Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access December 18, 2019

Occurrence of Aflatoxin M1 in Milk-based Mithae samples from Pakistan

  • Narjis Naz , Mateen Abbas EMAIL logo , Anam Rubab and Kinza Kanwal
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

Milk products with aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) contamination are a lethal dilemma worldwide due to their carcinogenic and mutagenic effects especially in developing countries. This study investigated the occurrence of AFM1 in milk-based mithae samples marketed in Lahore, Pakistan. Two hundred (n = 200) different types of mithae samples were analyzed for AFM1 using a HPLC florescence detector. Results showed that AFM1 was present in 76% of the analyzed samples, of which more than 80% had a much higher level of AFM1 than the European Union permissible level of i.e.0.05 μg/kg in milk products. The aflatoxin M1 in all the tested samples was observed in the range of 0.004 to 1.49 μg/kg. On average, the Gulab Jamun and Malai Laddu showed the highest level of aflatoxin M1 i.e. 1.49 and 1.17μg/kg, respectively. The lowest amount of aflatoxin M1 was found in Kalakand samples 0.004μg/ kg. The conclusion drawn from this data revealed that almost three-fourths of the mithae samples were highly contaminated with AFM1 due to their main component, milk. The consumption of milk-based mithae is popular due to health benefits as well as being part of tradition. Instead of being nourishing and beneficial, it is been found to be hazardous to human health due to aflatoxin contamination. Continued monitoring of aflatoxin M1with strict rules and regulations is required to prevent aflatoxin accumulation in this favorite food commodity.

Graphical Abstract

1 Introduction

In Pakistani culture, milk-based mithae (sweets) is a most popular traditional sweet treat.. It is composed of various ingredients such as sugar, ghee, flavoring, food color, nuts, and especially milk. It is a highly nutritious food containing macro and micro-nutrients essential for human health. Mithae has established itself as a symbol of social event celebrations such as Eid happiness festival, Noroz, child births, weddings, and winnings etc. and also signifies encouragemtn, happiness and prosperity in Pakistan [1].The strong bond between traditions, customs, festivities and mithae has accelerated mithae’s consumption of high nutritional value, but conversely, the consumption has a large quantity of aflatoxin M1 [1, 2].The most important ingredient, milk, environment, processing and storage conditions have been listed to have an impact on the development of the aflatoxins in these food commodities(Mithae) [2].

Aflatoxins are the sub group of a large family known as mycotoxins generally produced by toxigenic strains of Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus. nominus, and Aspergillus. parasiticus grow on agricultural foodstuffs [3, 4, 5]. Aflatoxin B1, aflatoxin B2, aflatoxin G1 and aflatoxin G2 are the major classes of aflatoxins while aflatoxin B1 is the most toxic, teratogenic and mutagenic class of aflatoxins. International Agency for Research on Cancer documented it as group I human carcinogen [6, 7, 8]. Aflatoxin M1 is a hydroxylated metabolite of AFB1 [9], that is excreted in the milk of dairy animals who have ingested contaminated food. The proportion of feed-to-tissue transfer for aflatoxin B1 is the maximum in milk, which is bio-transformed to aflatoxin M1 (known as milk toxin) by the hepatic microsomal mixed-function oxidase system [10, 11]. It has been classified as a group 2B toxin and considered a possible hazard to humans [12]. Milk has the confirmed potential for introducing AFM1 into the human diet through its pure form and products [13, 14]. Exposure of living systems to harmful levels of aflatoxin M1 results in the formation of epoxide, which reacts with proteins and DNA leading to DNA-adducts, thus causing liver cancer [15, 16, 17]. It persists to some degree in food even after food processing methods such as high temperatures have inactivated the fungi, due to their significant chemical stability [5,18]. The presence of AFM1 in milk and milk-based products have been reported from different countries as well as Pakistan [6,19, 20, 21]. Yet, only one report exists on the incidence of AFM1 in Barfi from Pakistan.

Strict regulatory limits are currently in place in most countries because of high toxicity levels and health concerns. The international regulations for the maximum limit of AFM1 in milk and dairy products range from 0 to 10 μg/kg. In the European Commission (EC) Directive (2006), the maximum AFM1 content in liquid milk and milk-based products intended for human intake has been set at 0.05 μg/kg [6,7,22]. The USA has set an upper limit of 0.5 μg/kg, which is much higher than that of the EC [23].The Pakistan Standard and Quality Control Authority has recently set the maximum limit for aflatoxin M1 in milk at 10 ppb [24]. No further limits have been set for AFM1 in milk products.

Several analytical methods exist for the detection of AFM1 in milk commodities with a comparable basic protocol of extraction, clean-up, separation, detection and quantification. However, at this time, immunoaffinity column (IAC) clean-up followed by RP-HPLC with a fluorescence detector has emerged as a promising technique for the reliable detection and quantification of aflatoxins in diversified foods [21,25].

The present study was intended to assess aflatoxin M1 contamination in various Mithae products collected from different markets of Lahore, Pakistan using a RP-HPLC fluorescence detector. These findings will be helpful to deliver some suggested references to correlate the contamination level with EU recommended limits, health hazards associated with this toxin as well as public awareness for mithae consumers. Moreover, this study intends to alert and involve legislative authorities to consider stricter regulations because of public health concerns.

2 Experimental

2.1 Material and methods

2.1.1 Sampling

Two hundred samples of different types of freshly prepared milk-based mithae were purchased randomly from the local area/markets within Lahore, Pakistan during the period of March to July 2017. The samples contained 20 samples of each type i.e. Gulab jamun, Rasgulleh, Barfi, Ras Malai, Balushahi, Khoya, Carrot Halwa, Kalakand, Malai laddu, peda. All the samples of Mithae had the main ingredient of milk, sugar and ghee. Properly labeled samples were transported to the laboratory and were stored at -40C before the analysis of aflatoxin M1.

2.1.2 Chemicals and Reagents

The standard for aflatoxin M1 in acetonitrile was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (Germany), whereas the immunoaffinity columns (IAC) Afla M1TM were purchased from VICAM (Watertown, MA, USA). All other chemicals and reagents were of analytical grade. The experiments used deionized water after filtering through a 0.45micron filter with a Waters Millipore (Milford, MA, USA) system. Solvents and water were degassed for 30 min using an ultrasonic bath. The calibration curve for AFM1 was determined using a series of calibration solutions in acetonitrile with concentrations of 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 5.0, and 10.0 μg/L. The working standard solutions were prepared according to the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) method [26] and stored at 200C in amber glass vials until analysis. The response was linear (R2= 0.9988).

2.1.3 Extraction procedure for Aflatoxin M1

Aflatoxin M1 was analyzed in milkbased mithae according to the method reported in the literature [27] with little modification. 25 grams of well-homogenized mithae samples were added and placed in a conical flask containing a mixture of acetonitrile: water (150 mL) and then 5 g of sodium chloride. The flasks were covered with aluminum foil and placed in a water bath (WTO/ PAT/E/013) and stirred for 4-5 hours at a temperature of 37˚C and 120 oscillations. The resulting mixture was filtered by a Whatman filter paper No. 5. A portion of the above filtrate was passed through an immune affinity column. The column was then washed with water. AFM1 was eluted with methanol into a glass vial. The eluate was then evaporated until dry under N2 blanketing, and the residue was reconstituted in a mobile phase comprising of water: acetonitrile (7:3, v/v). Vortex the samples for 15 minutes, and the 1mL sample was filtered by micron filter paper of 0.25 microns in the small vials and then analyzed.

2.1.4 HPLC conditions

A high performance liquid chromatography instrument model Agilent 1100 with C18 (4.6× 250 mm, 5.0 μm) analytical column and fluorescence detection set at FL Ex 365 nm, Em 435 nm was used for to analyze aflatoxin M1. The mobile phase consisting of acetonitrile: water (3:7 v/v) was used at a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The injection volume was 20 μL for both standard solution and sample extracts.

2.1.5 Validation and Recoveries

Validation parameters like linearity, Limit of detections (LOD), Limit of quantifications (LOQ), repeatability and reproducibility of Aflatoxin M1 are calculated. LOD and LOQ for AFM1 was 0.03 μg/kg and 0.01 μg/kg, respectively. The recoveries were ascertained by spiking 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 μg/kg of AFM1 in different types of mithae with three-replicated analyses shown in Table 1. The fortified samples were extracted and analyzed using the same procedure. The method showed good recoveries that varied from 95± 2.5to 78± 3% [28].

Table 1

%Recovery of Spiked Samples of Milk Based Mithae.

Sample TypeFortified con- centration of AFM1 μg/KgAFM1 recovered μg/kg ± SDRecovery % (Mean ± SD) μg/kg
Gulab jamun0.10.08 ± 0.0180.0 ± 10.0
0.20.16 ± 0.01583 ± 5.78
0.40.38 ± 0.0394 ± 3.60
Rasgulleh0.10.09 ± 0.0886 ± 5.83
0.20.18 ± 0.0591.6 ± 5.77
0.40.36 ± 0.0490.8 ± 6.2
Barfi0.10.09 ± 0.0886± 5.8
0.20.17 ± 0.0188 ± 7.65
0.40.36 ± 0.02490 ± 2.5
Ras Malai0.10.08 ± 0.0680 ± 14.2
0.20.16 ± 0.02180 ± 21.7
0.40.35 ± 0.01288.3 ± 6.29
Balushahi0.10.08 ± 0.0280 ± 14.1
0.20.16 ± 0.08190 ± 7.6
0.40.38 ± 0.01695 ± 2.5
Khoya0.10.09 ± 0.0785 ± 5.7
0.20.16 ± 0.0280 ± 5.0
0.40.35 ± 0.0688.3 ± 9.5
Carrot Halva0.10.08 ± 0.0781 ± 14.1
0.20.15 ± 0.0378.3 ± 20.8
0.40.35 ± 0.0390 ± 9.01
MalaiLaddu0.10.09 ± 0.0686 ± 5.4
0.20.16 ± 0.0280 ± 13.2
0.40.38 ± 0.0395 ± 2.5
kalakand0.10.08 ± 0.0780 ± 5.1
0.20.17 ± 0.0388.3 ± 5.7
0.40.37 ± 0.0593.3 ± 7.6
Peda0.10.08 ± 0.1386.6 ± 3.5
0.20.17 ± 0.0188.3 ± 7.6
0.40.37 ± 0.493 ± 1.4

2.1.6 Statistical analysis

All the measurements of the milk-based mithae samples were repeated three times, and the data was statistically analyzed and presented as mean and range by using SPSS software (IBM SPSS Statistics, 20, USA). Regression analyses were applied to determine the coefficient of determination (⍰2). Samples with a higher concentration of aflatoxin M1 than the limit of detection were considered positive, while the samples with concentrations lower than the limit of detection were considered negative.

Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

3 Results and Discussion

Milk-based mithae is the most consumed food in Asian countries especially in Pakistan, owing to their specific flavor, traditional importance and main ingredient, milk [2]. Milk is a highly nutritious constituent of mithae however, it tends to have a maximum quantity of aflatoxin M1, a serious risk to consumer health and food safety [19,29]. The presence of aflatoxin M1 (AFM1) in milk and milk-based products is well known and has become an important problem internationally [6].

In this study, the AFM1 contamination in milk-based mithae samples was determined by HPLC-FLD. Prior to this investigation, the analysis method was developed and validated. Mean recoveries for AFM1 added to different types of mithae samples at levels ranging from 0.1 to 0.4μg/kg were >80%. The limit of detection was 0.03 μg/kg while the limit of quantification was 0.01μg/kg. No interferences from matrix components were observed, as standard and samples had the same AFM1 peak retention time (Figure 1 and 2). Chromatograms displayed good accuracy and reproducibility for the mithai samples.

Figure 1 HPLC Chromatogram of standard solution of A.
Figure 1

HPLC Chromatogram of standard solution of A.

Figure 2 HPLC Chromatogram of Milk based Mithae sample.
Figure 2

HPLC Chromatogram of Milk based Mithae sample.

A total of 200 samples of the different types of mithae were analyzed to evaluate the contamination level of AFM1, commonly consumed by the Pakistani population (Table 2). Results show that 152 (76%) mithae samples were found to be contaminated with AFM1, of which 80% samples had AFM1 residue above the 0.05μg/kg (EU limits for AFM1). Gulab Jamuns was highly contaminated (90%) and had the highest mean level of 1.89-2.45 μg/kg followed by malai laddu (1.17±0.79). 100% contamination was revealed by the rasmali sample which had liquid milk as a major constituent. Kalakand samples (40%) were shown to have the lowest contamination level i.e. 0.004±0.009. The mithae samples that were prepared using milk as the main ingredient had a high level of AFM1 contamination such as Gulab Jamun, Malailaddu, Rasmalai and Peda. This demonstrated that milk was the source of contamination.

Table 2

Level of AFM1 in different types of Milk based Mithae.

Sample TypenPositive sampleRange μg/kg
Gulab Jamun2018(90%)1.89-2.45
Rasgulleh2015(75%)0.15-0.26
Ras Malai2020(100%)1.17-1.55
Carrot Halva2014(70%)0.07-0.17
Peda2019(95%)0.2-0.33
Malai Laddu2017(85%)1.5-1.77
Khoya2018(90%)0.3-0.44
Barfi2016(80%)0.7-0.96
Kalakand208(40%)0.1-0.3
Balushai207(35%)0.08-0.1

The contamination level of the different types of mithai were compared and publicized in Figure 3. The study shows that this issue needs to be examined further and with more wide-ranging data. AFM1 contamination is a worldwide problem as there is available data on the contamination of AFM1 in milk and milk-derived products [6,19, 20, 21]. Mostly cheese, yogurt, halva, milk-based drinks and milk-based infant formula were studied by different researchers and referenced in literature. The occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in dairy products (cheese, yogurt, and dairy drinks) produced in Brazil was investigated. AFM1 was detected in 84% of the analyzed cheese, 95% of the yogurt and 72% of the dairy drink samples [30]. A total of 70 dairy products consisting of 24 ultra-heated treated pasteurized milk samples, 27 white cheese samples and 19 yogurt samples were analyzed for AFM1 in Ankara, Turkey. The levels of AFM1 in the samples ranged from 0.0073 to 0.1072 μg/kg [21]. The AFM1 was analyzed using a commercial ELISA kit for 185 samples of milk and their products from Kenya, of which 156 samples were positive with levels higher than the tolerance limit of 0.05 μg/L[31]. A study was conducted to screen the occurrence of AFM1 in 53 selected milk and dairy product samples. Of 53 samples, 19 samples were positive with AFM1. 7.5% of the tested products had a contamination level greater than the European Commission (EC) limit in Malaysia [32]. The analysis of Halva showed that twenty samples (59%) were found to be contaminated with AFM1, and three (9%) samples were found to be above the recommended limit for AFM1 due to its main preparation ingredient, milk [27]. 138 sweet desserts (barfi) from Pakistan reported an AFM1 incidence rate of 97%, and an average of AFM1 concentration of 0.48 mg/kg [2]. The former research showed the distribution/stability of AFM1 from milk to milk-based products and a possible risk for consumer health. To achieve and maintain the quality of mithae, milk samples must be evaluated routinely for AFM1. Furthermore, government agencies should monitor milk samples routinely and enforce food laws to minimize health hazards for human beings.

Figure 3 Comparison of AFM1 concertation in different Types of Mithae.
Figure 3

Comparison of AFM1 concertation in different Types of Mithae.

4 Conclusion

This study concluded that 76% samples of milk-based mithae marked in Lahore, Pakistan were found to be contaminated with AFM1, of which 80% of the samples were found to be above the EU permissible limits. The main ingredient, milk, was the source of the AFM1 contamination in mithae. The presence of this toxin is a serious health risk for consumers. There should be continuous monitoring of mithae for aflatoxins, and more studies should be carried out with the intent of reducing the accumulation of this toxin in milk for mithae production. Moreover, strict permissible limits should be implemented by the government to avoid aflatoxin contamination.


“Dr. Narjis Naz was a detailed-oriented and innovative thinker devoted to logic, which served him well in both science and related areas of study. I have found him to be an enthusiastic and creative person. She was a team player able to glean optimal performance while consistently producing high quality work in a timely manner“.


  1. Conflict of interest: The authors confirm that this article content has no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

Authors thank the Central Laboratory of Lahore College for Women University, Lahore, and UVAS Toxicology Lab for providing Laboratory facilities.

References

[1] Naqvi I.I., Saeed Q., Farrukh M.A., Determination of trace metals (Co, Cu, Cd, Pb, Fe, Ni and Mn) in selected sweets of different shops of Karachi city by atomic absorption spectroscopy, Pak J Biol Sci., 2004, 7, 1355-1359.10.3923/pjbs.2004.1355.1359Search in Google Scholar

[2] Sadia A., Jabbar M.A., Deng Y., Hussain E.A., Riffat S., Naveed S., Arif M., A survey of aflatoxin M1 in milk and sweets of Punjab, Pakistan, Food Control., 2012, 26, 235-240.10.1016/j.foodcont.2012.01.055Search in Google Scholar

[3] Luttfullah G., Hussain A., Studies on contamination level of aflatoxins in some dried fruits and nuts of Pakistan, Food Control., 2011, 22(3), 426-429.10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.09.015Search in Google Scholar

[4] Naz N., Kashif A., Kanwal K., Khan A.M., Abbas M., Quantitative scrutinization of aflatoxins in different spices from Pakistan, Int. J. Anal. Chem., 2016, A. 4907425.10.1155/2016/4907425Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[5] Prandini A., Tansini G., Sigolo S., Filippi L., Laporta M., Piva G., On the occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk and dairy products, Food and Chem Toxicol., 2009, 47(5), 984-991.10.1016/j.fct.2007.10.005Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[6] Iqbal S.Z., Jinap S., Pirouz A.A., Faizal A.R.A., Aflatoxin M 1 in milk and dairy products, occurrence and recent challenges: A review, Trends in Food Sci & Technol., 2015, 46(1), 110-119.10.1016/j.tifs.2015.08.005Search in Google Scholar

[7] Iqbal S.Z., Asi M.R., Jinap S., A survey of aflatoxin M1 contamination in milk from urban and rural farmhouses of Punjab, Pakistan, Food Addit Contam Part-B., 2014, 7(1), 17-20.10.1080/19393210.2013.828322Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[8] Nuryono N., Agus A., Wedhastri S., Maryudani Y.B., Setyabudi F.M.C.S., Bohm J., Razzazi-Fazeli E., A limited survey of aflatoxin M1 in milk from Indonesia by ELISA. Food Control., 2009, 20(2), 721–724.10.1016/j.foodcont.2008.09.005Search in Google Scholar

[9] Asi M.R., Iqbal S.Z., Arino A., Hussain A., Effect of seasonal variations and lactation times on aflatoxin M1 contamination in milk of different species from Punjab, Pakistan. Food Control., 2012, 25(1), 34–38.10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.10.012Search in Google Scholar

[10] Aslam N., Rodrigues I., McGill D., Warriach H., Cowling A., Haque A., Wynn P., Transfer of aflatoxins from naturally contaminated feed to milk of Nili-Ravi buffaloes fed a mycotoxin binder, Anim. Prod. Sci., 2015, doi:10. 1071/AN14909.10.1071/AN14909Search in Google Scholar

[11] Jalili M., Scotter M., A review of aflatoxin M1 in liquid milk, Iran J Health Saf Environ., 2015, 2(2), 283-295.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Caloni F., Stammati A., Grigge G., Angelis I.D., Aflatoxin M1 absorption and cytotoxicity on human intestinal in vitro model, Toxicon., 2006, 47, 409–415.10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.12.003Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[13] Iqbal S.Z., Asi M.R., Arino A., Aflatoxin M1 contamination in cow and buffalo milk samples from the North West Frontier Province (NWFP) and Punjab provinces of Pakistan, J. Food Addit. Contam., 2011, 282–288.10.1080/19393210.2011.637237Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[14] Gurbay A., Aydin S., Girgin G., Engin A.B., Sahin G., Assessment of aflatoxin M1 levels in milk in Ankara, Turkey, Food Control., 2006, 17, 1–4.10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.07.008Search in Google Scholar

[15] Cucci C., Mignani A.G., Dall’Asta C., Pela R., Dossena A., A portable fluorometer for the rapid screening of M1 aflatoxin Sens, Actuators B., 2007, 126, 467–472.10.1016/j.snb.2007.03.036Search in Google Scholar

[16] Afsah-Hejri L., Jinap S., Hajeb P., Radu S., Shakibazadeh S. H., A review on mycotoxins in food and feed: Malaysia case study, Compr Rev Food Sci F., 2013, 12, 629–651.10.1111/1541-4337.12029Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[17] Gursoy-Yuzugullu O., Yuzugullu H., Yilmaz M., Ozturk M., Aflatoxin genotoxicity is associated with a defective DNA damage response by passing p53 activation, Liver International., 2011, 31(4), 561-571.10.1111/j.1478-3231.2011.02474.xSearch in Google Scholar PubMed

[18] Abdallah M.I., Bazalou M.S., Al-Julaifi M.Z., Determination of aflatoxin M1 concentrations in full-fat cow’s UHT milk sold for consumption in Najran-Saudi regarding its public health significance, Egypt. J. of Appl. Sci., 2012, 27(3), 40-54.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Aslam N., Wynn P.C., Aflatoxin contamination of the milk supply: A Pakistan perspective, Agriculture., 2015, 5(4), 1172-1182.10.3390/agriculture5041172Search in Google Scholar

[20] Ketney O., Santini A., Oancea S., Recent aflatoxin survey data in milk and milk products: A review, Int J Dairy Technol., 2017.10.1111/1471-0307.12382Search in Google Scholar

[21] Sarica D.Y., Has O., Taşdelen S., Ezer U., Occurrence of aflatoxin M1 in milk, white cheese and yoghurt from Ankara, Turkey markets, Biol Chem Research., 2015, 36-49.Search in Google Scholar

[22] European Commission, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 401/2006 of 23 February 2006 laying down the methods of sampling and analysis for the official control of the levels of mycotoxins in foodstuffs. Off J Eur Union. L70:12–34, 2006.Search in Google Scholar

[23] WHO. Toxicological Evaluation of Certain Food Additives with a Review of General Principle and of Specifications; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1974.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Ashiq S., Natural occurrence of mycotoxins in food and feed: Pakistan perspective. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf., 2015, 14, 159–175.10.1111/1541-4337.12122Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[25] Mushtaq M., Sultana B., Anwar F., Khan M.Z., Ashrafuzzaman M., Occurrence of aflatoxins in selected processed foods from Pakistan, Int. J. Mol. Sci., 2012, 13(7), 8324-8337.10.3390/ijms13078324Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[26] IARC, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. In Traditional herbal medicines, some mycotoxins, naphthalene and styrene (Vol.82). Lyon: IARC Press., 2002, 1-556.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Iqbal S.Z., Asi M.R., Jinap S., Natural occurrence of aflatoxin B1 and aflatoxin M1 in “halva” and its ingredients, Food Control., 2013, 34, 404-407.10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.04.038Search in Google Scholar

[28] Sizoo E.A., Egmond V., Analysis of duplicate 24-hour diet samples for aflatoxin B1, aflatoxin M1 and ochratoxin A, Food Addit. Contam., 2005, 22, 163–172.10.1080/02652030400029439Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[29] Bellio A., Bianchi D.M., Gramaglia M., Loria A., Nucera D., Gallina S., Decastelli L., Aflatoxin M1 in Cow’s Milk: Method Validation for Milk Sampled in Northern Italy, Toxins., 2016, 8(3), 57.10.3390/toxins8030057Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[30] Iha M.H., Barbosa C.B., Okada I.A., Trucksess M.W., Occurrence of aflatoxin M 1 in dairy products in Brazil, Food Control., 2011, 22(12), 1971-1974.10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.05.013Search in Google Scholar

[31] Langat G., Tetsuhiro M., Gonoi T., Matiru V., Bii C., Aflatoxin M1 Contamination of milk and its products in Bomet County, Kenya, Adv Microbiol ., 2016, 6(07), 528.10.4236/aim.2016.67053Search in Google Scholar

[32] Nadira A.F., Rosita J., Norhaizan M.E., Redzwan S.M., Screening of aflatoxin M1 occurrence in selected milk and dairy products in Terengganu, Malaysia, Food Control., 2017, 73, 209-214.10.1016/j.foodcont.2016.08.004Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2017-09-25
Accepted: 2018-01-31
Published Online: 2019-12-18

© 2019 Narjis Naz et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Public License.

Downloaded on 21.2.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/chem-2019-0123/html
Scroll to top button