Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter December 13, 2013

Routine use of the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq™ Cancer Hotspot Panel for identification of clinically actionable somatic mutations

  • Gregory J. Tsongalis EMAIL logo , Jason D. Peterson , Francine B. de Abreu , Christopher D. Tunkey , Torrey L. Gallagher , Linda D. Strausbaugh , Wendy A. Wells and Christopher I. Amos

Abstract

Background: Somatic mutation analysis is standard of practice for solid tumors in order to identify therapeutic sensitizing and resistance mutations. Our laboratory routinely performed standalone PCR-based methods for mutations in several genes. Rapid discovery and introduction of new therapeutics has demanded additional genomic information for adequate management of the cancer patient. We evaluated a next generation sequencing assay, the Ion Torrent AmpliSeq Cancer Hotspot Panelv2 (CHPv2), capable of identifying multiple somatic mutations in 50 genes in a single assay.

Methods: Accuracy, precision, limit of detection, and specificity were evaluated using DNA from well-characterized cell lines, genetically engineered cell lines fixed and embedded in paraffin, and previously tested mutation positive or negative, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues. Normal kidney, tonsil and colon FFPE tissues were used as controls.

Results: Accuracy studies showed 100% concordance in each patient sample between previous PCR results and the corresponding variants identified using the Ion Torrent panel. Precision studies gave consistent results when libraries were prepared from the same original DNA and were run on multiple 316 chips. The limit of detection was determined to be 5% for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and 20% for insertions and deletions (indels). Specificity studies using normal FFPE tissue previously tested by PCR methods were also 100%.

Conclusions: We have evaluated the performance of the AmpliSeq Cancer Panel Hotspotv2 and show that it is suitable for clinical testing. This next generation sequencing panel has allowed the laboratory to consolidate a broader range of molecular oncology testing to a single platform and single assay.


Corresponding author: Gregory J. Tsongalis, Department of Pathology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, 1 Medical Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA, Phone: +1 603 650 5498, E-mail:

References

1. Tuononen K, Mäki-Nevala S, Sarhadi VK, Wirtanen A, Rönty M, Salmenkivi K, et al. Comparison of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) and real-time PCR in the detection of EGFR, KRAS, and BRAF mutations on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor material of non-small cell lung carcinoma-superiority of NGS. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2013;5:503–11.10.1002/gcc.22047Search in Google Scholar PubMed

2. Peeters M, Oliner KS, Parker A, Siena S, Van Cutsem E, Huang J, et al. Massively parallel tumor multigene sequencing to evaluate response to panitumumab in a randomized phase III study of metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2013;19:1902–12.10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1913Search in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M, Van Cutsem E, Siena S, Freeman DJ, et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1626–34.10.1200/JCO.2007.14.7116Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Tol J, Koopman M, Cats A, Rodenburg CJ, Creemers GJ, Schrama JG, et al. Chemotherapy, bevacizumab, and cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 2009;360:563–72.10.1056/NEJMoa0808268Search in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Di Nicolantonio F, Martini M, Molinari F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Arena S, Saletti P, et al. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:5705–12.10.1200/JCO.2008.18.0786Search in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Paez JG, Jänne PA, Lee JC, Tracy S, Greulich H, Gabriel S, et al. EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy. Science 2004;304:1497–500.10.1126/science.1099314Search in Google Scholar PubMed

7. Hudis CA. Trastuzumab – mechanism of action and use in clinical practice. N Engl J Med 2007;357:39–51.10.1056/NEJMra043186Search in Google Scholar PubMed

8. Walther A, Johnstone E, Swanton C, Midgley R, Tomlinson I, Kerr D. Genetic prognostic and predictive markers in colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 2009;9:489–99.10.1038/nrc2645Search in Google Scholar PubMed

9. Davies H, Bignell GR, Cox C, Stephens P, Edkins S, Clegg S, et al. Mutations of the BRAF gene in human cancer. Nature 2002;417:949–54.10.1038/nature00766Search in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Eberhard DA, Johnson BE, Amler LC, Goddard AD, Heldens SL, Herbst RS, et al. Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor and in KRAS are predictive and prognostic indicators in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer treated with chemotherapy alone and in combination with erlotinib. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:5900–9.10.1200/JCO.2005.02.857Search in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Pao W, Miller VA. Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations, small-molecule kinase inhibitors, and non-small-cell lung cancer: current knowledge and future directions. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2556–68.10.1200/JCO.2005.07.799Search in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Sequist LV, Joshi VA, Jänne PA, Muzikansky A, Fidias P, Meyerson M, et al. Response to treatment and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing somatic EGFR mutation testing. Oncologist 2007;12:90–8.10.1634/theoncologist.12-1-90Search in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Marks JL, Broderick S, Zhou Q, Chitale D, Li AR, Zakowski MF, et al. Prognostic and therapeutic implications of EGFR and KRAS mutations in resected lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol 2008;3:111–6.10.1097/JTO.0b013e318160c607Search in Google Scholar PubMed

14. Siegfried JM, Gillespie AT, Mera R, Casey TJ, Keohavong P, Testa JR, et al. Prognostic value of specific KRAS mutations in lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1997;6:841–7.Search in Google Scholar

15. Wertheim GB, Daber R, Bagg A. Molecular diagnostics of acute myeloid leukemia: it’s a (next) generational thing. J Mol Diagn 2013;1:27–30.10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.08.002Search in Google Scholar PubMed

16. Spencer DH, Abel HJ, Lockwood CM, Payton JE, Szankasi P, Kelley TW, et al. Detection of FLT3 internal tandem duplication in targeted, short-read-length, next-generation sequencing data. J Mol Diagn 2013;1:81–93.10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.08.001Search in Google Scholar PubMed

17. Metzker ML. Sequencing technologies – the next generation. Nat Rev Genet 2010;11:31–46.10.1038/nrg2626Search in Google Scholar PubMed

18. Quail MA, Smith M, Coupland P, Otto TD, Harris SR, Connor TR, et al. A tale of three next generation sequencing platforms: comparison of Ion Torrent, Pacific Biosciences and Illumina MiSeq sequencers. BMC Genomics 2012;13:341.10.1186/1471-2164-13-341Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

19. Hadd AG, Houghton J, Choudhary A, Sah S, Chen L, Marko AC, et al. Targeted, high-depth, next-generation sequencing of cancer genes in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded and fine-needle aspiration tumor specimens. J Mol Diagn 2013;2:234–47.10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.11.006Search in Google Scholar PubMed

20. Beadling C, Neff TL, Heinrich MC, Rhodes K, Thornton M, Leamon J, et al. Combining highly multiplexed PCR with semiconductor-based sequencing for rapid cancer genotyping. J Molec Diagn 2013;15:171–6.10.1016/j.jmoldx.2012.09.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

21. Singh RR, Patel KP, Routbort MJ, Reddy NG, Barkoh BA, Handal B, et al. Clinical validation of a next generation sequencing screen for mutational hotspots in 46 cancer related genes. J Molec Diagn 2013;15:607–22.10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.05.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

22. Merriman B, Ion Torrent R&D Team, Rothberg JM. Progress in ion torrent semiconductor chip based sequencing. Electrophoresis 2012;33:3397–417.10.1002/elps.201200424Search in Google Scholar

23. Rothberg JM, Hinz W, Rearick TM, Schultz J, Mileski W, Davey M, et al. An integrated semiconductor device enabling non-optical genome sequencing. Nature 2011;475:348–52.10.1038/nature10242Search in Google Scholar

24. Yousem SA, Dacic S, Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova M. Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis: profiling of multifocal tumors using next-generation sequencing identifies concordant occurrence of BRAF V600E mutations. Chest 2013;143:1679–84.10.1378/chest.12-1917Search in Google Scholar

25. Lièvre A, Bachet JB, Boige V, Cayre A, Le Corre D, Buc E, et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:374–9.10.1200/JCO.2007.12.5906Search in Google Scholar

26. Jarry A, Masson D, Cassagnau E, Parois S, Laboisse C, Denis MG. Real-time allele-specific amplification for sensitive detection of the BRAF mutation V600E. Mol Cell Probes 2004;18:349–52.10.1016/j.mcp.2004.05.004Search in Google Scholar

27. Pan Q, Pao W, Ladanyi M. Rapid polymerase chain reaction-based detection of epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutations in lung adenocarcinomas. J Mol Diagn 2005;7:396–403.10.1016/S1525-1578(10)60569-7Search in Google Scholar

28. Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G, et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol 2011;29:24–6.10.1038/nbt.1754Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

29. Kaushal D, Naeve CW. An overview of Spotfire for gene-expression studies. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2004;7:7.7.10.1002/0471250953.bi0709s7Search in Google Scholar PubMed

30. Forbes SA, Bindal N, Bamford S, Cole C, Kok CY, Beare D, et al. COSMIC: mining complete cancer genomes in the Catalogue of Somatic Mutations in Cancer. Nucleic Acids Res 2011;39:D945–50.10.1093/nar/gkq929Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

31. Worthey EA, Mayer AN, Syverson GD, Helbling D, Bonacci BB, Decker B, et al. Making a definitive diagnosis: successful clinical application of whole exome sequencing in a child with intractable inflammatory bowel disease. Genet Med 2011;3:255–62.10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182088158Search in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2013-10-14
Accepted: 2013-11-23
Published Online: 2013-12-13
Published in Print: 2014-5-1

©2014 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 24.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2013-0883/html
Scroll to top button