Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 20, 2019

Fast 0/1-h algorithm for detection of NSTEMI: are current high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays fit for purpose? An EQA-based evaluation

Eline A.E. van der Hagen, Christa M. Cobbaert, Ron Meijer and Marc H.M. Thelen



High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T/I (hs-cTnT/I) assays have improved analytical sensitivity for the detection of myocardial infarction (MI). To gain clinical specificity and sensitivity, interpretation of changes in cTn concentrations over time is crucial. The 2015 ESC NSTEMI guideline defines absolute delta values as additional rule-in and rule-out criteria for MI. A critical assumption for application of this rule is that total analytical imprecision within the delta period, including inter-instrument bias, is comparable to analytical imprecision in the validation studies.


Data from the Dutch External Quality Assessment Scheme (EQAS) were used to calculate inter-instrument bias and estimate imprecision for the measuring range where the proposed delta values are relevant: for Roche Elecsys hs-cTnT, 5–52 and 5–12 ng/L; for Abbott Architect hs-cTnI, 2–52 and 2–5 ng/L for rule-in and rule-out, respectively.


For Elecsys, the median inter-instrument bias is 0.3 ng/L (n = 33 laboratories), resulting in reference change values (RCVs) of 3.0 and 1.7 ng/L, respectively, for rule-in and rule-out with imprecision as claimed by the manufacturer. With RCVs smaller than the guideline’s delta thresholds, 100% of the laboratories have adequate specifications. RCVs for rule-in/rule-out increased to 4.6 ng/L/2.5 ng/L, respectively, with individual imprecisions as estimated from EQA data, resulting in 64% and 82% of laboratories with adequate specifications. For Architect, 40% of instruments (n = 10) might falsely qualify the result as clinically relevant; hence, inter-instrument bias could not be determined.


We advise laboratories that use the fast 0/1-h algorithm to introduce stringent internal quality procedures at the relevant/low concentration level, especially when multiple analyzers are randomly used.

  1. Author contributions: All the authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this submitted manuscript and approved submission.

  2. Research funding: None declared.

  3. Employment or leadership: None declared.

  4. Honorarium: None declared.

  5. Competing interests: The funding organization(s) played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; or in the decision to submit the report for publication.


1. Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, Chaitman BR, Bax JJ, Morrow DA, et al.; on behalf of the Joint ESC/ACCF/AHA/WHF Task Force for the Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction. Fourth universal definition of myocardial infarction (2018). Glob Heart 2018;13:305–38.10.1016/j.gheart.2018.08.004Search in Google Scholar

2. Roffi M, Patrono C, Collet JP, Mueller C, Valgimigli M, Andreotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST segment elevation: Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2016;37:267–315.10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320Search in Google Scholar

3. Ibanez B, James S, Agewall S, Antunes MJ, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Bueno H, et al. 2017 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2018;39:119–77.10.1093/eurheartj/ehx393Search in Google Scholar

4. Reichlin T, Hochholzer W, Bassetti S, Steuer S, Stelzig C, Hartwiger S, et al. Early diagnosis of myocardial infarction with sensitive cardiac troponin assays. N Engl J Med 2009;361:858–67.10.1056/NEJMoa0900428Search in Google Scholar

5. Keller T, Zeller T, Ojeda F, Tzikas S, Lillpopp L, Sinning C, et al. Serial changes in highly sensitive troponin I assay and early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. J Am Med Assoc 2011;306:2684–93.10.1001/jama.2011.1896Search in Google Scholar

6. Apple FS, Jaffe AS, Collinson P, Mockel M, Ordonez-Llanos J, Lindahl B, et al. IFCC educational materials on selected analytical and clinical applications of high sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Biochem 2015;48:201–3.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.08.021Search in Google Scholar

7. Wu AHB, Christenson RH, Greene DN, Jaffe AS, Kavsak PA, Ordonez-Llanos J, et al. Clinical Laboratory Practice Recommendations for the Use of Cardiac Troponin in Acute Coronary Syndrome: Expert Opinion from the Academy of the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and the Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem 2018;64:645–55.10.1373/clinchem.2017.277186Search in Google Scholar

8. Hamm CW, Bassand JP, Agewall S, Bax J, Boersma E, Bueno H, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: The Task Force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 2011;32:2999–3054.10.1093/eurheartj/ehr236Search in Google Scholar

9. Giannitsis E, Becker M, Kurz K, Hess G, Zdunek D, Katus HA. High-sensitivity cardiac troponin T for early prediction of evolving non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome and negative troponin results on admission. Clin Chem 2010;56:642–50.10.1373/clinchem.2009.134460Search in Google Scholar

10. Fraser CG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:409–37.10.3109/10408368909106595Search in Google Scholar

11. Thygesen K, Mair J, Katus H, Plebani M, Venge P, Collinson P, et al. Recommendations for the use of cardiac troponin measurement in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2010;31: 2197–204.10.1093/eurheartj/ehq251Search in Google Scholar

12. Thygesen K, Mair J, Giannitsis E, Mueller C, Lindahl B, Blankenberg S, et al. How to use high-sensitivity cardiac troponins in acute cardiac care. Eur Heart J 2012;33:2252–7.10.1093/eurheartj/ehs154Search in Google Scholar

13. Reichlin T, Schindler C, Drexler B, Twerenbold R, Reiter M, Zellweger C, et al. One-hour rule-out and rule-in of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiactroponin T. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1211–8.10.1001/archinternmed.2012.3698Search in Google Scholar

14. Reichlin T, Twerenbold R, Wildi K, Rubini Gimenez M, Bergsma N, Haaf P, et al. Prospective validation of a 1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction using a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. CMAJ 2015;187: E243–52.10.1503/cmaj.141349Search in Google Scholar

15. Gimenez MR, Twerenbold R, Jaeger C, Schindler C, Puelacher C, Wildi K, et al. One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am J Med 2015;128:861–70.10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.01.046Search in Google Scholar

16. Jaeger C, Wildi K, Twerenbold R, Reichlin T, Rubini Gimenez M, Neuhaus JD, et al. One-hour rule-in and rule-out of acute myocardial infarction using high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I. Am Heart J 2016;171:92–102.10.1016/j.ahj.2015.07.022Search in Google Scholar

17. Mueller C, Giannitsis E, Christ M, Ordóñez-Llanos J, deFilippi C, McCord J, et al. TRAPID-AMI Investigators. Multicenter evaluation of a 0-hour/1-hour algorithm in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T. Ann Emerg Med 2016;68:76–87.10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.11.013Search in Google Scholar

18. Thelen MH, Jansen RT, Weykamp CW, Steigstra H, Meijer R, Cobbaert CM. Expressing analytical performance from multi-sample evaluation in laboratory EQA. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1509–16.10.1515/cclm-2016-0970Search in Google Scholar

19. Haagensen K, Collinson P, Åsberg A, Aakre KM. How does the analytical quality of the high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay affect the ESC rule out algorithm for NSTEMI? Clin Chem 2019;65:494–6.10.1373/clinchem.2018.298703Search in Google Scholar

20. Kavsak PA. External Quality Assessment Testing near the limit of detection for high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem 2018;64:1402–4.10.1373/clinchem.2018.288613Search in Google Scholar

21. Aakre KM, Røraas T, Petersen PH, Svarstad E, Sellevoll H, Skadberg Ø, et al. Weekly and 90-minute biological variations in cardiac troponin T and cardiac troponin I in hemodialysis patients and healthy controls. Clin Chem 2014;60:838–47.10.1373/clinchem.2013.216978Search in Google Scholar

22. Wu AH, Lu QA, Todd J, Moecks J, Wians F. Short- and long-term biological variation in cardiac troponin I measured with a high sensitivity assay: implications for clinical practice. Clin Chem 2009;55:52–8.10.1373/clinchem.2008.107391Search in Google Scholar

23. Frankenstein L, Wu AH, Hallermayer K, Wians FH Jr, Giannitsis E, Katus HA. Biological variation and reference change value of high-sensitivity troponin T in healthy individuals during short and intermediate follow-up periods. Clin Chem 2011;57:1068–71.10.1373/clinchem.2010.158964Search in Google Scholar

24. Vasile VC, Saenger AK, Kroning JM, Jaffe AS. Biological and analytical variability of a novel high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T assay. Clin Chem 2010;56:1086–90.10.1373/clinchem.2009.140616Search in Google Scholar

25. Saenger AK, Jaffe AS, Body R, Collinson PO, Kavsak PA, Lam CS, et al. Cardiac troponin and natriuretic peptide analytical interferences from hemolysis and biotin: educational aids from the IFCC Committee on Cardiac Biomarkers (IFCC C-CB). Clin Chem Lab Med 2019;57:633–40.10.1515/cclm-2018-0905Search in Google Scholar

26. Karon BS, Wockenfus AM, Hartung KJ, Scott RJ, Carter SD, Jaffe AS. Comparing analytical outliers and the percent of emergency department patients with results above the 99th percentile upper reference limit for 2 conventional and one high sensitivity troponin assay. Clin Biochem 2018;53:104–9.10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.01.001Search in Google Scholar

27. Pretorius CJ, Dimeski G, O’Rourke PK, Marquart L, Tyack SA, Wilgen U, et al. Outliers as a cause of false cardiac troponin results: investigating the robustness of 4 contemporary assays. Clin Chem 2011;57:710–8.10.1373/clinchem.2010.159830Search in Google Scholar

28. Kavsak PA, Clark L, Jaffe AS. Effect of repeat measurements of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin on the same sample using the European Society of Cardiology 0-hour/1-hour or 2-hour algorithms for early rule-out and rule-in for myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 2017;63:1163–5.10.1373/clinchem.2017.272914Search in Google Scholar

29. Kavsak PA, Jaffe AS, Greene DN, Christenson RH, Apple FS, Wu AH. Total analytic error for low cardiac troponin concentrations (≤10 ng/L) by use of a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin assay. Clin Chem 2017;63:1043–5.10.1373/clinchem.2017.271361Search in Google Scholar

30. Bandstein N, Ljung R, Johansson M, Holzmann MJ. Undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T level in the emergency department and risk of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;63:2569–78.10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.017Search in Google Scholar

31. Lyon AW, Kavsak PA, Lyon OA, Worster A, Lyon ME. Simulation models of misclassification error for single thresholds of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I due to assay bias and imprecision. Clin Chem 2017;63:585–92.10.1373/clinchem.2016.265058Search in Google Scholar

32. Pickering JW, Greenslade JH, Cullen L, Flaws D, Parsonage W, Aldous S, et al. Assessment of the European Society of Cardiology 0-hour/1-hour algorithm to rule-out and rule-in acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2016;134:1532–41.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.022677Search in Google Scholar

33. Cobbaert C, Weykamp C, Franck P, de Jonge R, Kuypers A, Steigstra H, et al. Systematic monitoring of standardization and harmonization status with commutable EQA-samples – five year experience from the Netherlands. Clin Chim Acta 2012;414:234–40.10.1016/j.cca.2012.09.027Search in Google Scholar

34. Ceriotti F, Cobbaert C. Harmonization of external quality assessment schemes and their role – clinical chemistry and beyond. Clin Chem Lab Med 2018;56:1587–90.10.1515/cclm-2018-0265Search in Google Scholar

35. Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, Jansen R, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med 2015;53:833–5.10.1515/cclm-2015-0067Search in Google Scholar

36. Panteghini M, Ceriotti F, Jones G, Oosterhuis W, Plebani M, Sandberg S, Task Force on Performance Specifications in Laboratory Medicine of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM). Strategies to define performance specifications in laboratory medicine: 3 years on from the Milan Strategic Conference. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:1849–56.10.1515/cclm-2017-0772Search in Google Scholar

37. Jones GR, Albarede S, Kesseler D, MacKenzie F, Mammen J, Pedersen M, et al. Analytical performance specifications for external quality assessment – definitions and descriptions. Clin Chem Lab Med 2017;55:949–55.10.1515/cclm-2017-0151Search in Google Scholar

Supplementary Material

The online version of this article offers supplementary material (

Received: 2019-03-06
Accepted: 2019-06-20
Published Online: 2019-07-20
Published in Print: 2019-11-26

©2019 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Scroll Up Arrow