Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 31, 2018

Periurbanization and conservation pressures over remnants of native vegetation: impact on ecosystem services for a Latin-American capital city

Francisco de la Barrera EMAIL logo , Cristián Henríquez , Fanny Coulombié , Cynnamon Dobbs and Alejando Salazar


Urban expansion in Latin-American cities is faster than urban planning. In order to implement sustainable planning the capacity of peri-urban areas to provide ecosystem services must be evaluated in the context of competing urbanization and conservation pressures. In this study we analyzed the effect of urban expansion on peri-urban vegetation of the Metropolitan Area of Santiago and what ecosystem services are provided by El Panul, land rich in biodiversity embedded in the fringe of the city. The city has lost vegetation while urbanized areas grow. Under this context, we evaluated the multi-functionality of El Panul through the quantification of three ecosystem services (ES): sense of place through the interviews of 60 residents, recreation via GIS analyses, and local climate regulation determined with air temperature measurements. El Panul increased the provision of urban green spaces, where inhabitants recognize and appreciate ES, and it plays a significant role in mitigating the urban heat island on summer nights. ES have emerged as a concept and framework for evaluating competing urban development alternatives.

7 References

[1] Jacquin, A., Misakova, L., Gaya, M.A. Hybrid object-based classification approach for mapping urban sprawl in periurban environment. Landsc Urban Plan, 2008, 84, 152–165.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.006Search in Google Scholar

[2] Allen, A.. Environmental planning and management of the peri-urban interface: perspectives on an emerging field. Environ Urban, 2003, 15(1), 135-148.10.1630/095624703101286402Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cavailhes, J., Peeters, D., Sekeris, E. Thisse, J.F. The periurban city. Why to live between the city and the countryside. Reg Sci Urban Econ, 2004, 34 (6), 681–703.10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2003.08.003Search in Google Scholar

[4] Salazar, A. Transformaciones socio-territoriales en la periferia metropolitana: la ciudad periurbana, estrategias locales y gobernanza en Santiago de Chile. Scripta Nova. Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 2010, 331 (47) Retrieved from - in Google Scholar

[5] CBO. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity. Cities and Biodiversity Outlook. Montreal, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Merlín-Uribe, Y., Contreras-Hernández, A., Astier-Calderón, M. Jensen, O. P. Zaragoza, R., Zambrano, L. Urban expansion into a protected natural area in Mexico City: alternative management scenarios. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2013, 56:3, 398-41.10.1080/09640568.2012.683686Search in Google Scholar

[7] Radford, K. G., James, P. Changes in the value of ecosystem services along a rural–urban gradient: A case study of Greater Manchester, UK. Landsc Urban Plan, 2013, 109(1), 117-127.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.10.007Search in Google Scholar

[8] Ravetz, J., Fertner, C. Sick Nielsen, T.A. The Dynamics of Peri-Urbanization. In: Nilsson, K., S. Pauleit, S. Bell, C. Aalbers & T.A. Sick Nielsen (eds.) Peri-urban futures: Scenarios and models for land use change in Europe (pp. 13-45). Springer- Verlag Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Inostroza, L., Baur, R., Csaplovics, E. Urban sprawl and fragmentation in Latin America: A dynamic quantification and characterization of spatial patterns. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 115, 87-97.10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.11.007Search in Google Scholar

[10] Sperandelli, D. I., Dupas, F. A., Dias Pons, N. A. Dynamics of urban sprawl, vacant land, and green spaces on the metropolitan fringe of São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 2013, 139(4), 274-279.10.1061/(ASCE)UP.1943-5444.0000154Search in Google Scholar

[11] Janoschka, M. El nuevo modelo de la ciudad latinoamericana: fragmentación y privatización. EURE, 2002, 28(85), 11-20.10.4067/S0250-71612002008500002Search in Google Scholar

[12] Borsdorf, A. Cómo modelar el desarrollo y la dinámica de la ciudad latinoamericana. EURE, 2003, 29 (86), 37-49.10.4067/S0250-71612003008600002Search in Google Scholar

[13] Borsdorf, A., Hidalgo, R., Sánchez, R. A new model of urban development in Latin America: The gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valparaíso. Cities, 2007, 24 (5), 365-378.10.1016/j.cities.2007.04.002Search in Google Scholar

[14] Romero-Lankao, P., Qin, H., Borbor-Cordova, M. Exploration of health risks related to air pollution and temperature in three Latin American cities. Social Science & Medicine, 2013, 83, 110-118.10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.01.009Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[15] Sarricolea, P., Martín-Vide, J. El estudio de la Isla de Calor Urbana de Superficie del Área Metropolitana de Santiago de Chile con imágenes Terra-MODIS y Análisis de Componentes Principales. Revista de geografía Norte Grande, 2014, 57, 123-141.10.4067/S0718-34022014000100009Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ward, P. M. “A Patrimony for the Children”: Low-Income Homeownership and Housing (Im) Mobility in Latin American Cities. Ann Assoc Am Geogr, 2012, 102(6), 1489-1510.10.1080/00045608.2011.628260Search in Google Scholar

[17] UNEP–United Nations Environment Programme. Latin America and the Caribbean: Environment Outlook, GEO LAC 3, 2010.Search in Google Scholar

[18] De la Barrera, F., Moreira, D. Recognizing how ecosystem services of Mahuida Park (Santiago de Chile) benefit citizen: a strategy to link the protection of natural areas to urban settings. Treballs de la Societat Catalana de Geografia, 2013, 75, 243-253.Search in Google Scholar

[19] La Rosa, D., Takatori, C., Shimizu, H., Privitera, R. A planning framework to evaluate demands and preferences by different social groups for accessibility to urban greenspaces. Sustain Cities Soc, 2018, 36, 346-362.10.1016/j.scs.2017.10.026Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kabisch, N., Strohbach, M., Haase, D., Kronenberg, J. Urban green space availability in European cities. Ecol Indic, 2016, 70, 586-596.10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.029Search in Google Scholar

[21] Huang, S. L., Chen, Y. H., Kuo, F. Y., Wang, S. H. Emergy-based evaluation of peri-urban ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 2011, 8(1), 38-50.10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.12.002Search in Google Scholar

[22] McKinney, M. L. Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst, 2008, 11(2), 161-176.10.1007/s11252-007-0045-4Search in Google Scholar

[23] Keeley, M. Using individual parcel asessment to improve stormwater management. J Am Plann Assoc, 2007, 73(2), 149-160.10.1080/01944360708976149Search in Google Scholar

[24] Opdam, P., Steingrover, E., Rooji, S. Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes. Landsc Urban Plan, 2006, 75(3-4), 322-332.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.015Search in Google Scholar

[25] Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R. Defining and measuring ecosystem services. In: Potschin, M., Haines-Young, R., Fish, R. and Turner, R.K. (eds) Routledge Handbook of Ecosystem Services. Routledge, London and New York, pp. 25-44, 2016. Available from: in Google Scholar

[26] Colding, J. The role of ecosystem services in contemporary urban planning. In J. Niemelä, (Ed.), Urban Ecology - Patterns, processes and applications (pp. 228-237). New York – Oxford, 201210.1093/acprof:oso/9780199563562.003.0028Search in Google Scholar

[27] Troy, A., Wilson, M. A. Mapping ecosystem services: Practical challenges and opportunities in linking GIS and value transfer. Ecol Econ, 2006, 60(2), 435–449.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.04.007Search in Google Scholar

[28] De Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., Willemen, L. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making. Ecological Complexity, 2010, 7(3), 260–272.10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ahern, J., Cilliers, S., Niemelä, J. The concept of ecosystem service in adaptive urban planning and design: A framework for supporting innovation. Landsc Urban Plan, 2014, 125, 254-25910.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.01.020Search in Google Scholar

[30] Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas (INE) Síntesis resultados Censo 2017. Retrieved November 1, 2018 from -, 2018.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Romero, H., Vásquez, A. Environmental evaluation of Andean piedmont urbanization process in Santiago de Chile. EURE, 2005, 31(94), 97-117.10.4067/S0250-71612005009400006Search in Google Scholar

[32] Pavez, E., Lobos, G., Jaksic, F. Cambios de largo plazo en el paisaje y los ensambles de micromamíferos y rapaces en Chile. Revista Chilena de Historia Natural, 2010, 83, 99-111.10.4067/S0716-078X2010000100006Search in Google Scholar

[33] Madaleno, I. M., Gurovich, A. “Urban versus rural” no longer matches reality: An early public agro-residential development in periurban Santiago, Chile. Cities, 2014, 21(6), 513–526.10.1016/j.cities.2004.08.001Search in Google Scholar

[34] Borsdorf, A., Hildalgo, R., Vidal-Koppmann, S. Social segregation and gated communities in Santiago de Chile and Buenos Aires. A comparison. Habitat Int, 2016, 54, 18-27, doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.03310.1016/j.habitatint.2015.11.033Search in Google Scholar

[35] OECD Urban Policy Reviews, Chile 2013, OECD Publishing., 2013.10.1787/9789264191808-en2013Search in Google Scholar

[36] Cooper, M., Henríquez, C. Planificación Territorial y Crecimiento Urbano: Desarticulaciones y Desafíos de la Sostenibilidad Urbano-Regional en Santiago Metropolitano. Scripta Nova, Revista Electrónica de Geografía y Ciencias Sociales, 2010, 331 (14). Retrieved from - in Google Scholar

[37] Banzhaf, E., Reyes-Paecke, S., Müller, A., Kindler, A. Do demographic and land-use changes contrast urban and suburban dynamics? A sophisticated reflection on Santiago de Chile. Habitat Int, 2013, 39, 179–191.10.1016/j.habitatint.2012.11.005Search in Google Scholar

[38] Peña, M. A. Relationships between remotely sensed surface parameters associated with the urban heat sink formation in Santiago, Chile. Int J Remote Sens, 2008, 29(15), 4385-4404.10.1080/01431160801908137Search in Google Scholar

[39] De la Barrera, F., Henriquez, C. Vegetation cover change in growing urban agglomerations in Chile. Ecol Indic, 2017, 81, 265-73.10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.05.067Search in Google Scholar

[40] Stefanov, W. L., Netzband, M. Assessment of ASTER land cover and MODIS NDVI data at multiple scales for ecological characterization of an arid urban center. Remote Sens Environ, 2005, 99(1), 31-43.10.1016/j.rse.2005.04.024Search in Google Scholar

[41] Verbesselt, J., Hyndman, R., Newnham, G., Culvenor, D. Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series. Remote Sens Environ, 2010, 114(1), 106-115.10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.014Search in Google Scholar

[42] Potter, C. S., Brooks, V. Global analysis of empirical relations between annual climate and seasonality of NDVI. Int J Remote Sens, 1998, 19(15), 2921-2948.10.1080/014311698214352Search in Google Scholar

[43] Tzoulas, K., Korpela, K., Venn, S., Yli-Pelkonen, V., Kaźmierczak, A., Niemela, J., et al. Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using green infrastructure: a literature review. Landsc Urban Plan, 2007, 81(3), 167-178.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.02.001Search in Google Scholar

[44] Soini, K., Vaarala, H., Pouta, E. Residents’ sense of place and landscape perceptions at the rural–urban interface. Landsc Urban Plan, 2012, 104(1), 124-134.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[45] Handley, J., Pauleit, S., Slinn, P., Barber, A., Baker, M., Jones, C., Lindley, S. Accessible natural green space standards in towns and cities: a review and toolkit. English Nature research report number 526. English Nature, Peterborough, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

[46] ADIMARK. Mapa socioeconómico de Chile. Nivel socioeconómico de los hogares del país basado en datos del Censo 2002. [online] URL: 2004Search in Google Scholar

[47] López, E., Bocco, G., Mendoza, M., Duhau, E. Predicting land-cover and land-use change in the urban fringe: a case in Morelia city, Mexico. Landsc Urban Plan, 2001, 55(4), 271-285.10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00160-8Search in Google Scholar

[48] Henríquez, C., Azócar, G., Romero, H. Monitoring and modeling the urban growth of two mid-sized Chilean cities. Habitat Int, 2006, 30(4), 945-964.10.1016/j.habitatint.2005.05.002Search in Google Scholar

[49] Rojas, C., Muñiz, I., Pino, J. Understanding the urban sprawl in the mid-size Latin American cities through the urban form: Analysis of the Concepción metropolitan area (Chile). Journal of Geographic Information System, 2013, 5 (3), 222-234.10.4236/jgis.2013.53021Search in Google Scholar

[50] Schulz, J.J., Cayuela, L., Echeverria, C., Salas, J., Rey Benayas, J.M. Monitoring land cover change of the dryland forest landscape of central Chile (1975-2008). Appl Geogr, 2010, 30, 436-447.10.1016/j.apgeog.2009.12.003Search in Google Scholar

[51] De la Barrera, F., Rubio, P., Banzhaf, E. The value of vegetation cover for ecosystem services in the suburban context. Urban For Urban Green, 2016, 16, 110-122.10.1016/j.ufug.2016.02.003Search in Google Scholar

[52] Lissner, T. K., Reusser, D. E., Lakes, T., Kropp, J. P. A systematic approach to assess human wellbeing demonstrated for impacts of climate change. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 2014, 1(1), 98-110.10.2478/cass-2014-0010Search in Google Scholar

[53] La Rosa, D. Accessibility to greenspaces: GIS based indicators for sustainable planning in a dense urban context. Ecol Indic, 2014, 42, 122-134.10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.011Search in Google Scholar

[54] Schipperijn, J., Stigsdotter, U. K., Randrup, T. B., Troelsen, J. Influences on the use of green space - A case study in Odense, Denmark. Urban For Urban Green, 2010, 9(1), 25-32.10.1016/j.ufug.2009.09.002Search in Google Scholar

[55] Taylor B., Fernando P., Bauman A., Williamson A., Craig J., Redman S. Measuring the quality of public open space using Google Earth. Am J Prev Med, 2011, 40 (2) 105-11210.1016/j.amepre.2010.10.024Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[56] Zhou, X., Kim, J. Social disparities in tree canopy and park accessibility: A case study of six cities in Illinois using GIS and remote sensing. Urban For Urban Green, 2013, 12(1), 88-97.10.1016/j.ufug.2012.11.004Search in Google Scholar

[57] Yao, L., Liu, J., Wang, R., Yin, K., Han, B. Effective green equivalent—A measure of public green spaces for cities. Ecol Indic, 2014, 47(0), 123-127.10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.009Search in Google Scholar

[58] La Rosa, D., Spyra, M., Inostroza, L. Indicators of Cultural Ecosystem Services for urban planning: A review. Ecol Indic, 2016, 61, 74-89.10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.028Search in Google Scholar

[59] Reis, S., Seto, E., Northcross, A., Quinn, N. W., Convertino, M., Jones, R. L., et al. Integrating modelling and smart sensors for environmental and human health. Environ Model Softw, 2015, 74, 238-246.10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[60] Bagstad, K. J., Johnson, G. W., Voigt, B., Villa, F. Spatial dynamics of ecosystem service flows: a comprehensive approach to quantifying actual services. Ecosyst Serv, 2013, 4, 117-125.10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.012Search in Google Scholar

[61] Serna-Chavez, H. M., Schulp, C. J. E., Van Bodegom, P. M., Bouten, W., Verburg, P. H., Davidson, M. D. A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services. Ecol Indic, 2014, 39, 24-33.10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.11.024Search in Google Scholar

[62] Opdam, P., Coninx, I., Dewulf, A., Steingröver, E., Vos, C., Van der Wal, M. Framing ecosystem services: Affecting behaviour of actors in collaborative landscape planning?. Land Use Policy, 2015, 46, 223-231.10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.02.008Search in Google Scholar

[63] Sagaris, L. Citizen participation for sustainable transport: the case of “Living City” in Santiago, Chile (1997–2012). J Transp Geogr, 2014, 41, 74-83.10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.08.011Search in Google Scholar

[64] Opdam, P., Albert, C., Fürst, C., Grêt-Regamey, A., Kleemann, J., Parker, D., et al. Ecosystem services for connecting actors–lessons from a symposium. Change and Adaptation in Socio-Ecological Systems, 2015, 2(1), 1-7.10.1515/cass-2015-0001Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2018-03-09
Accepted: 2018-06-11
Published Online: 2018-12-31
Published in Print: 2019-01-01

© 2018 Francisco de la Barrera et al., published by Sciendo

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 7.12.2022 from
Scroll Up Arrow