Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access October 28, 2017

Territorial cohesion through cross-border landscape policy? The European case of the Three Countries Park (BE-NL-DE)

Anja Brüll EMAIL logo , Timo Matti Wirth , Frank Lohrberg , Annet Kempenaar , Marlies Brinkhuijsen , Marie- Françoise Godart , Alain Coppens and Marc Nielsen

Abstract

Landscapes can be understood as socialecological systems under constant change. In Europe various territorial dynamics pose persistent challenges to maintaining diverse landscapes both as European heritage and in their capacity to provide vital functions and services. Concurrently, under the competence of cohesion policy, the EU is attempting to improve policy making by better policy coordination and respecting regional specifics. This paper explores the question how a policy dedicated to landscape can help to handle territorial change and support territorial cohesion. It presents results and performances of the ESPON applied research study LP3LP: (1) a common landscape policy for the Three Countries Park, across the Dutch, German and Belgium borders, including a spatial landscape vision, a governance proposal of adaptive landscape management, and thematic strategies dealing with green infrastructure, cultural heritage, complementary biomass and quality production; (2) recommendations at the EU level. In discussing the significance of a landscape approach for EU policy,three dimensions of landscape are linked withimportant aspects of territorial cohesion: ‘landscape as asset’ addressing natural-cultural territorial capital as an indigenous base forsmart, sustainable, and inclusivedevelopment;‘landscape as place’ stressing the relevance of landscape for place-based policies; and ‘landscape as common ground’ highlighting its potential for horizontal, vertical, and territorial integration.

References

[1] TFEU Consolidated version of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union, OJ C 326, 2012 Search in Google Scholar

[2] European Parliament, Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion, Factsheet, 2016 Search in Google Scholar

[3] Faludi, A., Territorial Cohesion under the Looking Glass, Synthesis paper about the history of the concept and policy background to territorial cohesion, 2009 Search in Google Scholar

[4] Medeiros, E., Territorial Cohesion: An EU concept, European Journal of Spatial Development, 2016,60 Search in Google Scholar

[5] Territorial Agenda of the European Union 2020: Towards an inclusive, smart and sustainable Europe of diverse regions, Agreed at the Informal Ministerial Meeting of Ministers responsible for Spatial Planning and Territorial Development, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[6] Böhme, K., Doucet, P., Komomicki, T., Zaucha, J. and Swiatek, D., How to strengthen the territorial dimension of ‘Europe 2020’ and the EU Cohesion Policy: Report based on the Territorial Agenda 2020, prepared at the request of the Polish Presidency of the Council of the European Union, Warsaw, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[7] Lohrberg, F., Wirth, T.M., Brüll, A., Nielsen, M., Coppens, A., Godart, M.-F., Kempenaar, A., Brinkhuijsen, M. and Morris, F., LP3LP Landscape Policy for the Three Countries Park: ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/21, Final Report/ Executive Summary, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

[8] Lohrberg, F., Wirth, T.M., Brüll, A., Nielsen, M., Coppens, A., Godart, M.-F., Kempenaar, A., Brinkhuijsen, M. and Morris, F., LP3LP Landscape Policy for the Three Countries Park: ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/21, Final Report/ Main Report, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

[9] Lohrberg, F., Wirth, T.M., Brüll, A., Nielsen, M., Coppens, A., Godart, M.-F., Kempenaar, A., Brinkhuijsen, M. and Morris, F., LP3LP Landscape Policy for the Three Countries Park: ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/21, Final Report/ Scientific Report, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Lohrberg, F., Wirth, T.M., Brüll, A., Nielsen, M., Coppens, A., Godart, M.-F., Kempenaar, A., Brinkhuijsen, M. and Morris, F., LP3LP Landscape Policy for the Three Countries Park: ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/21, Final Report/ Atlas of Maps, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Council of Europe, European Landscape Convention, ETS No. 176, Florence, 2000 Search in Google Scholar

[12] Garcia-Blanco, G., Feliu, E., Schröder, R., Pedroli, B., et al., Liveland - Liveable landscapes: a key value for sustainable territorial development, ESPON Targeted Analysis 2013/2/22, Final Report, 2014 Search in Google Scholar

[13] Bergmann, M., Jahn, T., Knobloch, T., Krohn, W. and Schramm, E., Methoden transdisziplinärer Forschung: Ein Überblick mit Anwendungsbeispielen, Campus-Verl., Frankfurt am Main [u.a.], 2010 (in German) Search in Google Scholar

[14] Lenzholzer, S., Duchhart, I. and Koh, J., ‘Research through designing’ in landscape architecture, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2013, 113, 120-127 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[15] Becker, E., Social-ecological systems as epistemic objects, In: Glaser, M., Krause, G., Ratter, B. and Welp Martin (Eds.), Human-nature interactions in the anthropocene: Potentials of social-ecological systems analysis, Routledge, New York, 2012, 37-59 Search in Google Scholar

[16] Brüll, A., Biomass - a renewable energy source? Complementary biomass (re)production through Landscape Quality Management, PhD thesis, Leuphana University, Lüneburg, Germany, 2015 Search in Google Scholar

[17] Pinto-Correia, T., Gustavsson, R. and Pirnat, J., “Bridging the gap between centrally defined policies and local decisions - Towards more sensitive and creative rural landscape management”, Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21, 333-346 10.1007/s10980-005-4720-7Search in Google Scholar

[18] PURPLE, Topic Paper Peri-urban Open Space, http://www.purple-eu.org, accessed 13/01/2017 [19] European Commission, Integrated Territorial Investment: Factsheet, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[20] European Commission, Community Led Local Development: Factsheet, 2011Search in Google Scholar

[21] European Parliament, European Council, REGULATION (EU) No 1305/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 december 2013 on support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/20Search in Google Scholar

[22] European Parliament, European Council, REGULATION (EU) No 1301/2013 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 17 December 2013 on the European Regional Development Fund and on specific provisions concerning the Investment for growth and jobs goal and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1080/2006, OJ L 347/289, 2013 Search in Google Scholar

[23] Verwaltungsbehörde Interreg V-A Euregio Maas-Rhein, Kooperationsprogramm im Rahmen des Ziels „Europäische territoriale Zusammenarbeit“ Interreg V-A Euregio Maas-Rhein 2014-2020 (in German, French andDutch), http://www.interregemr.eu/site_de1/downloads, accessed 13/01/2017 Search in Google Scholar

[24] European Commission, A resource-efficient Europe - Flagship initiative under the Europe 2020 Strategy: COM(2011)21, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[25] European Commission, Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe: COM(2011)571, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[26] European Commission, Green Infrastructure (GI) - Enhancing Europe’s Natural Capital, COM(2013) 249 final, 2013 Search in Google Scholar

[27] Dreiländerpark, Drielandenpark, Parc des Trois Pays, Strategic Plan 2016-2019, 2016, (available in German, French and Dutch) http://www.3landenpark.eu, accessed 31.03.2017 Search in Google Scholar

[28] Committee of Ministers, Recommendation of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the guidelines for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention, CM/ Rec(2008)3, 2008 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Paetzold, A., Warren, P.H. and Maltby, L.L., A framework for assessing ecological quality based on ecosystem services, Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7/3, 273-281. 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.11.003Search in Google Scholar

[30] Barnes, P., Capitalism 3.0: A guide to reclaiming the commons, 1. ed., Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco, 2006 Search in Google Scholar

[31] European Commission, Europe 2020 A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth: COM(2010)2020, 2010 Search in Google Scholar

[32] European Commission, Cohesion policy 2014-2020: Investing in growth and jobs, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[33] Merritt, G. and Backer, W. De, The nature of growth: In search of a new framework for progress and prosperity, Brussels, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[34] Costanza, R., Kubiszewski, I., Giovannini, E., Lovins, H., McGlade, J., Picket, K.E., Ragnarsdóttir, K.V., Roberts, D., Vogli, R. De and Wilkinson, R., Time to leave GDP behind. Comment, Nature, 2014, 505, 283-285 10.1038/505283aSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[35] Kienast, F., Bolliger, J., Potschin, M., Groot, R.S. de, Verburg, P.H., Heller, I., Wascher, D. and Haines-Young, R., Assessing Landscape Functions with Broad-Scale Environmental Data: Insights Gained from a Prototype Development for Europe, Environmental Management, 2009, 44, 1099-112010.1007/s00267-009-9384-7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[36] Maarel, E.V.d. and Dauvellier, P., Naar een globaal ecologisch model voor de ruimtelijke ontwikkeling van Nederland, Studierapporten / Rijksplanologische Dienst, Vol. 9, Staatuitgeverij, Den Haag, 1978 (in Dutch) Search in Google Scholar

[37] Groot, R. de, Function-analysis and valuation as a tool to assess land use conflicts in planning for sustainable, multifunctional landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 75, 175-186 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.016Search in Google Scholar

[38] Haaren, C.v., Galler, C. and Ott, S., Landscape planning: The basis of sustainable landscape development, 2008 Search in Google Scholar

[39] TEEB, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature a synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB, 2010Search in Google Scholar

[40] Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Ecosystems and human well-being: General synthesis, Island Press, Washington, DC, 2005 Search in Google Scholar

[41] Natural England, Experiencing Landscapes: capturing the cultural services and experiential qualities of landscape, Report NECR024, 2009 Search in Google Scholar

[42] Biesecker, A. and Hofmeister, S., Focus: (Re)Productivity. Sustainable relations both between society and nature and between the genders, Ecological Economics, 2010, 69, 1703-1711 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.03.025Search in Google Scholar

[43] Primdahl, J. &Kristensen L., Landscape strategy making and landscape characterization - experiences from Danish experimental planning processes, Landscape research, 2016, 41(2), 227-238 10.1080/01426397.2015.1135322Search in Google Scholar

[44] Haaren, C.v., Albert, B., Integrating ecosystem services and environmental planning: limitations and synergies, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 2011, 7(3), 150-167 10.1080/21513732.2011.616534Search in Google Scholar

[45] Opdam, P. and Termorshuizen, J.W., Landscape services as a bridge between landscape ecology and sustainable development, Landscape Ecology, 2009, 24, 1037-1052 10.1007/s10980-008-9314-8Search in Google Scholar

[46] European Parliament and Council of the European Union, DIRECTIVE 2000/60/EC of 23 Oct 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy, 2000 Search in Google Scholar

[47] Natural England, CQuEL Character and Quality of England’s Landscapes: Preparing a detailed project plan for CQuel, Work package 4: Sources of Data, 2010 Search in Google Scholar

[48] Syrbe, R.-U., Bastian, O., Röder, M. and James, P., A framework for monitoring landscape functions: The Saxon Academy Landscape Monitoring Approach (SALMA), exemplified by soil investigations in the Kleine Spree floodplain (Saxony, Germany), Landscape and Urban Planning, 2007, 79, 190-199.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.02.005Search in Google Scholar

[49] Bastian, O., Krönert, R. and Lipský, Z., Landscape diagnosis on different space and time scales - a challenge for landscape planning, Landscape Ecology, 2006, 21, 359-374 10.1007/s10980-005-5224-1Search in Google Scholar

[50] ESPON SIESTA, Spatial Indicators for a ‘Europe 2020 Strategy’ Territorial Analysis: Draft final report - executive summary, 2012 Search in Google Scholar

[51] Schaich, H., Bieling, C. and Plieninger, T., Linking ecosystem services with cultural landscape research, GAIA, 2010, 19/4, 269-27710.14512/gaia.19.4.9Search in Google Scholar

[52] Girot, C., Freytag, A., Kirchengast, A. and Richter, D. (Eds.), Topology: Topical thoughts on the contemporary landscape, Landscript, Vol. 3, Jovis, Berlin, 2013Search in Google Scholar

[53] Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M., Re-thinking science - Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty, Polity Press, Cambridge, 2002 Search in Google Scholar

[54] Selmen, P., Planning at the Landscape Scale, Routledge, London, 2006 10.4324/9780203696903Search in Google Scholar

[55] Prager, K., Reed, M. and Scott, A., Encouraging collaboration for the provision of ecosystem services at a landscape scale. Rethinking agri-environmental payments, Land Use Policy, 2012, 29, 244-249 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.06.012Search in Google Scholar

[56] European Commission, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing rules for direct payments to farmers under support schemes within the framework of the common agricultural policy: COM(2011)625, 2011 Search in Google Scholar

[57] Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P. and Norberg, J., Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems, Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2005, 30, 441-47310.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-9-19
Accepted: 2017-7-18
Published Online: 2017-10-28
Published in Print: 2017-10-26

© 2017

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.

Downloaded on 10.12.2022 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cass-2017-0007/html
Scroll Up Arrow