Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter February 4, 2022

Perinatal asphyxia partly affects presepsin urine levels in non-infected term infants

Valentina Botondi, Alice Pirra, Mariachiara Strozzi, Marika Perrotta, Danilo A.W. Gavilanes, Laura Di Ricco, Cynzia Spagnuolo, Antonio Maconi, Andrea Rocchetti, Laura Mazzucco, Valeria Balbo, Federico Schena, Giuseppina Stellitano, Arianna Oddi, Andrea Dotta, Iliana Bersani, Andrea Sannia, Chiara Peila, Enrico Bertino, Ines Bianco, Alessandra Gambi, Rocco Mangifesta and Diego Gazzolo

Abstract

Objectives

Standard of care sepsis biomarkers such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) can be affected by several perinatal factors, among which perinatal asphyxia (PA) has a significant role. In this light, new early sepsis biomarkers such as presepsin (P-SEP) are needed to enact therapeutic strategies at a stage when clinical and laboratory patterns are still silent or unavailable. We aimed at investigating the potential effects of PA on longitudinal P-SEP urine levels.

Methods

We conducted an observational case-control study in 76 term infants, 38 with PA and 38 controls. Standard clinical, laboratory, radiological monitoring procedures and P-SEP urine measurement were performed at four time-points (first void, 24, 48, 96 h) after birth.

Results

Higher (p<0.05) CRP and PCT blood levels at T1–T3 were observed in PA than control infants whilst no differences (p>0.05, for all) at T0 were observed between groups. P-SEP urine levels were higher (p<0.05) in PA at first void and at 24 h while no differences (p>0.05) at 48 and 96 h were observed. No significant correlations were found (p>0.05) between P-SEP and urea (R=0.11) and creatinine (R=0.02) blood levels, respectively.

Conclusions

The present results, showed that PA effects on P-SEP were limited up to the first 24 h following birth in absence of any kidney function bias. Data open the way to further investigations aimed at validating P-SEP assessment in non-invasive biological fluids as a reliable tool for early EOS and LOS detection in high-risk infants.


Corresponding author: Prof. Diego Gazzolo, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, G. d’Annunzio University, 65100 Chieti, Italy, Phone: +39 0871 358219, E-mail:

Funding source: I Colori della Vita Foundation

Award Identifier / Grant number: Grant 2019/3 IO PhD International

Funding source: Mellin, Danone-Nutricia Benefit

Award Identifier / Grant number: Presap ASL-NL-6229

Acknowledgments

We thank Gepa s.r.l., Italy, for supporting analysis kits.

  1. Research funding: This work is part of the I.O. PhD International Program under the auspices of the Italian Society of Neonatology and was partially supported by grants to DG from “I Colori della Vita Foundation (Grant 2019/3 IO PhD International),” Italy, and by unconditioned sponsorship to DG from Mellin, Danone-Nutricia Benefit (Presap ASL-NL-6229), Italy.

  2. Author contributions: Valentina Botondi, Alice Pirra, Chiara Strozzi, Marika Perrotta, Danilo AW Gavilanes, Laura Di Ricco, Cynzia Spagnuolo, Antonio Maconi, Andrea Rocchetti, Laura Mazzucco, Valeria Balbo, Federico Schena, A Giuseppina Stellitano, Arianna Oddi, Andrea Dotta, Iliana Bersani, Andrea Sannia, Chiara Peila, Enrico Bertino, Ines Bianco, Alessandra Gambi, Rocco Mangifesta and Diego Gazzolo made substantial contribution to conception and design of the study, acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data; authors participate in drafting the article or revising it critically. All authors have accepted responsibility for the entire content of this manuscript and approved its submission.

  3. Competing interests: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Informed consent: The parents of the subjects admitted in the study gave informed and signed consent.

  5. Ethical approval: Research involving human subjects complied with all relevant national regulations, institutional policies and is in accordance with the tenets of the Helsinki Declaration (as revised in 2013). The local Ethic Committees of the Institutions approved the study protocol (Presap.ASO.Neonat.19.02/ 23.05.19).

References

1. Shane, AL, Sánchez, PJ, Stoll, BJ. Neonatal sepsis. Lancet 2017;14:1770–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31002-4.Search in Google Scholar

2. Zea-Vera, A, Ochoa, TJ. Challenges in the diagnosis and management of neonatal sepsis. J Trop Pediatr 2015;61:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/tropej/fmu079.Search in Google Scholar

3. Shane, AL, Stoll, BJ. Neonatal sepsis: progress towards improved outcomes. J Infect 2014;68(1 Suppl):S24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinf.2013.09.011.Search in Google Scholar

4. Keij, FM, Kornelisse, RF, Tramper-Stranders, GA, Allegaert, K. Improved pathogen detection in neonatal sepsis to boost antibiotic stewardship. Future Microbiol 2020;15:461–4. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb-2019-0334.Search in Google Scholar

5. Morad, EA, Rabie, RA, Almalky, MA, Gebriel, MG. Evaluation of procalcitonin, c-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 as early markers for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis. Int J Microbiol 2020;2020:8889086. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8889086.Search in Google Scholar

6. Sproston, NR, Ashworth, JJ. Role of C-Reactive protein at sites of inflammation and infection. Front Immunol 2018;9:754. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.00754.Search in Google Scholar

7. Samsudin, I, Vasikaran, SD. Clinical utility and measurement of procalcitonin. Clin Biochem Rev 2017;38:59–68.Search in Google Scholar

8. Munteanu, AI, Manea, AM, Jinca, CM, Boia, M. Basic biochemical and hematological parameters in perinatal asphyxia and their correlation with hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. Exp Ther Med 2021;21:259. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9690.Search in Google Scholar

9. Van Maldeghem, I, Nusman, CM, Visser, DH. Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST) as biomarker in neonatal early-onset sepsis and late-onset sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Immunol 2019;20:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12865-019-0298-8.Search in Google Scholar

10. Abudeev, SA, Kiselev, KV, Kruglyakov, NM, Belousova, KA, Lobanova, IN, Parinov, OV, et al.. Cerebrospinal fluid presepsin as a marker of nosocomial infections of the central nervous system: a prospective observational study. Front Neurol 2018;9:58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00058.Search in Google Scholar

11. Mussap, M, Puxeddu, E, Burrai, P, Noto, A, Cibecchini, F, Testa, M, et al.. Soluble CD14 subtype (sCD14-ST) presepsin in critically ill preterm newborns: preliminary reference ranges. J Matern Neonatal Med 2012;25(5 Suppl):51–3. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.717462.Search in Google Scholar

12. Wu, J, Hu, L, Zhang, G, Wu, F, He, F. Accuracy of presepsin in sepsis diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2015;10:e0133057. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133057.Search in Google Scholar

13. Zhu, Y, Li, X, Guo, P, Chen, Y, Li, J, Tao, T. The accuracy assessment of presepsin (sCD14-ST) for mortality prediction in adult patients with sepsis and a head-to-head comparison to PCT: a meta-analysis. Therapeut Clin Risk Manag 2019;15:741–53. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s198735.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kamel, MM, Abd-Ullah, HF, Ahmed, M, Sayed, E, Aziz, RAA. Presepsin as an early predictor of neonatal sepsis. Int J Pediatr 2021;9:13359–69.Search in Google Scholar

15. Hashem, HE, Abdel Halim, RM, El Masry, SA, Mokhtar, AM, Abdelaal, NM. The utility of neutrophil CD64 and presepsin as diagnostic, prognostic, and monitoring biomarkers in neonatal sepsis. Int J Microbiol 2020;2020:8814892. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8814892.Search in Google Scholar

16. Koh, JH, Lee, S, Kim, HS, Lee, K, Lee, CS, Yoo, SA, et al.. Development of monitoring system for assessing rheumatoid arthritis within 5 minutes using a drop of bio-fluids. J Clin Med 2020;9:3499. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9113499.Search in Google Scholar

17. Horan, TC, Andrus, M, Dudeck, MA. CDC/NHSN surveillance definition of health care-associated infection and criteria for specific types of infections in the acute care setting. Am J Infect Control 2008;36:309–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2008.03.002.Search in Google Scholar

18. Bertino, E, Di Nicola, P, Varalda, AGG, Occhi, L, Giuliani, F, Coscia, A. Neonatal growth charts. J Matern Neonatal Med 2012;25(1 Suppl):67–9. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.664889.Search in Google Scholar

19. D’Alton, ME, Hankins, GDV, Berkowitz, RL, Bienstock, J, Ghidini, A, Goldsmith, J, et al.. Neonatal encephalopathy and neurologic outcome, second edition report of the american college of obstetricians and gynecologists’ task force on neonatal encephalopathy. Pediatrics 2014;133:e1482-8. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-0724.Search in Google Scholar

20. Prechtl, HF. The neurological examination of the full-term newborn infant, 2nd ed. Levenham, Suffolk: The Levenham Press Ltd; 1977.Search in Google Scholar

21. Sarnat, HB, Sarnat, MS. Neonatal encephalopathy following fetal distress. a clinical and electroencephalographic study. Arch Neurol 1976;33:696–705. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1976.00500100030012.Search in Google Scholar

22. Gazzolo, D, Pluchinotta, F, Bashir, M, Aboulgar, H, Said, HM, Iman, I, et al.. Neurological abnormalities in full-term asphyxiated newborns and salivary S100B testing: the “Cooperative Multitask against Brain Injury of Neonates” (CoMBINe) international study. PLoS One 2015;10:e0115194. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0115194.Search in Google Scholar

23. Chalak, LF. Inflammatory biomarkers of birth asphyxia. Clin Perinatol 2016;43:501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2016.04.008.Search in Google Scholar

24. Xanthou, M, Fotopoulos, S, Mouchtouri, A, Lipsou, N, Zika, I, Sarafidou, J. Inflammatory mediators in neonatal asphyxia and infection. Acta Paediatr 2002;91(1 Suppl):92–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2002.tb02911.x.Search in Google Scholar

25. Biolo, G, Di Girolamo, FG, McDonnell, A, Fiotti, N, Mearelli, F, Situlin, R, et al.. Effects of hypoxia and bed rest on markers of cardiometabolic risk: compensatory changes in circulating trail and glutathione redox capacity. Front Physiol 2018;30:1000. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2018.01000.Search in Google Scholar

26. Zhou, M, Wang, CM, Yang, W-L, Wang, P. Microglial CD14 Activated by iNOS contributes to neuroinflammation in cerebral ischemia. Brain Res 2013;1506:105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.02.010.Search in Google Scholar

27. Hasegawa, K, Ichiyama, T, Isumi, H, Nakata, M, Sase, M, Furukawa, S. NF-κB activation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells in neonatal asphyxia. Clin Exp Immunol 2003;132:261–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02127.x.Search in Google Scholar

28. Frid, MG, Brunetti, JA, Burke, DL, Carpenter, TC, Davie, NJ, Reeves, JT, et al.. Hypoxia-induced pulmonary vascular remodeling requires recruitment of circulating mesenchymal precursors of a monocyte/macrophage lineage. Am J Pathol 2006;168:659–69. https://doi.org/10.2353/ajpath.2006.050599.Search in Google Scholar

29. Klokker, M, Kharazmi, A, Galbo, H, Bygbjerg, I, Pedersen, BK. Influence of in vivo hypobaric hypoxia on function of lymphocytes, neutrocytes, natural killer cells, and cytokines. J Appl Physiol 1993;74:1100–6. https://doi.org/10.1152/jappl.1993.74.3.1100.Search in Google Scholar

30. Pugni, L, Pietrasanta, C, Milani, S, Vener, C, Ronchi, A, Falbo, M, et al.. Presepsin (Soluble CD14 Subtype): reference ranges of a new sepsis marker in term and preterm neonates. PLoS One 2015;10:e0146020. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146020.Search in Google Scholar

31. Ergor, SN, Yalaz, M, Koroglu, OA, Sozmen, E, Akisu, M, Kultursay, N. Reference ranges of presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype) in term and preterm neonates without infection, in relation to gestational and postnatal age, in the first 28 days of life. Clin Biochem 2020;77:7–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2019.12.007.Search in Google Scholar

32. Poggi, C, Vasarri, MV, Boni, L, Pugni, L, Mosca, F, Dani, C. Reference ranges of Presepsin in preterm infants in the first 48 h of life: a multicenter observational study. Clin Chim Acta 2020;508:191–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2020.05.040.Search in Google Scholar

33. Bersani, I, Pluchinotta, F, Dotta, A, Savarese, I, Campi, F, Auriti, C, et al.. Early predictors of perinatal brain damage: the role of neurobiomarkers. Clin Chem Lab Med 2020;58:471–86. https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2019-0725.Search in Google Scholar

34. Risso, FM, Sannia, A, Gavilanes, DAW, Vles, HJ, Colivicchi, M, Ricotti, A, et al.. Biomarkers of brain damage in preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2012;4(1 Suppl):101–4. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2012.715024.Search in Google Scholar

35. Nagata, T, Yasuda, Y, Ando, M, Abe, T, Katsuno, T, Kato, S, et al.. Clinical impact of kidney function on presepsin levels. PLoS One 2015;10:e0129159. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0129159.Search in Google Scholar

36. Risso, FM, Serpero, LD, Zimmermann, LJ, Gavilanes, AW, Frulio, R, Michetti, F, et al.. Perinatal asphyxia: kidney failure does not affect S100B urine concentrations. Clin Chim Acta 2012;413:150–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2011.09.011.Search in Google Scholar

37. Nakamura, Y, Hoshino, K, Kiyomi, F, Kawano, Y, Mizunuma, M, Tanaka, J, et al.. Comparison of accuracy of presepsin and procalcitonin concentrations in diagnosing sepsis in patients with and without acute kidney injury. Clin Chim Acta 2019;490:200–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2018.09.013.Search in Google Scholar

38. Kobayashi, S, Amano, H, Terawaki, H, Kawaguchi, Y, Yokoo, T. Prediction of presepsin concentrations through commensurate decline in kidney function in the elderly. Clin Chim Acta 2020;500:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2019.09.012.Search in Google Scholar

39. Strauss, RG. Neonatal anemia: pathophysiology and treatment. Immunol Invest 1995;24:341–51. https://doi.org/10.3109/08820139509062784.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-08-19
Accepted: 2022-01-14
Published Online: 2022-02-04
Published in Print: 2022-04-26

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston