The authors are grateful to Vincent Fitzpatrick for his English rereading of the manuscript.
Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.
Research funding: None declared.
Employment or leadership: None declared.
Honorarium: None declared.
Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.
1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Eur Heart J 2018;40:237–69. Search in Google Scholar
2. Clerico A, Zaninotto M, Ripoli A, Masotti S, Prontera C, Passino C, et al. The 99th percentile of reference population for cTnI and cTnT assay: methodology, pathophysiology and clinical implications. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1634–51. Search in Google Scholar
3. Franzini M, Lorenzoni V, Masotti S, Prontera C, Chiappino D, Latta DD, et al. The calculation of the cardiac troponin T 99th percentile of the reference population is affected by age, gender, and population selection: a multicenter study in Italy. Clin Chim Acta 2015;438:376–81. Search in Google Scholar
4. Wildi K, Gimenez MR, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T, Jaeger C, Heinzelmann A, et al. Misdiagnosis of myocardial infarction related to limitations of the current regulatory approach to define clinical decision values for cardiac troponin. Circulation 2015;131:2032–40. Search in Google Scholar
5. Hickman PE, Koerbin G, Potter JM, Abhayaratna WP. Statistical considerations for determining high-sensitivity cardiac troponin reference intervals. Clin Biochem 2017;50:502–5. Search in Google Scholar
6. Hubert M, Vandervieren E. An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Comput Stat Data Anal 2008;52:5186–201. Search in Google Scholar
7. Johansen MB, Christensen PA. A simple transformation independent method for outlier definition. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1524–32. Search in Google Scholar
8. Monneret D, Gellerstedt M, Bonnefont-Rousselot D. Determination of age- and sex-specific 99th percentiles for high-sensitive troponin T from patients: an analytical imprecision- and partitioning-based approach. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:685–96. Search in Google Scholar
9. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Defining, establishing, and verifying reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline, 3rd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2008. Document C28-A3. Search in Google Scholar
10. Campbell MJ, Gardner MJ. Calculating confidence intervals for some non-parametric analyses. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988;296:1454–6. Search in Google Scholar
11. Sheskin DJ. Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures, 5th ed. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall, CRC, 2011. Search in Google Scholar
12. Osborne JW. Improving your data transformations: applying the Box-Cox transformation. Pract Assess Res Eval 2010;15:1–9. Search in Google Scholar
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2018-1366).
©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston