Skip to content
Licensed Unlicensed Requires Authentication Published by De Gruyter Mouton June 9, 2022

Development of second language productive skills through CLIL in a Japanese university: a pre-experimental longitudinal study

Takanori Sato EMAIL logo and Chantal Hemmi

Abstract

The benefit of Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) for second language (L2) development has been addressed by second language acquisition theory and investigated by empirical studies. However, previous studies have not demonstrated the effectiveness of CLIL precisely as most of their study participants took CLIL and non-CLIL courses concurrently. Additionally, existing studies have focused on the effectiveness of CLIL in primary and secondary education and rarely addressed it in higher education. The present study considered the limitations of the previous studies and investigated the development of L2 English productive skills (i.e., speaking and writing) through CLIL conducted in a university in Japan. This study employed a pre-experimental pretest-posttest design, in which all participants received CLIL instruction for four months undertaking the pretest and posttest. The results showed that their productive skills improved significantly. The analysis of pretest and posttest scores also revealed the specific areas of productive skills that benefitted from CLIL, such as Task Achievement (speaking and writing), Coherence and Cohesion (writing), and Grammatical Range and Accuracy (writing). However, this study revealed that the degree of improvement was small, and that vocabulary and critical thinking skills did not improve significantly. This study’s findings provide empirical evidence for the effectiveness of CLIL itself on L2 development in higher education.


Corresponding author: Takanori Sato, Sophia University, Tokyo, Japan, E-mail:

References

Ball, Phil, Keith Kelly & John Clegg. 2015. Putting CLIL into practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Benati, Alessandro. 2021. Focus on form: Elements in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108762656Search in Google Scholar

British Council. n.d.-a. IELTS task 2 writing band descriptors (public version). Available at: https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ielts_task_2_writing_band_descriptors.pdf#search=%27IELTS+TASK+2+Writing+band+descriptors+%28public+version%29%27.Search in Google Scholar

British Council. n.d.-b. IELTS speaking band descriptors (public version). Available at: https://www.ielts.org/-/media/pdfs/speaking-band-descriptors.ashx?la=en.Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe. 2001. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Coyle, Do, Philip Hood & David Marsh. 2010. CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009024549Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2007. Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lllt.20Search in Google Scholar

Dalton-Puffer, Christiane. 2013. A construct of cognitive discourse functions for conceptualising content-language integration in CLIL and multilingual education. European Journal of Applied Linguistics 1(2). 216–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/eujal-2013-0011.Search in Google Scholar

Derwing, Tracey M. & Murray J. Munro. 2015. Pronunciation fundamentals: Evidence-based perspectives for L2 teaching and research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lllt.42Search in Google Scholar

Doughty, Catherine & Jessica Williams (eds.). 1998. Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Gené-Gil, Maria, Maria Juan-Garau & Joana Salazar-Noguera. 2015. Development of EFL writing over three years in secondary education: CLIL and non-CLIL settings. The Language Learning Journal 43(3). 286–303.10.1080/09571736.2015.1053278Search in Google Scholar

Goris, Jose, Eddie Denessen & Ludo Verhoeven. 2019. Effects of content and language integrated learning in Europe: A systematic review of longitudinal experimental studies. European Educational Research Journal 18(6). 675–698. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904119872426.Search in Google Scholar

Jiménez Catalán, Rosa M. & M. Pilar Agustín Llach. 2017. CLIL or time? Lexical profiles of CLIL and non-CLIL EFL learners. System 66. 87–99.10.1016/j.system.2017.03.016Search in Google Scholar

Linacre, John Michael. 2019. Facets computer program for many-facet Rasch measurement, version 3.83.0 [Computer Software]. Beaverton: Winsteps.com.Search in Google Scholar

Llinares, Ana, Tom Morton & Rachel Whittaker. 2012. The roles of language in CLIL. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 2007. Learning and teaching languages through content: A counterbalanced approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/lllt.18Search in Google Scholar

Lyster, Roy. 2017. SLA perspectives on learning and teaching language through content. In Anna Llinares & Tom Morton (eds.), Applied linguistics perspectives on CLIL, 33–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, Tim F. 1996. Measuring second language performance. London: Longman.Search in Google Scholar

McNamara, Tim, Ute Knoch & Jason Fan. 2019. Fairness, justice and language assessment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Merino, Jon Ander & David Lasagabaster. 2018. CLIL as a way to multilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 21(1). 79–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2015.1128386.Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Cañado, María Luisa. 2018. CLIL and educational level: A longitudinal study on the impact of CLIL on language outcomes. Porta Linguarum 29. 51–70.10.30827/Digibug.54022Search in Google Scholar

Pérez-Cañado, María Luisa & Nina Karen Lancaster. 2017. The effects of CLIL on oral comprehension and production: A longitudinal case study. Language, Culture and Curriculum 30(3). 300–316.10.1080/07908318.2017.1338717Search in Google Scholar

Phakiti, Aek. 2014. Experimental research methods in language learning. London: Bloomsbury.Search in Google Scholar

Plonsky, Luke & Frederick L. Oswald. 2014. How big is “big”? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning 64(4). 878–912. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12079.Search in Google Scholar

Rallo Fabra, Lucrecia & Karen Jacob. 2015. Does CLIL enhance oral skills? Fluency and pronunciation errors by Spanish-Catalan learners of English. In Maria Juan-Garau & Joana Salazar-Noguera (eds.), Content-based language learning in multilingual educational environments, 163–177. Cham: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-11496-5_10Search in Google Scholar

Rallo Fabra, Lucrecia & Maria Juan-Garau. 2010. Intelligibility and foreign accentedness in a Context-and-Language-Integrated-Learning (CLIL) setting. In Katarzyna Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, Magdalena Wrembel & Małgorzata Kul (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second Language Speech, New Sounds 2010, Poznań, Poland, 1–3 May 2010, 373–378.Search in Google Scholar

Richards, Jack C. & Theodore S. Rodgers. 2014. Approaches and methods in language teaching, 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009024532Search in Google Scholar

Roquet, Helena & Carmen Pérez-Vidal. 2017. Do productive skills improve in content and language integrated learning contexts? The case of writing. Applied Linguistics 38(4). 489–511.10.1093/applin/amv050Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda. 2011. Which language competencies benefit from CLIL? An insight into applied linguistics research. In Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe, Juan Manuel Sierra & Francisco Gallardo del Puerto (eds.), Content and foreign language integrated learning: Contributions to multilingualism in European contexts, 129–153. Peter Lang: Bern.10.3726/978-3-0351-0171-3Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz de Zarobe, Yolanda. 2016. CLIL implementation: From policy-makers to individual initiatives. In Yolanda Ruiz de Zarobe (ed.), Content and language integrated learning: Language policy and pedagogical practice, 1–13. New York: Routledge.10.1080/13670050.2013.777383Search in Google Scholar

San Isidro, Xabier & David Lasagabaster. 2019. The impact of CLIL on pluriliteracy development and content learning in a rural multilingual setting: A longitudinal study. Language Teaching Research 23(5). 584–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168817754103.Search in Google Scholar

Stephenson, Helen, Lansford Lewis & Paul Dummett. 2017. Keynote 4. Boston: Cengage.Search in Google Scholar

Whittaker, Rachel, Ana Llinares & Anne McCabe. 2011. Written discourse development in CLIL at secondary school. Language Teaching Research 15(3). 343–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168811401154.Search in Google Scholar

Wright, Benjamin D. 2003. Rack and stack: Time 1 vs. Time 2 or pre-test vs. post-test. Rasch Measurement Transactions 17(1). 905–906.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-07-02
Accepted: 2022-02-25
Published Online: 2022-06-09
Published in Print: 2022-05-25

© 2022 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 5.12.2022 from frontend.live.degruyter.dgbricks.com/document/doi/10.1515/cercles-2022-2040/html
Scroll Up Arrow