Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter October 19, 2020

Do not measure an extra high value monoclonal IgM by immunoturbidity: a case report

  • Li-Ying Lv EMAIL logo , De-bao Shi and Zhong-Wei Jia

Corresponding author: Li-Ying Lv, Department of Clinical Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, 218 Jixi Road, Hefei, Anhui, 230022, P.R. China, Phone: +86055162922125, Fax: +86055162922125, E-mail:

  1. Research funding: None declared.

  2. Author contributions: All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: Informed consent was obtained from all individuals included in this study.

  5. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013), and has been approved by the authors’ Institutional Review Board or equivalent committee.


1. Barbara, D, John, LS, Robert, GH. Manual of molecular and clinical laboratory immunology, 8th ed. Washington DC: Association for microbiology Press; 2016;65–73 pp.Search in Google Scholar

2. Turesson, I, Kovalchik, SA, Pfeiffer, RM, Kristinsson, SY, Goldin, LR, Drayson, MT, et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of lymphoid and myeloid malignancies: 728 cases followed up to 30 years in Sweden. Blood 2014;123:338–45. in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

3. College of American Pathologists. CAP Survey SE-B, 2012. Chicago, IL: College of American Pathologists; 2012.Search in Google Scholar

4. Bossuyt, X, Vranken, G, Marien, G, Blanckaert, N. Monoclonal IgM: difficulties with correct measurement. Ann Clin Biochem 2001;38:708–10. in Google Scholar PubMed

5. Durie, BG, Harousseau, JL, Miguel, JS, Blade, J, Barlogie, B, Anderson, K, et al. International uniform response criteria for multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2006;20:1467–73. in Google Scholar PubMed

6. Roche Diagnostics, GmbH. Tina-quant IgM Gen.2 reagent instruction. Roche, Germany: Roche Diagnostics GmbH; 2015.Search in Google Scholar

7. Beckman Coulter Inc. IgM reagent instruction. Beckman Coulter, Ireland: Beckman Coulter Inc.; 2014.Search in Google Scholar

8. Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH. N. Antisera to Human Immunoglobulins (IgG, IgA and IgM) reagent instruction. Siemens, Germany: Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics Products GmbH; 2010.Search in Google Scholar

9. Mali, B, Armbruster, D, Serediak, E, Ottenbreit, T. Comparison of immunoturbidimetric and immunonephelometric assays for specific proteins. Clin Biochem 2009;42:1568–71. in Google Scholar PubMed

10. Denham, E, Mohn, B, Tucker, L, Lun, A, Cleave, P, Boswell, DR. Evaluation of immunoturbidimetric specific protein methods using the Architect ci8200: comparison with immunonephelometry. Ann Clin Biochem 2007;44:529–36. in Google Scholar PubMed

11. Daval, S, Tridon, A, Mazeron, N, Ristori, JM, Evrard, B. Risk of antigen excess in serum free light chain measurements. Clin Chem 2007;53:1985–6. in Google Scholar PubMed

12. Keren, DF, Schroeder, L. Challenges of measuring monoclonal proteins in serum. Clin Chem Lab Med 2016;54:947–61. in Google Scholar PubMed

13. Sinclair, D, Ballantyne, F, Shanley, S, Caine, E, O’Reilly, D, Shenkin, A. Estimation of paraproteins by immunoturbidimetry and electrophoresis followed by scanning densitometry[J]. Ann Clin Biochem 1990;27:335–7. in Google Scholar PubMed

Received: 2020-04-15
Accepted: 2020-10-08
Published Online: 2020-10-19
Published in Print: 2021-03-26

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 4.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button