Plasma free metanephrines are commonly used for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGLs), but can also provide other information. This multicenter study prospectively examined whether tumor size, location, and mutations could be predicted by these metabolites.
Predictions of tumor location, size, and mutation type, based on measurements of plasma normetanephrine, metanephrine, and methoxytyramine were made without knowledge of disease in 267 patients subsequently determined to have PPGLs.
Predictions of adrenal vs. extra-adrenal locations according to increased plasma concentrations of metanephrine and methoxytyramine were correct in 93 and 97% of the respective 136 and 33 patients in who these predictions were possible. Predicted mean tumor diameters correlated positively (p<0.0001) with measured diameters; predictions agreed well for pheochromocytomas but were overestimated for paragangliomas. Considering only patients with mutations, 51 of the 54 (94%) patients with NF1 or RET mutations were correctly predicted with those mutations according to increased plasma metanephrine, whereas no or minimal increase in metanephrine correctly predicted all 71 patients with either VHL or SDHx mutations; furthermore, among the latter group increases in methoxytyramine correctly predicted SDHx mutations in 93% of the 29 cases for this specific prediction.
Extents and patterns of increased plasma O-methylated catecholamine metabolites among patients with PPGLs allow predictions of tumor size, adrenal vs. extra-adrenal locations and general types of mutations. Predictions of tumor location are, however, only possible for patients with clearly increased plasma methoxytyramine or metanephrine. Where possible or clinically relevant the predictions are potentially useful for subsequent clinical decision-making.
Funding source: Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Award Identifier / Grant number: CRC/TRR 205
Funding source: European Union Seventh Framework Programme - FP7/2007–2013
Award Identifier / Grant number: 259735 (ENS@T-Cancer)
Research funding: This work was supported by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007–2013) under grant agreement 259735 (ENS@T-Cancer) and the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CRC/TRR 205).
Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.
Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.
Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.
Ethical approval: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committees of the participating centers.
1. Eisenhofer, G, Prejbisz, A, Peitzsch, M, Pamporaki, C, Masjkur, J, Rogowski-Lehmann, N, et al. Biochemical diagnosis of chromaffin cell tumors in patients at high and low risk of disease: plasma versus urinary free or deconjugated O-methylated catecholamine metabolites. Clin Chem 2018;64:1646–56. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2018.291369. Search in Google Scholar
2. Eisenhofer, G, Huynh, TT, Hiroi, M, Pacak, K. Understanding catecholamine metabolism as a guide to the biochemical diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2001;2:297–311. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1011572617314. Search in Google Scholar
3. Eisenhofer, G, Lenders, JW, Goldstein, DS, Mannelli, M, Csako, G, Walther, MM, et al. Pheochromocytoma catecholamine phenotypes and prediction of tumor size and location by use of plasma free metanephrines. Clin Chem 2005;51:735–44. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2004.045484. Search in Google Scholar
4. Wurtman, RJ, Axelrod, J. Control of enzymatic synthesis of adrenaline in the adrenal medulla by adrenal cortical steroids. J Biol Chem 1966;241:2301–5. 4287854. Search in Google Scholar
5. Funahashi, H, Imai, T, Tanaka, Y, Tobinaga, J, Wada, M, Matsuyama, T, et al. Discrepancy between PNMT presence and relative lack of adrenaline production in extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma. J Surg Oncol 1994;57:196–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.2930570312. Search in Google Scholar
6. Isobe, K, Nakai, T, Yashiro, T, Nanmoku, T, Yukimasa, N, Ikezawa, T, et al. Enhanced expression of mRNA coding for the adrenaline-synthesizing enzyme phenylethanolamine-N-methyl transferase in adrenaline-secreting pheochromocytomas. J Urol 2000;163:357–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5347(05)68051-2. Search in Google Scholar
7. Grouzmann, E, Tschopp, O, Triponez, F, Matter, M, Bilz, S, Brandle, M, et al. Catecholamine metabolism in paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma: similar tumors in different sites?. PloS One 2015;10:e0125426. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0125426. Search in Google Scholar
9. Sue, M, Martucci, V, Frey, F, Lenders, JM, Timmers, HJ, Peczkowska, M, et al. Lack of utility of SDHB mutation testing in adrenergic metastatic phaeochromocytoma. Eur J Endocrinol 2015;172:89–95. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-14-0756. Search in Google Scholar
10. Eisenhofer, G, Lenders, JW, Timmers, H, Mannelli, M, Grebe, SK, Hofbauer, LC, et al. Measurements of plasma methoxytyramine, normetanephrine, and metanephrine as discriminators of different hereditary forms of pheochromocytoma. Clin Chem 2011;57:411–20. https://doi.org/10.1373/clinchem.2010.153320. Search in Google Scholar
11. Gupta, G, Pacak, K, Committee, AAS. Precision medicine: an update on genotype/biochemical phenotype relationships in pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma patients. Endocr Pract 2017;23:690–704. https://doi.org/10.4158/ep161718.ra. Search in Google Scholar
12. Yan, Q, Bancos, I, Gruber, LM, Bancos, C, McKenzie, TJ, Babovic-Vuksanovic, D, et al. When biochemical phenotype predicts genotype: pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Am J Med 2018;131:506–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.01.010. Search in Google Scholar
13. Eisenhofer, G, Klink, B, Richter, S, Lenders, JW, Robledo, M. Metabologenomics of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma: an integrated approach for personalised biochemical and genetic testing. Clin Biochem Rev 2017;38:69–100. 29332973. Search in Google Scholar
15. Qin, N, de Cubas, AA, Garcia-Martin, R, Richter, S, Peitzsch, M, Menschikowski, M, et al. Opposing effects of HIF1alpha and HIF2alpha on chromaffin cell phenotypic features and tumor cell proliferation: insights from MYC-associated factor X. Int J Canc 2014;135:2054–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28868. Search in Google Scholar
16. Wang, H, Cui, J, Yang, C, Rosenblum, JS, Zhang, Q, Song, Q, et al. A transgenic mouse model of Pacak(-)Zhuang syndrome with an Epas1 gain-of-function mutation. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11:667. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11050667. Search in Google Scholar
17. Geroula, A, Deutschbein, T, Langton, K, Masjkur, JR, Pamporaki, C, Peitzsch, M, et al. Pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma: clinical feature based disease probability in relation to catecholamine biochemistry and reason for disease suspicion. Eur J Endocrinol 2019;181:409–20. https://doi.org/10.1530/eje-19-0159. Search in Google Scholar
18. Peitzsch, M, Pelzel, D, Glockner, S, Prejbisz, A, Fassnacht, M, Beuschlein, F, et al. Simultaneous liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometric determination of urinary free metanephrines and catecholamines, with comparisons of free and deconjugated metabolites. Clin Chim Acta 2013;418:50–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2012.12.031. Search in Google Scholar
19. Peitzsch, M, Prejbisz, A, Kroiss, M, Beuschlein, F, Arlt, W, Januszewicz, A, et al. Analysis of plasma 3-methoxytyramine, normetanephrine and metanephrine by ultraperformance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: utility for diagnosis of dopamine-producing metastatic phaeochromocytoma. Ann Clin Biochem 2013;50:147–55. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2012.012112. Search in Google Scholar
20. Curras-Freixes, M, Pineiro-Yanez, E, Montero-Conde, C, Apellaniz-Ruiz, M, Calsina, B, Mancikova, V, et al. PheoSeq: a targeted next-generation sequencing assay for pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma diagnostics. J Mol Diagn 2017;19:575–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoldx.2017.04.009. Search in Google Scholar
21. Gieldon, L, William, D, Hackmann, K, Jahn, W, Jahn, A, Wagner, J, et al. Optimizing genetic workup in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma by integrating diagnostic and research approaches. Cancers (Basel) 2019;11. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11060809. Search in Google Scholar
22. Richter, S, Klink, B, Nacke, B, de Cubas, AA, Mangelis, A, Rapizzi, E, et al. Epigenetic mutation of the succinate dehydrogenase C promoter in a patient with two paragangliomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:359–63. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3856. Search in Google Scholar
23. Stenstrom, G, Waldenstrom, J. Positive correlation between urinary excretion of catecholamine metabolites and tumour mass in pheochromocytoma. Results in patients with sustained and paroxysmal hypertension and multiple endocrine neoplasia. Acta Med Scand 1985;217:73–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0954-6820.1985.tb01637.x. Search in Google Scholar
24. Eisenhofer, G, Walther, MM, Huynh, TT, Li, ST, Bornstein, SR, Vortmeyer, A, et al. Pheochromocytomas in von Hippel–Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 display distinct biochemical and clinical phenotypes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001;86:1999–2008. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.5.7496. Search in Google Scholar
25. Eisenhofer, G, Lenders, JW, Siegert, G, Bornstein, SR, Friberg, P, Milosevic, D, et al. Plasma methoxytyramine: a novel biomarker of metastatic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma in relation to established risk factors of tumour size, location and SDHB mutation status European. J Canc 2012;48:1739–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2011.07.016. Search in Google Scholar
26. Taieb, D, Hicks, RJ, Hindie, E, Guillet, BA, Avram, A, Ghedini, P, et al. European association of nuclear medicine practice guideline/society of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging procedure standard 2019 for radionuclide imaging of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imag 2019;46:2112–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-019-04398-1. Search in Google Scholar
27. Gild, ML, Naik, N, Hoang, J, Hsiao, E, McGrath, RT, Sywak, M, et al. Role of DOTATATE-PET/CT in preoperative assessment of phaeochromocytoma and paragangliomas. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2018;89:139–47. Search in Google Scholar
28. Kannan, S, Purysko, A, Faiman, C, Remer, EM, Shah, L, Bena, J, et al. Biochemical and radiological relationships in patients with pheochromocytoma: lessons from a case control study. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 2014;80:790–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12420. Search in Google Scholar
29. Davidson, DF, Bradshaw, N, Perry, CG, Lindsay, R, Freel, EM. Urinary free (unconjugated) metadrenalines in different hereditary forms of catecholamine-secreting phaeochromocytoma/paraganglioma. Ann Clin Biochem 2012;49:486–90. https://doi.org/10.1258/acb.2012.012021. Search in Google Scholar
31. Toledo, RA, Hatakana, R, Lourenco, DMJr, Lindsey, SC, Camacho, CP, Almeida, M, et al. Comprehensive assessment of the disputed RET Y791F variant shows no association with medullary thyroid carcinoma susceptibility. Endocr Relat Canc 2015;22:65–76. https://doi.org/10.1530/erc-14-0491. Search in Google Scholar
32. Eisenhofer, G, Vocke, CD, Elkahloun, A, Huynh, TT, Prodanov, T, Lenders, JW, et al. Genetic screening for von Hippel–Lindau gene mutations in non-syndromic pheochromocytoma: low prevalence and false-positives or misdiagnosis indicate a need for caution. Horm Metab Res 2012;44:343–8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1304662. Search in Google Scholar
33. Toledo, RA, Burnichon, N, Cascon, A, Benn, DE, Bayley, JP, Welander, J, et al. Consensus statement on next-generation-sequencing-based diagnostic testing of hereditary phaeochromocytomas and paragangliomas. Nat Rev Endocrinol 2017;13:233–47. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrendo.2016.185. Search in Google Scholar
34. Stenman, A, Welander, J, Gustavsson, I, Brunaud, L, Backdahl, M, Soderkvist, P, et al. HRAS mutation prevalence and associated expression patterns in pheochromocytoma. Gene Chromosome Canc 2016;55:452–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/gcc.22347. Search in Google Scholar
35. Flynn, A, Dwight, T, Harris, J, Benn, D, Zhou, L, Hogg, A, et al. Pheo-type: a diagnostic gene-expression assay for the classification of pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:1034–43. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-3889. Search in Google Scholar
The online version of this article offers supplementary material (https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2020-0904).
© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston