Skip to content
BY-NC-ND 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter September 7, 2017

Comparison of the effectiveness of different antimicrobial surface technologies

  • Sebastian Buhl , Sebastian Käs , Alexander Stich , Sabine Gruber and Clemens Bulitta EMAIL logo

Abstract

The risk of infection via microbiologically contaminated surfaces has already been demonstrated by other publications. In this work two different antibacterial surface technologies transition metalloacids (AMiSTec) and TiO2/AgNO3 (Health Complete) were compared regarding feasibility as well as their advantages and disadvantages. The examination of the antimicrobial activity was assessed according to the JIS Z 2801. We could demonstrate that all of our tested samples showed a strong antimicrobial activity (>log 3 germ reduction) in the JIS experiments. Furthermore this strong antibacterial effect could be shown already after <30min incubation and at low light intensity (approx. 300 Lux) for the TiO2/AgNO3 samples. Both technologies provide a high potential for an improved infection control for example in a high risk environment like operation rooms or intensive care units.


Corresponding author: Prof. Dr. Clemens Bulitta: Technical University of Applied Science Amberg-Weiden, Hetzenrichter Weg 15, Germany, +49 (961) 382-1620, +49 (961) 382-2620

Published Online: 2017-09-07

©2017 Sebastian Buhl et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 22.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/cdbme-2017-0073/html
Scroll to top button