Antitumor activity of 5-hydroxy-3 ′ ,4 ′ ,6,7-tetramethoxy ﬂ avone in glioblastoma cell lines and its antagonism with radiotherapy

: 5-Hydroxy-3 ′ ,4 ′ ,6,7-tetramethoxy ﬂ avone (TMF) is a plant-origin ﬂ avone known for its anti-cancer properties. In the present study, the cytotoxic e ﬀ ect of TMF was evaluated in the U87MG and T98G glioblastoma (GBM) cell lines. The e ﬀ ect of TMF on cell viability was assessed with trypan blue exclusion assay and crystal violet staining. In addition, ﬂ ow cytometry was performed to examine its e ﬀ ect on the di ﬀ erent phases of the cell cycle, and in vitro scratch wound assay assessed the migratory capacity of the treated cells. Furthermore, the e ﬀ ect of in vitro radiotherapy was also evaluated with a combination of TMF and radiation. In both cell lines, TMF treatment resulted in G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, reduced cell viability, and reduced cell migratory capacity. In contrast, there was an antagonistic property of TMF treatment with radiotherapy. These results demonstrated the antineoplastic e ﬀ ect of TMF in GBM cells in vitro , but the antagonistic e ﬀ ect with radiotherapy indicated that TMF should be further evaluated for its possible antitumor role post-radiotherapy.


Introduction
The most frequent primary malignant brain tumor in adults is glioblastoma (GBM) [1].It is defined as grade 4 astrocytoma and consists of extremely unstable and invasive cells, which show resistance to most therapeutic approaches [2].For this reason, it is largely considered an incurable disease with a median survival of only 15 months after diagnosis [1,3].
Considering the complex nature of GBM, combination therapy, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, is usually recommended [4].Surgical removal of the tumor is the primary treatment; however, due to its invasive nature, it is impossible to remove it entirely, resulting in relapse.Radiotherapy and chemotherapy act synergistically, killing residual cancer cells and thus improving patients' life expectancy [5,6].The most common chemotherapeutic drug used against GBM is temozolomide (TMZ).However, cancer cells often develop resistance, posing a serious challenge to successful treatment [7][8][9].In addition, the naturally occurring blood-brain barrier (BBB) prevents successful drug delivery, allowing only very small and hydrophobic molecules to pass through.At the same time, a patients' full recovery is hampered by the aggressive migration of cancer cells to nearby tissues [10].
In recent years, the role of natural compounds in cancer treatment has been highlighted through variant ongoing research [11,12].Natural compounds have been isolated from several plants and have been tested as anticancer agents.One of them is curcumin, a polyphenol that has been isolated from turmeric, Curcuma longa, and acts mainly through inhibition of cellular cycle, oncogene silencing, and cancer cell apoptosis.Resveratrol is classified as a stilbenoid and is found in various plant species, such as mulberries, peanuts, and grapes.It prevents the growth of cancer cells and leads them to apoptosis.Corresponding action has been observed from lycopene too, a carotenoid found in tomatoes.Finally, camptothecin (isolated from Camptotheca acuminata) and taxol (isolated from Taxus brevifolia) cause cell cycle arrest [13][14][15].
5-Hydroxy-3′,4′,6,7-tetramethoxyflavone (TMF) is a natural compound.It belongs to the group of flavonoids, more specifically in flavones, with a molecular weight of 358 kDa (Figure 1).Flavonoids are secondary metabolites that are widely found in plants, vegetables, and fruits.They protect plants from external dangers, and they have antioxidant activity.TMF has been isolated from extracts of Centaurea bruguieriana subsp.belangeriana of the Asteraceae family.C. bruguieriana subsp.belangeriana is an annual herb with purple spiky flowers and a white stem that reaches 15-50 cm tall and has several therapeutical properties [16][17][18].The cytotoxicity of TMF has been studied in certain types of cancer, such as lung, prostate, colon, and leukemia [19].A more prominent effect was observed in lung cancer, inhibiting the growth of cancer cells by 95%, for a concentration of 50 μM TMF.However, in prostate cancer cells, proliferation has been inhibited by only 20% at the same concentration of TMF [19].No previous study has investigated the therapeutic potential of TMF in GBM.
The purpose of this study was to investigate, for the first time, the antitumor effects of TMF in GBM cell lines as a single pharmacological treatment and as a combination with radiotherapy.Our findings indicate a favorable in vitro effect of TMF against GBM cells but an antagonistic effect when it is combined with radiotherapy.

Isolation and identification of TMF
TMF, a yellow powder in highly pure form (95% purity), was derived from the ethyl acetate extract of C. bruguieriana subsp.belangeriana (DC.)Bornm.(collected from the suburbs of Peshawar, Pakistan, and authenticated by Dr. Shahid Farooq, Plant Taxonomist of Pakistan Council of Scientific and Industrial Research-PCSIR, Peshawar).A voucher specimen was deposited in the herbarium at the PCSIR Laboratories, Peshawar, under the code CA-001-04.The air-dried aerial parts of C. bruguieriana subsp.belangeriana (DC.)Bornm.(1.5 kg) were finely ground and extracted at room temperature with a mixture of cyclohexane:diethyl ether:methanol 1:1:1, which yielded 80.46 g of extract.The extract was redissolved with the same mixture and washed with brine.The aqueous fraction was extracted with ethyl acetate (EtOAc) (organic phase B, 25.81 g).Chromatographic methods such as CC (column chromatography), TLC (thin-layer chromatography), and VLC (vacuum-layer chromatography) were selected for the isolation of TMF from the extract.Organic phase B was fractioned by VLC (10.0 × 7.0 cm) on silica gel (Merck 60H, Art.7736), with gradient elution with mixtures of solvents and yielded 11 fractions of 300 mL each (A-L).Fraction E (3.287 g), eluted with ethyl acetate (EtOAc) 100%, was subjected to VLC (10.0 × 7.0 cm) on silica gel (Merck 60H, Art.7736), using dichloromethane (CH 2 Cl 2 )-methanol (MeOH) mixtures of increasing polarity as eluents to give 13 fractions of 300 mL each (EA-EN).Fraction EC (166.2 mg) eluted with CH 2 Cl 2 -MeOH (99:1) was refractionated (CC) on Sephadex LH-20 using MeOH as an eluent to give 11 fractions (ECA-ECL).Fraction ECG (32.5 mg) was subjected to preparative thin-layer chromatography (pTLC) on silica gel (Kieselgel F254, Merck, Art.5715, Merck GLOBAL, Athens, Greece) with elution solvent CH 2 Cl 2 -MeOH 98:2 and yielded three bands (ECGα-ECGγ).Band ECGα (Rf = 0.29) was identified as the compound TMF (14.9 mg).Fraction ECK (41.3 mg) was subjected to preparative pTLC on silica gel (Kieselgel F254, Merck, Art.5715, Merck GLOBAL, Athens, Greece) with elution solvent CH 2 Cl 2 -MeOH 98:2 and yielded two bands (ECK1-ECK2).Band ECK1 (Rf = 0.29) was identified as the compound TMF (34.3 mg).TLC was used to control the quality of the fractions.For the TLC, a silica gel (Kieselgel F254, Merck, Art.5554, Merck GLOBAL, Athens, Greece) stationary phase on aluminum foil (20 cm × 20 cm, 0.1 mm) with a fluorescence marker and a cellulose (Merck, Art.5552) stationary phase on aluminum foil (20 cm × 20 cm, 0.1 mm) was used.The development of the TLC plates was carried out using mixtures of solvents appropriate for each group of fractions.Finally, the TLC plates of silica gel were sprayed with vanillin-H 2 SO 4 (1:1) [25], and the cellulose plates were sprayed with Naturstoffreagenz A [26].The identification/verification of TMF was performed via 1D NMR (nuclear magnetic resonance) studies ( 1 H).The 1 H-NMR was recorded in CD 3 OD and CDCl 3 using an AGILENT DD2 500 (500.1 MHz for 1 H-NMR) spectrometer.Chemical shifts are reported in δ (ppm) values relative to TMS (tetramethylsilane) (3.31 ppm for CD 3 OD and 7.24 ppm for CDCl 3 for 1 H-NMR).The data of isolated and identified TMF were compared with those of samples from our collection and by comparison with data reported in the literature (Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2) [27].

Cell lines
The GBM cell lines, U87MG and T98G, were derived from two patients with GBM.They were supplied by Dr W.K. Alfred Yung (Department of Neuro-Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA) and ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), respectively.Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM, Gibco BRL, Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA), supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 1% penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco BRL), was used to cultivate both cell lines.They were incubated in a humidified environment that was maintained at 37°C and 5% CO 2 .

Natural compound treatment
TMF was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a stock concentration of 13, 15.6, and 16.5 mM and stored at −80°C.Before each experiment, stock aliquots were diluted to the desired final concentration.The final volume of each experiment included less than 1% DMSO.TMF was applied to malignant glioma cell cultures with or without radiation.

Cell viability assay
Cell viability was assessed by Trypan Blue exclusion assay [28,29].Approximately, 20,000 cells, from each cell line, were seeded in 12-well plates, and after 24 h, they were exposed to TMF-increasing concentrations.Specifically, the concentrations used were 25, 50, 75, 100, and 150 μM.The percentage of cell viability was determined after 72 h of incubation with the TMF using a phase-contrast microscope.Viability curves were then drawn, and the IC50 value was calculated for each cell line.Results were averaged by three independent experiments with duplicate runs of each sample.

Crystal violet assay
Using the crystal violet assay, cell proliferation was further evaluated after treatment with TMF [30].Approximately, 100,000 cells were cultured in 6-well plates, incubated for 24 h, and then treated with TMF at concentrations of ½ IC50, IC50, and 2× IC50.After 72 h, cells were washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), incubated with the crystal violet solution 0.2% (0.2 g crystal violet powder, Merck, MA, USA) for 2-3 min, and then rinsed again with deionized water (ddH 2 O).After that, plates were left overnight to dry, and the next day, a phase-contrast microscope was used to take pictures of each well plate.

Flow cytometry
Flow cytometry was used to study the effects of TMF on cell cycle, as a single treatment.It was performed after 24 and 72 h.Specifically, approximately 20,000 cells were cultured in 12-well plates, incubated for 24 h, and then treated with TMF at concentrations of ½ IC50, IC50, and 2× IC50.Cells were then treated with trypsin and washed with PBS before being incubated with propidium iodide (PI) working solution 50 µg/mL (20 mg/mL RNase A and 0.1% Triton X-100) for 20 min in the dark at 37°C.Using a flow cytometer (CYT; OMNI, Santa Marta De Tormes Salamanca, Spain), cells were analyzed and separated into the four phases G0/G1, S, G2/M, and sub-G0/G1.Each sample was repeated three times in two independent experiments, and results were obtained from the averages [31,32].

In vitro scratch wound assay
The anti-migratory properties of TMF were evaluated by wound healing assay [33].Approximately, 10,000 cells were seeded in 6-well plates, an artificial vacuum was created, and then concentrations of TMF equal to IC50 and 2× IC50 were added.The injury caused to the cells was photographed using a phase contrast microscope at 5× magnification for four consecutive days, from t = 0 to t = 72 h.The migration distance at each of these time points was measured using the ImageJ program, while the migration width was given by the formula Width migration = Width 0h − Width 72h .Results were derived from the averages of three independent experiments.

Combination treatment with TMF and radiation
Each cell line (U87MG and T98G) was cultured in three separate 12-well plates and was treated with various combinations of TMF and radiation after 24 h.TMF was added in concentrations of 20, 40, 80, 100, and 140 μM for the U87MG cells and in concentrations of 10, 20, 30, 40, and 60 μM for the T98G cells.After 2 h, both cell lines were irradiated with two different radiation doses of 2 or 4 Gy, using a linac 6 MV accelerator (Varian MedicalSystems) as described previously in detail [28,34].The third well plate was the control sample [34].Cell viability was determined by the trypan blue exclusion assay after 72 h of incubation.The combination index approach of Chou and Talalay was used to assess the combinatorial effect of TMF and radiation [35].The combination index (CI) was calculated by CompuSyn software (ComboSyn, Inc., New York, NY, USA) based on the multiple drug-effect equation and taking into account the dose-effect curves for TMF alone, radiotherapy alone, and their different combinations.The formula for measuring the Combination Index is the following: CI = (D 1 /D X1 ) + (D 2 /D X2 ), where D X1 and D X2 designate the doses of single treatments capable of producing a specific inhibitory effect on cell viability, where D 1 and D 2 refer to the doses of the same treatment agents that when combined can produce the same inhibitory effect as each monotherapy.The effect of the combo treatment was determined by the CI value (CI < 1 was considered a synergistic, CI = 1 additive, and CI > 1 as an antagonistic effect) [36].

Statistical analysis
All results were obtained as mean of three independent experiments ± standard deviation (SD), calculated by the statistical program MedCalc (trial version).The comparison between different experimental conditions was performed using two-way ANOVA with the post hoc Turkey test.At p-values <0.05, differences were considered statistically significant.

Cytotoxicity of TMF in GBM cell lines
Both cell lines showed sensitivity to TMF.This outcome is shown in Figure 2. The number of surviving cells decreases exponentially, as the dose of TMF increases.The IC50 value of the TMF was 78 μM for U87MG cells and 30.5 for T98G cells after 72 h of treatment.Crystal violet staining   for each cell line.Each curve in the graphs corresponds to a stage of the cell cycle and is symbolized by the letter R. Specifically, the R3 region corresponds to the G0/G1 phase, R4 to S phase, R5 to G2/M phase, and R6 to sub-G0/G1.Also for each stage, the percentage of cells found in it is indicated.An increase in the percentage of cells in R3 and a decrease in the remaining phases was observed.

TMF causes cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase.
The mechanism of the TMF effect was evaluated by examining its impact on the cell cycle.Flow cytometry assessed the potential of a specific cell cycle phase disruption at 24 h, while the effect of TMF on cell death was examined at 72 h since the optimum time to assess cell death is after the compound has been administered for a few days.Cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase was observed in both cell lines (Figure 4, Tables 1 and 2).
Mean values from the independent experiments performed in each cell line are summarized in Tables 1 and 2, expressed as (%) percentage.In each case, the SD has been calculated, and statistically significant results (p < 0.05) have been marked with an asterisk.Regarding TMF's impact on cell death, after 72 h of incubation, no remarkable change in the percentage of U87MG cells in the sub-G0/G1 phase was observed.On the contrary, in T98G cells, there was a very slight rise (around 2%) from control to TMF concentration equal to 2× IC50 (Tables 3 and 4).
Mean values from the independent experiments performed for each cell line are summarized in Tables 3 and 4, expressed as (%) percentage.In each case, the SD has been calculated, and statistically significant results (p < 0.05) were marked with an asterisk.

TMF acts as an anti-migratory agent
To investigate if TMF could affect the migration of U87MG and T98G cancer cells, a 72-h artificial wound-healing procedure was used.Control samples were compared with samples that had been treated with the TMF, and the percentages of migration were calculated for each cell line.For U87MG cells, the percentage of wound healing in the control group was 34.06%.This percentage decreased to 20.97% after treatment with 78 μM (IC50) TMF, and it decreased even further to 7.86% at a TMF concentration of 156 μM (2IC50).This reduction was even greater for T98G Cells' percentage at the G0/G1 phase was greater than that at the other phases; this indicated the cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase.An increase in this percentage was also observed at higher doses of TMF, going from 75.41 to 84.19%.No significant changes were noticed at the other phases.*Statistically significant results (p < 0.05).cells, as the wound healing rate was 79.6% in control, while at TMF concentrations of 30.5 μM (IC50) and 61 μM (2IC50), this percentage decreased to 39.2 and 23.6%, respectively.These percentages also appear in Figure 5.

Combined action of TMF and radiation on GBM cells
Various combinations of TMF and radiation were used to assess whether or not these treatments may present a synergistic effect.Specifically, the TMF ranged in concentrations of 20-140 μM for U87MG and 10-60 μM for T98G cells.Radiation was given in doses of 2 or 4 Gy.CompuSyn software was used to calculate the CI index, which determined the relationship between the two treatments.Most combinations for both cell lines demonstrated an antagonistic association between TMF and radiation.Except for a single instance of synergy in both cell lines and two cases of additive effect.These results are summarized in Tables 5  and 6.
The relationship of TMF and radiation was also represented graphically through the dose-effect curve and the combination index diagram, which were derived from the CompuSyn software (Figures 6 and 7).

Discussion
In recent years, many beneficial effects have been discovered from natural compounds.Anticancer properties are one of the most important characteristics of several natural compounds.These effects have been attributed to a variety of mechanisms.Inhibition of cell proliferation, inhibition of migration, oncogene silencing, reactive oxygen species generation, apoptotic pathway activation, and mitochondrial dysfunction are only some of them [37,38].Moreover, natural compounds, especially flavonoids, phenolic acids, and stilbenes, have displayed positive effects on neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease.This effect might be possibly attributed to antioxidant activity and prevention of protein misfolding and chronic inflammation [39].
In the present study, the anticancer effect of a natural agent was tested in GBM, the most frequent malignant  The effect denotes cellular death and ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates no cellular death and 1 depicts complete cellular death.CI < 1 represents synergism, CI = 1 additivity, and CI > 1 represents an antagonistic behavior.The effect denotes cellular death and ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 indicates no cellular death and 1 depicts complete cellular death.CI < 1 represents synergism, CI = 1 additivity, and CI > 1 represents an antagonistic behavior.
5-Hydroxy-3′,4′,6,7-tetramethoxyflavone for glioblastoma  7 primary brain tumor in adults [40].GBM is a difficult-totreat tumor.So far, surgery is the main therapeutic approach, along with radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant chemotherapy [5].TMZ is a widely used chemotherapeutic drug against GBM with a modest therapeutic effect.Tumor recurrence is almost universal within a few months post-surgery [8,9].Herewith, we tested TMF, a flavone, for its possible anti-glioma effect.The anticancer properties of this compound and some of its isoforms have been evaluated in previous studies [19][20][21]23,24].TMF can be isolated from various natural plants; in the present study, the plant C. bruguieriana subsp.belangeriana was the source of TMF.
The effect of TMF against GBM cells in vitro was significant.Specifically, it induced the death of GBM cells at low IC50 concentrations (78 μM for U87MG cells and 30.5 μM for T98G cells), indicating that a high dose of the drug is not necessary to provide the desired effect.Thus, if future studies demonstrate low toxicity in animal models, it may be considered for further evaluation and development as a possible antitumor agent against GBM.In flow cytometry experiments, cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase was seen  after TMF administration.This might explain the reduced viability of cancer cells.TMF also prevented the migration of cells, especially in the T98G cell line, which also represents a desirable property for an anti-glioma agent.
The combination of TMF with radiation turned out to be antagonistic.In both tested cell lines, the CI index was greater than 1, in most combinations, which can be interpreted as antagonism.As shown above, TMF arrested the cell cycle in the G0/G1 phase, while radiation inhibited the cell cycle in the G2/M phase [41].The two therapies affected the cells' cycle in a distinguished different ways.These opposite approaches resulted in a situation where pharmacological treatment competed with radiation.
Using combination therapy could have beneficial, neutral, or harmful results [42].There are several other potential mechanisms contributing to the antagonism of concomitant use of chemotherapy and radiation in GBM cells.Thus, due to the diversity of cancer cells, radiation can activate both pro-apoptotic and pro-survival signaling pathways [6].In addition, previous studies have shown that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling can exert an antagonistic effect between chemotherapy and radiotherapy, when they are administered sequentially in GBM cells [6,43].Increased EGFR signaling, caused by either radiation or chemotherapy, activates downstream pathways, such as rat sarcoma virus (RAS), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/protein kinase B (AKT), and mitogenactivated protein kinase (MAPK).These pathways finally lead to the expression of factors that can cause resistance to the other treatment approach [43].Nuclear factor kB (NF-kB) has been found to be activated in some cases of combined therapy.It regulates cell apoptosis and protects the cancer cells from the negative effects of radiation [44].Another potential mechanism of resistance in combination therapy is the regulation of B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) gene family members [44].Tο determine the exact cause of antagonism between TMF and radiation, further studies must be done, and it would be very helpful if they focus on the exact mechanism of both TMF and radiation in cells and molecular pathways.This would not only help to predict the therapeutic relationship between these two, but also to find ways that could prevent this.
Regarding the BBB, there is no published literature to support that TMF crosses BBB since the cytotoxic activity of TMF has only been studied in other non-brain types of cancer.However, its low molecular weight and hydrophobic nature are two very important and encouraging characteristics, which could potentially allow TMF to cross that barrier.Studies show that only highly hydrophobic molecules with upper molecular weight 500 kDa can pass through BBB [45].
In summary, this study is the first to indicate an encouraging anti-glioma effect of TMF.Our results show that this natural compound can inhibit cell proliferation, cause a G0/G1 cell cycle arrest, and reduce the cells' migratory capacity.Also, the significant reduction of collected cells, in the T98G cell line, during flow cytometry indicates the possibility of necrosis at higher concentrations of the TMF.This could be concluded from the absence of a sub-G0/G1 population, as well as the lack of indication of autophagy.Due to the absence of previous studies on TMF as a GBM treatment, comparison and confirmation of the results were not possible.Although our current results are quite encouraging, more studies need to proceed in order to clarify the exact molecular pathways that are modified by the action of TMF.Finally, GBM growth mechanism is different in the human brain compared to GBM cell lines.This fact highlights the need for animal experiments before clinical trials.
Funding information: Authors state no funding involved.

Figure 2 :
Figure 2: Viability of U87MG and T98G cancer cells following TMF treatment.The y-axis corresponds to the % viability of the cells, while the x-axis corresponds to the different concentrations of TMF in μM.Both curves were determined using the exponential analysis model of Microsoft 365 Excel.

Figure 3 :
Figure 3: Crystal violet staining (0.2% crystal violet) of U87MG and T98G cells after treatment with TMF in concentrations of IC50/2, IC50, and 2IC50.Cells that survived are represented in purple; images were taken using a phase-contrast microscope in 10× magnification.Scale bars = 100 μM.

Figure 4 :
Figure4: Effect of TMF on the cell cycle of U87MG and T98G cells after 24 h of incubation.TMF was added in concentrations of IC50/2, IC50, and 2IC50 for each cell line.Each curve in the graphs corresponds to a stage of the cell cycle and is symbolized by the letter R. Specifically, the R3 region corresponds to the G0/G1 phase, R4 to S phase, R5 to G2/M phase, and R6 to sub-G0/G1.Also for each stage, the percentage of cells found in it is indicated.An increase in the percentage of cells in R3 and a decrease in the remaining phases was observed.

Figure 5 :
Figure 5: Migration rates of U87MG and T98G cells after treatment with TMF.The x-axis represents the two cell lines, while the y-axis represents their migration rate in the different concentrations of the compound.Error bars indicate SDs in each case, and asterisks indicate statistically significant results p < 0.05.

Figure 6 :
Figure 6: Plots from the combination of TMF and radiation in U87MG cells.(a) Dose-effect curve: the action of the TMF is represented in blue, the action of radiation in red, and their combined action in green.(b) Combination index diagram: values below the horizontal line, which corresponds to value 1, indicate synergy, while the values above the horizontal line indicate antagonism.

Figure 7 :
Figure 7: Plots from the combination of TMF and radiation in T98G cells.(a) Dose-effect curve: the action of the TMF is represented in blue, the action of radiation in red, and their combined action in green.(b) Combination index diagram: values below the horizontal line, which corresponds to value 1, indicate synergy, while the values above the horizontal line indicate antagonism.

Table 1 :
Cell cycle distribution in U87MG cells, after the effect of TMF in different concentrations, for t = 24 h

Table 2 :
Cell cycle distribution in T98G cells, after the effect of TMF in different concentrations, for t = 24 h

Table 3 :
Cell cycle distribution in U87MG cells, after the effect of TMF in different concentrations, for t = 72 h

Table 4 :
Cell cycle distribution in T98G cells, after the effect of TMF in different concentrations, for t = 72 h

Table 5 :
Evaluation of the combined effects of TMF and radiation in U87MG cells

Table 6 :
Evaluation of the combined effects of TMF and radiation in T98G cells