Accessible Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton February 3, 2021

Academic, cultural and social growth through the language of websites: A challenge for European University Language Centres

Carmen Argondizzo, Anna Maria De Bartolo, Alessandra Fazio, Jean M. Jimenez and Ida Ruffolo


At the start of 2000 a new scenario emerged in Europe thanks to the Council of Europe and the European Commission who, in support of the Bologna Process (1999), laid the foundations for disseminating the value of multilingualism and multiculturalism. The aim was to create a framework of actions to make citizens more aware of respecting diversity in languages and cultures and pave the way for integrating the varied geographical realities present in Europe. Language instruction was a priority identified as a tool for developing socio-cultural awareness and, within this scenario, universities played a key role. In particular, University Language Laboratories, previously regarded as language learning resources for small numbers of students, became University Language Centres, gaining status as fully-fledged academic places for the dissemination of multilingualism and multiculturalism, where intercultural communication, learning by doing, autonomous language learning, self-assessment and European Language Portfolios, communicative strategies and social inclusion, creativity and knowledge-sharing became key concepts to be internalised and implemented in academic communities. Indeed, the enhancement of cultural and democratic growth among young learners and citizens, in general, assumed paramount importance. The impact of the Lifelong Learning and Erasmus programs, strongly encouraged by the Bologna Accords, and later the internationalization process of European universities, further strengthened the need to promote linguistic, social and cultural growth in academic societies. Based on these premises, the purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it will discuss the importance of investigating how University Language Centres present the aforementioned concepts through their actions, focussing principally on the language used on their websites. Secondly, it will propose a potential project framework in which the CercleS community will be invited to share ideas and experiential knowledge in representing itself and its mission to potential users.

Corresponding author: Carmen Argondizzo, Università della Calabria, Arcavacata, Italy, E-mail:

  1. Author contribution: Carmen Argondizzo Introduction and state of the art, Potential research objectives, Conclusions: Prospective remarks and future perspectives; Anna Maria De Bartolo Project procedure and research design; Alessandra Fazio Methodology and research instruments: Planned discourse and multimodal analysis of EULC websites; Jean M. Jimenez Methodology and research instruments: Identification of users’ perspectives; Ida Ruffolo Expected results. The authors would like to thank Gillian Mansfield for her precious suggestions in developing a research-oriented approach.


Argondizzo, Carmen (ed.). 2015. European projects and university language centres. Creativity, dynamics, best practice. Peter Lang: Bern. Search in Google Scholar

Askehave, Inger. 2007. The impact of marketization on higher education genres - the international student prospectus as a case in point. Discourse Studies 9(6). 723–742. Search in Google Scholar

Baker, Paul & Tony McEnery (eds.). 2015. Corpora and discourse studies integrating discourse and corpora. Palgrave: Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Baldry, Anthony & Kay O’Halloran. 2014. Multimodal corpus based approach to website analysis. Equinox: P. L. Search in Google Scholar

Bateman, John. 2008. Multimodality and genre. New York: Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Beacco, Jean-Claude. 2007. From linguistic diversity to plurilingual education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe, Language Policy Division. Search in Google Scholar

Bickerton, David & Maurizio Gotti (eds.). 1999. Language centres: Integration through Innovation, Papers from the 5th Cercles Conference. Plymouth: CercleS. Search in Google Scholar

Bowles, Melissa. 2010. The think-aloud controversy in second language research. New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Byram, Michael. 1997. Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters. Search in Google Scholar

Byrd Clark, Julie S. & Fred Dervin. 2014. Reflexivity in language and intercultural education: Rethinking multilingualism and interculturality. New York and London: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Caiazzo, Luisa. 2009. “National”, “international” and “global” across British and Indian university websites. ESP Across Cultures 6. 45–59. Search in Google Scholar

CercleS. 2002. European Language Portfolio 29.2002. (accessed 20 June 2016). Search in Google Scholar

Colborne, Giles. 2011. Simple and usable web, mobile, and interaction design. New Riders. Search in Google Scholar

Dervin, Fred. 2010. Assessing intercultural competence in language learning and teaching: A critical review of current efforts. In Fred Dervin & Eija Suomela-Salmi (eds.), New approaches to assessment in higher education, 157–173. Bern: Peter Lang. Search in Google Scholar

Dervin, Fred. 2016. Interculturality in education: A theoretical and methodological toolbox. London: Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. Anders & Herbert Simon. 1993. Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1993. Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse and Society 4(2). 133–168. Search in Google Scholar

Fairclough, Norman. 1995. Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London: Longman. Search in Google Scholar

Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 1973. Explorations in the function of language. London: Arnold. Search in Google Scholar

Herzog-Punzenberger, Barbara, Emmanuelle Le Pichon-Vorstman & Hanna Siarova. 2017. ‘Multilingual Education in the Light of Diversity: Lessons Learned’, NESET II report. LuxembourgPublications Office of the European Union. Search in Google Scholar

Hymes, Dell. 1972. On Communicative competence. In John Pride & Janet Holmes (eds.), Sociolinguistics: Selected readings, 269–293. Harmondsworth, England: Penguin Books. Search in Google Scholar

Ingram, David. 2001. Language centres. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Keeling, Ruth. 2006. The Bologna process and the Lisbon research agenda: The European Commission’s expanding role in higher education discourse. European Journal of Education 41(2). 203–223. Search in Google Scholar

Kramsch, Claire. 2013. Culture in foreign language teaching. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 1(1). 57–78. Search in Google Scholar

Kress, Gunther. 2010. Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York: Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Krug, Steve. 2013. Don’t make me think: A common sense approach to web usability voices that matter. New Riders. Search in Google Scholar

Little, David. 1991. Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik. Search in Google Scholar

Little, David. 1999. Developing learner autonomy in the foreign language classroom: A social-interactive view of learning and three fundamental pedagogical principles. Revista Canaria de Estudios Ingleses 38. 77–88. Search in Google Scholar

Little, David. 2000. Learner autonomy and human interdependence: Some theoretical and practical consequences of a social-interactive view of cognition, learning and language. In Barbara Sinclair, Ian McGrath & Terry Lamb (eds.), Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions, 15–23. Harlow: Longman/Pearson. Search in Google Scholar

McManus, Sean. 2014. Web design in easy steps, 6th edn. Warwickshire: Easy Steps Limited. Search in Google Scholar

Pop, Raluca. 2016. Foreign language learning in today’s multicultural and multilingual classrooms. Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai - Philologia 61(3). 231–238. Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John. 1990. Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Swales, John. 2004. Research genres: Explorations and applications (Cambridge Applied Linguistics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

The Wulkow Memorandum on Language Centres at Institutions of Higher Education in Europe 2009, Search in Google Scholar

Williams, Christopher. 2015. Innovation in methodology and practice in language learning. Experiences and Proposals for University Language Centres. Search in Google Scholar

Zhang, Tongtong. 2017. The marketization of higher education discourse: A genre analysis of university website homepages in China. Higher Education Studies 7(3). 64–79. Search in Google Scholar

Published Online: 2021-02-03
Published in Print: 2020-12-16

© 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston