References
1. International Organization for Standardization. Medical laboratories – requirements for quality and competence. ISO 15189. Geneva: ISO, 2012.Search in Google Scholar
2. Sociedad Española de bioquímica clínica y patología molecular. Definición del límite de estabilidad de las magnitudes en las muestras biológicas. Quím Clín 2006;25:81–5.Search in Google Scholar
3. Fuentes-Arderiu X. Clinical sample stability and measurement uncertainty. Clin Chem Lab Med 2014;52:e37–8.10.1515/cclm-2013-0721Search in Google Scholar PubMed
4. Guide to the evaluation of measurement uncertainty for quantitative test results. European Federation of National Associations of Measurement. Testing and analytical laboratories. Technical report 1/2006.Search in Google Scholar
5. Magnusson B, Näykki T, Hovind H, Krysell M. Handbook for calculation of measurement uncertainty in environmental laboratories, 2nd ed. Nordtest report, Tekniikantie 12, 02150 Espoo, Finland, TR 537. Approved 2003–05.Search in Google Scholar
6. Maroto A, Boqué R, Riu J, Rius FX. Effect of non-significant proportional bias in the final measurement uncertainty. Analyst 2003;128:373–8.10.1039/b210526hSearch in Google Scholar PubMed
7. Fraser CG. Reference change values. Clin Chem Lab Med 2011;50:807–12.Search in Google Scholar
8. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307–10.Search in Google Scholar
9. Andersen M, Petersen PH, Blaabjerg O, Hangaard J, Hagen C. Evaluation of growth hormone assays using ratio plots. Clin. Chem 1998;44:1032–8.Search in Google Scholar
©2015 by De Gruyter
