Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter July 3, 2020

Could the UKNEQAS program “Manual Differential Blood Count” be performed by the use of an automated digital morphology analyzer (Sysmex DI-60)? A feasibility study

  • Marco Rosetti ORCID logo EMAIL logo , Evita Massari , Giovanni Poletti and Romolo M. Dorizzi

Corresponding author: Marco Rosetti, Clinical Pathology Unit, Hub Laboratory, AUSL della Romagna, Cesena, Italy, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Marco Rosetti is scientific consultant for Italian users of UKNEQAS general haematology and blood coagulation schemes.


1. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Reference leukocytes (WBC) differential count (proportional) and evaluation of instrumental methods: approval standard, 2nd ed. CLSI Document H20-A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

2. Da Costa, L. Digital image analysis of blood cells. Clin Lab Med 2015;35:105–22. in Google Scholar PubMed

3. Van Vranken, SJ, Patterson, ES, Rudmann, SV, Waller, KV. A survey study of benefits and limitations of using CellaVision DM96 for peripheral blood differentials. Clin Lab Sci 2014;27:32–9. in Google Scholar

4. Van Vranken, SJ. Utilization of digital images in clinical haematology. Master thesis. Available from:!etd.send_file?accession=osu1343057653&disposition=inline [Accessed 30 Apr 2020].Search in Google Scholar

5. Bain, JB, Bates, I, Laffan, AL. Dacie and Lewis practical haemathology, 11th ed. Elselvier; 2017: pp. 533–45.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2020-04-30
Accepted: 2020-06-08
Published Online: 2020-07-03
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button