Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 23, 2014

Comparison of approaches and measurement of continuing professional development for specialists in laboratory medicine within four European countries

  • Jan Martin EMAIL logo , Visnja Gasljevic , Tomáš Šálek , Attila Horvath , Charles Borg , Zlata Flegar-Meštrić , Mladen Jakovcic , Josef Silhavik , Adrienn Adonics , Zsófia Szlamka , Ian Brincat , Dorianne Buttigieg , Noel Ciantar , Anna Lisa Sciortino , Antoinette Mifsud , Alison Adkins , Tracey Bennett , Kirstie Rice and Yvette Taylor

Abstract

Background: This study investigated approaches to continuing professional development (CPD) for specialists in laboratory medicine within four European countries: Croatia, the Czech Republic, Malta and the UK.

Methods: The research questions focussed on ascertaining if continued registration/licence was linked to CPD and if so, were there requirements for certain amounts and types of CPD and for CPD activities to meet specified accreditation criteria. The Professional Associations Research Network (PARN) model of CPD measurement was applied to each country’s registration/licencing body’s CPD requirements.

Results: Our results indicate a spectrum of approaches to CPD within participating countries.

Conclusions: It will be necessary for European employers to be familiar with these differences and to take them into account for this increasingly mobile European workforce.


Corresponding author: Dr. Jan Martin, CBiol CSci FHEA FIBMS FSB, Deputy Head of School of Biomedical Science and Physiology, Principal Lecturer for Accreditation and Development, Faculty of Science and Engineering, University of Wolverhampton, Wulfruna Street, Wolverhampton WV1 1LY, UK, Phone: +44 1902 321154, Fax: +44 1902 322714, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a Leonardo Partnership [30] Grant from the European Union Lifelong Learning Programme [31] – Leonardo Grant Number LdVP/13/006C ‘Enhancing Hospital Laboratory Standards for Continuing Professional Development: A Quality Improvement Toolkit’.

Author’s contribution: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

Research funding: None declared.

Employment or leadership: None declared.

Honorarium: None declared.

Role of sponsor: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

References

1. Kovacs GL, Ludany A, Koszegi T, Liszt F, Kellermayer M. Graduate and postgraduate state university education of laboratory specialists in Hungary: medical doctors, pharmacists and laboratory analysts. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011; 21:22–9.10.11613/BM.2011.006Search in Google Scholar

2. Simundic AM, Topic E, Cvoriscec D, Cepelak I. Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine in Croatia: regulation of the profession. Special themed issue: education in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine in various European countries. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2011;21:15–21.10.11613/BM.2011.005Search in Google Scholar

3. McMurray J, Zérah S, Hallworth M, Schuff-Werner P, Haushofer A, Szekeres T, et al. The European register of specialists in clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine: guide to the register, version 3-2010. Clin Chem Lab Med 2010;48:999–1008.10.1515/CCLM.2010.223Search in Google Scholar PubMed

4. Directive 2005/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 7 September 2005 on the recognition of professional qualifications. OJEU. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/qualifications/policy_developments/legislation/indexen.htm. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

5. EU single market regulated professions database. Ranking the most mobile professions. Available from: http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/qualifications/regprof/index.cfm?action=stat_ranking&b_services=false. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

6. Topic E, Beletic A, Zima T. Continuing professional development crediting system for specialists in laboratory medicine within 28 EFLM national societies. Biochem Med 2013;23:332–41.10.11613/BM.2013.041Search in Google Scholar

7. EucoLABS. A road to a European credit system for continuing professional development of biomedical laboratory scientists in Europe 2010–2012. Available from: http://www.europeansharedtreasure.eu/detail.php?id_project_base=2010-1-BE3-LEO04-02269.Search in Google Scholar

8. Martin J. A European project to enhance hospital laboratory standards for biomedical scientists continuing professional development by establishing a quality improvement toolkit and an online community of practice. NAPC Rev 2013;14:29–30.Search in Google Scholar

9. Martin J. A European project to enhance continuing professional development for biomedical scientists. Biomed Sci 2014;58:155.Search in Google Scholar

10. Zerah S, Murray J, Horvath AR. EFLM position statement – our profession now has a European name: specialist in laboratory medicine. Biochem Med 2012;22:272–3.10.11613/BM.2012.029Search in Google Scholar

11. Friedman A, Woodhead S. Approaches to CPD measurement. Bristol: Professional Associations Research Network PARN, 2008. Available from: http://www.ifac.org/sites/default/files/meetings/files/3629.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

12. Friedman A, Davis K, Philips M. Continuing professional development in the UK: policies and programmes. Bristol: Professional Associations Research Network (PARN), 2000.Search in Google Scholar

13. Friedman A, Phillips M. Continuing professional development: developing a vision. J Educ Work 2004;17:361–76.10.1080/1363908042000267432Search in Google Scholar

14. Croatian Chamber of Medical Biochemists: rules of continuing education for masters of medical biochemistry. Available from: http://www.hkmb.hr/. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

15. Czech Republic Ministry of Health. Available from: http://www.mzcr.cz/. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

16. HCPC: Health and Care Professions Council. Your guide to our standards for continuing professional development. 2012. Available from: http://www.hpc-uk.org/assets/documents/10003B70Yourguidetoourstandardsofcontinuingprofessionaldevelopment.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

17. Friedman A, Mason J. The professionalisation of UK professional associations: governance, management & member relations. Bristol: Professional Associations Research Network (PARN), 2004.Search in Google Scholar

18. Wilson G. Continuing professional development: current understanding and practice. Biomed Sci 2004;54:168–9.Search in Google Scholar

19. Department of Health. Allied health professions project: demonstrating competence through continuing professional development – final report. London: Department of Health, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

20. HCPC: Health and Care Professions Council. Continuing professional development and your registration. 2012. Available from: http://www.hpc-uk.org/assets/documents/10001314CPD_and_your_registration.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

21. HCPC: Health and Care Professions Council. Continuing professional development, frequently asked questions. 2012. Available from: http://www.hpc-uk.org/registrants/cpd/faqs/. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

22. CPSM: Council for the Professions Complementary to Medicine – Malta. Code of practice – medical laboratory science. 2006. Available from: http://www.ba-malta.org/file.aspx?f=642. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

23. O’Sullivan J. Continuing professional development. In: Jones R, Jenkins F, editors. Developing the allied health professional. London: Radcliffe Publishing, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

24. Saidi G, Weindling AM. An evaluation of a national scheme for continuing professional development (CPD) for career grade doctors; the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health’s programme for paediatricians evaluated by focus group methodology. Med Educ 2003;37:328–34.10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01464.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

25. Schostaka J, Davis M, Hanso J, Schostakd J, Brown T, Driscoll P, et al. The effectiveness of continuing professional development project: a summary of findings. Med Teach 2010;32:586–92.10.3109/0142159X.2010.489129Search in Google Scholar PubMed

26. Gunn H, Goding L. Continuing professional development of physiotherapists based in community primary care trusts: a qualitative study investigating perceptions, experiences and outcomes. Physiotherapy 2009;95:209–14.10.1016/j.physio.2007.09.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

27. Eaton K, Brookes J, Patel R, Batchelor P, Merali F, Narain A. The impact of continuing professional development in dentistry: a literature review. 2011. Available from: http://www.gdc-uk.org/Aboutus/policy/Documents/Impact%20Of%20CPD%20In%20Dentistry.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

28. Drey N, Gould D, Allan T. The relationship between continuing professional education and commitment to nursing. Nurs Educ Today 2009;29:740–5.10.1016/j.nedt.2009.03.008Search in Google Scholar PubMed

29. Cook S. RSPGB continuing professional development. A guide to getting started. A journey round the CPD cycle 2004. Available from: http://www.uptodate.org.uk/PlanandRecord/getting_started_guide/getting_started_/2.pdf. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

30. European Union Leonardo Partnerships. Available from: http://www.leonardo.org.uk/default.asp?section=00010001&sectionTitle=Home. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

31. European Union Lifelong Learning Programme. Available from: https://www.lifelonglearningprogramme.org.uk/. Accessed on April 15, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2014-4-16
Accepted: 2014-6-10
Published Online: 2014-7-23
Published in Print: 2015-1-1

©2015 by De Gruyter

Downloaded on 23.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cclm-2014-0415/html
Scroll to top button