Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access March 16, 2022

The mesoporous aluminosilicate application as support for bifunctional catalysts for n-hexadecane hydroconversion

  • Gulzira Vassilina , Kamilla Umbetkaliyeva EMAIL logo , Albina Abdrassilova , Tursunay Vassilina and Zhassulan Zakirov
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

Mesoporous aluminosilicate (MAS) and bifunctional catalysts based on it were synthesized. The MAS synthesis is based on the method of copolycondensation of silicon and aluminum sources in the presence of alcohol. Hexadecylamine was used as a template for the formation of a porous structure. The catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller, temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia, hydrogen-temperature programmed reduction, Fourier transform infra-red spectroscopy, and diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopic methods. The catalytic activity of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite was investigated during the hydroconversion of n-hexadecane. It has been shown that a sample promoted with molybdenum and nickel based on MAS has the high activity and selectivity in the process of n-hexadecane hydroisomerization under optimal conditions (320°C, atm pressure).

1 Introduction

The attention of many scientists is focused on the investigation of mesoporous materials, which are promising components of industrial heterogeneous catalysts [1,2]. A major breakthrough in this area was made by the Mobile researchers [3], who described the synthesis of the ordered mesoporous aluminosilicates (MASs) in 1990. The method is based on the sol–gel synthesis of silicon dioxide solids and the use of long-chain surfactants’ self-assembling properties [3] in this synthesis. The great practical significance of Mobile studies is also confirmed by the fact that mesoporous materials which contain exclusively silicon have a chemically inert silicate framework and, therefore, do not contain acid sites [4]. And the introduction of aluminum into the framework of mesoporous materials made it possible to use regular porous structures. Also, along with it, it made it possible to carry out reactions with larger molecules due to specially selected porosity, much higher than that of zeolites and zeotypes [3]. It should be noted that a number of microporous materials, such as ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-48, and SAPO-11, were studied as functional supports for hydroisomerization catalysts. But because zeolite materials have diffusion limitations, mesoporous materials can be expected to solve this problem [5,6,7,8,9,10]. Mesopores, in comparison with micropores, provide faster mass transfer and perform the role of “molecular highways.” Intracrystalline or “configurational” diffusion of molecules in the pores of a zeolite is slow, and the diffusion coefficient is from 10−8 to 10−20 m2/g, which is about 10 orders of magnitude lower than the coefficient of diffusion mass transfer. Only a part of the zeolite is adsorptive and catalytically effective due to limited diffusion in micropores. Transport restrictions negatively affect both the activity and the selectivity of adsorbents and catalysts and shorten their service life. One of the vectors for solving this problem is shortening the diffusion path or increasing the diffusion efficiency in pores. This can be successfully implemented using mesoporous molecular sieves [11].

Since the priority direction of the use of MASs is in the oil industry, particularly the processes of isomerization and cracking of n-alkanes, a necessary condition for the successful operation of the catalyst is the combination of its acidic and metallic functions [3,12,13,14,15]. A worthy solution is the synthesis of bifunctional catalysts – acidity, porosity, and specific surface area (SSA). A second solution is a balance between acidic and metallic functions, which can be varied at the stage of synthesis by modifying the finished materials [16].

For example, the use of ionic surfactants as a structure-forming agent leads to the synthesis of MASs with a large SSA (up to 1,100 m2/g and pore size in the range from 20 to 100 Å and more) [17,18]. At the same time, the use of nonionic surfactants as a template makes it possible to obtain materials with pore size up to 500 Å. This exceeds the size of the molecules of most substances contained in petroleum feedstock [19]. In this regard, the use of nonionic surfactants as templates is of greatest interest for petrochemistry and oil refining. Materials synthesized on the basis of hexadecylamine have the highest SSA (up to 1,030 m2/g) in comparison with other widely used templates. For example, triblock copolymers of polyethylene and polypropylene oxide are only up to 750 m2/g [19].

The strength of acid sites is also one of the important characteristics of bifunctional catalysts, as the best selectivity to isomers is provided by acid support which does not contain strong Brønsted acid sites, but only Lewis acid sites of medium strength [20].

Another important issue in the synthesis of mesostructured aluminosilicates is the silicon to the aluminum ratio (Si/Al). At the high content of introduced aluminum (up to 85% Al2O3), the obtained aluminosilicates retain the uniformity of the mesopore distribution. At the same time, with an increase in the Al2O3/SiO2 ratio, the deposition of aluminosilicates becomes more difficult due to the formation of poorly soluble AL(OH)3 [11]. In addition, it was found [15] that the most optimal Si/Al ratio is 10. Thus, MASs with a high aluminum content possess a higher SSA of 1,030 m2/g compared to samples with a Si/Al ratio of 20, 40 (673, 963 m2/g, respectively). Also, they provide higher selectivity in the process of n-dodecane hydroisomerization. For this reason, in the present work, Si/Al ratio of 10 was used during synthesis.

Platinum and palladium have become widespread as metal centers for bifunctional catalysts [21], which cannot be applied to Kazakhstan oil due to the high content of contact poisons in them. To resolve this issue, it is proposed to use catalysts promoted with Ni and Mo. This is due to the fact that catalysts based on them possess a high hydrogenating activity even with significant sulfur content in the feed.

Based on the foregoing, the choice of the optimal method and synthesis conditions for the preparation of bifunctional catalysts is an important and practically significant problem. The purpose of this work is to synthesize a new hydroisomerization catalyst with Ni, Mo based on MAS and study the hydroconversion of n-hexadecane with these catalysts.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Synthesis of MAS

In order to synthesize (Figure 1) MAS, the method of tetraethylorthosilicate Si(OC2H5)4 and secondary aluminum butoxide (sec-BuO)3Al copolycondensation was used. In this method, hexadecylamine was used as a structure-forming template [22]. First of all, in the polypropylene glass supplied with a magnetic mixer and a dropping funnel, solution of (sec-BuO)3A1 was dissolved in i-PrOH. Further, tetraethylorthosilicate Si(OEt)4 solution was added dropwise at intensive stirring. The distilled water was added dropwise to the stirred solution for 5 min, after which the resulting solution was mixed for 30 min. At the same time, hexadecylamine and isopropanol were directly placed into the polypropylene flask supplied with a mechanical mixer and a dropping funnel followed by stirring and heating to 75°C. Then after complete dissolution of surfactants, 100 mL of the distilled water was added to the flask. To the resulting thick homogeneous mass containing a surfactant solution, a solution of silicon and aluminum compounds mixture (solution A) was added in portions. Next, after adding water dropwise and stirring for 10 min, the resulting mixture was stirred for 6 h at room temperature. Then it was kept without stirring at room temperature for 20 h. Further, the precipitate was filtered on a Buchner funnel, dried at room temperature for 24 h, and then slowly heated in an oven to 110°C for 3 h. The dried sample was transferred to a muffle furnace and heated to 300°C at a heating rate of 3°C/min. Then, at this temperature, the sample was kept in a muffle furnace for 1 h and heated to 550°C at a rate of 3°C/min. At this temperature, the sample was calcined for 6 h. Then the temperature was increased to 600°C, and the sample was calcined for another 3 h with intensive air circulation.

Figure 1 
                  Scheme of synthesis of MAS by copolycondensation method.
Figure 1

Scheme of synthesis of MAS by copolycondensation method.

2.2 Synthesis of bifunctional catalysts

The obtained sample of MAS became one of the components of the bifunctional catalyst carrier (the synthesis scheme is shown in Figure 2) and was placed in a porcelain cup together with bentonite from the Tagan field (East Kazakhstan region, Kazakhstan), which was used as a binding agent. The resulting mixture was gently crushed for 20 min. With stirring, a solution of 0.53 mL of concentrated nitric acid in 42 mL of water was gradually added and triturated for 30 min. Then it was triturated for 20 min by heating the mixture on a hot water bath. After the mixture became viscous and plastic, it was placed in an extruder, resulting in extrudates with a diameter of 0.2 mm. The extrudates were dried for 20 h at room temperature and divided into pieces of 3–4 mm long. They were then blow-dried for 2 h at 60°C, then 2 h at 80°C, 2 h at 110°C, and another 2 h at 140°C. Next, the dried extrudates were calcined in a muffle furnace in airflow at 550°C for 3 h. Synthesis of bifunctional monometallic catalysts, 5% Ni/MAS-H-bentonite, and 1% Mo/MAS-H-bentonite, was prepared using the wet impregnation technique. First of all, samples of the carrier in the form of extrudates were calcined for 2 h at a temperature of 380–400°C, then cooled to 200°C in a dry argon atmosphere. The calculated amount of nickel nitrate, Ni(NO3)2, which was used as a source of Ni, was added to the calcined sample with stirring. Further, the resulting solution was mixed at a frequency of 1 time in 10 min for 2 h. The resulting samples were dried at room temperature for 24 h. The dried samples were reduced in a flow of dry hydrogen at a temperature of 550°C for 5 h. Monometallic bifunctional catalyst (1% Mo/MAS-H-bentonite) was synthesized by the same procedure as 5% Ni/MAS-H-bentonite, with the condition of using ammonium molybdate (NH4)6Mo7O24 · 4H2O as a precursor of the Mo source.

Figure 2 
                  Scheme of synthesis of bifunctional catalysts Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite based on MAS: 1. Preparation of calcinated extrudates; 2. Promotion of the catalysts.
Figure 2

Scheme of synthesis of bifunctional catalysts Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite based on MAS: 1. Preparation of calcinated extrudates; 2. Promotion of the catalysts.

2.3 Characterization of the samples

The ordering of the porous structure of the synthesized materials was analyzed using the method of X-ray small-angle scattering. X-ray diffraction patterns were taken on a Rigaku D/MAX 2200 diffractometer with a Cu K radiation source.

The characteristics of the porous structures of the synthesized samples and the SSA were determined using the standard method of nitrogen adsorption/desorption using a Quantachrome Autosorb-6 sorptometer. The IR spectrum of the samples was obtained on a Thermo Nicolet 8700 FTIR spectrometer with a spectral resolution of 4 cm−1.

Temperature-programmed desorption of ammonia (TPD-NH3) was carried out on a USGA-101 unit (Russia). A weighed quantity of a sample (0.1 g, fraction 0.30–0.50 mm) was placed into a quartz reactor, calcined at 512°C in a helium flow (for 139 min, at the flow rate of 20 mL/min), and then cooled. The adsorption of ammonia (NH3/N2 ratio of 7 by volume, at the flow rate of 40 mL/min) was carried out at 102°C for 1 h, after which the system was purged with helium (for 60 min). TPD-NH3 curves were recorded in helium flow (at the flow rate of 8 mL/min) from 60 to 600°C at a linear temperature rise rate of 8°C/min.

Hydrogen-temperature programmed reduction (H2-TPR) was carried out on a USGA-101 unit (Russia), which is equipped with a gas treatment system, a flow-type reactor (inner diameter is 4 mm) with a tube furnace, and a thermal conductivity detector. The sample (100 mg, fraction 0.30–0.50 mm) was preliminarily purged with Ar at 480°C for 40 min, followed by cooling to 50°C, and then heated at a rate of 10°C/min from 50 to 950°C in a mixture flow with H2/Ar ratio of 10 by volume at a feed rate of 30 cm3/min. The analysis of the gas mixture was carried out using a thermal conductivity detector.

The Lewis and Brønsted acid centers in the synthesized catalysts were determined using diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform (DRIFT) spectroscopy on PerkinElmer Spectrum One instrument. Before these tests, samples were pretreated at a temperature of 110°C to remove water adsorbed on acidic sites. After pyridine adsorption, the samples were dried at a temperature of 40°C, before analysis of DRIFT. The background spectrum was recorded using KBr. The spectra obtained after desorption of pyridine were subtracted from those measured before the adsorption of pyridine (fresh samples) to determine the bands relative to the Lewis and Brønsted acidic centers.

2.4 Hydroisomerization process of n-hexadecane

Pilot studies on testing were carried out on the installation of flowing type (Figure 3) with fixed-bed catalyst, in hydrogen current at a temperature interval of 280–340°C; fresh feed rate of 0.8–0.9 mL/min. The H2:feed volume ratio of 100 was controlled with the help of a flowmeter. The catalyst (3) was placed in the quartz reactor (2) 500 mm long and with an internal diameter of 11 mm. Mass of the catalyst was 2.5 g and 3–4 mm long in length with a diameter of 0.2 mm, layer height – 80 mm. The raw materials with a pump for feeding liquid raw materials (1) came to the reactor and warmed by the furnace (4). Temperature in the reactor was installed with the help of a temperature regulator (5) and measured with a thermocouple (6). Liquid products of the reaction were collected in the receiver tank (7) supplied with the water direct refrigerator (8). For the prevention of products carried over by a hydrogen stream, after the refrigerator, a glass trap was installed with the cooling mixture (ice:salt = 3:1). Gaseous products of the reaction were collected in the gasometer (9). Hydrogen was given from a balloon (10) through a reducer (12). The consumption of gas was regulated by the fine adjustment valve (11) and measured with a flowmeter. Further hydrogen through a bottle with calcium chloride, for drying, came to the reactor. Purity degree of hydrogen is of 99.9%. Duration of experiments was varied from 40 min to 1 h. Then cooling of installation in hydrogen current was carried out. The liquid products, which were collected in a flask, weighed on scales with an accuracy up to 0.01. In order to study the activity of the synthesized catalysts, n-hexadecane was used as a model compound, as it is a part of the diesel fraction. Analysis of liquid products was carried out on the “Crystal 5000” chromatograph with linear programming of the temperature.

Figure 3 
                  Schematic of the laboratory catalytic installation.
Figure 3

Schematic of the laboratory catalytic installation.

3 Results and discussion

3.1 Characterization of catalysts

The X-ray scattering method was used to confirm the mesoporosity and orderliness of the porous structure of the synthesized materials (Figure 4). The small-angle scattering X-ray pattern of the synthesized MAS shows two well-resolved peaks in the 2θ region of 0.8 and 2.1°, which can be indexed as (100) and (200), respectively, which indicates the mesoporous structure of the synthesized aluminosilicate with a hexagonal arrangement of pores [23,24,25]. The intensity peak in the 2.1° region at the wavelength of the radiation used corresponds to an interplanar distance of 4.2 nm. Compared with the X-ray diffraction pattern of the synthesized aluminosilicate, diffraction peaks of the Ni and Mo promoted catalysts (Figure 5) appear at 2θ values of ≈20°, 27°, and 50°, which belong to Ni and Mo formed at high calcination temperatures.

Figure 4 
                  Small-angle X-ray scattering of MAS.
Figure 4

Small-angle X-ray scattering of MAS.

Figure 5 
                  Wide-angle X-ray scattering of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts.
Figure 5

Wide-angle X-ray scattering of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts.

The nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms on the synthesized samples belong to type IV according to the classification of Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller. The presence of a hysteresis loop in them is associated with capillary condensation occurring in the mesopores. However, they differ in the type of hysteresis loop (Figure 6). Hysteresis loop of the MAS sample belongs to the H1 type and indicates a narrow pore size distribution and ordered structure. While hysteresis loops of the bifunctional catalysts belong to the H4 type and indicate narrow slit-shaped pores [26]. The induced deformation of the ordered mesoporous structure of these samples is associated with the penetration of Ni and Mo ions into the pores. Also, the synthesized materials differ sharply in SSA, mean pore diameter, and pore volume (Table 1). For example, MAS and bifunctional catalysts (Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite) possess SSA of 511.0, 151.7, and 283.6 m2/g, respectively. A decrease in the SSA and pore volume indicates that some of the pores in the catalyst structure are closed by the metals – Ni and Mo. As shown in Figure 6, the pore size distribution of the support materials and catalysts impregnated with Ni and Mo was rather narrow. In the case of the promoted catalysts, the bidisperse pore size distribution was observed in the lower pore size range. According to the data shown in Figure 6, the maximum on the pore size distribution curve is observed at 3.5–4.2 nm for the studied samples. The average pore size for all three samples is due to the presence of a small number of micro- and macropores.

Figure 6 
                  Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of support material (MAS) and Ni, Mo impregnated catalysts.
Figure 6

Nitrogen adsorption/desorption isotherms of support material (MAS) and Ni, Mo impregnated catalysts.

Table 1

Physical properties of MAS, Ni/MAS-bentonite, and Mo/MAS-bentonite bifunctional catalysts

Samples SSA, m2/g Pore volume, cm3/g Mean pore diameter, nm
MAS 511.0 1.469 3.82
5% Ni/MAS-H-bentonite 151.7 0.3565 1.67
1% Mo/MAS-H-bentonite 283.6 0.2166 2.17

FTIR spectroscopy was used to study the retention of crystalline ordering in the synthesized MASs. FTIR spectra of synthesized samples in the range of 400–4,000 cm−1 are shown in Figure 7. FTIR complements X-ray diffraction in the search for changes in crystallinity by comparing peak intensities in the range from 1,300 to 300 cm−1 [27]. These bands are grouped into two types of vibrations of TO4 tetrahedral units (where T = Al or Si): vibrations associated with bonds between TO4 tetrahedra, which are therefore sensitive to structural changes, and vibrations of TO4 tetrahedra, insensitive to structural changes.

Figure 7 
                  FTIR spectra of synthesized samples: MAS, Ni/MAS-bentonite, and Mo/MAS-bentonite bifunctional catalysts.
Figure 7

FTIR spectra of synthesized samples: MAS, Ni/MAS-bentonite, and Mo/MAS-bentonite bifunctional catalysts.

According to the data in Figure 7, the appearance of the band in the 1,059 cm−1 region can be attributed to asymmetric stretching vibrations of Si–O and Al–O within tetrahedra. While, the bands in the regions of 750 and 800 cm−1 in the spectra of the studied materials indicate crystalline ordering [28], i.e., apparently, this is due to the internal vibration of TO4 tetrahedra containing Al and Si. The absorption band at 450 cm−1 corresponds to the bending vibrations of SiO4. It should be noted that the average intensity band at 550 cm−1 is specific to the identification of crystalline aluminosilicates and which is related to the vibrations of alternating SiO4 and AlO4 tetrahedra included in the lattice of the aluminosilicate framework, is absent in the spectra of the synthesized aluminosilicate samples. Probably, this is due to the increased silicon content in the aluminosilicate. It is known that with a decrease in the Al2O3/SiO2 ratio, the intensity of this band decreases, and it shifts to the high-frequency region [29]. The vibrations obtained at 1,620 cm−1 can be attributed to molecular water adsorbed on the oxide surface [30]. It should be noted that a small band appears in the FTIR spectrum of the nickel-promoted sample at 1,360 cm−1, which may indicate the imperfect decomposition of the nitrate residue at the stage of calcination [31]. The peaks obtained at 1,620 cm−1 were attributed to molecular water adsorbed on the oxide surface [30]. Of particular interest is the peak at 520 cm−1, which can be attributed to the O–H and Ni–OH hydrogen bonds in the NiOOH phase [32].

The curves of temperature-programmed hydrogen reduction (TPR-H2) of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts are shown in Figure 8. The TPR profile of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite has seven peaks: 328, 472, 532, 683, 792, 840, and 858°C. The peak at around 328°C correlates to the reduction of free NiO on the catalyst support [33,34]. This reduction peak corresponds to the reduction of the NiO species, which has minimal or no interaction with the Al2O3 supports. Reduction peaks in the range of 450°C to about 800°C may be attributed to the strong interaction of NiO and alumina support. The formation of strongly interacting NiO–Al2O3 phase is observed in the region between 550 and 750°C [35,36]. The peak centered at 532°C relates to the reduction of Ni2+ to Ni0 [37] and to the reduction of monolayer nickel oxide species on the catalyst surface [38]. The peak centered at 683°C corresponds to the reduction of the nickel oxide species having weak interactions with the alumina support (NiO–Al2O3) [39]. The high reduction temperatures (683, 792°C) may indicate the presence of NiAl2O4 spinel, which is difficult to reduce and is associated with high reduction temperatures of 600–870°C [40,41]. The Ni-Promoted sample also presents reduction peaks at 840 and 858°C. These high reduction temperatures are attributed to the reduction of Ni2+ to Ni, strongly interacting with the alumina support due to the metal alloy effect [33,42].

Figure 8 
                  Temperature-programmed hydrogen reduction (TPR-H2) of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts.
Figure 8

Temperature-programmed hydrogen reduction (TPR-H2) of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts.

In the case of Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalyst four peaks were observed at 544, 658, 688, and 814°C. The peak at 544°C is due to tetrahedral molybdenum species reduction MoO2+ → Mo0 [43,44]. The peak at 658°C is assigned to the reduction of the Mo2+  phase to Mo0 [45]. Another reduction peak (688 and 814°C) might be due to the reduction of molybdenum oxide (Mo4+) to metallic molybdenum (Mo0) [46].

In agreement with TPR investigations of Mo/ZSM-5 catalysts, the first peak (565°C) can be assigned to the reduction of two kinds of Mo6+ species to Mo4+. The first kind is located on the external surface of the zeolite and, hence, reducible more readily, whereas the second kind (658°C) associated with Brønsted acid sites in the zeolite is difficult to reduce. At the end of the TPR profile, the peak that appears with a maximum at 658°C is usually attributed to the reduction of Mo4+ to metallic Mo0 [47].

Although the TPR profiles suggest a reduction temperature of over 550°C, the temperature for the reduction of catalysts was limited at 550°C to avoid the strong interaction between metal and catalyst support according to the calcination temperature of the Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts.

The strength and concentration of acid–base centers in the aluminosilicate have a strong influence on the qualitative and quantitative composition of the reaction products. In this regard, the study of the acidic properties of catalysts on the basis of MASs is of great importance from the point of view of both elucidating the nature of their active sites and improving their selectivity by regulating their acidic function and developing new effective catalysts. The acid characteristics of the synthesized bifunctional catalysts were investigated by TPD-NH3 and DRIFT methods.

Thermal desorption curves of ammonia for catalysts based on MASs are shown in Figure 9. The amount of desorbed ammonia for each temperature is shown in Table 2. From the analysis of the obtained profiles, it follows that both samples have one broad peak. However, the concentration and strength of the acid sites are completely different. If for the Ni/MAS-H-bentonite catalyst, the peak is observed in the range of 100–450°C, with a maximum at T 1max = 193°C with a small shoulder at T 2max = 635°C. Then for Mo/MAS-H-bentonite, the peak is observed at 100–400°C, with maxima at T 1max = 193°C, T 2max = 241°C, and T 3max = 358°C. Compared to the nickel-promoted catalyst sample in which strong acid sites are present in small amounts, the molybdenum-promoted catalyst is characterized by medium-strength acid sites responsible for catalytic isomerization.

Figure 9 
                  TPD-NH3 profiles of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts.
Figure 9

TPD-NH3 profiles of Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts.

Table 2

Acidity of bifunctional catalysts by TPD-NH3

Sample Temperature (°C) NH3 amount (μmol/g)
Ni/MAS-H-bentonite 193 357
635 14
Mo/MAS-H-bentonite 193 70
241 42

To determine the relative strength of the Brønsted and Lewis acidic centers on the surface of MASs and bifunctional catalysts based on them used in this study, we analyzed DRIFT spectra of adsorbed pyridine samples (Figure 10). The absorption bands at 1,445, 1,490, and 1,595 cm−1 are fixed on the studied samples. The observed bands at 1,445 and 1,595 cm−1 in the spectra are explained by the presence of hydrogen-bonded pyridine adsorbed on sites of Lewis acids [48,49]. The band observed at approximately 1,490 cm−1 is due to the adsorption of pyridine in both the Lewis and the Brønsted acid sites [50,51,52,53]. It is clear from the DRIFT spectra that the sample of the Mo/MAS-bentonite catalyst has a higher acidity compared to Ni/MAS-H-bentonite, which is in good agreement with the TPD-NH3 data. Thus, on the basis of the data obtained, it can be argued that catalysts based on MAS promoted with nickel and molybdenum differ in strength and in the concentration of acid sites. The strongest acid sites are characteristic of a catalyst sample based on MAS promoted with molybdenum ions.

Figure 10 
                  DRIFT spectra of pyridine adsorbed MAS, Ni/MAS-bentonite, and Mo/MAS-bentonite bifunctional catalysts.
Figure 10

DRIFT spectra of pyridine adsorbed MAS, Ni/MAS-bentonite, and Mo/MAS-bentonite bifunctional catalysts.

3.2 Hydroisomerization of n-hexadecane

The results of catalytic hydroconversion of n-hexadecane on Ni/MAS-H-bentonite and Mo/MAS-H-bentonite catalysts are presented in Table 3. It was found that an increase in the reaction temperature from 280 to 340°C leads to an increase in conversion from 10–12 to 82%. It should be noted that temperature affects not only the overall conversion but also the distribution of the product. At low reaction temperatures of 280–320°C, the main direction of n-hexadecane transformation is the isomerization process. In addition, the isomeric structures of the hexadecane are obtained due to the isomerization process without the participation of cracking. When the temperature rises from 320 to 340°C, along with the isomerization reactions, cracking reactions are also observed. The highest yield of the target products (iso-C16H34) during hydroisomerization of n-hexadecane is observed on a sample of the Mo/MAS-H bentonite catalyst at a temperature of 320°C and is 46% by mass with a selectivity of 91% and on a Ni/MAS-H catalyst sample at a temperature of 320°C and is 44% by mass with a selectivity of 95%. Thus, it can be concluded that both catalysts have good activity and selectivity for hydroisomerization of n-hexadecane.

Table 3

Catalytic performance of Ni/MAS-bentonite and Mo/MAS-bentonite bifunctional catalysts based on MAS in the process of n-hexadecane hydroisomerization

Catalyst Temperature (°C) Conversion (%) Hydroisomerization Hydrocracking
iso-C16H34 (%) Selectivity to iso-C16H34 (%) Gaseous products of cracking (%) Liquid products of cracking (%)
Ni/MAS-H-bentonite 280 12 10 83 0 2
300 31 30 97 0 1
320 44 42 95 1 1
340 86 30 35 10 46
Mo/MAS-H-bentonite 280 10 10 100 0 0
300 30 30 100 0 0
320 46 42 91 1 3
340 82 30 37 12 40

In the process of higher n-paraffins hydroisomerization, coke deposits are formed on the catalyst surface, leading to a gradual decrease in its activity. Determining the time of stable operation of the catalyst in the reaction cycle and the total number of “reaction–regeneration” cycles is very important from the point of view of the practical use of catalytic systems. The stability of the operation of the Ni/MAS-bentonite and Mo/MAS-bentonite catalysts during the hydroisomerization of n-hexadecane was measured at 320°C and fresh feed rate of 0.8–0.9 mL/min. It has been established that as a result of continuous 10 h tests at 320°C, the activity of catalysts based on both Ni/MAS-bentonite and Mo/MAS-bentonite practically does not decrease.

4 Conclusion

Thus, an ordered MAS and bifunctional catalysts based on it were synthesized. Tetraethylorthosilicate and aluminum sec-butoxide were used as sources of silicon and aluminum, respectively. Hexadecylamine was used as a template. The synthesized samples were examined using various physicochemical methods of analysis. The presence of a mesoporous and ordered structure in the synthesized aluminosilicates is confirmed by the data of low-temperature nitrogen adsorption/desorption, X-ray diffraction, and FTIR. According to the data of DRIFT and TPD-NH3 analyses, it was shown that the surface of the synthesized materials mainly contains acid sites of medium strength. The presented results on the study of the activity of the catalysts showed how the promoting additives of the catalysts deposited on the synthesized aluminosilicate affect not only their physical and chemical properties but also their activity in the hydroconversion of n-hexadecane. The maximum yield of isoparaffins on the studied samples of Ni/MAS-bentonite and Mo/MAS-bentonite is 44–46 wt%, with a selectivity of 91–95%. It has been established that as a result of continuous 10 h tests at 320°C, the activity of bifunctional catalysts practically does not decrease.

Acknowledgments

G.V. and K.U. acknowledge Department of Chemical Engineering of Gazi University (Ankara, Turkey) for XRD, BET, FTIR, and DRIFT analyses, and Institute of Combustion Problems (Almaty, Kazakhstan) for TPD-NH3 and H2-TPR analyses.

  1. Funding information: This research was funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Grant number AP08052032 “Development of Technology for the Production of New Catalysts Based on Mesoporous Aluminosilicates for the Production of Diesel Fuel with Improved Low-Temperature Properties.” The APC was funded by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan.

  2. Author contributions: K.U. and G.V. – conceptualization; G.V. and T.V. – methodology; K.U. and Z.Z. – software; A.A. and T.V. – validation; G.V. and K.U. – formal analysis; K.U., G.V., A.A., and Z.Z. – investigation; G.V. – data curation; K.U., G.V., and A.A. – writing – original draft preparation; K.U., G.V., and T.V. – writing – review and editing; K.U., A.A., and Z.Z. – visualization; G.V. – supervision; G.V. – project administration. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: Authors state no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: Not applicable.

References

[1] Martin-Aranda RM, Cejka J. Recent advances in catalysis over mesoporous molecular sieves. Top Catal. 2010;53(3–4):141–53. 10.1007/s11244–009–9419–6.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Taguchi A, Schuth F. Ordered mesoporous materials in catalysis. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2005;77(1):1–45. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2004.06.030.Search in Google Scholar

[3] Garrone E, Fajula F. Acidity and basicity of ordered silica-based mesoporous materials. Mol Sieves. 2008;6:213–67. 10.1007/3829_2007_015.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Linssen T, Cassiers K, Cool P, Lebedev O, Whittaker A, Vansant EF. Physicochemical and structural characterization of mesoporous aluminosilicates synthesized from leached saponite with additional aluminum incorporation. Chem Mater. 2003;15(25):4863–73. 10.1021/cm031111a.Search in Google Scholar

[5] Zhang M, Chen Y, Wang L, Zhang Q, Tsang CW, Liang C. Shape selectivity in hydroisomerization of hexadecane over Pt supported on 10-ring zeolites: ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-35, and ZSM-48. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2016;55(21):6069–78. 10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01163.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Park KC, Ihm SK. Comparison of Pt/zeolite catalysts for n-hexadecane hydroisomerization. Appl Catal A Gen. 2000;203(2):201–9. 10.1016/S0926–860X(00)00490–7.Search in Google Scholar

[7] Niu P, Liu P, Xi H, Ren J, Lin M, Wang Q, et al. Design and synthesis of Pt/ZSM-22 catalysts for selective formation of iso-Dodecane with branched chain at more central positions from n-Dodecane hydroisomerization. Appl Catal A. 2018;562:310–20. 10.1016/j.apcata.2018.06.025.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Li H, Liu C, Wang Y, Zheng J, Fan B, Li R. Synthesis, characterization and: N-hexane hydroisomerization performances of Pt supported on alkali treated ZSM-22 and ZSM-48. RSC Adv. 2018;8(51):28900–17. 10.1039/c8ra04858d.Search in Google Scholar PubMed PubMed Central

[9] Sharanda LF, Plyuto YV, Babich IV, Babich YA, Moulijn JA. Preparation of carbon-coated alumina by pyrolysis of adsorbed acetylacetone. Mendeleev Commun. 1999;9(3):95–6. 10.1070/MC1999v009n03ABEH001070.Search in Google Scholar

[10] Vinogradov NA, Glotov AP, Savinov AA, Vutolkina AV, Vinokurov VA, Pimerzin AA. The mesoporous silicate-alumina composites application as supports for bifunctional sulfide catalysts for n-hexadecane hydroconversion. J Porous Mater. 2021;28(5):1449–58. 10.1007/s10934–021–01097–x.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Kouznetsova T, Sauka J, Ivanets A. Template synthesis and gas adsorption properties of ordered mesoporous aluminosilicates. Appl Nanosci. 2021;11(6):1903–15. 10.1007/s13204–021–01871–y.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Meyers RA. Handbook of petroleum refining processes. 2nd edn. New York: McGraw–Hill; 1996.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Akhmedov VM, Al-Khowaiter SH. Recent advances and future aspects in the selective isomerization of high n-alkanes. Catal Rev. 2007;49(1):33–139. 10.1080/01614940601128427.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Marcilly C. Present status and future trends in catalysis for refining and petrochemicals. J Catal. 2003;216(1–2):47–62. 10.1016/s0021–9517(02)00129–x.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Gao L, Shi Z, Etim UJ, Wu P, Han D, Xing W, et al. Beta-MCM-41 micro-mesoporous catalysts in the hydroisomerization of n-heptane: Definition of an indexed isomerization factor as a performance descriptor. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2019;277:17–28. 10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.10.015.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Karakhanov EA, Kardashev SV, Maksimov AL, Baranova SV, Kulikov AB, Ostroumova VA, et al. Hydroisomerization of n-dodecane on bifunctional catalysts containing mesoporous aluminosilicates. Pet Chem. 2012;52(4):228–32. 10.1134/S0965544112040020.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Kresge CT, Leonowicz ME, Roth WJ, Vartuli JC, Beck JS. Ordered mesoporous molecular sieves synthesized by a liquid-crystal template mechanism. Nature. 1992;359(6397):710–2. 10.1038/359710a0.Search in Google Scholar

[18] Beck JS, Vartuli JC, Roth WJ, Leonowicz ME, Kresge CT, Schmitt, et al. A new family of mesoporous molecular sieves prepared with liquid crystal templates. J Am Chem Soc. 1992;114(27):10834–43. 10.1021/ja00053a020.Search in Google Scholar

[19] Lysenko SV, Kryukov IO, Sarkisov OA, Abikenova AB, Baranova SV, Ostroumova VA, et al. Mesoporous aluminosilicates as components of gas oil cracking and higher-alkane hydroisomerization catalysts. Pet Chem. 2011;51(3):151–6. 10.1134/S0965544111030091.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Musselwhite N, Na K, Sabyrov K, Alayoglu S, Somorjai GA. Mesoporous aluminosilicate catalysts for the selective isomerization of n-hexane: the roles of surface acidity and platinum metal. J Am Chem Soc. 2015;137(32):10231–37. 10.1021/jacs.5b04808.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[21] Deldari H. Suitable catalysts for hydroisomerization of long-chain normal paraffins. Appl Catal A. 2015;293:1–10. 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.07.008.Search in Google Scholar

[22] Vassilina G, Umbetkaliyeva K, Oktar N, Karaman BP, Vassilina T. Materials Today Proceedings of 6th International Russian–Kazakhstan Conference “Chemical Technologies of Functional Materials”, 2020 May 15–16. Almaty, Kazakhstan: Elsevier; 2020, 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.06.562.Search in Google Scholar

[23] Wang C, Zhu G, Cai X, Shang T, Zhao L, Li N, et al. Synthesis of higher aluminum content hexagonal and cubic mesoporous aluminosilicates toward catalysts. Top Catal. 2005;35(1–2):25–34. 10.1007/s11244–005–3810–8.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Heba MG. Characterization and catalytic activity of NiO/mesoporous aluminosilicate AlSBA-15 in conversion of some hydrocarbons. Egypt J Pet. 2012;21(1):1–10. 10.1016/j.ejpe.2012.02.001.Search in Google Scholar

[25] Zhang Z, Han Y, Xiao FS, Qiu S, Zhu L, Wang R, et al. Mesoporous aluminosilicates with ordered hexagonal structure, strong acidity, and extraordinary hydrothermal stability at high temperatures. J Amer Chem Soc. 2001;123(21):5014–21. 10.1021/ja004138t.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Sing KSW, Everett DH, Haul RAW, Moscou L, Pierotti RA, Rouquerol J, et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem. 1985;57:603–19. 10.1351/pac198557040603.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Shukla DB, Pandya VP. Estimation of crystalline phase in ZSM-5 zeolites by infrared spectroscopy. J Chem Technol Biotechnol. 1989;44(2):147–54. 10.1002/jctb.280440206.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Isernia LF. FTIR Study of the relation, between extra-framework aluminum species and the adsorbed molecular water, and its effect on the acidity in zsm-5 steamed zeolite. J Mater Res. 2013;16(4):792–802. 10.1590/S1516–14392013005000044.Search in Google Scholar

[29] Rabo JA, Gajda GJ. Acid function in zeolites: recent progress. Cat Rev Sci Eng. 1989;31:385–430. 10.1080/01614948909349936.Search in Google Scholar

[30] Cordoba G, Arroyo R, Fierro JLG, Viniegra M. Study of xerogel - glass transition of CuO/SiO2. J Solid State Chem. 1996;123(1):93–9. 10.1006/jssc.1996.0156.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Nakamoto K. Infrared and Raman Spectra of Inorganic and Coordination Compounds. 4th edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1978.Search in Google Scholar

[32] Mile B, Stirling D, Zammitt MA, Lovell A, Webb MJ. The location of nickel oxide and nickel in silica-supported catalysts: two forms of “NiO” and the assignment of temperature-programmed reduction profiles. J Catal. 1998;114(2):217–27. 10.1016/0021–9517(88)90026–7.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Sangsong S, Ratana T, Tungkamani S, Sornchamni T, Phongaksorn M, Eric CE. The demonstration of the superiority of the dual ni-based catalytic system for the adjustment of the H2/CO ratio in syngas for green fuel technologies. Catalyst. 2020;10(9):1056. 10.3390/catal10091056.Search in Google Scholar

[34] Luisetto I, Tuti S, Battocchio C, Lo MS, Sodo A. Ni/CeO2-Al2O3 catalysts for the dry reforming of methane: The effect of CeAlO3 content and nickel crystallite size on catalytic activity and coke resistance. Appl Catal A Gen. 2015;500:12–22. 10.1016/j.apcata.2015.05.004.Search in Google Scholar

[35] Negrier F, Marceau É, Che M, Caro D. Role of ethylenediamine in the preparation of alumina-supported Ni catalysts from [Ni(en)2(H2O)2](NO3)2: From solution properties to nickel particles. Comptes Rendus Chim. 2003;6(2):231–40. 10.1016/s1631–0748(03)00026–2.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Zhang X, Liu J, Jing Y, Xie Y. Support effects on the catalytic behavior of NiO/Al2O3 for oxidative dehydrogenation of ethane to ethylene. Appl Catal A Gen. 2003;240(1–2):143–50. 10.1016/S0926–860X(02)00426–X.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Yang E, Noh YS, Hong GH, Moon DJ. Combined steam and CO2 reforming of methane over La1-xSrxNiO3 perovskite oxides. Catal Today. 2018;299:242–50. 10.1016/j.cattod.2017.03.050.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Patcas F, Honicke D. Effect of alkali doping on catalytic properties of alumina-supported nickel oxide in the selective oxidehydrogenation of cyclohexane. Catal Commun. 2005;6(1):23–7. 10.1016/j.catcom.2004.10.005.Search in Google Scholar

[39] Miletić N, Izquierdo U, Obregón I, Bizkarra K, Agirrezabal–Telleria I, Bario LV, et al. Oxidative steam reforming of methane over nickel catalysts supported on Al2O3-CeO2-La2O3. Catal Sci Technol. 2015;5(3):1704–15. 10.1039/c4cy01438c.Search in Google Scholar

[40] Stroud T, Smith TJ, Le Sache E, Santos JL, Centeno MA, Arellano-Garcia H, et al. Chemical CO2 recycling via dry and bi reforming of methane using Ni-Sn/Al2O3 and Ni-Sn/CeO2-Al2O3 catalysts. Appl Catal B. 2018;224:125–35. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.10.047.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Li PP, Lang WZ, Xia K, Yan X, Guo YJ. The promotion effects of Ni on the properties of Cr/Al catalysts for propane dehydrogenation reaction. Appl Catal A. 2016;522:172–9. 10.1016/j.apcata.2016.05.007.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Sache E, Johnson S, Pastor-Pérez L, Horri BA, Reina TR. Biogas upgrading via dry reforming over a Ni-Sn/CeO2-Al2O3 catalyst: influence of the biogas source. Energies. 2019;12(6):1007. 10.3390/en12061007.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Tireli AA, Guimarães IR, Castro GM, Gonçalves MA, Ramalho TC, Guerreiro MC. Iron and molybdenum mixed oxide supported on Al-PILC for the catalytic oxidative desulfurization of dibenzothiophene in simulated diesel fuel. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2020;27(13):14969–76. 10.1007/s11356–020–07961–8.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Zhang T, Liu J, Wang D, Zhao Z, Wei Y, Cheng K. Selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over HZSM-5-supported Fe-Cu nanocomposite catalysts: the Fe-Cu bimetallic effect. Appl Catal B Environ. 2014;148–149:520–31. 10.1016/j.apcatb.2013.11.006.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Kostyniuk A, Key D, Mdleleni M. Effect of Fe-Mo promoters on HZSM-5 zeolite catalyst for 1-hexene aromatization. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2019;23:612–26. 10.1016/j.jscs.2018.11.001.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Behnejad B, Abdouss M, Tavasoli A. Comparison of performance of Ni-Mo/γ-alumina catalyst in HDS and HDN reactions of main distillate fractions. Pet Sci. 2019;16:645–56. 10.1007/s12182–019–0319–5.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Rhimi B, Mhamdi M, Kalevaru VN, Martin A. Synergy between vanadium and molybdenum in bimetallic ZSM-5 supported catalysts for ethylene ammoxidation. RSC Adv. 2016;6(70):65866–78. 10.1039/c6ra09736g.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Aguado J, Escola JM, Castro MC, Paredes B. Metathesis of 1-hexene over rhenium oxide supported on ordered mesoporous aluminas: comparison with Re2O7/γ-Al2O3. Appl Catal A. 2005;284(1–2):47–57. 10.1016/j.apcata.2005.01.017.Search in Google Scholar

[49] Chakraborty B, Viswanathan B. Surface acidity of MCM-41 by in situ IR studies of pyridine adsorption. Catal Today. 1999;49(1–3):253–60. 10.1016/S0920–5861(98)00431–3.Search in Google Scholar

[50] Xinyu C, Min J, Xiangwen GL, Zh LI, Wzh MI. Catalytic performance of grafted Al-MCM-41 in hydroisomerization of n-dodecane. Appl Surf Sci. 2010;256(20):5856–61. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2010.03.060.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Mokaya R, Jones W, Luan Z, Alba MD, Klinowski J. Acidity and catalytic activity of the mesoporous aluminosilicate molecular sieve MCM-41. Catal Lett. 1996;37(1–2):113–20. 10.1007/BF00813528.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Corma A. From microporous to mesoporous molecular sieve materials and their use in catalysis. Chem Rev. 1997;97(6):2373–420. 10.1021/cr960406n.Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[53] Lopez T, Navarrete J, Gomez R, Novaro O, Figueras F, Armendariz H. Preparation of sol-gel sulfated ZrO2-SiO2 and characterization of its surface acidity. Appl Catal A. 1995;125(2):217–32. 10.1016/0926–860X(95)00022–4.Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2021-12-21
Revised: 2022-02-11
Accepted: 2022-02-11
Published Online: 2022-03-16

© 2022 Gulzira Vassilina et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloaded on 3.3.2024 from https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/chem-2022-0134/html
Scroll to top button