Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter September 19, 2018

Optical measurement of the corneal oscillation for the determination of the intraocular pressure

Jan Osmers, Michael Sorg and Andreas Fischer



Glaucoma is currently the most common irreversible cause of blindness worldwide. A significant risk factor is an individually increased intraocular pressure (IOP). A precise measurement method is needed to determine the IOP in order to support the diagnosis of the disease and to monitor the outcome of the IOP reduction as a medical intervention. A handheld device is under development with which the patient can perform self-measurements outside the clinical environment.


For the measurement principle of the self-tonometer the eye is acoustically excited to oscillate, which is analyzed and attributed to the present IOP. In order to detect the corneal oscillation, an optical sensor is required which meets the demands of a compact, battery driven self-tonometer. A combination of an infrared diode and a phototransistor provides a high-resolution measurement of the corneal oscillation in the range of 10 μm–150 μm, which is compared to a reference sensor in the context of this study. By means of an angular arrangement of the emitter and the detector, the degree of reflected radiation of the cornea can be increased, allowing a measurement with a high signal-to-noise ratio.


By adjusting the angle of incidence between the detector and the emitter, the signal-to-noise ratio was improved by 40 dB which now allows reasonable measurements of the corneal oscillation. For low amplitudes (10 μm) the signal-to-noise ratio is 10% higher than that of the commercial reference sensor. On the basis of amplitude variations at different IOP levels, the estimated standard uncertainty amounts to <0.5 mm Hg in the physiological pressure range with the proposed measuring approach.


With a compact and cost-effective approach, that suits the requirements for a handheld self-tonometer, the corneal oscillation can be detected with high temporal resolution. The cross-sensitivity of the sensor concept concerning a distance variation can be reduced by adding a distance sensor. Existing systematic influences of corneal biomechanics will be integrated in the sensor concept as a consecutive step.


The results outlined here were achieved within the project “SelTon - Selbsttonometer zur Bestimmung des intraokularen Drucks mit akustischer Schwingungsanregung”.

  1. Author Statement

  2. Research funding: The project was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF, reference number 13GW0054, Funder Id: 10.13039/501100002347).

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent is not applicable.

  5. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animals use.


[1] Jonas JB, Aung T, Bourne RR, Bron AM, Ritch R, Panda-Jonas S. Glaucoma. Lancet 2017;390:2183–93.10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31469-128577860 Search in Google Scholar

[2] Mariotti SP. Global data on visual impairements 2010. © World Health Organisation 2012. Available from: Search in Google Scholar

[3] Grehn F. Ophthalmology (in german). 30th ed. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2008. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Hoffmann EM, Zangwill LM, Crowston JG, Weinreb RN. Optic disk size and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol 2007;52:32–49.10.1016/j.survophthal.2006.10.00217212989 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Fry LE, Fahy E, Chrysostomou V, Hui F, Tang J, Wijngaarden P van, et al. The coma in glaucoma: retinal ganglion cell dysfunction and recovery. Prog Retin Eye Res 2018;65:77–92.10.1016/j.preteyeres.2018.04.00129631042 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Giaconi JA, Law SK, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Coleman AL, Caprioli J. Pearls of Glaucoma Management. 2nd ed. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer Verlag; 2016. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Rosentreter A, Neuburger M, Jordan JF, Schild AM, Dietlein TS. Einflussgrößen auf die Applanationstonometrie–ein praxisorientierter Überblick. In: Erb C, editor. Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart New York; 2011. p. 109–13.21328170 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Yung E, Trubnik V, Katz LJ. An overview of home tonometry and telemetry for intraocular pressure monitoring in humans. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2014;252:1179–88.2488838010.1007/s00417-014-2668-5 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Leske MC, Heijl A, Hussein M, Bengtsson B, Hyman L, Komaroff E. Factors for glaucoma progression and the effect of treatment. Arch Ophthalmol 2003;121:48–56.10.1001/archopht.121.1.4812523884 Search in Google Scholar

[10] Higginbotham EJ, Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Drake MV, Bennett GR, Wilson MR, et al. The ocular hypertension treatment study: topical medication delays or prevents primary open-angle glaucoma in African American individuals. Arch Ophthalmol 2004;122:813–20.10.1001/archopht.122.6.81315197055 Search in Google Scholar

[11] Sultan MB, Mansberger SL, Lee PP. Understanding the importance of IOP variables in glaucoma: a systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol 2009;54:643–62.10.1016/j.survophthal.2009.05.00119665744 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Arora T, Bali SJ, Arora V, Wadhwani M, Panda A, Dada T. Diurnal versus office-hour intraocular pressure fluctuation in primary adult onset glaucoma. J Optom 2015;8:239–43.2638653610.1016/j.optom.2014.05.005 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Goldmann H, Schmidt T. On applanationtonometry. Ophthalmologica 1957;134:221–42.10.1159/000303213 Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kwon TH, Ghaboussi J, Pecknold DA, Hashash YMA. Effect of cornea material stiffness on measured intraocular pressure. J Biomech 2008;41:1707–13.1845517310.1016/j.jbiomech.2008.03.004 Search in Google Scholar

[15] Rosa N, Lanza M, Cennamo G, Capasso L, Iaccarino G, Borrelli M, et al. Accuracy of schiotz tonometry in measuring the intraocular pressure after corneal refractive surgery. J Optom 2008;1:59–64.10.3921/joptom.2008.59 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C. Assessment of the pascal dynamic contour tonometer in monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and eyes after LASIK. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:746–51.10.1016/j.jcrs.2003.12.03315093634 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Draeger J. Principles of tonometry from the time of Albrecht von Graefes to D2-mission and self-tonometry (in german). Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. © 1993 F. Enke Verlag Stuttgart 1993;202:2–7.8464201 Search in Google Scholar

[18] Cook JA, Botello AP, Elders A, Ali AF, Azuara-Blanco A, Fraser C, et al. Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1552–7.2257844310.1016/j.ophtha.2012.02.030 Search in Google Scholar

[19] Derka H. The American optical non-contact tonometer and its results compared to Goldmann applanation tonometry (in german). Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde. © 1980 F. Enke Verlag Stuttgart 1980;177:634–42. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Shields MB. The non-contact tonometer. Its value and limitations. Surv Ophthalmol 1980;24:211–9.10.1016/0039-6257(80)90042-96987761 Search in Google Scholar

[21] Tonnu P, Ho T, Newson T, El Sheikh A, Sharma K, White E, et al. The influence of central corneal thickness and age on intraocular pressure measured by pneumotonometry, non-contact tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, and Goldmann applanation tonometry. Br J Ophthalmol 2005;89:851–4.10.1136/bjo.2004.05662215965165 Search in Google Scholar

[22] Sapkota K, Franco S, Lira M. Intraocular pressure measurement with ocular response analyzer over soft contact lens. Cont Lens Anterior Eye 2014;37:415–9.10.1016/j.clae.2014.07.00225086831 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Huseynova T, Waring GO, Roberts C, Krueger RR, Tomita M. Corneal biomechanics as a function of intraocular pressure and pachymetry by dynamic infrared signal and scheimpflug imaging analysis in normal eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2014;157:885–93.10.1016/j.ajo.2013.12.02424388837 Search in Google Scholar

[24] Miwa T. Non-contact ultrasonic tonometer. (United States Patent Application no. US20100324406A1) [cited 2018 Sep 4]. Available from:; 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Drescher J. Determination of the intraocular pressure from the vibration behavior of the human eye (in german). PhDThesis. Universität Fridericiana Karlsruhe; 2000. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Gundlach A. Interferometric oscillation analysis of the human eye for the determination of intraocular pressure (in german). PhDThesis. Universität Fridericiana Karlsruhe; 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[27] Hey S. Non-contact stimulation and analysis of human eye vibrations for the early diagnosis of glaucoma (in german). PhDThesis. Universität Fridericiana Karlsruhe; 2003. Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sinha DN, Wray WO. Apparatus and method for non-contact, acoustic resonance determination of intraocular pressure. (United States Patent Application no. US5375595A) [cited 2018 Sep 4]. Available from:; 1994. Search in Google Scholar

[29] Jinde M, Miwa T, Makino K. Non-contact ultrasonic tonometer. (United States Patent Application no. US8500638B2) [cited 2018 Sep 4]. Available from:; 2010. Search in Google Scholar

[30] Freyberg A von, Sorg M, Fuhrmann M, Kreiner CF, Pfannkuche J, Klink T, et al. Acoustic tonometry: feasibility study of a new principle of intraocular pressure measurement. J Glaucoma 2009;18:316–20.1936519810.1097/IJG.0b013e3181845661 Search in Google Scholar

[31] Osmers J, Patzkó Á, Hoppe O, Sorg M, Freyberg A von, Fischer A. The influence of intraocular pressure on the damping of a coupled speaker-air-eye system. J Sens Sens Syst 2018;7: 123–30.10.5194/jsss-7-123-2018 Search in Google Scholar

[32] Coquart L, Depeursinge C, Curnier A, Ohayon R. A fluid-structure interaction problem in biomechanics: prestressed vibrations of the eye by the finite element method. J Biomech 1992;25:1105–18.10.1016/0021-9290(92)90067-B1400511 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Standard I. Ophthalmic Instruments; Light Hazard protection. 15004 International Standards Organization (ISO); 2007. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Na JI, Kwon OS, Kim BJ, Park WS, Oh JK, Kim KH, et al. Ethnic characteristics of eyelashes: a comparative analysis in Asian and Caucasian females. Br J Dermatol 2006;155: 1170–6.1710738510.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07495.x Search in Google Scholar

[35] Rantamäki AH, Seppänen-Laakso T, Oresic M, Jauhiainen M, Holopainen JM. Human tear fluid lipidome: from composition to function. PLoS One 2011;6:e19553.2157317010.1371/journal.pone.0019553 Search in Google Scholar

[36] Koprowski R, Ambrósio R. Quantitative assessment of corneal vibrations during intraocular pressure measurement with the air-puff method in patients with keratoconus. Comput Biol Med 2015;66:170–8.2641060210.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.09.007 Search in Google Scholar

[37] Lago MA, Rupérez MJ, Martínez-Martínez F, Monserrat C, Larra E, Güell JL, et al. A new methodology for the in vivo estimation of the elastic constants that characterize the patient-specific biomechanical behavior of the human cornea. J Biomech 2015;48:38–43.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.11.00925465193 Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-05-28
Accepted: 2018-08-21
Published Online: 2018-09-19
Published in Print: 2019-08-27

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston