Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter March 12, 2016

Potential errors in the determination of urinary ammonium by formol titration

Patrick A. Walsh and Daniel J. O’Donovan

Corresponding author: Dr. Patrick A. Walsh, Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, RCSI – MUB, Building No. 2441, Road 2835, Busaiteen 228, Kingdom of Bahrain, Phone: +973 17 351 450, Fax: +973 17 330 806, E-mail:

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Bindhu Nair for helping with the compiling of the references.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received for this research from the Medical Research Council of Ireland, the Department of Education, and the National University of Ireland Galway (Postgraduate Fellowship).

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organisation(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.

  6. Ethical approval: The research work was carried out in the Physiology laboratories at the National University of Ireland Galway (NUIG). A permit to import the animals for the research work from the UK was obtained from the Department of Agriculture (Veterinary Section), Kildare St., Dublin 2, Ireland. A license to undertake the animal experiments was granted by the Department of Health (Public Health Division), Hawkins House, Dublin 2, Ireland.

References

1. Cunarro JA, Weiner MW. A comparison of methods for measuring urinary ammonium. Kidney Int 1974;5:303–5.10.1038/ki.1974.41Search in Google Scholar

2. Bishop ML, Fody EP, Schoeff LE. Clinical chemistry: principles, techniques, and correlations, 7th ed. Philadelphia, PA, USA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

3. Jorgensen K. Titrimetric determination of the net excretion of acid/base in urine. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1957;9:287–91.10.3109/00365515709079972Search in Google Scholar

4. Yu HL, Giammarco R, Goldstein MB, Stinebaugh DJ, Halperin ML. Stimulation of ammonia production and excretion in the rabbit by inorganic phosphate. Study of control mechanisms. J Clin Invest 1976;58:557–64.10.1172/JCI108501Search in Google Scholar

5. Bates RG. Revised standard values for pH measurements from 0 to 95 °C. J Res Nat Bur Stand 1962;66A:179–84.10.6028/jres.066A.016Search in Google Scholar

6. Schwartz WB, Bank N, Cutler RW. The influence of urinary ionic strength on phosphate pK2’ and the determination of titratable acid. J Clin Invest 1959;38:347–56.10.1172/JCI103808Search in Google Scholar

7. Los JM, Roeleveld LF, Wetsema BJ. Pulse polarography: part X. Formaldehyde hydration in aqueous acetate and phosphate buffer solutions. J Electroanal Chem Interfacial Electrochem 1977;75:819–37.10.1016/S0022-0728(77)80219-2Search in Google Scholar

8. Bell RP, Evans FR, Evans PG. Kinetics of the dehydration of methylene glycol in aqueous solution. Proc R Soc (Lond) 1966;291:(Ser. A):297–323.10.1098/rspa.1966.0097Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2015-11-27
Accepted: 2016-2-3
Published Online: 2016-3-12
Published in Print: 2016-10-1

©2016 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston