBB (Table-1) [42].

Table 1

Nanotechnology based CNS delivery of antiretroviral drugs.

Class Category Mechanism of Action Drugs Nanomaterials/nanocarriers
I Entry and Fusion inhibitors Drugs interfere with the, gp41-mediated fusion process. They block the CCR5 coreceptor that works together with gp41 to facilitate HIV entry through the membrane into the cell.HIV may express either the CCR5 coreceptor, or the CXCR4 coreceptor, or both. Enfuvirtide, Vicriviroc, Maraviroc, Aplaviroc Magnetic nanoparticle
II Protease inhibitors Reversible inhibition of HIV aspartyl protease Ritonavir, Indinavir, Saquinavir, Tipranavir PLGA nanoparticles, Liposome
III Integrase inhibitors Specific inhibition of the final step in integration of stand transfer of the viral DNA into host cell DNA. Raltegravir, Elvitegravir, Dolutegravir Polymeric nanoparticles
IV Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI) NRTI inhibits the viral reverse transcriptase enzyme which is responsible for transcribing viral RNA into double stranded DNA. Zidovudine, Zalcitabine, Stavudine, Lamivudine, Abacavir PLGA nanoparticles, Liposome
V Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTI) Directly inhibits HIV reverse transcriptase so that selective inhibition of the replication of viral DNA occurs. Delavirdine, Efavirenz, Nevirapine, Rilpivirine Tat-conjugated nanoparticle, Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN)

Polymeric nanocarriers for anti-retroviral drug delivery

Polymeric Nanocarriers (Polymeric NCs) have been widely investigated for brain targeting. High encapsulation efficiency, stability, biodegradability, safety and physical properties such as permeability, the rate of disassociation, and simple modulation of release kinetics, all together promote the drug entry to the brain [43]. Polymers, such as methylmethacrylate-sulfopropylmethacrylate (MMA-SPM) and poly butyl cyanoacrylate (PBCA), have been extensively used for lamivudine, stavudine and zidovudine delivery for in vitro and in vivo models of neuroAIDS [44].

Liposome-based nanomedicines

Lipid-based nanocarriers have significant importance in drug delivery methods. Several advantages associated with lipid-based nanomedicines are cell specificity, low immunogenicity, and increased stability for targeting various sites of the body, including the brain, that makes them more effective and safe [45]. Being lipophilic in nature, liposomes can be considered as a vital strategy for ARV drugs, which have limited permeability to the CNS. Liposomes primarily developed for the delivery of hydrophobic anti-HIV drugs, such as zidovudine, zalcitabine, and didanosine, is not possible with other nanocarriers like solid lipid or magnetic nanoparticles [46].

Magnetic nanoparticles-based nanomedicines

Magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) have been well explored for targeted drug delivery rationale. However, MNPs need to be considered as an effective drug delivery to the brain, as it possesses distinctive properties over others. Magnetic materials, such as Magnetite (Fe3O4) and maghemite (γ-Fe2O3), are the frequently used MNPs in the field of medicine [47]. The superparamagnetism property of MNPs can be extensively utilized in various approaches, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetometry, whilst also making MNPs superior over other drug delivery methods, like polymeric nanoparticles, micelles, and liposomes. MNPs tagged with 3’-azido-3’-deoxythymidine-5’-triphosphate (AZTTP) have been shown to effectively cross the BBB without affecting the integrity of the BBB [48].

Nanogels for anti-retroviral drug delivery

Nanogels appear to be an excellent drug delivery system for modern therapeutics [49]. Conventional therapeutics have poor stability in the biological system, and nanogels enables selective uptake into targeted cells. Nanogels are designed for both hydrophilic and hydrophobic drug delivery, with polymeric matrices and particles having high absorption capacity. Nanogels have vital properties, including excellent biocompatibility and degradability profile, colloidal stability, swelling property in aqueous media, higher drug loading capacity, particle size (20–200 nm), electromobility, and a non-immunologic response, that makes them a robust strategy for drug delivery in NeuroAIDS. Amphiphilic cationic nanogels have been used as a carrier for brain delivery for nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, such as zidovudine (AZT) and didanosine (ddI) [50].

Cell-mediated delivery of nanoparticles across the BBB

Dendritic cells, monocytes, and macrophages are mononuclear phagocytes (MPs), which are suitable for cell-mediated delivery via incorporating nanosized ARV drugs [51]. MPs can easily cross the BBB via diapedesis and chemotaxis movement, and reach the inflamed area in the brain. A range of nanoparticles (NPs) such as gelatin NPs, dendrimers, lipid-drug liposomes polymer blend NPs, and nanocrystals have been designed for the cellular uptake by MPs. Nanosuspensions containing ritonavir and efavirenz has been used for cell-mediated delivery across the BBB.

Tat conjugated nanoparticles mediated drug delivery across the BBB

Two distinct halves are exerted by BMVECs, abluminal (brain) and luminal (blood). Adsorptive mediated transcytosis (AMT) by BMVECs provides an inimitable opportunity for ARV drug delivery across the BBB [52]. Bypassing the P-gp efflux action, Tat conjugated NPs have been shown to enhance the transport of encapsulated ritonavir via transcytosis [53]. Astonishing levels of encapsulated ritonavir in the CNS can be attained for a sustained period by using conjugated Tat-NPs compared to the free drugs. The drug clearance also had unsatisfactory limits. However, due to several limitations, such as immunogenicity and neurotoxicity, possessed by Tat, this strategy is poorly translated from research to patients. Adsorptive mediated transcytosis can be translationally advantageous if the post-release mechanisms and interactions between Tat-NPs and neurons are further explored.

A protein-transduction domain (PTD) is imperative for cellular delivery of nanoparticles, polypeptides, and polynucleotide, and are derived from Tat, DNA-binding protein VP22 (HSV-1) or some other proteins [54]. Introduction of PTD in a protein via chemical conjugation or by various other strategies can be extensively used for modification of many proteins and enables them to cross the BBB [55]. Point modification of proteins with small fatty acids, such as palmitate or stearate, is an important approach that increases the lipophilic nature and facilitates the CNS entry and cellular uptake of proteins [56].

P85 mediated drug delivery across the BBB

Alteration of the BBB permeability can be considered as an alternative approach, where molecules can be allowed to pass via the BBB. Nevertheless, this might be an unsafe practice because of the unwanted passage of blood components toward the CNS. Various strategies have been exploited for altering the permeability of the BBB, such as, osmotic, chemical, biochemical, and MRI guided ultrasound [57]. Electromagnetic interference (EMI) in the form of frequency modulated (FM) and amplitude modulated (AM) waves can be applied to effectively parcel the ARV containing nanoparticles across the BBB. Using EMI, SLNs and Polymeric NPs containing saquinavir have been shown to cross the monolayer of human BMVECs mimicking the BBB [58]. Moreover, square AM waves show the strongest effect by increasing the BBB permeability of NPs by more than 14 times, whereas, the permeability of free drugs are unaffected. Likewise, modulation of P-gp via energy depletion methods might effectively increase the ARV drug delivery across the BBB. Pluronic® P85 (P85), is a copolymer block of amphiphilic nature, comprising of two hydrophilic polyethylene oxide chains flanking a hydrophobic group of polypropylene oxide. P85 has been shown to increase the lamivudine, zidovudine and nelfinavir delivery across the BBB, via inhibiting P-gp efflux activity [59]. Surprisingly, P85 also exhibits an antiretroviral effect in conjunction with P-gp modulating agent.

Prodrug-based approaches for drug delivery across the BBB

With the advantage of better penetration, site specificity, and lower toxicities than the original drug, prodrugs actin an enzyme-dependent manner [60]. The BBB possesses several enzymes, which induce biotransformation of prodrugs into active an drug, eventually leading to transmigration of the drug across the BBB, with effective concentration at the site of action [61]. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and fosamprenavir are two prodrugs developed with similar antiviral efficacy and better penetration for the treatment of neuroAIDS [62].


NeuroAIDS remains a major challenge among AIDS individuals. Treatment schedules for patients are unsuccessful, due to the inability of continuous lifelong medication, which results in a low concentration of the drug and increases the possibility of high viral load in the CNS. Insufficient passage of ARV drugs across the BBB eventually reduces the effectiveness and persistence of resistant viral strain against HAART treatment, suggesting that we need to look forward to novel drug delivery strategies. The development of nanotechnology-based strategies allowed us to combat the complex neuropathology associated with neuroAIDS. Advancement of nanoformulations for encapsulation of ARV drugs has been designed for the transport of drugs across the BBB. Polymeric nanocarriers, nanogels, liposome-based nanomedicines, prodrug-based approach, chemical modification of proteins for CNS delivery, and magnetic nanoparticles-based nanomedicines are the various approaches which can be utilized for designing and targeting the CNS of neuroAIDS patients. Persistence of the macrophage-tropic R5 variants in the brain illustrates the associated challenges for the effective treatment, in order to completely eradicate the HIV. Recent studies are suggesting that several approaches, such as antiretroviral therapy intensification shock and kill approach, stem cell transplantation, and gene therapy can be used for the eradication of HIV. Other approaches, such as the use of JAK inhibitors (Ruxolitinib), ribonucleoside chain terminators, and NADPH oxidase inhibitors are also beneficial in the elimination of HIV from the CNS. Additionally, various biotechnology-based approaches include, stem cell therapy, CRISPR/Cas9 pathways, RNA interference, intrabodies and monoclonal antibodies. Novel drug delivery systems should be utilized for the effective drug delivery in neuroAIDS patients.

Future perspectives

The CNS infection and involvement during HIV/AIDS is still a complex obscurity, and needs to be explored extensively. In order to understand HIV associated neuropathogenesis and to determine the potentially promising drug targets, we need to develop various in vitro models to study the neuroinvasion of HIV. Global predominant subtypes of HIV-1 clade B and C infections influence the differential effect of immune and neuronal dysfunctions, leading to clade-specific clinical variation in neuroAIDS patient cohorts. However, clinical impairment rates in India, Thailand, and the USA, were found to be similar, suggesting further studies are required to ascertain the clade-specific differential effect of immune and neuronal dysfunctions leading to neuroAIDS. In addition, neurocognitive evaluation needs to be taken into consideration of local, socioeconomic, genetic and epidemiological factors, to determine the rates of HAD/HAND. The HAART regimens being utilized by AIDS patients needs to be considered, while assessing the impact that HIV-1 clades associated neurocognitive impairment. One of the principal reasons for the failure of neuroAIDS treatment is the inability of ART drugs to cross the BBB, leading to poor bioavailability in the CNS. The presence of highly mac-tropic HIV-1 R5 envs in the brain tissue is responsible for adaption for replication in microglia and macrophages, which in turn forms the principal HIV reservoir. Furthermore, mac-tropic HIV-1 R5 envs is responsible for the formation of compartmentalized clusters in the brain tissue of the patients with non-neurological complications. Persistence of the macrophage-tropic R5 variants in the brain illustrates the associated challenges for the effective treatment in order to completely eradicate HIV. Utilizing novel drug delivery methods involving antiretroviral drugs can be further enhanced for the effective treatment of neuroAIDS. These novel methods should undergo ex vivo and in vivo studies to ascertain the neurotoxicity and effectiveness in neuroAIDS patients. Robust data to support these technologies is required to affirm their use in humans; hence there is a need to execute inter and intracontinental clinical trials as per the standards of various international agencies. Quantitative assessment for the neurocognitive impairment should be standardized in HIV infected individuals for understanding the prevalence of neuroAIDS. A development of prognostic markers based on signature sequences of clade-specific HIV is a priority area of research, which would help the clinicians for the early diagnosis of neuroAIDS. HAD/HAND are the most prevalent neurological complications of neuroAIDS, which is coupled with major challenges, and we need to proceed with a sense of urgency in this context.


The authors are grateful to the Vice Chancellor, King George’s Medical University (KGMU), Lucknow and Director, Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology, Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR-CCMB), India for the encouragement and support for this work. SK Saxena is also supported by CCRH, Government of India, and US NIH grants: R37DA025576 and R01MH085259. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

    Conflict of interest

    Conflict of interest statement: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.


1 Gelman BB, Endsley J, Kolson D. When do models of NeuroAIDS faithfully imitate “the real thing”? J Neurovirol. 2017;18:1-10. Search in Google Scholar

2 Saxena SK, Tiwari S, Nair MP. A global perspective on HIV/AIDS. Science. 2012;337(6096):798. Search in Google Scholar

3 Sagar V, Pilakka-Kanthikeel S, Martinez PC, Atluri VSR, Nair M. Common gene-network signature of different neurological disorders and their potential implications to neuroAIDS. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0181642. Search in Google Scholar

4 Saylor D, Dickens AM, Sacktor N, Haughey N, Slusher B, Pletnikov M, Mankowski JL, Brown A, Volsky DJ, McArthur JC. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder-pathogenesis and prospects for treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(4):234-248. Search in Google Scholar

5 Gott C, Gates T, Dermody N, Brew BJ, Cysique LA. Cognitive change trajectories in virally suppressed HIV-infected individuals indicate high prevalence of disease activity. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0171887. Search in Google Scholar

6 Sanmarti M, Ibáñez L, Huertas S, Badenes D, Dalmau D, Slevin M, Krupinski J, Popa-Wagner A, Jaen A. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. J Mol Psychiatry. 2014;2(1):2. Search in Google Scholar

7 Hemelaar J. The origin and diversity of the HIV-1 pandemic. Trends Mol Med. 2012;18(3):182-192. Search in Google Scholar

8 Geretti AM, Harrison L, Green H, Sabin C, Hill T, Fearnhill E, Pillay D, Dunn D, UK Collaborative Group on HIV Drug Resistance. Effect of HIV-1 subtype on virologic and immunologic response to starting highly active antiretroviral therapy. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48(9):1296-1305. Search in Google Scholar

9 Häggblom A, Svedhem V, Singh K, Sönnerborg A, Neogi U. Virological failure in patients with HIV-1 subtype C receiving antiretroviral therapy: an analysis of a prospective national cohort in Sweden. Lancet HIV. 2016;3(4):e166-e174. Search in Google Scholar

10 Sacktor N, Robertson K. Evolving clinical phenotypes in HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2014;9(6):517-520. Search in Google Scholar

11 Mishra M, Vetrivel S, Siddappa NB, Ranga U, Seth P. Clade-specific differences in neurotoxicity of human immunodeficiency virus-1 B and C Tat of human neurons: significance of dicysteine C30C31 motif. Ann Neurol. 2008;63(3):366-376. Search in Google Scholar

12 Buch S, Chivero ET, Hoare J, Jumare J, Nakasujja N, Mudenda V, Paul R, Kanmogne GD, Sacktor N, Wood C, Royal W, Joseph J. Proceedings from the NIMH symposium on “NeuroAIDS in Africa: neurological and neuropsychiatric complications of HIV”. J Neurovirol. 2016;22(5):699-702. Search in Google Scholar

13 Ellis RJ, Badiee J, Vaida F, Letendre S, Heaton RK, Clifford D, Collier AC, Gelman B, McArthur J, Morgello S, McCutchan JA, Grant I. CD4 nadir is a predictor of HIV neurocognitive impairment in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy. AIDS. 2011;25(14):1747-1751. Search in Google Scholar

14 Tauber SC, Staszewski O, Prinz M, Weis J, Nolte K, Bunkowski S, Brück W, Nau R. HIV encephalopathy: glial activation and hippocampal neuronal apoptosis, but limited neural repair. HIV Med. 2016;17(2):143-151. Search in Google Scholar

15 Xu Y, Kulkosky J, Acheampong E, Nunnari G, Sullivan J, Pomerantz RJ.HIV-1-mediated apoptosis of neuronal cells: Proximal molecular mechanisms of HIV-1-induced encephalopathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(18):7070-7075. Search in Google Scholar

16 Hudson L, Liu J, Nath A, Jones M, Raghavan R, Narayan O, Male D, Everall I. Detection of the human immunodeficiency virus regulatory protein tat in CNS tissues. J Neurovirol. 2000;6(2):145-155. Search in Google Scholar

17 Banks WA, Robinson SM, Nath A. Permeability of the blood-brain barrier to HIV-1 Tat. Exp Neurol. 2005;193(1):218-227. Search in Google Scholar

18 Johnson T, von Geldern G, Tyagi R, Sacktor N, McArthur J, Letendre S, Hasbun R, Petito C, Roh D, Verma A, Nath A. Detection of HIV-Tat protein in brain and CSF of patients on antiretroviral therapy. J Neurovirol 2013;19:S40-S41. Search in Google Scholar

19 Zayyad Z, Spudich S. Neuropathogenesis of HIV: from initial neuroinvasion to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND). Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2015;12(1):16-24. Search in Google Scholar

20 Nakamuta S, Endo H, Higashi Y, Kousaka A, Yamada H, Yano M, Kido H. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120-mediated disruption of tight junction proteins by induction of proteasome-mediated degradation of zonula occludens-1 and -2 in human brain microvascular endothelial cells. J Neurovirol. 2008;14(3):186-195. Search in Google Scholar

21 Eugenin EA, Dyer G, Calderon TM, Berman JW. HIV-1 tat protein induces a migratory phenotype in human fetal microglia by a CCL2 (MCP-1)-dependent mechanism: possible role in NeuroAIDS. Glia. 2005;49(4):501-510. Search in Google Scholar

22 Bardi G, Sengupta R, Khan MZ, Patel JP, Meucci O. Human immunodeficiency virus gp120-induced apoptosis of human neuroblastoma cells in the absence of CXCR4 internalization. J Neurovirol. 2006;12(3):211-218. Search in Google Scholar

23 Mishra M, Taneja M, Malik S, Khalique H, Seth P. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 Tat modulates proliferation and differentiation of human neural precursor cells: implication in NeuroAIDS. J Neurovirol. 2010;16(5):355-367. Search in Google Scholar

24 Churchill M, Nath A. Where does HIV hide? A focus on the central nervous system. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2013;8(3):165-169. Search in Google Scholar

25 Joseph SB, Arrildt KT, Swanstrom AE, Schnell G, Lee B, Hoxie JA, Swanstrom R. Quantification of entry phenotypes of macrophage-tropic HIV-1 across a wide range of CD4 densities. J Virol. 2014;88(4):1858-1869. Search in Google Scholar

26 Musich T, O’Connell O, Gonzalez-Perez MP, Derdeyn CA, Peters PJ, Clapham PR. HIV-1 non-macrophage-tropic R5 envelope glycoproteins are not more tropic for entry into primary CD4+ T-cells than envelopes highly adapted for macrophages. Retrovirology. 2015;12:25. Search in Google Scholar

27 Quitadamo B, Peters PJ, Repik A, O’Connell O, Mou Z, Koch M, Somasundaran M, Brody R, Luzuriaga K, Wallace A, Wang S, Lu S, McCauley S, Luban J, Duenas-Decamp M, Gonzalez-Perez MP, Clapham PR. HIV-1 R5 macrophage-tropic envelope glycoprotein trimers bind CD4 with high affinity, while the CD4 binding site on Non-macrophage-tropic, T-tropic R5 envelopes is occluded. J Virol. 2018;92(2).pii: e00841-17. Search in Google Scholar

28 Bracq L, Xie M, Lambelé M, Vu LT, Matz J, Schmitt A, Delon J, Zhou P, Randriamampita C, Bouchet J, Benichou S. T cell-macrophage fusion triggers multinucleated giant cell formation for HIV-1 spreading. J Virol. 2017;91(24):e01237-17. Search in Google Scholar

29 Bain LE, Nkoke C, Noubiap JJN. UNAIDS 90-90-90 targets to end the AIDS epidemic by 2020 are not realistic: comment on “Can the UNAIDS 90-90-90 target be achieved? A systematic analysis of national HIV treatment cascades”. BMJ Glob Health. 2017;2(2):e000227. Search in Google Scholar

30 Maurya VK, Kumar S, Saxena SK. Molecular mechanism of neuropathogenesis and current therapeutics for neuroAIDS. Research Reports 2018;1:e1-e8. Search in Google Scholar

31 Watkins CC, Treisman GJ. Cognitive impairment in patients with AIDS -prevalence and severity. HIV/AIDS – Research and Palliative Care. 2015;7:35–47. Search in Google Scholar

32 Yilmaz A, Price RW, Gisslén M. Antiretroviral drug treatment of CNS HIV-1 infection. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(2):299-311. Search in Google Scholar

33 Das MK, Sarma A, Chakraborty T. Nano-ART and NeuroAIDS. Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2016;6(5):452-472. Search in Google Scholar

34 Zhang YL, Ouyang YB, Liu LG, Chen DX. Blood-brain barrier and neuro-AIDS. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2015;19(24):4927-4939. Search in Google Scholar

35 Mahajan SD, Aalinkeel R, Law WC, Reynolds JL, Nair BB, Sykes DE, Yong KT, Roy I, Prasad PN, Schwartz SA. Anti-HIV-1 nanotherapeutics: promises and challenges for the future. Int J Nanomedicine. 2012;7:5301-5314. Search in Google Scholar

36 Varghese NM, Senthil V, Saxena SK. Nanocarriers for brain specific delivery of anti-retro viral drugs: challenges and achievements. J Drug Target. 2018;26(3):195-207. Search in Google Scholar

37 Kaul M, Lipton SA. Experimental and potential future therapeutic approaches for HIV-1 associated dementia targeting receptors for chemokines, glutamate and erythropoietin. Neurotox Res. 2005;8(1-2):167-186. Search in Google Scholar

38 Saxena SK, Tiwari S, Nair MP. Nanotherapeutics: emerging competent technology in neuroAIDS and CNS drug delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2012;7(7):941-944. Search in Google Scholar

39 Nowacek A, Gendelman HE. NanoART, neuroAIDS and CNS drug delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond). 2009;4(5):557-574. Search in Google Scholar

40 Nair M, Jayant RD, Kaushik A, Sagar V. Getting into the brain: Potential of nanotechnology in the management of NeuroAIDS. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;103:202-217. Search in Google Scholar

41 das Neves J, Amiji MM, Bahia MF, Sarmento B. Nanotechnology-based systems for the treatment and prevention of HIV/AIDS. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2010;62(4-5):458-477. Search in Google Scholar

42 Chhabra R, Tosi G, Grabrucker AM. Emerging use of nanotechnology in the treatment of neurological disorders. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21(22):3111-3130. Search in Google Scholar

43 Banik BL, Fattahi P, Brown JL. Polymeric nanoparticles: the future of nanomedicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2016;8(2):271-299. Search in Google Scholar

44 Sagar V, Pilakka-Kanthikeel S, Pottathil R, Saxena SK, Nair M. Towards nanomedicines for neuroAIDS. Rev Med Virol. 2014;24(2):103-124. Search in Google Scholar

45 Kumar L, Verma S, Prasad DN, Bhardwaj A, Vaidya B, Jain AK. Nanotechnology: a magic bullet for HIV AIDS treatment. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2015;43(2):71-86. Search in Google Scholar

46 Ramanathan R, Jiang Y, Read B, Golan-Paz S, Woodrow KA. Biophysical characterization of small molecule antiviral-loaded nanolipogels for HIV-1 chemoprophylaxis and topical mucosal application. Acta Biomater. 2016;36:122-131. Search in Google Scholar

47 Nair M, Guduru R, Liang P, Hong J, Sagar V, Khizroev S. Externally controlled on-demand release of anti-HIV drug using magneto-electric nanoparticles as carriers. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1707. Search in Google Scholar

48 Saiyed ZM, Gandhi NH, Nair MP. Magnetic nanoformulation of azidothymidine 5’-triphosphate for targeted delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Int J Nanomedicine. 2010;5:157-166. Search in Google Scholar

49 Yadav HKS, Al Halabi NA, Alsalloum GA. Nanogels as Novel Drug Delivery Systems - A Review. J Pharm Pharm Res. 2017;1:5. Search in Google Scholar

50 Vinogradov SV, Poluektova LY, Makarov E, Gerson T, Senanayake MT. Nano-NRTIs: efficient inhibitors of HIV type-1 in macrophages with a reduced mitochondrial toxicity. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2010;21(1):1-14. Search in Google Scholar

51 Batrakova EV, Gendelman HE, Kabanov AV. Cell-mediated drug delivery. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2011;8(4):415-433. Search in Google Scholar

52 Lu W. Adsorptive-mediated brain delivery systems. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2012;13(12):2340-2348. Search in Google Scholar

53 Rao KS, Reddy MK, Horning JL, Labhasetwar V. TAT-conjugated nanoparticles for the CNS delivery of anti-HIV drugs. Biomaterials. 2008;29(33):4429-4438. Search in Google Scholar

54 Wang W, Ye C, Liu J, Zhang D, Kimata JT, Zhou P. CCR5 gene disruption via lentiviral vectors expressing Cas9 and single guided RNA renders cells resistant to HIV-1 infection. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e115987. Search in Google Scholar

55 Yi X, Manickam DS, Brynskikh A, Kabanov AV. Agile delivery of protein therapeutics to CNS. J Control Release. 2014;190:637-663. Search in Google Scholar

56 Schwarze SR, Hruska KA, Dowdy SF. Protein transduction: unrestricted delivery into all cells? Trends Cell Biol. 2000;10(7):290-295. Search in Google Scholar

57 Hersh DS, Wadajkar AS, Roberts N, Perez JG, Connolly NP, Frenkel V, Winkles JA, Woodworth GF, Kim AJ. Evolving drug delivery strategies to overcome the blood brain barrier. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(9):1177-1193. Search in Google Scholar

58 Kuo YC, Kuo CY. Electromagnetic interference in the permeability of saquinavir across the blood-brain barrier using nanoparticulate carriers. Int J Pharm. 2008;351(1-2):271-281. Search in Google Scholar

59 Spitzenberger TJ, Heilman D, Diekmann C, Batrakova EV, Kabanov AV, Gendelman HE, Elmquist WF, Persidsky Y. Novel delivery system enhances efficacy of antiretroviral therapy in animal model for HIV-1 encephalitis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27(5):1033-1042. Search in Google Scholar

60 De Schutter C, Ehteshami M, Hammond ET, Amblard F, Schinazi RF. Metabolism of Nucleosides and Nucleotides Prodrugs. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(45):6984-7002. Search in Google Scholar

61 Chan L, Asriel B, Eaton EF, Wyatt CM. Potential kidney toxicity from the antiviral drug tenofovir: new indications, new formulations, and a new prodrug.Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2018;27(2):102-112. Search in Google Scholar

62 Dalpiaz A, Fogagnolo M, Ferraro L, Capuzzo A, Pavan B, Rassu G, Salis A, Giunchedi P, Gavini E. Nasal chitosan microparticles target a zidovudine prodrug to brain HIV sanctuaries. Antiviral Res. 2015;123:146-157. Search in Google Scholar



(Human Immunodeficiency Virus)


Central Nervous System




Associated Neurocognitive Disorders


HIV Associated Dementia


Asymptomatic Neurocognitive Impairment


Minor Neurocognitive Disorder


HIV Encephalitis


AIDS Dementia Complex


Multinucleated Giant Cells


Neuropsychological impairment


Trans-Activator of Transcription


Antiretroviral therapy


(combined anti retroviral therapy)




Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

(mac-tropic HIV-1 R5 envs)

Macrophage-tropic HIV-1 R5 envelopes


P glycoprotein




Nanotechnology Based Drug Delivery Systems


Solid Lipid Nanoparticles


Lipid Drug Conjugates


Nano Structured Lipid Carriers




Poly Butyl Cyanoacryalate




Protein-Transduction Domain


Magnetic Resonance Imaging


Magnetic nanoparticles


Brain Microvessel Endothelial Cells


Adsorptive Mediated Transcytosis


Mononuclear Phagocytes


Electromagnetic Interference


Frequency Modulated


Amplitude Modulated

Received: 2018-01-29
Accepted: 2018-04-06
Published Online: 2018-05-08

© 2018 Swatantra Kumar et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.