Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 3.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access June 1, 2015

Ecosystem services for connecting actors – lessons from a symposium

  • Paul Opdam , Christian Albert , Christine Fürst , Adrienne Grêt-Regamey , Janina Kleemann , Dawn Parker , Daniele La Rosa , Katja Schmidt , Grace B. Villamor and Ariane Walz

Abstract

This paper is a communication from the corresponding symposium at the Global Land Project Open Science Meeting, Berlin, March 2014. We explored the assumption that the ecosystem services-(ES) concept has the potential to support communication and collaboration between actors in land use planning. If true, the concept could facilitate collaborative planning processes. We analyse how to evolve a planning context in which governance networks at the local landscape level gain importance in decision making, while the central government delegates power. From case studies presented during the symposium we learned that the ES-concept has been explored for application in local land use planning around the world. However, whether ES are recognized as a useful planning concept depends on individual actor preferences and cultural and contextual factors, such as the actual nature-human relationship and gender differences. Also, successful application requires the support of novel assessment, design and visualization tools, which are designed to foster collaboration and social learning. The potential of the concept to contribute to collaborative relationships needs further investigation.

References

[1] Hauck J., Schweppe-Kraft B., Albert C., Görg C., Jax K., Jensen R., et al., The Promise of the Ecosystem Services-concept for Planning and Decision-Making, GAIA, 2013, 22, 232-236 10.14512/gaia.22.4.6Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hermann A., Schleifer S., Wrbka T., The concept of ecosystem services regarding landscape research: a review, Living Rev. Landscape Res., 2011, 5, 1-37 10.12942/lrlr-2011-1Search in Google Scholar

[3] Termorshuizen J., Opdam P., Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development, Landsc. Ecol., 2009, 24, 1037-1052 10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8Search in Google Scholar

[4] Daily G.C., Polasky S., Goldstein J., Kareiva P.M., Mooney H.A., Pejchar L., et al., Ecosystem services in decision making: time to deliver, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, 7, 21-28 10.1890/080025Search in Google Scholar

[5] Opdam P., Using ecosystem services in community based planning: science is not ready to deliver, In: Fu B., Jones B. K. (Eds.), Landscape Ecology for Sustainable Environment and Culture, Springer Verlag, 2013 10.1007/978-94-007-6530-6_5Search in Google Scholar

[6] Ruckelshaus M., McKenzie E., Tallis H., Guerry. A., Daily G., Kareiva P., et al., Notes from the field: Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real world decisions, Ecol. Econ., 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j. ecolecon.2013.07.009 Search in Google Scholar

[7] von Haaren C., Albert C., Integrating Ecosystem Services and Environmental Planning: Limitations and Synergies, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 2011, 7, 150-167 10.1080/21513732.2011.616534Search in Google Scholar

[8] Portman M.E., Ecosystem services in practice: Challenges to real world implementation of ecosystem services across multiple landscapes – A critical review, Appl. Geogr., 2013, 45, 185-192 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.011Search in Google Scholar

[9] Fürst, C., Pietzsch, K., Frank, S., Witt, A., Koschke, L., Makeschin F., How to better consider sectorial planning information in regional planning - example afforestation and conversion, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2012, 55, 1-29 10.1080/09640568.2011.630067Search in Google Scholar

[10] Albert C., Hauck J., Buhr N., von Haaren C., What ecosystem services information do users want? Investigating interests and requirements among landscape and regional planners in Germany, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1301-1313 10.1007/s10980-014-9990-5Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cowell R., Lennon M., The utilisation of environmental knowledge in land-use planning: drawing lessons for an ecosystem services approach, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 2014, 32, 263-282, DOI: 10.1068/c12289j 10.1068/c12289jSearch in Google Scholar

[12] Opdam P., Incorporating multiple ecological scales into the governance of landscape services, In: Padt F., Opdam P., Polman N., Termeer C., (Eds.), Scale-Sensitive Governance of the Environment, John Wiley and Sons Ltd., Chichester, UK, 2014 10.1002/9781118567135.ch2Search in Google Scholar

[13] Frank S., Fürst C., Witt A., Koschke L., Makeschin F., Making use of the ecosystem services-concept in regional planning— trade-offs from reducing water erosion, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1377-1391, DOI: 10.1007/s10980-014-9992-3 10.1007/s10980-014-9992-3Search in Google Scholar

[14] Fürst C., Frank S., Witt A., Koschke L., Makeschin, F., Assessment of the effects of forest land use strategies on the provision of Ecosystem Services at regional scale, J. Environ. Manage., 2013, 127, 96-116 10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.09.020Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Seppelt R., Lautenbach S., Volk M., Identifying trade-offs between ecosystem services, land use, and biodiversity: a plea for combining scenario analysis and optimization on different spatial scales, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2013, 5, 458-463 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[16] Armitage D.R., Plummer R., Berkes F., Arthur R.I., Charles A.T., Davidson-Hunt I.J., et al., Adaptive co-management for social– ecological complexity, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2009, 7, 95–102 10.1890/070089Search in Google Scholar

[17] Opdam P., Nassauer J., Wang Z., Albert C., Bentrup G., Castella J-C., et al., Science for action at the local landscape scale, Landsc. Ecol., 2013, 28, 1439-1445 10.1007/s10980-013-9925-6Search in Google Scholar

[18] Helming K., Diehl K., Geneletti D., Wiggering H., Mainstreaming ecosystem services in European policy impact assessment, Environ. Impact Assess. Rev., 2013, 40, 82-87 10.1016/j.eiar.2013.01.004Search in Google Scholar

[19] Waylen K.A., Young J., Expectations and experiences of diverse forms of knowledge use: the case of the UK National Ecosystem Assessment, Environ. Plann. C Gov. Policy, 2014, 32, 229-246 10.1068/c1327jSearch in Google Scholar

[20] Newell P., Pattberg P., Schroeder H., Multi-actor governance and the environment, Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour., 2012, 37, 365-387 10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-094659Search in Google Scholar

[21] Newig J., Koontz T. M., Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy, Journal of European Public Policy, 2014, 21, 248-267 10.1080/13501763.2013.834070Search in Google Scholar

[22] Lane M. B., McDonald G., Community-based Environmental Planning: Operational Dilemmas, Planning Principles and Possible Remedies, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2005, 48, 709-731 10.1080/09640560500182985Search in Google Scholar

[23] Berkes F., Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning, J. Environ. Manage., 2009, 90, 1692-1702 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.12.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[24] Fürst C., Opdam P., Inostroza L., Luque S., A balance score card tool for assessing how successful the ecosystem services concept is applied in participatory land use planning, Special Issue: Integrating Ecosystem Services in Land use planning and Decision-Making Practice, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1435-1446 10.1007/s10980-014-0052-9Search in Google Scholar

[25] Martinico F., La Rosa D., Privitera R., Green Oriented Urban Development for urban ecosystem services provision in a medium sized city in Southern Italy, iForest, 2014, 7, 385-395, http://dx.doi.org/10.3832/ifor1171-007 10.3832/ifor1171-007Search in Google Scholar

[26] Villamor G.B., van Noordwijk M., Djanibekov U., Chiong-Javier M.E., Catacutan D., Gender differences in land-use decisions: shaping multifunctional landscapes?, Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2014, 6, 128-133 10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.015Search in Google Scholar

[27] Albert C., Aronson J., Fürst C., Opdam P., Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: requirements, approaches, and impacts, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1277-1285 10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0Search in Google Scholar

[28] von Haaren C., Albert C., Barkmann J., de Groot R.S., Spangenberg J., Schröter-Schlaack C., et al., From Explanation to Application: Introducing a Practice-Oriented Ecosystem Services Evaluation (PRESET) Model Adapted to the Context of Landscape Planning and Management, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1335-1346 10.1007/s10980-014-0084-1Search in Google Scholar

[29] Chan K. M. A., Guerry A. D., Balvanera P., Klain S., Satterfield T., Basurto X., et al., Where are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement, Bioscience, 2012, 62, 744-756 10.1525/bio.2012.62.8.7Search in Google Scholar

[30] Daniel C.D., Muhar A., Arnberger A., Aznar O., Boyd J.W., Chan K.M.A., et al., Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem service agenda, PNAS, 2012, 109, 8812-8819 10.1073/pnas.1114773109Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[31] Hernández-Morcillo M., Plieninger T., Bieling C., An empirical review of cultural ecosystem service indicators, Ecol. Indic., 2013, 29, 434-444 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.01.013Search in Google Scholar

[32] Liu J., Opdam P., Valuing ecosystem services in communitybased landscape planning: introducing a wellbeing-based approach. Special Issue Integrating Ecosystem Services in Land use planning and Decision-Making Practice, Landsc. Ecol., 2014, 29, 1347-1360 10.1007/s10980-014-0045-8Search in Google Scholar

[33] Grêt-Regamey A., Burlando P., Girot Ch., Lin E. S., Shaad D., Vollmer D., Digital methods and collaborative platforms for informing design values with science, In: Wissen Hayek U., Fricker P., Buhmann E. (Eds.), Peer Reviewed Proceedings of Digital Landscape Architecture Conference 2014 at ETH Zurich, (21-23 May, 2014, Zurich, Switzerland), Herbert Wichmann Verlag, VDE VERLAG GMBH, Berlin/Offenbach, 2014, 46-56 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Star S.L., This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology and Human Values, 2010, 35, 601-617 10.1177/0162243910377624Search in Google Scholar

[35] Abson D. J., von Wehrden H., Baumgärtner S., Fischer J., Hanspach J., Härdtle W., et al., Ecosystem services as a boundary object for sustainability, Ecol. Econ., 2014, 103, 29-37 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.04.012Search in Google Scholar

[36] Opdam P., Westerik J., Vos C., De Vries B., The role and Evolution of Boundary concepts in transdisciplinary landscape planning, Planning Theory and Practice, 2015, 16, 63-78 10.1080/14649357.2014.997786Search in Google Scholar

[37] Grêt-Regamey A., Celio E., Klein T.M., Wissen Hayek U., Understanding ecosystem services trade-offs with interactive procedural modeling for sustainable urban planning, Landsc. Urban. Plan., 2013, 109, 107-116 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.011Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-5-8
Accepted: 2015-2-2
Published Online: 2015-6-1

© 2015 Paul Opdam et al.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Downloaded on 23.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cass-2015-0001/html
Scroll to top button