并列关系定语是多项定语中特殊的一类，可以是词并列、短语并列以及词和短语混合并列。并列关系定语的各并列项之间可以是无标记的，也可以通过标点、连词、副词、连词副词同现以及多项连接方式共现等方式进行并列。定语标记词 “的” 的隐现与各并列项的性质、并列关系定语的语义等有密切的联系，总体上倾向于使用 “的” ，进行强调时会在每一个并列项后都使用 “的”。并列关系定语的排序原则比较多样，总体使用倾向为：逻辑关系原则＞显著性原则＞重要性原则＞形式原则＞约定俗成原则＞时间先后原则＞熟悉程度原则＞对应原则＞文化原则＞立足点原则、语序自由＞多项原则＞空间原则。语义重心在后占有一定优势。
This paper mainly discusses and studies the juxtaposed attributive from four aspects, the nature of the parallel items, the connection way of the items, the looming rules of the attributive markup “de” and lastly, the arrangement rules of the attributive. We have retrieved 788 examples of juxtaposed attributive clauses from 900,000 words of the corpus of Contemporary Chinese Language to conduct the empirical research based on these 788 examples regarding those four aspects mentioned above.
By analyzing the examples, this paper classifies and analyzes the properties of the juxtaposed attributive and finds that the juxtaposition of the attributive is exceedingly complicated. In addition to the common juxtaposition between words and words, the juxtaposition of phrases and phrases also accounts for a certain proportion. Additionally, the juxtaposition between words and words does not always belong to the same kind of structural property. We also found some examples juxtaposed by different kinds of structural elements. In regards to the form and semantics, we have studied the juxtaposition of different parts of words and phrases, taking into account juxtaposition in all possible situations, and have analyzed their parallel basis and reasons. According to the analysis, we conclude that the usage frequency of juxtaposed attributive is as follows: juxtaposed by similar kind of words ＞juxtaposed by similar kind of phrases ＞juxtaposed by words and phrases ＞juxtaposed by different kind of phrases ＞juxtaposed by different kind of words.
Through the study of the corpus, we conclude the connection methods between the juxtaposed attributives and put forward that the conjunctions should include “huo” conjunctions as the connection mode on the basis of the original connection methods, and we analyze the connection modes from both the form and the semantics. We get the usage tendency of the connection ways of the attributive and parallel items: punctuation ＞ no mark ＞ “he” conjunctions ＞ “er” conjunctions ＞ adverbs ＞ multiple ways ＞ conjunctions and adverbs connected ＞ “huo” conjunctions. We also analyze usage from the semantic proximity, syntax, syllable and other aspects.
Based on the detailed analysis of the corpus, taking into account the looming situation of “e” after the individual attributive, we analyze the looming of the attributive-labeled word “de”, and get the situations where the juxtaposed attributive tends not to add “de”, which includes: the quantitative phrase or the ordinal number juxtaposed to express the restriction relations; the combination of each juxtaposed term when the central language in a compound attribute constitutes the name or title of one or a class of things; when the central language is followed by the word “de”; when the central language is an ancient Chinese word like “shi” or “zhe” and so on. The situations where tends to add “de” after the juxtaposed attributives are: the central language is a verb; the existence of some logical relationships among the items, such as choice, progression, causality, transition and so on; when one-syllable attributive and the multiple-syllable attributive juxtaposed; the juxtaposed attributives are descriptive attributives, etc. four kinds. At the same time, we tend to use the “… de … de” when the semantic closeness between the attributives is not high. According to the number of cases of the looming of “de” after the juxtaposed attributives, we come to the conclusion that the sign word “de” appears after the juxtaposed attributives is the most common expression, which holds the absolute superiority.
Liao Qiuzhong (1992) and Gao Qin (2004) researched the arrangement of parallel structure. Based on the analysis of our corpus, this paper sums up 13 principles which are suitable for the arrangement of the juxtaposed attributives, in which the principle of logical relations, the principle of prominence and the principle of significance are reanalyzed. It also puts forward that the principle of convention should be separated from the principle of time. At the same time, we found some more conventional, not affected by the above ranking principle of the flexible relationship attributives, including overlapping with words. According to the data analysis, we derive the usage tendency among these sort principles: the principle of logical relations ＞ the principle of prominence ＞ the principle of significance ＞ the principle of form ＞ the principle of convention ＞ the principle of chronology ＞ the principle of familiarity ＞ the principle of correspondence ＞ cultural principles ＞ standpoints, disorders ＞ multiple principles ＞ spatial principles. In the use of these principles, most of them have more obvious inclination of semantic focus, according to our analysis, if the semantic emphasis points to the last part of the sentence, it usually lays with some advantages.
