Skip to content
Publicly Available Published by De Gruyter March 19, 2016

The Power of Norms

22-24 September 2016, Prague, Czech Republic

From the journal Chemistry International

The 7th International Conference of the European Society for the History of Science will be held in Prague, Czech Republic, 22–24 September 2016. The Conference is organized by the Society for the History of Sciences and Technology of the Czech Republic. The theme of the Conference is “Science and power, Science as power”.

One session, for example, will explore “The power of norms: standardisation and normalization through International Scientific Organisms”. Most international scientific unions, such as IUPAC, IUPAP, IUPAB, IAU, IUGG, URSI, ... etc., were creations of the 20th century, and aspired to be pure scientific bodies, above national government or cultural influences, and making decisions or issuing recommendations on strictly rational grounds. One of their aims, especially in the case of IUPAC and IUPAP, was to draw up norms and standards to facilitate the development and the propagation of science. In the frame of ICSU for instance, IUPAC and IUPAP founded joint special commissions to deal with specific matters: symbols, units, nomenclature, constants, atomic weights, physicochemical standards, analytical methods, etc. Furthermore, IUPAP or IUPAC also developed joint commissions with the other international organizations mentioned above for special common subjects.

Standards allow for a better diffusion and exchange of knowledge by creating and maintaining a common language. But standards, terminology, and norms also are a mean of power. It comes thus as no surprise that before these standards were enacted and accepted locally, whenever they were, heated or extended debates took place inside commissions before reaching consensus. Afterwards, the task still remained for the international bodies to diffuse the new standard as a scientific recommendation to be followed by its users, especially in teaching and publishing. Few historical studies have been devoted to this contingent part of scientific activity up to now, as it appears at first to be a purely administrative or technical part of scientific management, whereas this process of normalization eventually impacts and structures the science itself.

The proposed session will focus on this under-investigated facet of scientific work, to which nonetheless several scientists, often of great fame—F. and I. Joliot-Curie, E. Bauer, G.T. Seaborg, G. De Hevesy, or J. Timmermans, among others—have devoted a notable part of their time and activity.

For more information about this specific session, contact Danielle Fauque: or Brigitte Van Tiggelen:

For full program see

Published Online: 2016-3-19
Published in Print: 2016-3-1

©2016 by Walter de Gruyter Berlin/Boston

Downloaded on 2.3.2024 from
Scroll to top button