Skip to content
BY 4.0 license Open Access Published by De Gruyter Open Access July 12, 2022

Characterization of the elastic modulus of ceramic–metal composites with physical and mechanical properties by ultrasonic technique

Ayhan Erol ORCID logo, Vildan Özkan Bilici ORCID logo and Ahmet Yönetken ORCID logo
From the journal Open Chemistry

Abstract

The scope of this study, that is, the effect of the elastic modulus obtained by ultrasonic method on the physical and mechanical properties of tungsten carbide (WC)-based ceramic–metal composites, which have Ni and Co metallic binder composition produced by powder metallurgy and represented by high strength and hardness criteria, was investigated. In order to obtain composite samples in the study, it was sintered in a microwave furnace at different temperatures to combine the powder particles prepared at the rate of 60% Ni, 20% Co, and 20% WC by weight. Then, the velocities and longitudinal attenuation values of longitudinal and shear ultrasonic waves along the composite sample were measured using the ultrasonic pulse-echo method. The elastic modulus of the composites was determined using ultrasonic velocities and sample density. Hardness testing, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were also performed. The results show that the elastic modulus increases with the increase in sintering temperature and ultrasonic wave speeds, but decreases with the longitudinal attenuation value, considering the SEM images and XRD analysis. There is also a linear relationship between elastic modulus and stiffness.

1 Introduction

The field of materials science and characterization is to create new materials under different physical conditions, develop, and improve previously known materials [1]. Today, the quality of WC-reinforced ceramic–metal composites produced in powder metallurgy is expressed by their high strength and hardness values. In addition, composite materials with WC are known to be used in places requiring high strength [2,3,4,5,6]. The subject of material characterization is mainly the study of elastic behavior, material microstructure, and morphological properties, and relevant mechanical properties and includes evaluation. Destructive and non-destructive testing techniques are available for full material characterization without damaging the structure [7]. In recent years, it is possible to characterize the microstructural, physical, and mechanical properties of materials using ultrasonic testing methods. Research studies and development of ultrasonic testing procedures and equipment are carried out, trying to achieve better results. Each ultrasonic test parameter is significantly affected by changes in the microstructural or mechanical properties of the materials. Quantities, ultrasonic velocity, and attenuation are important parameters required for the ultrasonic nondestructive material characterization technique [8,9,10]. Ultrasonic velocity gives information about the mechanical, anisotropic, and elastic properties of the medium through which it passes, while at the same time it is related to the elastic constants and density of a material [11,12]. In addition, as a result of the studies, it has been observed that the ultrasonic method is a very sensitive and reliable technique from the data obtained for sintered composite samples and materials [13,14,15,16,17,18].

According to the literature, materials obtained by microwave sintering can exhibit comparable and high-level properties under the conditions of appropriate chemical composition and production technology, in specific application conditions superior to the observed properties of many hard metals, alloys, cermets, and composites. Microwave sintering has been widely used in the field of powder metal technology [19,20]. Compared to other conventional sintering methods, microwave sintering is an economical heating method that saves time and energy and also limits grain growth with its fast-heating rate. It provides better production performance with a good microstructure and therefore improved mechanical properties [21,22,23,24]. All these advantages make it one of the scientific and economical and industrially practical methods for the preparation of hard metals such as nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), and tungsten carbide (WC) to be formed by microwave heating. Besides this kind of work, there are many kinds of works done on material science to investigate different properties [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51].

In this study, ceramic–metal composites were sintered at different sintering temperatures. The aim is to measure the elastic modulus of composites prepared at different temperatures ultrasonically and to examine the relationship between ultrasonic properties and physical and mechanical properties without damaging the structure in order to explain the changes in the structure. In the study, the velocity and attenuation values of the samples and the modulus of elasticity were measured using ultrasonic method, microstructural development was examined with a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD), and hardness measurement was made for hardness values.

2 Experimental procedures

2.1 preparation of sample

In this study, Ni, Co, and tungsten carbide (WC) were used in the form of powders. The powders used in the study were 99.8% purity and particle size Ni from lower than −325 mesh, Co powders with 99.9% purity and a particle size of lower than 150 μm, and WC powder with 99.9% purity and a particle size of lower than 50 μm. All powders were obtained from Sigma Aldrich. The powders prepared by weight (60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC) were mixed homogeneously in a mixer for 24 h after weighing. All the powders were placed in a mold of 15 mm diameter and 5 mm height and pressed using a hydraulic press at a pressure of 305.9 kg/cm2, and then, the cold-pressed samples underwent sintering at 600–1,000℃ for 2 h in a microwave sintering. The sintering process was carried out in a Phoenix Standard Unit (CEM Innovations in Microwave Technology) brand microwave oven with a heating rate of 10°C per minute.

2.2 Mechanical characterization

Microhardness measurements of Ni–Co–WC composite specimens were made using a METTEST-HT (Vickers) brand microhardness tester by applying Vickers hardness at 0.5 kg load. In addition, in order for the results of the hardness measurements to be accurate, measurements were taken from 10 different regions of each composite sample, and the hardness value was given with an average value.

Shimadzu brand XRD-6,000 X-Ray diffraction analyzer was operated with Cu K alpha radiation at a scanning rate of 2° per minute.

Equipped with X-ray (energy-dispersive X-ray – EDX spectroscopy) detector, LEO-1,430 VP SEM was applied to observe the microstructure of composite material.

The densities of the prepared composite samples of the (60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC) composition were calculated according to the Archimedes principle, taking into account the volumetric changes after sintering at different temperatures.

2.3 Ultrasonic measurements

In ultrasonic measurement methods, as in every experimental system, there is a transducer that produces the ultrasound and another transducer that detects the produced ultrasound from the other end of the environment. In our experimental study, we used pulse-echo method, one of the ultrasonic measurement methods. The ultrasonic pulse-echo technique is generally used to take precise measurements of ultrasonic velocity and absorption in the megahertz and gigahertz frequency regions, to evaluate its elastic modulus, determine microstructure characterization, and evaluate its mechanical properties [52]. Velocity and attenuation measurements of the samples were made with Sonatest Sitescan 150 model ultrasonic wave flaw detector. A 2 MHz (Sonatest SLH2-10, T/R) transmitter/receiver longitudinal probe was used to measure ultrasonic longitudinal velocity, and 4 MHz (GE Inspection Technologies MB 4Y 66100541) transmitter/receiver shear probe was used to measure ultrasonic shear wave velocity. Sonatest sonagel-W liquid gel was used as a coupling fluid between the probes and the sample. Then, the image of the ultrasonic wave sent to the sample with the transmitter/receiver transducer was obtained with the front wall reflection, back wall reflection peaks and echoes peaks on the A-Scan screen. By changing the height of the transducers from the sample, measurements were tried to be taken until the sharpest peak in the spectrum was obtained. The propagation rate of ultrasonic waves through the thickness of the samples was evaluated as follows:

(1) V = 2 × d t ,

where d is the sample thickness (mm), t is the propagation time of ultrasonic wave (ns), and V is the propagation speed of the ultrasonic wave (m/s) [53,54]. Considering that the samples obtained in this analysis are isotropic, Young’s modulus can be calculated by using the standard velocity–elasticity formulas and the density of the sample. In this case, Young’s modulus is calculated from the measured ultrasonic longitudinal (V L) and transverse (V T) wave velocities and density (ρ) [55] as follows:

(2) E = ρ V T 2 3 V L 2 4 V T 2 V L 2 V T 2 .

Also, while the ultrasound wave propagates in a solid environment, the term absorption is used for the average energy loss that occurs due to its direct interaction with the particles in the environment. This reduction event occurs due to the absorption and scattering properties of the solid and is called “attenuation.” Using a flaw detector, the attenuation coefficient is generally obtained by the ratio of the amplitudes of the first back-wall echo to that of the second back-wall echo and echo peaks on the A-Scan screen [56]. This formula is used for calculating the attenuation coefficient as follows:

(3) α = 1 d 20 log A 1 A 2 ,

where A 1 and A 2 are the amplitude of two consecutive back wall echoes and d is the thickness of the samples in (mm). Also, in Figure 1, the general schematic representation of the experimental setup used for the ultrasonic measurements of the samples with the applied pulse-echo test is given.

Figure 1 
                  Ultrasonic pulse-echo testing setup.

Figure 1

Ultrasonic pulse-echo testing setup.

3 Results and discussion

The 60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC composite samples formed with the powders prepared in certain proportions were sintered in a microwave furnace at temperatures ranging from 600 to 1,000°C. The main focus of this study is to investigate the effect of the elastic modulus obtained using ultrasonic method on the physical and mechanical properties of these ready-made composite samples. The ultrasonic velocity, ultrasonic longitudinal attenuation and elastic modulus values depending on the sintering temperature are shown in Table 1. In the study, graphs showing the change of physical-mechanical properties such as hardness, sintering temperature (°C), ultrasonic velocity values, and longitudinal attenuation of the samples given in Table 1 against elastic modulus values were drawn (Figure 2).

Table 1

Physical and mechanical properties and sintering temperature of Ni–Co–WC ceramic–metal composites

Composite samples Sintering temperature V L (m/s), at V T (m/s), at Longitudinal attenuation (dB), at E (GPa) Hardness Density (g/cm3)
(°C) 2 MHz 4 MHz 2 MHz (0.05 HV)
60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC 600 1504.8 ± 9 1051.2 ± 29 0.567 ± 0.021 15.99 231.28 7.073
700 1816 ± 23 1180.3 ± 4 0.338 ± 0.032 21.94 246.57 6.943
800 2761.6 ± 28 1678.5 ± 16 0.274 ± 0.015 46.01 258.03 6.765
900 2949.6 ± 29 2071.4 ± 20 0.253 ± 0.025 58.89 270.04 6.771
1,000 3140.4 ± 23 2158.4 ± 24 0.217 ± 0.031 65.33 301.69 6.663
Figure 2 
               The relationship between E values and the physical–mechanical properties of composites.

Figure 2

The relationship between E values and the physical–mechanical properties of composites.

Ultrasonic velocity in powder compaction processes in powder metallurgy is directly dependent on the density and elastic modulus. In order for ultrasonic velocity to realize its full potential as a parameter for the characterization of sintered materials, a better understanding of the relationship between ultrasonic velocity and powder compact state is required [57]. When the velocities of both ultrasonic longitudinal and shear waves at 600°C sintering temperature and 1,000°C sintering temperature are examined, it is seen that there is an increase of approximately two times. It has been observed that a more stable and dense structure can be obtained as the sintering temperature increases. In our study, it was found to be consistent with similar results in the literature. In addition, the fact that the velocity is high in low-density samples and low in high-density samples is a result of the measurements being made parallel to the pressing direction. As the temperature increases, the grain boundary movement speed increases, and because the pores move more slowly at the grain boundary, densification increases. For a sintering temperature of 1,000°C, the wave velocities are independent of the heating rate and reach their maximum values. Longitudinal and shear wave velocity and elastic modulus values vary in proportion to the total hardness values (Table 1). It is known that the existing pores in the structure block the path of incoming ultrasonic signals and thus reduce the velocity of ultrasonic waves [58]. Therefore, it can be easily said that the total porosity values are low for a structure with high velocity and elastic modulus values. At the same time, the ultrasonic velocity measurement method appears to be an easy, convenient and suitable non-destructive technique for estimating porosity in materials [59]. The relationship of Ni–Co–WC ceramic–metal composite samples with the elastic modulus is clearly shown in the graphs drawn. While the elastic modulus decreases with the increase in the longitudinal attenuation polynomial (Figure 2c), it increases with the sintering temperature (Figure 2a) and the longitudinal and shear velocity values (Figure 2b). The results also show that the elastic modulus values increase with the increase in the hardness values (Figure 2d). Hardness, which is actually a type of strength, is largely controlled by its microstructure and the presence of imperfections. It is used to detect invisible discontinuities in materials or open discontinuities on the material surface using the pulse-echo method, which is one of the non-destructive testing methods. In this way, the microstructural, physical, and mechanical properties of 60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC composite samples were evaluated.

3.1 Metallographic and XRD analysis

SEM and XRD analysis results of metal matrix composite sample obtained from powders (60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC) sintered at 600°C and 1,000°C are shown in Figures 3 and 4. Sintering is not better understood at (60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC) composition at 600°C temperature. The SEM picture (Figure 3b and c) shows some porous unclear phases.

Figure 3 
                  SEM image of (Ni–Co–WC) composite 600–1,000°C. (a) 600°C, (b) 700°C, (c) 800°C, (d) 900°C and (e) 1,000°C.

Figure 3

SEM image of (Ni–Co–WC) composite 600–1,000°C. (a) 600°C, (b) 700°C, (c) 800°C, (d) 900°C and (e) 1,000°C.

Figure 4 
                  XRD analysis of (Ni–Co–WC) composite sintered in microwave furnace at (a) 600°C and (b) 1,000°C.

Figure 4

XRD analysis of (Ni–Co–WC) composite sintered in microwave furnace at (a) 600°C and (b) 1,000°C.

In Figure 3d, the interaction between the particles has started and the structure is getting denser, the existing grain boundaries are gradually disappearing. Figure 3e is an SEM photograph taken at 1,000°C of the produced sample. It shows the start of the neck formation between particles. Grain boundaries are unclear. It is the moment when the porosity is less. Density is also a property that depends on the amount of porosity. In this case, there is a structure that becomes more stable with necking and the hardness value is the highest. After SEM analysis of the samples produced at 600, 700, 800, 900, and 1,000°C, X-ray analysis was made of the samples sintered at 600 and 1,000°C (Figure 4). The strong tungsten carbide peak according to the phases and elements, which emerged according to the XRD analysis taken at both temperature values, shows that the structure is composed of tungsten carbide and that WC, WO2, WO3, CoWO4, and W2C formations occur and the existence of the WC–Co system. Among these peaks, the W2C phase was not observed in the Ni–Co–WC composite sample sintered at 1,000°C, which is shown in Figure 4b. The obstacles to using the WC phase alone in the WC–Co system are its very brittleness and extreme difficulty in sintering. WC particles embedded in the cobalt phase give the structure its hardness and wear resistance, while the cobalt phase gives toughness and holds the WC particles together. In addition, in structures such as WC–Co, the stiffness is affected by the amount of the W2C phase [60]. The disappearance of this phase at 1,000°C supports the high elastic modulus and hardness value.

4 Conclusion

Ni–Co and WC mixture powders were produced samples and were investigated. Metal powders are reinforced with ceramic powder. In the study, 60% Ni–20% Co–20% WC composite samples produced at different temperatures were characterized, and the ultrasonic pulse-echo technique was effectively used for the characterization of their properties.

Unlike conventional sintering, microwave sintering was used in the preparation of samples in the study. The reason is that since the heating of the sample in microwave heating is provided in the interior, it causes volumetric and homogeneous heating. Thus, the structural properties of the obtained sample are improved in many ways. At this point, the relationship between the elastic modulus of Ni–Co–WC ceramic–metal composites obtained by the ultrasonic method and their physical and mechanical properties was investigated. The results of the study show that an elastic modulus measurement is a reliable tool for the characterization of hardness, sintering temperature, ultrasonic longitudinal and shear velocity, and longitudinal attenuation in Ni–Co–WC composites. The highest density, hardness, and elastic modulus values of 60% Ni–20% Co–20WC composite produced by the powder metallurgy method were found as 6.663 gr/cm3, 301.69 HV, and 65.33 GPa, respectively, in the sample sintered at 1,000°C. Besides the desired microstructure, the highest hardness value obtained also brings good strength and stiffness. While the elastic modulus value increased approximately four times at 1,000°C, the longitudinal attenuation value decreased from 0.567 dB to 0.217 dB. The reason for this is that energy is lost as it interacts with more particles in the environment. Since the ultrasonic wave sent to the structure is absorbed by the particle, a reduction occurs depending on the interaction.

Acknowledgment

Study A.K.U. was supported by the Scientific Research Projects Unit with the project numbered 15.Teknoloji.04.

  1. Funding information: This research (15.Teknoloji.04.) was funded by A.K.U. BAPK.

  2. Author contributions: Conceptualization, A.Y. and V.Ö.B.; methodology, V.O.B., A.Y. and A.E. formal analysis, A.Y. and V.Ö.B.; investigation, A.Y. and A.E.; resources, V.O.B., A.Y. and A.E.; data curation, A.Y; writing – original draft preparation, A.Y. and V.O.B.; writing – review and editing, A.Y. and A.E. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

  3. Conflict of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

  4. Ethical approval: The conducted research is not related to either human or animal use.

  5. Data availability statement: The processed data necessary to reproduce these findings are available upon request with permission.

References

[1] Nagy PB. Introduction to ultrasonics. 2001;20:251–728.10.3138/9781442602847-013Search in Google Scholar

[2] Colin C, Durant L, Favrot N, Besson J, Barbier G, Delannay F. Processing of functional-gradient WC-Co cerment by powder metallurgy. Int J Refract Hard Met. 1994;12(3):145–52.10.1016/0263-4368(93)90064-MSearch in Google Scholar

[3] Gao J, Liu S, Zhao Y, Ji X, Yang Y, Tong W. Microstructure and properties of Fe– Cr–B alloy with different WC addition. Vacuum. 2021;193:11055.10.1016/j.vacuum.2021.110544Search in Google Scholar

[4] Yang XH, Wang KF, Chou KC, Zhang GH. Preparation of low binder WC-Co-Ni cemented carbides with fine WC grains and homogeneous distribution of Co/Ni. Mater Today Commun. 2022;30:103081.10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.103081Search in Google Scholar

[5] Lin T, Li Q, Han Y, Song K, Wang X, Shao H, et al. Effects of Nb and NbC additives on microstructure and properties of WC-Co-Ni cemented carbides. Int J Refract Hard Met. 2022;103:105782.10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2022.105782Search in Google Scholar

[6] Li H, Yan L, Zhang H, Ai F, Zhao D, Li Y, et al. Effects of sintering temperature on interface microstructure and element diffusion of WC-Co-Ni-Fe/high-speed steel composites. Mater Lett. 2022;310:13144.10.1016/j.matlet.2021.131449Search in Google Scholar

[7] Nanekar PP, Shah BK. Characterization of Material Properties by Ultrasonics. Founder’s Day Spec. 2003;249:25–38.Search in Google Scholar

[8] Yim HJ, Bae YH, Jun Y. Hydration and microstructural characterization of early-age cement paste with ultrasonic wave velocity and electrical resistivity measurements. Constr Build Mater. 2021;303:124508.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.124508Search in Google Scholar

[9] Zamen S, Dehghan-Niri E, Al-Beer H, Lindahl J, Hassen AA. Characterization of nonlinear ultrasonic waves behavior while interacting with poor interlayer bonds in large-scale additive manufactured materials. NDT E Int. 2022;127:102602.10.1016/j.ndteint.2022.102602Search in Google Scholar

[10] Honarvar F, Varvani-Farahani A. A review of ultrasonic testing applications in additive manufacturing: Defect evaluation, material characterization, and process control. Ultrasonics. 2020;108:106227.10.1016/j.ultras.2020.106227Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[11] Farahmand S, Soorgee MH, Monazzah AH. Evaluating the elastic properties of Al2O3–Al FGMs by longitudinal and transverse ultrasonic bulk waves velocity features. Ceram Int. 2021;47(17):24906–15.10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.05.217Search in Google Scholar

[12] Pandey DK, Pandey S. Ultrasonics: a technique of material characterization. In: Dissanayake DW, (Ed.). Acoustic waves. Croatia: InTech; 2010. p. 397–430.10.5772/10153Search in Google Scholar

[13] Hübschen G, Altpeter I, Tschuncky R, Herrmann HG. Materials Characterization using nondestructive evaluation (NDE) methods. Woodhead Publishing; 2016. p. 177–224.10.1016/B978-0-08-100040-3.00007-9Search in Google Scholar

[14] Gültekin Eren E. The effect of heating rate and sintering temperature on the elastic modulus of porcelain tiles. Ultrasonics. 2018;83:120–5.10.1016/j.ultras.2017.06.005Search in Google Scholar

[15] Özkan V, Sarpün İH, Erol A, Yönetken A. Influence of mean grain size with ultrasonic velocity on micro-hardness of B4C–Fe–Ni composite. J Alloy Compd. 2013;574:512–9.10.1016/j.jallcom.2013.05.097Search in Google Scholar

[16] Ünal R, Sarpün IH, Yalım HA, Erol A, Özdemir T, Tuncel S. The mean grain size determination of boron carbide (B4C)–aluminium (Al) and boron carbide (B4C)–nickel (Ni) composites by ultrasonic velocity technique. Mater Charact. 2006;56(3):241–4.10.1016/j.matchar.2005.11.006Search in Google Scholar

[17] Gür CH. Investigation of microstructure–ultrasonic velocity relationship in SiCp-reinforced aluminium metal matrix composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2003;361(1-2):29–35.10.1016/S0921-5093(03)00568-9Search in Google Scholar

[18] Rousseau CE, Plume G, Goni M, Bhaskar A. Behavior of syntactic foam under plate impact. Mech Res Commun. 2017;83:1–5.10.1016/j.mechrescom.2017.02.006Search in Google Scholar

[19] Singhal C, Murtaza Q, Parvej. Microwave sintering of advanced composites materials: a review. Mater Today Proc. 2018;5:24287–98.10.1016/j.matpr.2018.10.224Search in Google Scholar

[20] Chaix JM. Microwave Sintering of Ceramics. Encycl Mater Technical Ceram Glasses. 2021;1:327–41.10.1016/B978-0-12-818542-1.00004-7Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ghasali E, Pakseresht AH, Agheli M, Marzbanpour AH, Ebadzadeh T. WC-Co particles reinforced aluminum matrix by conventional and microwave sintering. Mater Res. 2015;18:1197–202.10.1590/1516-1439.027115Search in Google Scholar

[22] Ghasali E, Shahmorad A, Orooji Y, Faraji A, Asadian K, Alizadeh M, et al. Effects of vanadium and titanium addition on the densification, microstructure and mechanical properties of WC-Co cermets. Ceram Int Part A. 2021;47(10):14270–79.10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.02.010Search in Google Scholar

[23] Tayier W, Janaekaran S, Tai VC. Microwave hybrid heating (MHH) of Ni-based alloy powder on Ni and steel-based metals – A review on fundamentals and parameters. Int J Lightweight Mater Manuf. 2022;5(1):58–73.10.1016/j.ijlmm.2021.10.002Search in Google Scholar

[24] Breval E, Cheng JP, Agrawal DK, Gigl P, Dennis M, Roy R, et al. Comparison between microwave and conventional sintering of WC/Co composites. Mater Sci Eng A. 2005;391:285–95.10.1016/j.msea.2004.08.085Search in Google Scholar

[25] Rammah YS, Kumar A, Mahmoud KAA, El-Mallawany R, El-Agawany FI, Gulfem SusoyTekin, et al. SnO-reinforced silicate glasses and utilization in gamma-radiation-shielding applications. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9-3:1000–8. 10.1680/jemmr.20.00150.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Malidarreh RB, Akkurt İ, Günoğlu K, Akyıldırım H. Fast neutrons shielding properties for Fe2O3 added composite. Int J Comput Exp Sci Eng. 2021;7(3):143–5. 10.22399/ijcesen.1012039.Search in Google Scholar

[27] Arslankaya Çelik SMT. Green supplier selection in steel door industry using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy Moora methods. Emerg Mater Res. 2021;4(10):357–69.10.1680/jemmr.21.00011Search in Google Scholar

[28] Malidarre RB, Arslankaya S, Nar M, Yasin KI, Karpuz N, Dogan SO, et al. Deep learning prediction of gamma-ray-attenuation behavior of KNN–LMN ceramics Emerging. Mater Res. 2022;11-2(2):1–7.10.1680/jemmr.22.00012Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ozhan Doğan S, Özden T. Optimization of welding application parameters of thin sheet blocks used in the new-generation ship hull. Emerg Mater Res. 2022;1(11):67–75.10.1680/jemmr.20.00330Search in Google Scholar

[30] Malidarreh Boodaghi R, Akkurt I, Malidarreh Boodaghi P, Arslankaya S. Investigation and ANN-based prediction of the radiation shielding, structural and mechanical properties of the Hydroxyapatite (HAP) bio-composite as artificial bone. Radiat Phys Chem. 2022;197:1–11.Search in Google Scholar

[31] Akkurt I, Malidarre RB. Physical, structural, and mechanical properties of the concrete by Fluka code and phy-X/PSD software. Radiat Phys Chem. 2022;193:1–10.10.1016/j.radphyschem.2021.109958Search in Google Scholar

[32] Gunoglu K, Özkavaka VH, Akkurt İ. Evaluation of gamma ray attenuation properties of boron carbide (B4C) doped AISI 316 stainless steel: Experimental, XCOM and Phy-X/PSD database software. Mater Today Commun. 2021;29:102793. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2021.102793.Search in Google Scholar

[33] Jawad AA, Demirkol N, Gunoğlu K, Akkurt I. Radiation shielding properties of some ceramic wasted samples. Int J Env Sci Technol. 2019;16(9):5039–42.10.1007/s13762-019-02240-7Search in Google Scholar

[34] Akkurt İ, Emıkönel S, Akarslan F, Günoğlu K, Kilinçarslan Ş, Üncü İS. Barite effect on radiation shielding properties of cotton -polyester fabric. Acta Phys Pol A. 2015 Aug;128 2B:B-53–4.10.12693/APhysPolA.128.B-53Search in Google Scholar

[35] Al-Obaidi S, Akyıldırım H, Gunoglu K, Akkurt I. Neutron shielding calculation for barite-boron-water. Acta Phys Polonica A. 2020;137-4:551–3. 10.12693/APhysPolA.137.551.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Akkurt I, Basyigit C, Kilincarslan S, Beycioglu A. Prediction of photon attenuation coefficients of heavy concrete by fuzzy logic. J Frankl Inst. 2010;347-9(9):1589–97.10.1016/j.jfranklin.2010.06.002Search in Google Scholar

[37] Akkurt I, Akyıldırım H, Karipçin F, Mavi B. Chemical corrosion on gamma-ray attenuation properties of barite concrete. J Saudi Chem Soc. 2012;16-2:199–202. 10.1016/j.jscs.2011.01.003.Search in Google Scholar

[38] Hanfi MY, Sayyed MI, Lacomme E, Akkurt I, Mahmoud KA, Lacommeet E, et al. The influence of MgO on the radiation protection and mechanical propertiesof tellurite glasses. Nucl Eng Technol. 2021 Jun;53(6):2000–10.10.1016/j.net.2020.12.012Search in Google Scholar

[39] Demir N, Tarim UA, Popovici MA, Demirci ZN, Gurler O, Akkurt I. Investigation of mass attenuation coefficients of water, concrete and bakelite at different energies using the FLUKA Monte Carlo code. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2013;298(2):1303–7.10.1007/s10967-013-2494-ySearch in Google Scholar

[40] Akkurt I, Canakci H. Radiation attenuation of boron doped clay for 662, 1173 and 1332 keV gamma rays. Int J Radiat Res. 2011;9(1):37–40.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Al-Sarraya E, Akkurt İ, Günoğlu K, Evcin A, Bezir NÇ. Radiation shielding properties of some composite panel. Acta Phys Pol A. 2017;132-3(3):490–2.10.12693/APhysPolA.132.490Search in Google Scholar

[42] Kayiran HF. Numerical analysis of composite discs with carbon/epoxy and aramid/epoxy materials. Emerg Mater Res. 2022;11-1:155–9. 10.1680/jemmr.21.00052.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Kulali F. Simulation studies on radiological parameters for marble concrete. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9-4:1341–7. 10.1680/jemmr.20.00307.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Malidarrea RB, Kulali F, Inal A, Oz A. Monte Carlo simulation of the Waste Soda-Lime-Silica Glass system contained Sb2O3. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9-4:1334–40. 10.1680/jemmr.20.00202.Search in Google Scholar

[45] Akkurt I, Tekin HO. Radiological parameters for bismuth oxide glasses using Phy-X/PSD software. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9-3:1020–7. 10.1680/jemmr.20.00209.Search in Google Scholar

[46] Tekin HO, Issa SAM, Mahmoud KA, El-Agawany FI, Rammah YS, Susoy G, et al. Nuclear radiation shielding competences of Barium (Ba) reinforced borosilicate glasses. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9-4:1131–44. 10.1680/jemmr.20.00185.Search in Google Scholar

[47] Çelen YY, Evcin A. Synthesis and characterizations of magnetite–borogypsum for radiation shielding. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9-3:770–5. 10.1680/jemmr.20.00098.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Çelen YY. Gamma Ray Shielding Parameters of Some Phantom Fabrication Materials for Medical Dosimetry. Emerg Mater Res. 2021;10-3(3):307–13.10.1680/jemmr.21.00043Search in Google Scholar

[49] FI, , El-Agawany, KA-A, Mahmoud, H, Akyildirim, E-S, Yousef, HO, Tekin, YS, Rammah. Physical, neutron, and gamma-rays shielding parameters for Na2O–SiO2–PbO glasses. Emerg Mater Res. 2021;10-2:227–37.10.1680/jemmr.20.00297Search in Google Scholar

[50] Arslankaya S. Estimation of hanging and removal times in eloxal with artificial neural networks. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9(2):366–74.Search in Google Scholar

[51] Arslankaya S. Estimating the effects of heat treatment on aluminum alloy with artificial neural networks. Emerg Mater Res. 2020;9(2):540–9.Search in Google Scholar

[52] Zhang G, Li X, Zhang S, Kundu T. Investigation of frequency-dependent attenuation coefficients for multiple solids using a reliable pulse-echo ultrasonic measurement technique. Measurement. 2021;177:109270.10.1016/j.measurement.2021.109270Search in Google Scholar

[53] El Rayes MM, El-Danaf EA, Almajid AA. Characterization and correlation of mechanical, microstructural and ultrasonic properties of power plant steel. Mater Charact. 2015;100:120–34.10.1016/j.matchar.2014.11.034Search in Google Scholar

[54] Stegemann D, Raj B, Bhaduri AK. NDT for analysis of microstructures and mechanical properties of metallic materials. Refer Modul Mater Sci Mater Eng. 2016;1–6.10.1016/B0-08-043152-6/01802-7Search in Google Scholar

[55] Toozandehjani M, Ostıvan F, Shamshirsaz M, Matori KA, Shafiei E. Velocity and attenuation of ultrasonic wave in Al–Al2O3 nanocomposite and their correlation to microstructural evolution during synthesizing procedure. J Mater Res Technol. 2021;15:2529–42.10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.09.065Search in Google Scholar

[56] Li X, Han X, Arguelles AP, Song Y, Hu H. Evaluating grain size in polycrystals with rough surfaces by corrected ultrasonic attenuation. Ultrasonics. 2017 Jul;78:23–9.10.1016/j.ultras.2017.02.018Search in Google Scholar PubMed

[57] Martin LP, Rosen M. Correlation between surface area reduction and ultrasonic velocity in sintered zinc oxide powders. J Am Ceram Soc. 1997;80(4):839–46.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1997.tb02912.xSearch in Google Scholar

[58] Eren E, Kurama S. Characterization of mechanical properties of porcelain tile using ultrasonics. Gazi Univ J Sci. 2012;25:761–8.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Phani KK. Porosity-dependence of ultrasonic velocity in sintered materials-a model based on the self-consistent spheroidal inclusion theory. J Mater Sci. 1996;31(1):272–9.10.1007/BF00355156Search in Google Scholar

[60] Tao L, Qingfa L, Fuh JY, Poh CY, Wu CC. Effects of lower cobalt binder concentrations in sintering of Tungsten carbide. Mater Sci Eng A. 2006;430(1–2):113–9.10.1016/j.msea.2006.05.118Search in Google Scholar

Received: 2022-05-16
Revised: 2022-06-02
Accepted: 2022-06-06
Published Online: 2022-07-12

© 2022 Ayhan Erol et al., published by De Gruyter

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Scroll Up Arrow