Funding statement: 基金项目: 本文受国家社会科学基金项目 “韩国留学生汉语篇章衔接手段习得研究” （项目编号：16BYY102）资助。
程仕仪、高则云, 2016, 并列宾语的排序考察, 《世界华文教学》第 4 期, 55–64 页。 Search in Google Scholar
程仕仪、肖奚强, 2017, 外国留学生双项并列宾语习得研究, 《汉语学习》第 4 期, 72–83 页。 Search in Google Scholar
崔应贤, 2002, 《现代汉语定语的语序认知研究》, 北京：中国社会科学出版社, 91–228 页。 Search in Google Scholar
储泽祥, 2002, 《汉语联合短语研究》, 长沙：湖南大学出版社, 1–205 页。 Search in Google Scholar
戴浩一, 1988, 时间顺序和汉语的语序, 《国外语言学》第 1 期, 10–20 页。 Search in Google Scholar
高 琴, 2004, 现代汉语并列结构的语序考察, 山西大学硕士学位论文, 9–17 页。 Search in Google Scholar
廖秋忠, 1992, 现代汉语并列名词性成分的顺序, 《中国语文》第 3 期, 161–173 页。 Search in Google Scholar
刘月华, 1984, 定语的分类和多项定语的顺序, 《语言学和语言教学》, 合肥：安徽教育出版社, 136–157 页。 Search in Google Scholar
刘月华等, 2001, 《实用现代汉语语法•增订版》, 北京：商务印书馆, 277–288 页。 Search in Google Scholar
陆丙甫, 1988, 定语的外延性、内涵性和称谓性及其顺序, 《语言研究和探索（四）》, 北京：北京大学出版社, 102–115 页。 Search in Google Scholar
陆丙甫, 1993, 关于建立深一层的汉语句型系统的刍议, 《语言研究》第 1 期, 7–20 页。 Search in Google Scholar
马清华, 2005, 《并列结构的自组织研究》, 上海：复旦大学出版社, 1–29 页。 Search in Google Scholar
袁毓林, 2004, 定语顺序的认知解释及其理论蕴含, 《汉语语法研究的认知视野》, 北京：商务印书馆, 7–41 页。 Search in Google Scholar
周丽颖, 2008, 《现代汉语语序研究》上海：上海辞书出版社, 118–134 页。 Search in Google Scholar
朱德熙, 1958, 《定语和状语》, 上海：上海教育出版社, 5–18 页。 Search in Google Scholar
English translation of the reference in Chinese
Cheng, S. & Z. Gao. 2016. Binglie Binyu de Paixu Kaocha [Research on the Ranking of Juxtaposed Objectives]. Shijie Huawen Jiaoxue 4. 55–64. Search in Google Scholar
Cheng, S. & X. Xiao. 2017. Waiguo Liuxuesheng Shuangxiang Binglie Binyu Xide Yanjiu [An Acquisition Study of Binomial Coordinate Object]. Hanyu Xuexi 4. 72–83. Search in Google Scholar
Cui, Y. 2002. Xiandai Hanyu Dingyu de Yuxu Renzhi Yanjiu[Cognitive Study on the Word Order of Contemporary Chinese Attributive], 91–228. Beijing: China Social Science Press. Search in Google Scholar
Chu, Z. 2002. Hanyu Lianhe Duanyu Yanjiu[Research on Chinese Joint Phrases], 1–205. Changsha: Hunan University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Dai, H. 1988. Shijian Shunxu he Hanyu de Yuxu [Temporal Sequence and Chinese Word Order]. Guowai Yuyanxue 1. 10–20. Search in Google Scholar
Gao, Q. 2004. Xiandai Hanyu Binglie Jiegou de Yuxu Kaocha [The Sequence of Parallel Components in the Contemporary Chinese]. Shanxi University Master’s Degree Thesis, 9–17. Search in Google Scholar
Liao, Q. 1992. Xiandai Hanyu Binglie Mingcixing Chengfen de Shunxu [The Sequence of Nominal Coordinate Structures in the Contemporary Chinese]. Zhongguo Yuwen 3. 161–173. Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Y. 1984. Dingyu de Feilei he Duoxiang Dingyu de Shunxu [The Classification of the Attributive and the Order of Multiple Attributives]. Yuyanxue he Yuyan Jiaoxue, 136–157. Hefei: Anhui Education Press. Search in Google Scholar
Liu, Y. 2001. Shiyong Xiandai Hanyu Yufa• Zengding Ban [Practical Contemporary Chinese Grammar, 277–288, Revised and Enlargededn. Beijing: Commercial Press. Search in Google Scholar
Lu, B. 1988. Dingyu de Waiyanxing, Neihanxing he Chengweixing Ji Qi Shunxu [The Extensionality, Intensionality, Appellative and Sequence of Attributive]. Yuyan Yanjiu he Tansuo (4) [Language research and exploration], 102–115. Beijing: Peking University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Lu, B. 1993. Guanyu Jianli Shenyicheng de Hanyu Juxing Xitong de Chuyi [A Brief Discussion on the Establishment of A Chinese Sentence Pattern System with A Deep Level]. Yuyan Yanjiu 1. 7–20. Search in Google Scholar
Ma, Q. 2005. Binglie Jiegou de Zizuzhi Yanjiu [The Self-organizing Research of Parallel Components], 1–29. Shanghai: Fudan University Press. Search in Google Scholar
Yuan, Y. 2004. Dingyu Shunxu de Renzhi Jieshi Ji Qi Lilun Yunhan[The Cognitive Interpretation of Attributive Order and its Theoretical Implication]. Hanyu Yufa Yanjiu de Renzhi Shiye [The cognitive perspective of the study Chinese grammar], 7–41. Beijing: Commercial Press. Search in Google Scholar
Zhou, L. 2008. Xiandai Hanyu Yuxu Yanjiu [The Research of Contemporary Chinese Word Order], 118–134. Shanghai: Shanghai Lexicographical Publishing House. Search in Google Scholar
Zhu, D. 1958. Dingyu he Zhuangyu [Attributive and Adverbial], 5–18. Shanghai: Shanghai Education Press. Search in Google Scholar
© 2018 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston