Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter April 9, 2014

Introduction of a neutral shoe to assess reference values for dynamic pedobarography

  • Anna Katharina Kluger , Hans-Dieter Carl , Andreas Jendrissek , Bernd Swoboda and Thilo Hotfiel EMAIL logo

Abstract

Background: The aim of our study was to introduce a so-called “neutral shoe” as a tool to assess reference values for dynamic pedobarographic investigations.

Materials and methods: Twelve healthy volunteers were asked to participate. During the first trial the participants were asked to walk with a neutral shoe (Breidbach, Germany). The second trial was performed with the running shoe “Faas 500” (Puma SE, Germany). Peak plantar pressure values were analyzed from nine foot regions using the Pedar® X system (Novel Inc., Munich, Germany).

Results: The mean peak pressure reduction for the total foot was 36% under the left (non-preferred) foot and 32% for the right (preferred) foot. A statistically significant reduction of peak pressure was observed for eight regions, from a mean 14% peak pressure reduction under the right metatarsal head 1 up to a 41% peak pressure reduction under the right big toe.

Conclusions: The neutral shoe is a feasible tool to assess reference values for dynamic pedobarography. Such a reference tool may help to standardise several steps in the development and construction of shoes and orthotic devices.


Corresponding author: Thilo Hotfiel, Division of Orthopaedic Rheumatology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Rathsberger Str. 57, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany, E-mail:

References

[1] Arts ML, Bus SA. Twelve steps per foot are recommended for valid and reliable in-shoe plantar pressure data in neuropathic diabetic patients wearing custom made footwear. Clin Biomech 2011; 26: 880–884.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.05.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[2] Bonacci J, Saunders PU, Hicks A, Rantalainen T, Vicenzino BG, Spratford W. Running in a minimalist and lightweight shoe is not the same as running barefoot: a biomechanical study. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47: 387–392.10.1136/bjsports-2012-091837Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[3] Butler RJ, Davis IS, Hamill J. Interaction of arch type and footwear on running mechanics. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34: 1998–2005.10.1177/0363546506290401Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[4] Carl HD, Pauser J, Swoboda B, Jendrissek A, Brem M. Soccer boots elevate plantar pressures in elite male soccer professionals. Clin Journal Sports Med 2014; 24: 58–61.10.1097/01.jsm.0000432857.79305.6cSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[5] Carl HD, Pfander D, Swoboda B. Assessment of plantar pressure in forefoot relief shoes of different designs. Foot Ankle Int 2006; 27: 117–120.10.1177/107110070602700208Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Carl HD, Putz C, Weseloh G, Forst R, Swoboda B. Insoles for the rheumatic foot. A clinical and pedobarographic analysis. Orthopäde 2006; 35: 1176–1182.10.1007/s00132-006-1018-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[7] Czurda T, Seidl M, Seiser AS, Schuh R, Trnka HJ, Ritschl P. Triple arthrodesis in treatment of degenerative hindfoot deformities: clinical, radiological and pedobarographic results. Z Orthop Unfall 2009; 147: 356–361.10.1055/s-0029-1185407Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] DeFrino PF, Brodsky JW, Pollo FE, Crenshaw SJ, Beischer AD. First metatarsophalangeal arthrodesis: a clinical, pedobarographic and gait analysis study. Foot Ankle Int 2002; 23: 496–502.10.1177/107110070202300605Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[9] Dixon SJ. Use of pressure insoles to compare in-shoe loading for modern running shoes. Ergonomics 2008; 51: 1503–1514.10.1080/00140130802239562Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[10] Hahn F, Maiwald C, Horstmann T, Vienne P. Changes in plantar pressure distribution after Achilles tendon augmentation with flexor hallucis longus transfer. Clin Biomech 2008; 23: 109–116.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2007.08.015Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Hodge MC, Bach TM, Carter GM. Novel Award First Prize Paper Orthotic management of plantar pressure and pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech 1999; 14: 567–575.10.1016/S0268-0033(99)00034-0Search in Google Scholar

[12] Horisberger M, Hintermann B, Valderrabano V. Alterations of plantar pressure distribution in posttraumatic end-stage ankle osteoarthritis. Clin Biomech 2009; 24: 303–307.10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2008.12.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Hotfiel T, Carl HD, Swoboda B, Jendrissek A, Pauser J. Foot load with different restrictions of knee joint extension. Z Orthop Unfall 2012; 150: 257–261.10.1055/s-0031-1298141Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Jeans KA, Karol LA. Plantar pressures following Ponseti and French physiotherapy methods for clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop 2010; 30: 82–89.10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181c6c4deSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Jorge Filho D, Battistella LR, Lourenço C. Computerized pedobarography in the characterization of ankle-foot instabilities of haemophilic patients. Haemophilia 2006; 12: 140–146.10.1111/j.1365-2516.2006.01187.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[16] Kleindienst FI, Krabbe B, Walther M, Brüggemann GP. Grading of the functional sport shoe parameter “cushioning” and “forefoot flexibility” on running shoes. Sportverletz Sportschaden 2006; 20: 19–24.10.1055/s-2006-926640Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Lipscombe S, Molloy A, Sirikonda S, Hennessy MS. Scarf: osteotomy for the correction of hallux valgus: midterm clinical outcome. J Foot Ankle Surg 2008; 47: 273–277.10.1053/j.jfas.2008.02.021Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Nagel A, Rosenbaum D. Vacuum cushioned removable cast walkers reduce foot loading in patients with diabetes mellitus. Gait Posture 2009; 30: 11–15.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.02.007Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[19] Queen RM, Abbey AN, Wiegerinck JI, Yoder JC, Nunley JA. Effect of shoe type on plantar pressure: a gender comparison. Gait Posture 2010; 31: 18–22.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2009.08.235Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[20] Rixe JA, Gallo RA, Silvis ML. The barefoot debate: can minimalist shoes reduce running-related injuries? Curr Sports Med Rep 2012; 11: 160–165.10.1249/JSR.0b013e31825640a6Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Skwara A, Zounta V, Tibesku CO, Fuchs-Winkelmann S, Rosenbaum D. Plantar contact stress and gait analysis after resection of tarsal coalition. Acta Orthop Belg 2009; 75: 654–660.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Tessutti V, Trombini-Souza F, Ribeiro AP, Nunes AL, Sacco Ide C. In-shoe plantar pressure distribution during running on natural grass and asphalt in recreational runners. J Sci Med Sport 2010; 13: 151–155.10.1016/j.jsams.2008.07.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[23] Wiegerinck JI, Boyd J, Yoder JC, Abbey AN, Nunley JA, Queen RM. Differences in plantar loading between training shoes and racing flats at a self-selected running speed. Gait Posture 2009; 29: 514–519.10.1016/j.gaitpost.2008.12.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2013-7-17
Accepted: 2013-11-29
Published Online: 2014-4-9
Published in Print: 2014-6-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 7.2.2023 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/bmt-2013-0078/html
Scroll Up Arrow